OSHIT

[Anonymous No.17590145]

OH NO HE DIDN'T

[Anonymous No.17590194]

[Anonymous No.17591127]

looks like the christfags didn't want to reply

[Anonymous No.17591161]

>>17591127
They don't reply because it's a vapid criticism that has already been refuted a thousand times before. The man is clearly arguing in bad faith. Everyone knows Christ personally established His Church Himself through Peter. There was none of this "gathering around the dead body" in order to establish the institution after the fact. This happened with the Buddha, I don't know about Lao, but not Christ. Why OSHO would make such an obvious error, I don't know.

[Anonymous No.17591395]

>>17590194
>If Jesus came back, he would disturb the whole business
That's literally the ending of the Bible. Osho is the epitome of Indian deceit.

[Anonymous No.17591447]

>>17591395
so you agree jesus would disturb jews like osho said?

[Anonymous No.17591481]

>>17591447
I don't need to engage with Osho to know about the Book of Revelations.

[Anonymous No.17591534]

>>17591481
It's Book of Revelation not revelations, retard

[Anonymous No.17591545]

>>17591534
Well that's a revelation to me, faggot

[Anonymous No.17591548]

>>17590194
So spiritual Christianity truly is the best form of Christianity

[Anonymous No.17591594]

>>17591545
Good day, sir

[Anonymous No.17591610]

>>17591395
/Biz/ taught me to be weary of the Indians

[Anonymous No.17591613]

>>17591548
Yes
thats what osho said
but its always a bussiness
look at the popes car
>>17591610
we are smarter than jews nigger

[Anonymous No.17592179]

>>17591613
>we are smarter than jews nigger
ahahahahhahahahahahha no.

[Anonymous No.17592228]

>>17590194
> Jesus was a religious man
No, he was God incarnate as man on earth.
>I and the Father are one. (John 10:30)
Why do people lend so much credibility to these pseudo-spiritual gurus that don’t even know what they’re talking about?

[Anonymous No.17592246]

>>17591548
All Christianity is spiritual. There is no one “form” of Christianity which is spiritual.

[Anonymous No.17592257]

>>17591613
>look at the popes car
look at Osho's car
>noooo it's OK because he only owns a series of Mercedes ironically
lol

[Anonymous No.17592792]

>>17592228
I interpret this as a sort of "My consciousness is so elevated that I constantly experience the divine as inseparable from my 'self' -- Indeed, I experience no self but the divine"

[Anonymous No.17592805]

>>17592792
>before Abraham was, I am
Only God can exist eternally, anon.

[Anonymous No.17592858]

>>17592792
>>>17592792
>In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (John 1:1)
> All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. (John 1:3)
> The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14)

[Anonymous No.17592860]

>>17592805
cosmic consciousness is timeless

[Anonymous No.17592980]

>>17592858
I don't see what you meant here, but truly, the gospel of John is incredibly beautiful.

[Anonymous No.17593019]

>>17592860
Then only God can possess it.

[Anonymous No.17593049]

>>17592980
What I meant was that it’s made perfectly clear that Jesus Christ is the God made flesh. None of that stuff that’s been claimed is true.

[Anonymous No.17593168]

>>17593019
expand your consciousness, friend. It's your birthright. Maybe you're right, maybe there is some limit for us with respect to god, but we can go very far even with our limited consciousness.

I am convinced this is the divinity sages like Jesus spoke of. To merely tell someone "love thy neighbor".. is not very effective. We cannot control our feelings like that. But when we elevate our thoughts to the divine, many things are possible.

>>17593049
I see. Well it's a this point that we need to exercise our discernment. To what degree do you believe in the bible literally? Do you believe in the flood and all of those things, for example? All the little self-contradictions.. We must read the Bible with reverence, yes, but with the understanding it was written (and edited!) by men. Mortal, fallible men.
And perhaps more importantly: Men from a very different place and time. Even notions of "literal" and "allegorical" were not thought of in that same way we do today.

But regardless, the materiality of Jesus's flesh shouldn't be the main point. We know that even He had need to clear his mind and elevate his consciousness to maintain his connection to the divine. This is what he is doing when he spends 40 days in the desert. Tempering his mind against the last remaining temptations of Maya.
This we can all do. And we should all do. Modern Christianity is too obsessed with "praising" Jesus, and not enough in practicing the things he practiced!

[Anonymous No.17593217]

>>17592228
No, he was a religious man, and nothing more than that, who retaliated against faithless, heartless drones like you.

[Anonymous No.17593274]

>>17592805
He was CLEARLY just trolling those priests. Right after this they start throwing stones at him and he runs away CACKLING

[Anonymous No.17593421]

>>17591613
>we are smarter than jews nigger

Are you shitting me?

[Anonymous No.17593435]

>>17592228
>No, he was God incarnate as man on earth.

Are you really gonna sit here and debate the mysteries of the trinity?

[Anonymous No.17593482]

>>17592858

>God incarnate on earth wasn't religious

God on earth is the only being capable of being religious, friend. It's the rest of us who are mired in sin and malady.

[Anonymous No.17595148]

>>17592228
To say two things are one "εν" doesn't mean they're numerically identical, even Calvin and James White recognize that verse is not a statement of numeric identity (otherwise he could have used the word εις, said they were "one ousia," or something similar) but a statement of unity in purpose - in that they share the same will or plan due to Christ being obedient to the Father in all things. See Jn 17:22 ("that they may be one, even as we are one") and 1 Cor 3:8 ("Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one"). The preposition εν is used idiosyncratically in the NT and LXX due to the influence of Semitic idiom, so Jesus isn't saying they're literally spatially inside one another or something. For instance see Mt 17:12, Jn 3:21, 11:10, 14:30, Rom 16:6, 1 Cor 7:39, 14:11, 15:18, 2 Cor 2:12, 13:4, Gal 1:16, 1:24, 3:14, Eph 6:21.

[Anonymous No.17595177]

>>17592228
To say two things are one "εν" doesn't mean they're numerically identical, even Calvin and James White recognize that verse is not a statement of numeric identity (otherwise he could have used the word εις, said they were "one ousia," or something similar) but a statement of unity in purpose - in that they share the same will or plan due to Christ being obedient to the Father in all things. See Jn 17:22 ("that they may be one, even as we are one") and 1 Cor 3:8 ("Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one"). The preposition εν is used idiosyncratically in the NT and LXX due to the influence of Semitic idiom, so Jesus isn't saying they're literally spatially inside one another or something. For instance see Mt 17:12, Jn 3:21, 11:10, 14:30, Rom 16:6, 1 Cor 7:39, 14:11, 15:18, 2 Cor 2:12, 13:4, Gal 1:16, 1:24, 3:14, Eph 6:21.

[Anonymous No.17595441]

>>17591161
>Christ personally established His Church Himself
>through Peter
hhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

[Anonymous No.17595595]

>>17591594
Sir do the needful, reject Christianity, Christianity bad yes? Thank you sirs

[Anonymous No.17595625]

>>17591161
>Christ personally established His Church Himself through Peter
Those are some spooky beliefs, anon.

[Anonymous No.17595969]

>>17590145
>*sneezes on your salad*
enlightened

[Anonymous No.17596549]

>>17591548
>So spiritual Christianity truly is the best form of Christianity
Christfags are this dumb...

[Anonymous No.17596846]

>>17595177
Based κοινή poster

[Anonymous No.17596854]

>>17590194
>>17590145
this is literally no the definition of the words. what a fucking cult leader.

[Anonymous No.17596956]

>>17591610
Ask fucking /biz/ to teach you to spell too. Get the fuck off my board.

[Anonymous No.17597542]

>>17590145
>>17590194
Isnt this the guy who mass poisoned and tried to assainate a politcian? Why is he still lecturing about cults?

[Anonymous No.17597553]

>>17595177
I actually agree with your conclusion but your reasons are bad, and this is because εν and εις both literally mean the same thing when they have a rough breathing mark. There's over 20 different ways of saying "one" in Greek and which one is used depends on the context of case, gender, and number. You can't just point to the different ways the indefinite article is expressed and act like that means anything in itself because it doesn't.

[Anonymous No.17597611]

>>17592228
Since you seem to lack wits i will try my best to make it as easy as possible for you
Jesus spiritual good individual he wrote nothing cool. Taught people his wisdom good
Buddha same
His disciples wrote something. We dont know what he truly said. We have to trust disciples words.
Disciples create instutions based on his character that become corrupt over time aka.Cults
Now my child do you understand why referencing Bible as a argument is retarded?

[Anonymous No.17597625]

>>17591161
This is literally the reason why people are becoming muslims and this dude is retarded enough post it as a argument
One book is written by God other is Paul should i believe in Gods words or some dude named Paul

[Anonymous No.17597714]

>>17597553
>You can't just point to the different ways the indefinite article is expressed
>the indefinite article
Anon, are you sure you aren't confusing the grammar of Demotic with Koine? Koine has no indefinite article

[Anonymous No.17597752]

>>17597542
Apparently the government did succeed in poisoning him.

[Anonymous No.17597781]

>>17597625
Absurd argument. The writings harmonise and all are inspired by God. You are purposefully creating a mountain out of a molehill because this is your lame attempt at dawah.

[Anonymous No.17597782]

>>17590145
>>17590194
holy shit I thought the joke was that the cunt said all that while being a cult leader himself, obviously, but instead /lit/ turns it into a debate about christianity. what the hell

[Anonymous No.17597790]

>>17595441
Yes. Have you not read the book you're trying to criticise?
>>17595625
See above. Why comment favourably on the Jesus presented in the Bible if you're then going to turn around and throw fundamental parts of what that Bible says about Christ and His ministry?

[Anonymous No.17597905]

>>17597752
Poona

[Anonymous No.17597918]

All of you except for the guy who quoted john10:30 and Koineman are pretentious fools who think they knew more about Christianity than the Apostles, true crossbearers who paid the ultimate price. The head of the Twelve, St. Peter states in 2 Peter 3:14-18 that St. Paul wrote only Good News. While St. Paul and the Twelve had their disagreements on the covanents, they resolved them. There was no heterodoxy among them. Yet here we are two thousand years later with people still following the lies of old churches that required correction by St. Paul. Christ warns us of the pseudoprophets whose ideologies bear bad fruit but you're all pigs stuffing their faces with it. Has your personal gnosticisms enriched your lives? I have never listened to this Osho man but from a Wikipedia glance he looks like another Deist fool. A hedonist who's turn on is coincidentally Christian virtues with a mix of sexual deviancy. Your dumb demiurge will never fulfill your metaphysical thirst. By never """"repressing"""" your bad habits you will lead a worldly life, since those habits are borne of our material animal brain. To even assume your soul has some permanent state and that you know what it looks like is an insult to your own free will. Repent in Christ, because God loves and forgives more richly than any mortal man.

[Anonymous No.17599217]

>>17597752
>materialism is good
KEK

[Anonymous No.17599222]

>>17593217
> Just a religious man who proclaimed himself God incarnate, performed miracles, and was crucified for our sins. Nothing to see here.

[Anonymous No.17599243]

>>17597611
No. The Bible is a part of the Holy Tradition and Word of God Himself. If you want to make this argument you could make it doubly so for Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, or literally any other religion. So if we even accepted what you said, you’d render all spiritualism incoherent nonsense and the spiritual critique of Jesus as nothing more than a spiritual man wouldn’t even make sense. He WAS the Word. He WAS with the Father in the beginning. It is really that simple.

These pseudo-spiritual gurus and those who follow them are just sad.

[Anonymous No.17599257]

>>17593168
>Modern Christianity is too obsessed with "praising" Jesus, and not enough in practicing the things he practiced!
Idiot. That is exactly what you see in the Catholic and Protestant churches which led to their demise. They have no theoria in their Church. The goal of Christianity is union with God, not the moral arms race you want it to be. Jesus Christ was the Word of God incarnate on earth in flesh. Jesus Christ IS God and hence why he is worshipped. We worship God.