[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 11 KB, 200x237, Max_stirner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17770704 No.17770704 [Reply] [Original]

>Dude uh morals aren't real lol I can't touch them
How did this 14 year old gain a semi respectable position in academia

>> No.17770707

>>17770704
I'm trans btw don't know if that matters

>> No.17770712

>>17770707
No I'm not

>> No.17770719

>>17770704
you really shouldn't be trans that's gross

>> No.17770723

>>17770704
Prove him wrong then, tranny

>> No.17770730

>>17770704
>>Dude uh morals aren't real lol I can't touch them
>How did this 14 year old gain a semi respectable position in academia
t. tranny

>> No.17770739
File: 181 KB, 785x1000, 1583744833739.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17770739

All the garbage and troll threads on the catalog and the tranny jannies have a hard on for deleting philosophy threads. Fuck you jannies, you anti-intellectual stooges.

>> No.17770740

>>17770723
When do you don't act morally and you die God tortures you eternally in hellfire so morals are real

>> No.17770815

lol op is a faggot

>> No.17770830

>>17770707
>>17770712
>>17770719
>>17770723
>>17770730
>>17770739
Tranny obsession
>>17770815
Faggot obsession

A typical day on /lit/

>> No.17770831

>>17770740
Kek

>> No.17770833

>>17770830
wym op said he was trans

>> No.17770838

What the fuck did anything in this thread do to provoke such a tangent on trannies

>> No.17770840

>>17770704
>Right and wrong are spooks! spooks!!
>it's wrong to be spooked! stop being communist! stop being Christian! stop being nationalist! stop being Muslim! stop being a Platonist! stop disagreeing with meeee!! REEEEEEEEEE!!!

>> No.17770845

Are The Ego and its own and The Unique and Its Property, the same book?

>> No.17770853

>>17770704
Only children, sheep and subversives get respectable positions in academia.

>> No.17770860

>>17770840
What ideology does Stirner propose to replace spooks other than "me right, everyone else wrong"?

>> No.17770863

>>17770838
OP is trans

>> No.17770994

>>17770860
He meant that people should think more about themselves and their loved ones instead of some stupid ideologies.

>> No.17771025

>>17770845
Same book, different translation I think

>> No.17771028

>>17771025
Fuck. Which translation should I read?

>> No.17771030

>>17770704
No they're not real because they're not real

>> No.17771056

>>17770739
every single "philosophy" thread on here is some shitty troll

>> No.17771062

>>17770704
>semi respectable position in academia

Did you by any chance confuse /lit/ with academia?

>> No.17771063

>>17771030
Well for normal people they're real, for sociopaths there's always beatings. Beatings are real. Moral is what doesn't make people want to beat you. You can understand that at least.

>> No.17771073

>>17771063
If everyone believed fairies were real that wouldn't make fairies real it would make everyone retarded

>> No.17771078

>>17770994
How is "loved ones" not a spook?

>> No.17771084

>>17771028
My translation:

Oh Lord, how many things shall not be My Cause! First of all the good cause, then the cause of Allah, the cause of menkind, honesty, liberty, humanness, equity; furthermore the cause of all My people, My principal, My parent country; finally even the cause of the Ghost and a billion other things. Only My business shall never be My affair. "Fie on the egomaniac who thinks only of hisself!" Let us then behold how those do with their work for whose cause we are to work and devote ourselves and be enraptured.

>> No.17771089

>>17771078
Loving someone is real though, how is it a spook?

Maybe the concept of "loved ones" is a spook but that doesn't really matter, it's just a map for the territory of actually loving someone which is a real feeling.

>> No.17771091
File: 84 KB, 419x238, e02e5ffb5f980cd8262cf7f0ae00a4a9_press-x-to-doubt-memes-memesuper-la-noire-doubt-meme_419-238.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17771091

>>17770704
>a semi respectable position in academia

>> No.17771093

>>17770704
>How did this 14 year old gain a semi respectable position in academia
He fucking didn't lmao

>> No.17771107

>a semi respectable position in academia
lol you've been browsing /lit/ too much. literally no one gives a fuck about stirner

>> No.17771112

>>17771089
Love is a social construct anon. Think about it. Logically.

>> No.17771150

>>17771112
Thinking that love is a social construct is the real spook here. Love is a natural occurrence.

>> No.17771157

>>17771150
Do animals love? Do insects? What about plants?

>> No.17771201

>>17771157
Do humans love? Yes.
By default? Yes.
But only in coordination with others? No.
How else? Individually.
How do you mean? Humans can love themselves.
Can you prove that? Not to the degree you probably demand.

Do humans love? Yes.
By default? Yes.
But only in coordination with others? Maybe so.
Is love a social construct? No.
Aren't your answers contradictory? Why should they?
If love occurs only in a social setting, it has to be socially constructed. I disagree.
How so? I believe the root of love to be desire; and desire to be the most fundamental emotion.
And? The desire to caringly possess another being, which I call love, can be socially customized, but not socially created.
Therefore? Therefore love predates the social "construction" of love. The better term would be: social customization of love.

>> No.17771203

>>17771112
>social construct
BUAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHA

>> No.17771915

>>17771201
Okay "love" is a term most frequently used equivocally, I just didn't want to ask for the definition, that would look silly. What I meant is romantic love, which as a concept that doesn't really exist outside of the Christian European culture.

If we go by your definition,

>the desire to possess another being

then I guess Stirnerism is a philosophy full of love.

>> No.17773143

>>17771089
>loving a person is real
>loving a nation is a spook
>loving God is a spook
>b- b- but loving a person is REAL

>> No.17773242

This thread is pathetic

>> No.17773281

>>17770704
How does Stirner deal with intersubjectivity?

>> No.17773302

>>17773143
A Person is a real object but a nation is just lines on a map and god is invented.

>> No.17773853

>>17773302
A person is just an arbitrary collection of atoms man

>> No.17773892

>>17770704
Nobody cares about him in academia and he wasn't an academic either.

>> No.17774501

>>17770704
>How did this 14 year old gain a semi respectable position in academia
by being extremely photogenic

>> No.17774726

>>17770704
His philosophy is the natural conclusion to an atheist worldview

>> No.17774918

>>17770704
Spoken like a true 14 year old.

>> No.17775374

Stirner's resurgence in popularity on the internet can be easily attributed to Engel's excellent caricature work. Without it he's just another man who wrote a book on solipsism, but the drawing gives him a new life as:
>le ebin trolling philosofags maymay man