[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 251 KB, 816x756, A412EC50-8F02-410A-A495-6F5359772204.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17608029 No.17608029 [Reply] [Original]

than similarly retarded anti woke stuff? I can see apparently when they are both being retarded, but my gut reaction to the latter is just thinking they are stupid, but the former, that they are disgusting.

Is it maybe that its an aperrant power differential that makes me feel this way? is it some sort of appreciation of the simplicity of shameless group thinking that doesnt try to mask it itself as something else? like noble savage shit? as apposed to those whos basic position is in combating a narrative but don’t adequately admit to forming a narrative themselves that requires a specific scapegoat to even exist a priori (not that aspects of the ”scapegoat” narrative dont have validity or isnt even true, but that the position requires it to be absolutely valid a priori as a starting point, which makes someone who begins from that new position focused on an end goal rather than a process). of course then the more “in group” people also do this to an extent, but I guess it feels more true to form? while there is something more visceral when someone talks about narratives and counter narritives in books published and shown on first shelves in Barnes and Noble and doesnt see the irony in creating a new narritive.


And this is not necessarily a left-right wing or some other shit either. or a racial or ideological thing, but in terms of process and representation.

>> No.17608053

>>17608029
Personally, woke stuff is more detestable because they are hypocrites who use predominant morality and socially accepted narratives while playing victims. Polretards and other brainlets who react to this stuff are cringe too, but they do not have socially accepted support, so they risk more and thus are more "noble". Both groups should be eliminated, shot against the wall, so the humanity can proceed to the next stage, where culture, thinking and morality functions without ressentiment.

>> No.17608064

> /lit/ - politics

>> No.17608147

>>17608053
i somewhat agree.
>>17608064
i was talking primarily in terms of books, but yah, I guess this topic is wider than just books. I just had the thought going into Barnes and Noble.

>> No.17608291

because they literally want to return to animalistic Babylonian state.
it is probably based on some psychological need to assert themselves against the determined course , a desperate irrationality to escape the clutches of meaningless of their life