/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17546760]

Any good books about eugenics?

[Anonymous No.17546789]

Not really.

[Anonymous No.17546798]

Left isn’t “how incels think it should be,” left is how any functioning society works

[Anonymous No.17546827]

>>17546798
I found a picture of you.

[Anonymous No.17546850]

>>17546827
Ironically, despite what you posted, my sexual value is probably double what yours is and you don’t even know it. Could even be triple. Doesn’t matter to me though, left works because that’s how lasting relationships work and lasting relationships CAUSE this as a by-product. Even wild simian societies look closer to the left than the middle. Only in our particular piece of the end does the middle occur.

[Anonymous No.17546851]

>>17546798
Found the incel.

[Anonymous No.17546858]

>>17546827
LMAOO

[Anonymous No.17546860]

>>17546850
Seething incel

[Anonymous No.17546897]

My IQ is avobe 150, I could literally sell my own sperm.

[Anonymous No.17546910]

>>17546897
>My IQ is avobe 150, I could literally sell my own sperm.

[Anonymous No.17546930]

>>17546827
based

[Anonymous No.17547007]

>>17546827
>>17546851
Even so, that is just shaming without addressing his point. Why should that "incel" be working for the benefit of the society, if it doesn't amount to the extension of his genetic line? You have any idea what kind of economical and societal benefit it would be to get these currently growing number of incels motivated to work towards a common goal, and what it means in the long run when there are competing countries which do not have that problem? Your culture is dying and your response is only to shame and make fun about it

[Anonymous No.17547027]

>>17546827

[Anonymous No.17547047]

>>17546910
>he's unironically better looking than me
Give me the rope.

[Anonymous No.17547051]

>>17547007
>Why should that "incel" be working for the benefit of the society, if it doesn't amount to the extension of his genetic line?

Maybe we could work out a one time payment for incels in exchange for chemical castration? Something like that would improve society by orders of magnitude.

[Anonymous No.17547097]

>>17547051
What are you talking about? What would castrating a celibate do? What we want from incels is productivity for the larger society, and for a man the bottom line incentive for that is the wellbeing of his offspring and continuity of genes, which for incels doesn't exist

[Anonymous No.17547151]

>>17547097
Fill them full of E and turn them into chads fucktoy. Incels make the best traps (pic related). Why fight hypergamy when you can be the hypergamist?

[Anonymous No.17547160]

>>17547151
Based.

[Anonymous No.17547641]

>>17546760
>couldnt figure out how to remove extra lines for lest picture
kek

[Anonymous No.17547682]

>>17547051
Based. Just need to make this world wide and it will last for a few generations but it will prevent an immense amount of suffering for the future descendants. Or maybe genetic engineering will make this obsolete.

[Anonymous No.17547699]

>>17547641
Smells like incel cope.

[Anonymous No.17547726]

>>17547151
>>17547682
based
you first
>Or maybe genetic engineering will make this obsolete.
the best thing about this is that blacks (the ones that can afford it l9l) and asians will self eradicate while chasing those fair european features

[Anonymous No.17547745]

Hit the road.
>>>/r9k/
>>>/pol/

This thread is not /lit/.

[Anonymous No.17547795]

>>17547151
STOP WITH THIS SHIT. STOP BLURRING THE LINES IM TIRED OF SEEING A GIRL AND IMMEDIATELY THINKING A PRIORI THAT IT MIGHT BE A NIGGA
STOOOOOOOOOP

[Anonymous No.17547828]

>>17547151
There is absolutely nothing "incel"-y about the guy on the left. He looks handsome.
>>17547795
Pretty sure it's a woman, there are obvious differences - right pic has a less prominent chin, fuller and smaller lips, higher brow ridge, lower jaw line etc. Most importantly, there's no Adam's apple. The Adam's apple is a dead giveaway, always.

[Anonymous No.17547857]

>>17547795
NIGGA YOU GAY

[Anonymous No.17547861]

>>17547682
Meant to reply to >>17546760
It shouldn't be just males.

[Anonymous No.17547864]

>>17547828
>Pretty sure it's a woman
Kek

[Anonymous No.17547891]

>>17547828
Literally from text book le /pol/ face to text book le trad wife face. Estrogen is incel medicine.

[Anonymous No.17548098]

>>17547864
I am fairly confident in my assessment, but then again the angle is challenging. I won't feel bad if it turns out to be a homofaggot. A very hard couple of decades await that sort of people.
>>17547891
You are genuinely mentally ill if you think the guy on the left is ugly. Looks pretty average, sure he's not Adonis but it's not like his features have any flaws. I am pretty fucking ugly, significantly uglier than him, and even I am not a third as bad as the ones who are truly ugly. Moreover, if these people were genuinely ugly beyond salvation (that's what being an incel means), the groomers wouldn't be targeting them. Still feel like the photos you are posting don't add up, but again, there's lots of factors that go into this - posture, angle, camera quality, makeup, facial expression etc.

[Anonymous No.17548141]

>>17548098
>I am pretty fucking ugly, significantly uglier than him.

So incel?

[Anonymous No.17548199]

>>17548141
Don't think so, I've known uglier people than me who have gotten married and had kids. I've never looksmaxxed either. I don't think I am an incel, but I am a virgin rn. Came pretty close to scoring once though, unfortunately another guy who had a crush on the same girl found out and literally committed suicide the day before in order to cockblock me. Unbelievable level of simphood. That girl is probably never going to have sex because of the trauma lol.

[Anonymous No.17548373]

>>17547151
Extremely based. It's the only solution to inceldom.

[Anonymous No.17548418]

>>17548199
>unfortunately another guy who had a crush on the same girl found out and literally committed suicide the day before in order to cockblock me.

kek

[Anonymous No.17548445]

>>17546760
stop being interested in such retarded things and start pursuing something you would actually enjoy in that would actually benefit you.

[Anonymous No.17548459]

>>17548445
Eugenics would benefit everyone.

[Anonymous No.17548490]

>>17548418
That was my reaction too. It was so surreal that I just found the whole experience hilarious. The only thing that hurt a bit was throwing a whole box of unused condoms in a trash can.

[Anonymous No.17548500]

>>17546760
>70% of the population chemically castrated
Uhhh wouldn't it just be better to have the elites exist in a system that excluded the bottom 70%? Like have a walled city/territory where the beautiful ones can live comfortably while the shitters have to scrounge around outside in a tribal hellscape? I cannot fathom having SEVENTY percent of the population chemically castrated (and desu it would make way more sense to just give the shit-tier males permanent vasectomies instead).

[Anonymous No.17548504]

>>17548500
>Like have a walled city/territory where the beautiful ones can live comfortably while the shitters have to scrounge around outside in a tribal hellscape?
So, Brazil?

[Anonymous No.17548522]

>>17548504
Yea, sure. Why not just have segregation based on genetic health instead of trying to have a functional society where SEVENTY PERCENT of the pop has been prevented from breeding?
>yea but the dysgenic tribals would grow too quickly
Then offer them certain material benefits to get vasectomies.
>"Okay Grug, I'll give you a little snip and then you can have a nice blanket and a gallon of vodka"
I'm not even opposed to this (rampant dysgenics is a huge unaddressed problem imo).

[Anonymous No.17548586]

>>17548522
>Why?

Because we want a green utopia like in those sci fi movies. We don't want a massive cyberpunk ghetto like in those other sci fi movies.

[Anonymous No.17548595]

>>17548586
There needs to be some kind of large depopulation event instead. The castration solution wouldn't go to well imo.

[Anonymous No.17548599]

>>17548595
Bottom 70% cope

[Anonymous No.17548603]

>>17548599
I'm White, 6'3, high-iq, healthy, and moderately attractive. I'm probably not bottom 70%.

[Anonymous No.17548604]

>>17548504
Brazil, but only for a generation or two. Then as if Estonia kicked everyone else out of the USSR.

>>17546760
Anyone one know how to calculate the IQ regression to mean based on parents IQ

[Anonymous No.17548648]

>>17548603
Smells like 70% cope.

[Anonymous No.17548651]

>>17548648
I forgot to add that my penis, while not exceptionally long, is quite thick.