/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17754358]

Is she /ourgirl/?

[Anonymous No.17754367]

>>17754358
based if true.

[Anonymous No.17754374]

No. Smells too much like a PR move to get her name back in the spotlight.

[Anonymous No.17754427]

>>17754374
Greta was already on the verge of becoming an extremist, becomung an anarcho-primitist is the natural next step

[Anonymous No.17754450]

looking at greta, i understand the feeling of loyalty. if she were my dictator or queen, i would bow to her. i want her to lead us to glory. i want her to dash our corrupt rulers to the winds. i want to execute her orders. i want to parade for her.. I want Greta to reform mankind into a brutal, steadfast, disciplined mass. I want to be part of her ecofascist vanguard. I want to be part of her SS. wearing black trenchcoats. black knights of death. crushing skulls beneath leather boots. walking through fields of death. hail greta.

[Anonymous No.17754458]

An *infamous* "gossip blogger" is not a meaningful source

[Anonymous No.17754459]

>>17754358
yes

[Anonymous No.17754627]

>>17754450
I want coomers to fuck off into the alleys of big cities and get stabbed to death.

[Anonymous No.17754635]

>>17754627
I'm gay. this has nothing to do with coom. It is more profound than that.

[Anonymous No.17754643]

>>17754427
Well, Ted isn't an AnPrim and has denounced it. So, I'm not sure why she'd contact Ted if that's her goal.

[Anonymous No.17754690]

>>17754358
I don't see what the big deal is, tons of anarchists, environmentalists etc. correspond and have corresponded with Kaczynski.

[Anonymous No.17754700]

>>17754358
>literature

[Anonymous No.17754718]

STOP RESPONDING TO THE BAIT THREAD YOU DUMBFUCKS

Not /lit/

[Anonymous No.17754749]

Look at this piece of shit. Looks like your regular twitch streamer

[Anonymous No.17754770]

>>17754749
How is this post relevant to this board?

[Anonymous No.17755520]

I have been saying for over a year now that Greta will turn redpilled and embrace Linkola and Kaczynski before long.

Greta will be my wife.

[Anonymous No.17755806]

>>17754643
he is, he just thinks anprims are retarded leftie hippies

[Anonymous No.17755809]

>>17754358
Is it weird I find Ted more pleasant to look at?

[Anonymous No.17755822]

what literary works are you hoping to discuss in this thread?

[Anonymous No.17755858]

>>17755806
He'd be correct then

[Anonymous No.17755885]

>>17754358
We may have a cool redemption ark

[Anonymous No.17755901]

>>17755809
no

[Anonymous No.17755942]

>>17754358
Just wait until she learns which countries are least interested in preserving the environment.

Will she get canceled?

[Anonymous No.17755961]

would be so funny if her tism turns her into an eco-fascist, the direction brains will have a meltdown and she won't understand because her superpower takes her above the masses. Convince me that aspies aren't the Übermensch

[Anonymous No.17755981]

>>17754450
absolutely profound and based.

[Anonymous No.17755988]

>>17755942
The countries least interested do a the production for the west because the west wants to produce where it doesn't have to deal with environmental regulations

[Anonymous No.17755996]

>>17754358
No but it's cute that she's writing letters to her real dad. It's obvious when you look at their eyes.

[Anonymous No.17756004]

>>17754374
How is talking to a Ted good PR?

[Anonymous No.17756028]

>>17755520
>I have been saying for over a year now that Greta will turn redpilled and embrace Linkola and Kaczynski before long.
This can happen.
>Greta will be my wife.
This will never happen.

[Anonymous No.17756320]

Great literature discussion going on up in here, not!

[Anonymous No.17756336]

>>17754358
You just know Butterfly is Greta Thunberg's mentor.

[Anonymous No.17756421]

stop posting crap from the rs sub you loser

[Anonymous No.17756840]

>>17754358
>tfw I'm starting to look like that

[Anonymous No.17757022]

>>17755885
thanks simulation scriptwriters

[Anonymous No.17757037]

>>17756840
You're starting to look like greta?

[Anonymous No.17757042]

>>17754643
>Ted isn't an AnPrim
yes he is.
>and has denounced it.
no, he denounced the ILLUSIONS surrounding Anarcho Primitivism. he doesn't pretend it's sunshine and rainbows.

[Anonymous No.17757049]

>>17755961
ted hates ecofascists and considers them spiritually leftist (because they believe in a planned society).

[Anonymous No.17757087]

>>17757042
>yes he is.
no he isn't
Give me any proof that he ever considered himself an Anprim at any point in his life

[Anonymous No.17757120]

>>17757087
>Give me any proof that he ever considered himself an Anprim at any point in his life
he wants to collapse technological society and is more than willing to resort to a form of primitivism IF that's required. you conflate ted's disdain for utopic ideals as outright rejecting any potential solution.

[Anonymous No.17757155]

>>17757120
Most anprims advocate for "egalitarian" ideals and living like hunter-gatherers ooga-boogas, just look at Zerzan and Sale and basically any anprim anywhere, even Zerzan disagrees with Ted on most of his views.
Just because ted advocates for destroying technological society doesn't mean he wants to completely collapse civilization (you'd know this if you actually read anything he wrote)

[Anonymous No.17757218]

>>17757155
>Most anprims advocate for "egalitarian" ideals and living like hunter-gatherers ooga-boogas, just look at Zerzan and Sale and basically any anprim anywhere, even Zerzan disagrees with Ted on most of his views.
these people do not hold a monopoly on anarcho-primitivism, at its crux anarcho-primitivism merely advocates for de-industrialization, abolition of the specialist divide, and large-scale technologies. it does not say anything about the existence of hierarchies or not, though history would lead us to believe it would be hierarchical all the same.
>Just because ted advocates for destroying technological society doesn't mean he wants to completely collapse civilization (you'd know this if you actually read anything he wrote)
once again you conflate his diagnosis with his personal preferences, when ted knows he's biased and wants his reader to draw their own conclusions. ted wants to do ANYTHING to collapse technological society. everything is fair game to reach that end, and yes even the most extreme countermeasure possible in the form of primitivism is fine if that's what it takes.

[Anonymous No.17757231]

>>17757049
>spiritually leftist (because they believe in a planned society).
Lmao based. Both commies and fascists are spiritually leftists

[Anonymous No.17757267]

>>17757218
>it does not say anything about the existence of hierarchies or not
The "anarcho" part implies that it does not support hierarchies. This alone dismissed your entire point as you don't even know what anarchism is in the first place.
Calling Ted a "primitivist" and "Neo-Luddite" would do just fine.
>everything is fair game to reach that end, and yes even the most extreme countermeasure possible in the form of primitivism is fine if that's what it takes.
None of this has anything to do with my points. Ted Kaczynski is NOT an anarcho-primitivist, he is a Luddite, anti-tech, anti-industrialisation, ecologist and more, but he is not an AnPrim, he is not an anarchist and he is not against civilization, he's only against TECHNOLOGICAL and INDUSTRIAL civilization.

[Anonymous No.17757302]

>>17757267
>The "anarcho" part implies that it does not support hierarchies.
What? No it means the radical dismantling of current modern day society.
>This alone dismissed your entire point as you don't even know what anarchism is in the first place.
Anarcho-Primitivism is not the same as Anarchism.
>Calling Ted a "primitivist" and "Neo-Luddite" would do just fine.
Game of semantics considering these all do fit under the same umbrella.
>None of this has anything to do with my points. Ted Kaczynski is NOT an anarcho-primitivist, he is a Luddite, anti-tech, anti-industrialisation, ecologist and more, but he is not an AnPrim, he is not an anarchist and he is not against civilization,
let me rephrase it like this, ted himself is not strictly a anarcho-primitivist, but one of the most logical conclusions of his diagnosis would very much align with anarcho-primitivist thought.
>he's only against TECHNOLOGICAL and INDUSTRIAL civilization.
you also have to consider that to destroy it, you may have to destroy civilization as a whole as well.

[Anonymous No.17757323]

>>17754358
Busy guy.

>>17757302
Anprim isn't An? I am suspicious.

[Anonymous No.17757336]

>>17757323
>Anprim isn't An? I am suspicious.
There's a clear epistemological distinction.

[Anonymous No.17757351]

source?

[Anonymous No.17757554]

>>17757302
>What? No it means the radical dismantling of current modern day society.
>Anarcho-Primitivism is not the same as Anarchism.
Why put the word "anarchism" in anarcho-primitivism if it's got nothing to do with anarchy?
Luddism is not a synonym with anarchism as far as I'm aware.
>let me rephrase it like this, ted himself is not strictly a anarcho-primitivist, but one of the most logical conclusions of his diagnosis would very much align with anarcho-primitivist thought.
That's my entire point. Ted isn't an AnPrim, but that doesn't mean he doesn't align with AnPrims.
>you also have to consider that to destroy it, you may have to destroy civilization as a whole as well.
Destroying Industrial civilization does not equal destroying all civilization. I'm sure most mongolian pastoralists and middle eastern goat-herders would continue their lives as usual regardless of any Technological-Industrial collapse.

[Anonymous No.17757589]

>>17757336
Could you explain? Because that doesn't make any sense.

[Anonymous No.17758117]

>>17757037
Dear god no, just like Ted

[Anonymous No.17758166]

>>17754358
yes

[Anonymous No.17758188]

>>17754459
ew

[Anonymous No.17758497]

>we are just months away from a Greta Thunberg bombing campaign