[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

File: 79 KB, 614x589, 1612907761280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

17699019

Anonymous Thu Mar 4 21:03:52 2021 No.17699019 [Reply] [Original]

Is there some kind of causal relation between time and motion?
Could you recommend me a book about that?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 21:05:06 2021 No.17699027 File: 111 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>17699019 This book, but you'll need to learn at least basic calculus to follow along.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 21:05:49 2021 No.17699030 >>17699027 you will never be a real woman

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 21:05:51 2021 No.17699032 >>17699019 Hume's problem of induction. Science is a spook

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 21:06:45 2021 No.17699040 >>17699030 I don't think Deleuze cared much about tranners one way or another.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 21:06:48 2021 No.17699041 >>17699032 what does he say?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 21:16:41 2021 No.17699087 >>17699032 I know what is Hume's position on that. What I'm asking is if someone knows theorizations about time and motion that implies a causal relation betwen them. I don't think that any theory could satisfy the humean account on induction tho

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 22:08:15 2021 No.17699397 File: 91 KB, 827x1230, 61iEsCjsQmL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 22:20:59 2021 No.17699463 >>17699041 He says everyone think it be, but it don’t really do - Hume

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 22:21:14 2021 No.17699465 >>17699397 Isn't classical mechanics supposed not to consider time?

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 22:23:48 2021 No.17699477 >>17699465 Huh? Newtonian mechanics is just a bunch of differential equations with respect to time

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 22:39:49 2021 No.17699569 >>17699465 no.

>>	Anonymous Thu Mar 4 22:52:51 2021 No.17699643 >>17699465 When people say that, they mean that classical mechanics consider time as formulae, not as transcendental. Had the same doubt time ago.

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 01:52:37 2021 No.17700629 File: 10 KB, 200x270, 1F17FE58-6A12-4D42-9C3B-F44E59285708.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>17699019 v =da/dt t = integral(v dt)

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 03:29:39 2021 No.17701046 >>17699019 Space is artificial and logical, time is entropic. That's all there is to know.

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 03:36:18 2021 No.17701070 >>17699019 Can't think of a book but try the paper 'Time without Change' by Shoemaker and the papers replying to it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 03:40:26 2021 No.17701089 >>17699019 motion is time and space, of course assuming all three exist and are not redundant

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 04:39:11 2021 No.17701303 Time is motion

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 09:01:20 2021 No.17702542 File: 12 KB, 296x445, thefinalredpill.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>17699019 >time >real

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 09:03:34 2021 No.17702550 >>17699019 What the fuck is going on in that picture?

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 09:05:44 2021 No.17702565 File: 18 KB, 338x500, 9EB2C42D-2733-4AA6-9985-2559C970D4FC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 09:07:52 2021 No.17702576 >>17699019 I always read the same conclusions on this, is there really no more complex view than time being progression of motion in space? That's what I came up with as a child.

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 09:10:35 2021 No.17702589 File: 14 KB, 300x213, 2F8ED0C5-B586-48CB-849D-FC90E43B68A6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Mar 5 09:59:32 2021 No.17702902 >>17701070 That looks pretty good, thanks >>17702565 >>17702589 Thanks, I'll give them an eye.