/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17681015]

I can't get behind his autistic hyper-individualism. Sorry, but collectivism is based. Communitarianism is based. Nationalism is based.

[Anonymous No.17681030]

no idea what you are saying son perhaps u need to read more

[Anonymous No.17681044]

>collectivism is based. Communitarianism is based. Nationalism is based.
Spooks. All Spooks. You have based your affairs on nothing

[Anonymous No.17681053]

>>17681044
Steiner is spook as well sorry

[Anonymous No.17681060]

>>17681044
Based post-left anarchy

[Anonymous No.17681104]

Primitive tribal societies were peak collectivism, though.
Only in nowaday's world could autists unable to cooperate with others or have normal human-to-human conversations could be able to survive.

[Anonymous No.17681123]

Primitive tribal societies were peak collectivism, though.
Only in nowaday's world could autists unable to cooperate with others or have normal human-to-human conversations be allowed to survive.

[Anonymous No.17681125]

Being exiled in a hunter gatherer community is a death sentence. It's impossible to survive in the wild on your own unless you have access to supplies.

[Anonymous No.17681132]

>>17681060
Yeah I'm just a normal ancom but I'm interested in post-leftist anarchism.

[Anonymous No.17681133]

There is no autistic hyper-individualism. You've infered too much from the simplicity of his works: Kaczynski defines revolution, what it entails, then delineates a path towards it.

Anything else he wrote is contingent and he acknowledges it.

>>17681030
Kaczynski is the negation of ideology. His entire point is that ideology AKA reformism is a lie. Anti-tech is not ideological, it is not about technology per se.

Here is the title of the main chapter of Anti-Tech Revolution:
>The development of society cannot be subject to rational human control
This is the essence of materialism.

Kaczynski is one of the most important materialist because as much as Debord or Marx are (infinitely more) insightful, they simply have no answer towards the technological problem of domestication. What good is praxis when the system produces the technical solution to neuter revolt.

[Anonymous No.17681139]

I just finished his manifesto, was a really good read. I think he’s right on the majority of points, where do I go from here?

[Anonymous No.17681155]

>>17681139
Anti-tech revolution is his most important work. then Technological slavery

[Anonymous No.17681157]

>>17681139
Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How

https://we.riseup.net/assets/389236/Kaczynski%2BAnti-Tech%2BRevolution%2BWhy%2Band%2BHow.pdf

[Anonymous No.17681158]

>>17681133
materialism doesnt work sonny you arent very well read. hegel synthesis isnt materialistically based

[Anonymous No.17681171]

>>17681158
shut the fuck up faggot

[Anonymous No.17681190]

>>17681133
Based Debord poster

[Anonymous No.17681194]

>>17681171
le midwit cope.
either read & self improve or slit your wrists immediately. post marxian thought has no innovation; coping otherwise

[Anonymous No.17681205]

>>17681194
Youposted three times.

Those three times you've enunciated:
>perhaps u need to read more
>you arent very well read
>le midwit cope. either read etc

Bahahahah, just shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.17681222]

>>17681205
Materialism simply does not work. Not many, to this day, has an idea of how humans have developed societies as Nietzsche says. They all just assume it is material conditions when the link is very weak.

In Goethe’s own words, his critics
“forgot that science arose from poetry, and
did not see that when times change the
two can meet again on a higher level as
friends”.


You are not very well read. You circlejerk breadtubers or whatever faggot ass fad you zoomers are on. Keep laughing with interjections noob

[Anonymous No.17681268]

>>17681044
This man brings me much joy. The fact that Marx had literally a mental down over his book shows how amazing this man really was.

[Anonymous No.17681296]

>>17681155
>>17681157
Thank you anons, what is your perfect scenarios to sort this out? The only thing I can think of is completely ethnic homegnous society’s based on the Amish system in America

[Anonymous No.17681332]

>>17681190

[Anonymous No.17681431]

>>17681332
have a better res version for your troubles

[Anonymous No.17681448]

>>17681030
>like democrat or republican?
>0.1%

[Anonymous No.17681450]

>>17681431
Thanks fren

[Anonymous No.17681559]

>>17681222
not him but you sound like a pseud. you haven't been able to finish one complete thought ITT. What does Nietzsche say? Why does "materialism" not work? Work for what? What's the point of quoting Goethe? You seem unable to communicate anything

[Anonymous No.17681631]

>>17681559
Domestication is a mindset it is not a result of the availability of goods or tech. Furthermore, Nietzsche's genealogy of morality is centered on the importance of art. Example: There is a reason why Hebrews are obsessed with the Hebrew language - even so far as to embed it to mathematics. The written word is underrated when it comes with Marxists/materialists

[Anonymous No.17681647]

>>17681015
Collectivism is only good if it exists for the benefit of the people rather than the other way around. Groups can go mad in destructive and unjust ways that individuals cannot. They are far from based and always need to be questioned and scrutinized to carve off the power they obtain without good reason.

[Anonymous No.17681648]

>>17681631
Consciousness and platonic thought was shaped as new words were invented, and Socratic dialogue helped demonstrated the concept of an individual mind - an inner world of thought. Philosophy was made by poetry

[Anonymous No.17681924]

>>17681268

> This man brings me much joy. The fact that Marx had literally a mental down over his book shows how amazing this man really was.

He was a literal unironic spook.

[Anonymous No.17682811]

>>17681015
The modern era is neither individualist or collectivist.

[Anonymous No.17682818]

>>17681431
Ted is not an accelerationist.

[Anonymous No.17682820]

>>17681030
Ted also said ideology is a cope, a way to fufill the power process in the absence of a fight for survival

[Anonymous No.17682847]

>>17681030
So now not only do I have to look out for tree rats and dirty old blue jays, but tree fascists too?