[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 476 KB, 1000x1519, R5722ba00513bae6ffda3c8612c009269.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17784256 No.17784256 [Reply] [Original]

Is he the greatest poet of all time?

>> No.17784276

>>17784256
He is the greatest poet of all space.

>> No.17784289

>>17784256
No. Not even close.

>> No.17784801

pretty damn good but i prefer others like Novatore or Vigil.

>> No.17784892
File: 445 KB, 1367x1809, JUANA INÉS DE LA CRUZ I.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17784892

>>17784256


NO —EL MEJOR POETA ES JUANA INÉS DE LA CRUZ.

>> No.17784897

>>17784276
Based metaphysician bro

>> No.17784970

>>17784256
Fucking retard. James joyce is, he just masquerades as a novelist.

>> No.17785716
File: 154 KB, 1005x709, 89B3F7BE-5F15-429C-B3E3-F7E40F3A4F23.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17785716

Yes he is. No doubt about it.

>> No.17786318

>>17784970
James Joyce actually isn't that good at writing in meter.

>> No.17786372

>>17784256
Yes and it's not even close

>> No.17786377

>>17784289
who is it for you?

>> No.17786390

>>17786372
Who is the second place if it is not even close to you?

>> No.17786403

>>17784256
Catullus is

>> No.17786413

>>17784256
no

>> No.17786430

>>17784256
Yes
>>17784289
Amazing how butterfly has the wrong opinion every time.

>> No.17786471

>>17784256
Obviously.

>>17786430
>Amazing how butterfly has the wrong opinion every time
That's exactly what I thought

>> No.17786534

>>17784256
Probably yes, but it's honestly a tie for me between Homer, Dante, and maybe Shakespeare. But then there are the great Greek dramatists like Sophocles, and even Nietzsche said only Wagner rivalled Dante's ability to portray an image in such detail. It's never going to be completely settled.

>> No.17786538

>>17784256
It's Ovid

>> No.17786556
File: 283 KB, 681x800, Ossian._Den_gamle_blinde_skotske_barde_synger_til_harpen_sin_svanesang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17786556

No, he is.

>> No.17786563

>>17786430
That's not butterfly

>> No.17786570

>>17786534
>Greek dramatists
>poets
Anon, they are quite literally not writing poetry.

>> No.17786576

>>17784256
Nope, because Ariosto will BTFO him nearly two centuries after.
Read Orlando Furioso and find out.
There's everything in Orlando Furioso: Epicness, love, hate, death, life, war, society, human nature, the folly of the Renaissance, a lot of comedy, extremely good characterization, symbolism, virtues...
Not only ALL of that, but instead of being one big allegory as is The Divine Comedy, it's a GREAT novel.
But WAIT, didn't I tell you that the verses in which the story is told are absolutely poetically delightful?! That they touch you deep within your soul?
Here are some excerpts from the best English translation:


« But when the pagan plied his sword, the sound
With whining, whistling winds might well compare
Which through the mountain peaks in March resound,
Or seize the forest by its tangled hair,
Bending the tree-tops down to kiss the ground,
And whirling broken branches through the air.
Although the prince avoided many blows,
One finally was sure to come too close.

One mighty stroke at last achieved its aim.
Between his sword and shield it reached his breast.
His mail was thick, his corslet was the same,
His metal apron too was of the best,
Yet through them passed that sword of cruel fame.
They being unequal to this crucial test,
Nothing resisted the descending blow
Which slashed from mid-breast to the saddle-bow.»

>> No.17786581

>>17786570
based retard

>> No.17786742

>>17786534
>Cuckner compared to Dante
Is this a joke?

>> No.17786760

>>17786742
kek this. wagner is obviously superior

>> No.17786802

So, like, what is that white thing supposed to be?

>> No.17786823

>>17786471
>>17786430
>>17786372
Why?

>> No.17786828

>>17786802
Part of his hat, or more likely, a cap he wears over his hair which goes under his hat from the 13th century.

>> No.17786861

>>17786802
Earflap

>> No.17787420

>>17786570
Tragedies are written in verse.

>> No.17787435

>>17787420
verse = poetry is the most midwit opinion there is

>> No.17787563

>>17784256
He's literally the Italian Ernest Cline

>> No.17787566
File: 6 KB, 205x246, headless wojak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17787566

>>17787435
>Shakespeare wasn't a poet

>> No.17787584

>>17786576
Torquato tasso shat over both

>> No.17787590

>>17787566
Did you hit your head really hard before typing this? You are so dumb it's making me worried about you.

>> No.17787591

>>17784256
Whoever was the author of the Iliad and the Odyssey is the greatest poet of all time.

>> No.17787599

>>17786403
Incredibly based

>> No.17787631

>>17784256
>>17784801
>>17786403
>>17786534
>>17786538
>>17786576
>>17787591
How can you judge poetry that you read after it has been translated from its original language? You’re really just judging the translator’s poetry

>> No.17787632

>>17787590
Was Shakespeare not a poet in your definition?

>> No.17787642

>>17787631
I read the original version of the divine comedy and he's still the greatest poet of all time

>> No.17787644

>>17787632
Shakespeare is obviously a poet. The fact that verses does not equal poetry does not imply that everything written in verses is not poetry. I was only responding to the point you made that because tragedies are written in verse they are made by poets.

>> No.17787807
File: 322 KB, 1214x1600, William-Blake-oil-canvas-Thomas-Phillips-National-1807.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17787807

*steps in your way*

>> No.17787842

>>17787642
How did you learn latin

>> No.17787868

What’s the best English translation of the divine comedy

>> No.17787980

>>17787842
Seeths

>> No.17788115

>>17787842
>>17787980
it is in fucking italian you retards

>> No.17788247

>>17786534
Why would I care what a schizo philosopher with a poor literature background says

>> No.17788255

>>17787642
How fucking dumb are you.

>> No.17788264

>/lit/ unironically thinks the divine comedy is in latin

>> No.17788286

>>17784289
It's kinda impressive how fucking stupid you are on a daily basis huh

>> No.17788305

>>17788264
Haha I know right. It's obviously in Spanish

>> No.17789145

>>17787631
I'm Italian and I can safely say that the Paradiso has some of the most beautiful sentences ever put on paper. Dante gets a lot of popularity thanks to the Inferno but the Paradiso is the highest piece of literature ever written.

>> No.17789268

>>17787644
Can you name some works that are written entirely in verse but are not poems?

>> No.17789294

>>17789268
Molière - Tartuffe for instance
On the other hand it's fair to consider Songs of Maldoror as a poem while it's entirely written in prose. Poets such as Baudelaire, Claudel, Reverdy and many others also published works comprised entirely of prose poems.

>> No.17789361

>>17789294
Why would Tartuffe not be a poem?
As for whether or not something not written in verse can be a poem, that is another matter altogether; I was arguing
that being written in verse makes something poetry, not the contrary.

>> No.17789502

>>17789361
>>17789268
You can't apply rational argumentation to everything. It ends up being mental masturbation.

If it's poetry or not you immediately feel it.

>> No.17789513

>>17789361
>Why would Tartuffe not be a poem?
Short answer: because it was not written as one and because no one considers it to be one. There is no "essential poetry", it's just a term that defines a literary genre (works in linguistics have dived deeper into the question for instance).

>> No.17789514

>>17784256
No, he was

>> No.17789527
File: 260 KB, 702x883, Portrait_of_Geoffrey_Chaucer_(4671380)_(cropped)_02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17789527

>>17789514
pic didn't upload for some reason

>> No.17789536

>>17787842
>Dante
>Writing in latin
This has to be bait. Its a statement too stupid even for the absolute state of this board

>> No.17789553

>>17789536
He wrote a few works in Latin

>> No.17789937
File: 109 KB, 519x922, 5CCDDDF6-3C9C-4905-AE2B-5729E64BAC9C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17789937

There is no book comparable to The Comedy. In scope, style, amount of characters, meaning, etc. It is one of the greatest achievements of humanity, or well, a human being.

When you consider everything Dante went through in his personal life, the Comedy is even more spectacular. It is an achievement, a testament of what human will can do.

Dante earned a place beyond space and time, there is no below or above. Every writer wishes he could be a fraction of what Dante was.

>> No.17790469

>>17789937
You really need to separate the artist from the art, and see that you're vastly overrating the book. Sure, the book is good, great even, but "a place beyond space and time" is a bit silly, don't you think?

>> No.17790494
File: 75 KB, 450x562, 1_vtY_QMptufMCT5AGUxqLog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17790494

>>17789514
>>17789527
Chaucer is definitely my favourite pre-Romantic English poet. Probably tied with John Donne. Though I wouldn't call him "the greatest poet of all time," but W.B Yeats is definitely my favourite, and I'd argue the best, post-Romantic poet in English.

>> No.17790503

>>17790469
He's right. When you read the Comedy in Italian and you understand every bit of it you realize that there is nothing else like it. The Comedy is the literary equivalent of the Sistine Chapel.

>> No.17790523

>>17790494
They're all pretty good.

>> No.17790547

Best translation?

>> No.17790645

>>17790503
>the Sistine Chapel
>being beautiful
kek

>> No.17790653

I am, but you’ll never know.

>> No.17790690
File: 797 KB, 2560x2560, 91h0eKwdupL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17790690

>>17790547
I've never read The Divine Comedy but Alasdair Gray who is a great author anyway translated it and when I get round to reading it this will be the translation I choose. I haven't read a word of it but I expect it to be great. He illustrates all his covers as well by the way.

>> No.17790717

>>17790469
Entra nel petto mio, e spira tue
sì come quando Marsïa traesti
de la vagina de le membra sue
(paradise 1)

Literally how do you beat this

>> No.17790761

>>17790717
English will never, ever, reach this peak of perfection. It's something that has to do with the language.

>> No.17790968

>>17790717
>vagina
Hehe

>> No.17791286

>>17787807
I have his complete poems and so far, theyre pretty good.

>> No.17792336

>>17789553
we are talking about divine comedy. such a dunce you are

>> No.17792345

do.. people really think its in latin? this is bait right

>> No.17792409

>>17790761
Literally every other word rimes with each other in italian. Riming is a vulgar ornament. This is why Milton is the best poet, and english being the most poetic language, bitch.

>> No.17792414
File: 417 KB, 1200x1200, william-shakespeare-194895-1-402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17792414

Are you people from under a rock?

>> No.17792477

He is one of the greatest in history, the question of absolute greatest requires too much personal taste to answer.

>>17792409
Terza rima is beautiful and incredibly difficult to sustain over a long period, Dante’s rhythm is also fantastic, recite or hear recited any part of Paradiso. Milton is also one of the world’s greatest in my eyes but he clearly owes many debts to Dante, Spenser, Josuah Sylvester, Homer and many other great poets, As such Milton wouldn’t mock Dante even if he disagrees on the matter of rhyme.

>>17792414
Shakespeare is great but they’re very different Poets and again the question of taste, no part of Shakespeare has ever brought me to tears or induced in my imagination a scene of complete celestial glory or the phantasmal liminal quality in the same way that Dante does repeatedly in his work. For someone like me, the philosophy and glory of Dante is far more interesting and entertaining and moving.

>> No.17792561

>>17792477
Yea I was just joking with the rime thing. I really love Dante, and I agree that when comparing the great poets it comes down to taste. I feel they all create their own language that renders there work totally unique and valuable. Anybody could study Shakespeare or Dante for their entire life, and it would be worth it in each case.

>> No.17792576

>>17792477
Also did you ever read Dante in any translations, and if so, were any them good?

>> No.17792599

>>17792561
Completely fair enough, question from out of the blue, have you read Ariosto? If so how do you feel he compares to Dante?

>> No.17792658

>>17792576
I’ve read Ciardi, Longfellow and Hollander and I’ve sampled the other major translations. All of the translations are pretty bad, it’s a testament to the beauty of Dante’s mind and ability that when his verse is butchered, it still shines with so much beauty of image and quality. But when I read/re-read Dante I like to also recite/read the canto in Italian just to grasp the sound I’m missing out on. All in all, all of the translations fail, this is because

1=Long form terza rima is very difficult, I’ve written longer poems in it and if you’re not putting enough effort in, you’ll resort to writing mush just to fill the rhyme, because you can’t just substitute it. But this is remedied by those authors who choose not to use the rhyme scheme

2=ignoring rhyme, the rhythm of Dante is one of the greatest in world history and this is noticeable by just hearing it without meaning, examining the syllables. I’ve done this for much global poetry, Dante is superb.

3=oddities in the text, Dante has a ton of local references, he uses word play, he constructs words, he references lore and the key to Dante which is so excellent about him, is he can create a fully fleshed out and powerful simile with a very very small amount of words, this high descriptive and charged nature of his verse means you can either try to match up with one of the worlds masters or translate literally. And people often fail here in either case.

Dante simply hasn’t had the proper translation come along yet and I’m unsure if it’s really doable by any poet who isn’t of a similar quality, I believe it was Mallarme who said when translating poetry, you remove the spirit from the work and must infuse a new spirit into it. Trying to match the spirit of Dante is a fool’s errand.

>> No.17792692

>>17792658
What languages do you speak/read? Also could you recommend the least shitty translation of the divine comedy

>> No.17792743

>>17792692
English, romani(gypo) and Middle English are the only ones I truly know, but due to study of tantra I’ve a lot of exposure to Sanskrit and if forced can grind out a basic translation if it isn’t too obscure, and because of study of Kabbalah and abrahamicism I’ve a bit of knowledge of Hebrew and Greek and I’m currently studying Hebrew both ancient and modern. I also have a ton of exposure to various types of Chinese due to study of Taoism and Confucian stuff and chink poetry in general, just from reading and music taste I’ve spent time analyzing the syllables of various German poetry. Studying occultism in general also exposes you to a lot of different untranslated poetry, I’m not unfamiliar with what we have of Akkadian poetry for example.

As for which to read, if you want to go rather deep, the notes in Hollander make him worth it though they aren’t as theological as I would like, ciardi is better if you want an easy first time through, Longfellow is kind of fun due to it being translated by Longfellow. So pick your poison.

>> No.17792858

>>17792743
Interesting thanks anon. You seem to be very immersed in the esoteric what do you do day to day if you don’t mind me asking

>> No.17792933

>>17792858
I’m a Gypsy, most of us are uneducated but relatively wealthy, as such I make a good deal of profit by acting as a middle man for us in the purchasing of jewelry. Gypsy cannot determine weight in gold, value in diamonds and other such and also do not know how to bargain. I also own auto repair shop but that more or less takes care of itself by now. Both of these aren’t very demanding and give me a lot of down time to just read and the like. But ehh, apologies Anons, I’m sure no one wants to hear about personal autism.

>> No.17792961

>>17792933
That sounds pretty comfy desu. How’s life as a gypsy? You guys have a pretty bad reputation around where I live

>> No.17794662

>>17792409
You don't get it. Italian has the most beautiful sound, that's it. English sounds like a mouth chewing food. I'm not saying you don't have amazing poets, I'm just saying they can't write the most perfect verses in absolute.

>> No.17794740

99% of you faggots have not read the original fuck off

>> No.17794774

>>17792933
As a lurker, your commentary is always a pleasure.

>> No.17794946

>>17792933
LARP

>> No.17794974
File: 64 KB, 800x525, Jozef-Loskoczynski-Cyprian-Norwid-grayscale.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17794974

>>17784256
You're havin a laff m8. It's this little fella.

>> No.17794984

HEY
i dont know or have time to learn italian so in what language would it be best to read the divine comedy; english, spanish or swedish?
Pls respond

>> No.17794999

>>17794984
just watch the silent movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M9e6jxA9tA

>> No.17795013

>>17794984
as to italian, spanish is more preferable than english due to its linguistic similarity as you could figure out western romance languages, but you're not that fluent in spanish, get into english one instead. definitely not swedish

>> No.17795026
File: 145 KB, 585x767, 1612917693986.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17795026

>>17784892
interesting

>> No.17795028

>>17784256
Ovid.

>> No.17795185

>>17786377
probably some Sappho copycat

>> No.17795202

>>17794999
Holy based. I didn't know about this. Trips totally deserved, anon.

>> No.17795775

>>17784256
Yes.

>> No.17795788
File: 53 KB, 332x499, 61am9lYSNGL._SX330_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17795788

>>17794984
Spanish

>> No.17795895

>>17792961
It’s pretty comfy considering the high family culture, traditionalism of it and so forth, only major negative is the anti-intellectualism.

>>17794946
Nah, I’ve posted my own personal translations of our songs around if you’re interested in reading them, if you want I’ll post some.

>> No.17796111

>>17784256
For me, it's Vergil.

>> No.17796314

Is the Robin Kirkpatrick translation of The Divine Comedy any good?

>> No.17796902

>>17784289
You're not even close.

>> No.17796943

>>17787644
And my point was that the Greek tragedians were also poets. I have no idea how you think that they are not, and the fact that you believe in a deeper definition to the poetic than mere technical rhyme and metre, as you have said, yet reject the Greek tragedians shows that you haven't read them.

I didn't say "they were poets because they wrote in verse", did I? You just presumed they weren't poets, and so assumed I only defined them as such because of verse. I spoke of them in the context of the other great poets like Shakespeare and Dante, that is great poets, not the entire history of verse-writing.

Did you read my original post wrong or just accidentally assume?

>> No.17796975

>>17787842
based retard

>> No.17797289

>>17796943
>I have no idea how you think that they are not
I never said that, I am not the anon who responded to you in the first place, which may have caused a little confusion. I merely said that verse=poetry is a retarded opinion.
>I didn't say "they were poets because they wrote in verse"
You said they wrote in verse, implying very strongly that because of that (and only because of that) they were poets.

>> No.17797597

>>17797289
That did indeed cause a little confusion, but when when I said "the tragedies were written in verse", it was in response to an anon who I thought maybe did not know this. And it seems I may have been right considering only you responded to my post.

>> No.17797949

>>17797289
>>17797597
I'm the Anon who made this post >>17786570, now returning to this thread, and I'm happy to see my little abhorent shitpost caused a ruckus.

Take it easy, lads.

>> No.17798128

>>17784256
he wrote the greatest self-insert fanfiction of all time.

>> No.17798141

>>17798128
reddit

>> No.17798764

>>17784256
Yes. Of course.

>> No.17798800
File: 93 KB, 663x800, 9DB2F62A-4A72-4596-A110-72E8084A6CF0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17798800

>>17784256

>> No.17798835
File: 106 KB, 612x491, confused apu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17798835

>>17798800
Didn't Eliot call Pound the better better craftsman?

And now that I think of it.. that's a quote from Dante about Arnaut Daniel, so if Dante is the greatest poet, wouldn't that make Arnaut Daniel the actual greatest poet?

>> No.17799061

>>17798800
He's not even the best of his century

>> No.17799135

>>17786430
Butterfly is actually pretty based, she just means the opposite of she says

>> No.17799137

>>17798835
Arnaut is pretty good, but the focus on love song and how short his work is really lessens him in terms of my personal taste. I’ve read him but I’ve more enjoyed hearing him be sung by various bands on YouTube. It’s really much more fitting because his stuff was designed for it. I’d still consider Dante superior.


If you want to get technical, the greatest poets to Dante would be Virgil, Homer, Horace, Lucan, and Ovid along with arnaut Daniel. Lucan is actually very high quality but he’s not really discussed here’s a particular favorite part of Lucan’s work.

Last comes her voice, bewitching the gods of Lethe [685-718] 685

more potently than any drug, first composed of jumbled noises,

jarring, utterly discordant with human speech:

the bark of dogs and howl of wolves,

the owl's cry of alarm, the screech-owl's night-time moan,

the wild beasts' shriek and wail, the serpent's hiss; 690

it utters too the beating of the cliff-smashed wave,

the sound of forests, and the thunderings of the fissured cloud;

of so many noises was one voice the source. Then she speaks

in Haemonian incantation and pierces Tartarus with utterance thus:

'I invoke the Eumenides, Hell's horror, and the Avengers; [695]

I invoke Chaos, eager to disorder countless worlds; [696]

I invoke the ruler of the earth, tormented for long future ages [697]

by the drawn-out death of the gods; I invoke the Styx, and the Elysian fields

no witch of Thessaly may reach; I invoke Persephone, loathing sky

and mother; and the lowest form of our Hecate, through whom [700] 700

the shades and I in silent utterance may commune;

I invoke the porter of the wide abode, who tosses human entrails

to the savage hound; I invoke the Sisters soon to spin a second

thread

of life, and you, a ferryman of the blazing water, [704]

old man already tired out by shades returning to me:

heed my prayers. Do I summon you with mouth sufficiently

abominable and polluted? Do I ever chant these spells

without consuming human entrails? How many times have I cut out

breasts filled by deity and washed them with warm brains?

Are there no babes, about to enter life, who laid 710

their head and heart upon your dishes? Then obey my prayer.

A soul I ask for, not one lying hid in the cave of Tartarus

and long accustomed to the darkness, but a soul on its way down,

life's light just fled, a soul still hesitating at the door

to pallid Orcus' chasm, a soul which, though he drain these drugs, [715]

will join the dead once only. Let the ghost of a soldier with us [716]

recently foretell all Pompey's future to the leader's son,

if civil wars have earned your gratitude.'

Cont

>> No.17799146

>>17799137
When, having said these things, she lifted up her head and her
720 foaming lips, she beheld the ghost of the extended corpse standing
by, dreading the lifeless limbs and the hated place of its
former confinement. It was dreading to go into the gaping
breasts, and the entrails torn with a deadly wound.
Ah wretch! from whom unrighteously the last privilege of death
725 is snatched, to be able to die! Erictho is surprised that
this delay has been permitted by the Fates, and, enraged with death,
with living serpents she beats the unmoved body; and through
the hollow clefts of the earth, which with her charms she opens, she
barks forth to the shades below, and breaks the silence of the realms:--
730 "Tisiphone, and Megaera, heedless of my voice, are ye
not driving the wretched soul with your ruthless whips through
the void space of Erebus? This moment under your real name will I
summon you forth, and, Stygian bitches, will leave you in the light of the
upper world; amid graves will I follow you, amid funereal rites, your watcher;
735 from the tombs will I expel you, from all the urns will I drive you away.
And thee, Hecate, squalid with thy pallid form, will I expose
to
the Gods, before whom in false shape with other features thou art
wont to come, and I will forbid thee to conceal the visage of Erebus.
I will disclose, damsel of Enna, under the boundless bulk
740 of the earth, what feasts are detaining thee, upon what compact
thou dost love the gloomy sovereign, to what corruption having submitted,
thy parent was unwilling to call thee back. Against thee, most evil ruler
of the worlds, into thy burst caverns will I send the sun, and with
sudden daylight thou shalt be smitten. Are you going to obey?
745 Or will he have to be addressed, by whom never, when named,
the shaken earth fails to tremble, who beholds the Gorgon
exposed to view, and with his stripes chastises the quailing Erinys,
who occupies depths of Tartarus by you unseen; in whose power
you are, ye Gods above; who by the Stygian waves forswears."

>> No.17799175

How is poets greatness measured? What are the parameters that determine their power level?

>> No.17799180

>>17784256
It's Pound, that man was something else, I'd wager he'd be the first to undergo a second Renaissance in a couple of hundred of years when most poets from this era aren't really talked about.

>> No.17799201

>>17786576
>the folly of the Renaissance
What does he say about that?

>> No.17799233

>>17799137
>If you want to get technical, the greatest poets to Dante would be Virgil, Homer,
I thought Dante hadn't read Homer?

>> No.17799246

>>17799180
>It's Pound
As far as modern poetry goes, Mallarmé takes the cakes IMO

>> No.17799268

>>17799246
Hmm I've read him briefly before, will give another look.

>> No.17799289

>>17799233
He hadn’t as far as evidence shows but in the canto where he meets up with the greatest dead poets, he says Homer is among the crowned and above all others he is special in the group and bares a sword. Think of it like writing a poem and mentioning Orpheus as the greatest poet, even though all authentic Orphic poetry is probably gone and we only have the latter cult Orphic material. In any case, he still esteemed Homer as the highest among the group of poets.

>>17799246
Mallarme in my opinion is also far superior to pound, I’d even call mallarme a favorite. But pound has been incredibly influential and I can agree to the idea that he’ll probably be talked about much in the future and studied/copied much in the future. Even if he’s not as good as mallarme (to me) I still see pound as probably having more cultural sway in the long term.

>> No.17799294

>>17799268
Read some of his more normal poetry and you’ll see his skill.
This is a pretty standard poem of his.


Apparition


The moon grew sad. Weeping seraphim,
dreaming, bows in hand, in the calm of hazy
flowers, drew from dying viols
white sobs that glided over the corollas’ blue.
—It was the blessed day of your first kiss.
My dreaming, glad to torment me,
grew skilfully drunk on the perfumed sadness
that—without regret or bitter after-taste—
the harvest of a Dream leaves in the reaper’s heart.
And so I wandered, my eyes fixed on the old paving stones,
when with sun-flecked hair, in the street
and in the evening, you appeared laughing before me
and I thought I glimpsed the fairy with her cap of light
who long ago crossed my lovely spoilt child’s slumbers,
always allowing from her half-closed hands
white bouquets of scented flowers to snow.

(Here’s the French if you know or are interested.)

Apparition

La lune s’attristait. Des séraphins en pleurs
Rêvant, l’archet aux doigts, dans le calme des fleurs
Vaporeuses, tiraient de mourantes violes
De blancs sanglots glissant sur l’azur des corolles.
—C’était le jour béni de ton premier baiser.
Ma songerie aimant à me martyriser
S’enivrait savamment du parfum de tristesse
Que même sans regret et sans déboire laisse
La cueillaison d’un Rêve au cœur qui l’a cueilli.
J’errais donc, l’œil rivé sur le pavé vieilli,
Quand avec du soleil aux cheveux, dans la rue
Et dans le soir, tu m’es en riant apparue
Et j’ai cru voir la fée au chapeau de clarté
Qui jadis sur mes beaux sommeils d’enfant gâté
Passait, laissant toujours de ses mains mal fermées
Neiger de blancs bouquets d’étoiles parfumées.

>> No.17799300

>>17786403
based and facefuckingpilled

>> No.17799340
File: 165 KB, 650x883, 115FE4D8-397E-4D73-840F-1CDFDEFAC8D2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17799340

>>17784256
it would be dante, if he had a hard life.

>> No.17799835

>>17799340
nigga was exiled

>> No.17799858

>>17799835
>the two greatest poets ever were exiled
is getting exiled the secret to writing GOAT tier poetry?

>> No.17799865

>>17799858
can you even get exiled today? or do you have to do some kundera self-imposed exile instead

>> No.17800991
File: 67 KB, 500x695, 17F46D9F-4FDE-4EEF-9006-EF321FB37107.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17800991

>>17799865
it’s called getting cancelled now

>> No.17801451

>>17784256
He's not even the greatest poet of his century

>> No.17802290

Yes.

>> No.17802350

>>17799858
Yes. See Bladee and his Exile track.

>> No.17802431

>>17795185
Sappho is to legbeards and trannies what Evola is to incels

>> No.17802453

>>17802431
I don’t understand how people can say Sappho is their favorite or how they love her, there’s so little of her work and what does remain isn’t all that impressive. How can you pick Sappho over the Orphic hymns or the works of Horace or Ovid or Homer. There are so many superior ancients both Greek and Latin which easily overwhelm the scraps we have of Sappho.

>> No.17802471

>>17784256
no

>> No.17802482

>>17792477
Shakespeare hasn't brought you to tears? Are you a robot?

>> No.17802499

>>17799858
Surviving a siege also.

>> No.17802507

>>17802482
Yes. I can only be brought to tears by religious fervor and only feel heavy emotion when it relates to religion. Anything less and I am absolutely neutral. I still deeply enjoy Shakespeare on the level of aesthetic, character analysis, humor, plot construction, sound, and other such elements. My favorites of his are the tempest and a midsummer’s night dream personally.

Is what it is, we have different tastes and compositions.

>> No.17802522

>>17802507
Shakespeare is an extremely religious writer.

>> No.17802540

>>17802522
I know, and I quite like the poem of his which takes it to the most burning bitch, Phoenix and the turtle. I also know how much esotericism is in his works. The problem is too much of it is fixated on human character, quality and psychology, it’s simply not appealing to me on a emotional level compared to the raw sublime glory of something like paradiso, parts of paradise lost or the hymnes of Spenser.

>> No.17802554

>>17802540
Whoops, spellcheck error, pitch not bitch.

>> No.17802581

>>17784256
No

>> No.17802621

>>17802540
But everything that Shakespeare is doing, albeit more or less in other works, is placing man before God and religion. The religiosity of life.

>> No.17802648

>>17802621
That’s fixation on the human element of religion and the inner-life, of which does not inspire zeal in me. The journey of men to knowing the eternal and doing away with the transient, coming to terms with vanity and so forth doesn’t inflame me, what inflames me is the thought of the eternal and the things of eternity. The journey of the religious life is not intoxicating, the Christ who is the result of the religious life is intoxicating.

Shakespeare is fixated on the human, I need ethereal glory. It’s a question of taste and by no means a fault of Shakespeare.

>> No.17802678

>>17802648
THE ETERNAL IS REALISED THROUGH THE TEMPORAL. You cannot create so sharp a divide between the eternal and temporary in Dante and Shakespeare; the merits which Shakespeare portrays are of an eternal value and importance.

Why do you think Dante got to Heaven? You also have to understand the nature of Shakespeare as dramatic.

>> No.17802682

>>17802540
What do you think of Wagner's operas? Like Parsifal?

>> No.17802698

>>17784256
Yeah, no.

>> No.17802715

>>17802678
>THE ETERNAL IS REALISED THROUGH THE TEMPORAL.

That very well may be, this doesn’t stop the fact that I am far more overwhelmed with bliss reading of the ascent of John, Paul, Ezekiel and so forth much more than I am with the suffering of David, and I am more inflamed with moses as he speaks with God than when he speaks to the Israelites, so also am I more inflamed when Milton speaks of Christ choosing to take flesh for the sin of man out of his boundless love more so than I am of any earthly man in his earthly struggle.

>You cannot create so sharp a divide between the eternal and temporary in Dante and Shakespeare; the merits which Shakespeare portrays are of an eternal value and importance.

Yes but they are bound up and portray themselves within the temporal, and the beauty is a beauty of the temporal. The form is not the highest divine form, I require the religious revelation as a minimum.

>Why do you think Dante got to Heaven? You also have to understand the nature of Shakespeare as dramatic.

I get the point anon, it’s simply that I on an emotional level only find pleasure in visions of God, the heavens, his return and so forth.

>>17802682
Love Wagner, whether his music, his prose theories or his poetry. As for parsifal, extremely esoteric and veiled, a ton of mysteries of which I plan to write a long essay concerning eventually. Wagner is great. I like goethe more though on average.

>> No.17802720

I only speak english so I can only speak for English poets. I think its probably Shakespeare, but Milton is rather good too.

>> No.17802731

>>17802715
Wagner always seemed to lead on to (the best of) modern culture, as Goethe did to the Romantic.

But do you think Wagner's sublimity rivals Dante's?

>> No.17802754

>>17802731
I don’t believe so, Wagner soars extremely high, but the misty phantasmal land of Dante’s purgatory is alive within me and at times will strike my imagination and capture me, so also with the circle dance of the sun-shining saints, the great Eagle, the holy rose and descending Christ, the vision of reality as clockwork. You get the idea. I believe Wagner is powerful and his intention of wrapping religious ideas in aesthetics in order to mature the religious and develop it further than any religion could is a idea worth esteeming and has a lot of connection to Neoplatonic conceptions, but Dante, for me at least, he stained my mind with his vision. However, Wagner has a total effect utilizing image and music which changes the experience, while that’s respectable I find that the pure poetry of Dante is more powerful. I’d be fine with saying that Wagner eclipses Dante in inferno though.

>> No.17802839

>>17802754
I think it's definitely a misunderstanding to think Wagner believed he was representing religious ideas better than the religions themselves; he believed in the definite places of religion, philosophy and art, but he did believe that for the sake of the artwork itself, it could sometimes better embody religious ideas by dispelling with the prior sensual dogma. I don't think he meant for religion itself. With Parsifal he no doubt realised the importance of traditional imagery most directly.

And it's interesting that Wagner criticised Dante's recurring restriction to dogma throughout the Comedy.

>> No.17802849

>>17802839
>I think it's definitely a misunderstanding to think Wagner believed he was representing religious ideas better than the religions themselves;

I’m referring to his writing on art where he argues that man is nature becoming conscious of itself and art is man becoming conscious of itself, that art is a reflection of man, that art and religion both express certain truths and mysteries of man, but while religion is bound by historical truth, art has the capacity to expand truth and meaning by folding it in on itself through art. This isn’t to say art is replacing religion, but rather he believed in a position of art that further developed the religious truth. Have you read his essays on art?

>> No.17802853

>>17802849
I think you might be referring to his mid-century works, which I've only briefly scanned.

I've read more of his later works on art like Religion and Art. Is that what you're referring to?

>> No.17802862

>>17802853
Yes and also The Artwork of the Future

>> No.17802916

>>17802862
Yes to reading Religion and Art?

>> No.17802922

>>17802916
Yes I’m referring to the work religion and art and also the ideas he shills in artwork of the future, they’re both very good and elaborate on the relationship of man with art and religion.

>> No.17802935
File: 550 KB, 1200x800, Paradiso XVIII.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17802935

>>17787868
Mine. Sadly unpublished as yet, but with a following wind that will change this year.

>> No.17803090

>angloid shakespearefags and an attention-seeking tripfag enter the thread
>biased seething anglos start interviewing the tripfag
>tripfag is happy
Thread ruined.

>> No.17803095

>>17784289
You stupid shit

>> No.17803102

>>17784801
>Novatore
The faggotry is unbecoming

>> No.17803646

Bump

>> No.17803659

>>17803646
Thank you for bumping. What's your favourite canto?

>> No.17803682

>>17787842
are you american?