I loved the text, it is screwed up as you even denoted the following.
Jung is rusty because he is genuinely rusty, it serves to read Hermann Hesse, but no more, the point with Jung is that the vato gives little more than approximations with the archetypal theme, the simplest example is the puer eternus, that child man to which his only solution was to propose the job. It is a pity that the cognitive-behavioral approach extended the thesis to determine that the environment and the illusion of idealistic self-determination are not enough to modify the conditioning that has settled for years, this is important, because Jung has softness everywhere, literally everywhere.
The organic components of a hormonal type are the most appropriate phrase to determine the hormones to dry, since there are unclear contrast, an example is vasopressin, which is very often treated only as an organic component, despite also being a damn hormone, then , an organic component of hormonal type frames you up to the fucking norepinephrine.
What is a stereotype of a normalizing type, the net that goes without saying, but we go with Foucault, the talk of normalizing power with a property of social interaction, a power that is not directly exercised by anyone, but is nonetheless there, the social norm, the very dynamics under which the interaction has been delimited outside of a social contract, if you do not find inviolable behavioral stereotypes, you are on the other hand bro, since stereotypes in this case determine and condition the concept of what correct and not correct.
Coerce. The organic components of a hormonal type coerce you, there is no more, this precious illusion of free will offers the possibility of delving into human action as something always free of dynamism, and no, if you masturbate too much, and release jets of cortisol in the blood , and then adrenol, epinephrine and norepinephrine, you are going to be ready to fight a tiger, but you really won't, so you will be super stressed, depressed because of the deficiencies in your reward system in dopamine and endorphins, come on, you will be coerced not to lead a dynamic of life where your free decision to act is the maximum, or yes? (Tell me pls).
Oh, and by the way, the family is an institution, and the influence on individuals is nuclear.
Although the individual is that which cannot be divided, at a conceptual level it seems rational, but in psychological practice it is not like that, since the person is made up of dividing fragments that adapt as a scheme depending on the situation. It happens that in the family this does not work like that, the level of defenselessness is terrible, and the idealistic pressure that this institution exerts on the person, you can imagine, right?