[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 102 KB, 500x750, 34c5dwysptg61.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17529606 No.17529606[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>this trigger /lit/

>> No.17529623

>>17529606
Bad things might happen if you don't kill yourself right this instant too

>> No.17529639

>>17529623
>It is unethical to put people in a situation where the only escape is suicide and all of the pain, fear, guilt of leaving others behind, and more that comes with it. Not to mention the pain that precedes it that pushes people to this point in the first place. Also, many people are miserable but don’t commit suicide because they are afraid they will survive, fear the pain, don’t want to hurt others, social stigma, the survival instinct, etc. They never should have been put into this situation in the first place.Additionally, the idea that no more new people should be brought into existence does not necessarily imply by itself that people who have already been forced to exist should stop existing. A person who is currently alive may be happy with their life and want to continue living. However, it is still unethical to create someone else who might not feel the same way. Since there is no way to know how they will feel and no way to receive consent to take the risk, it is not morally justified to reproduce.Furthermore, people who are born may suffer but still be concerned about how their friends or family will react to a suicide. So even if they are miserable, they will not commit suicide and continue suffering for the sake of others. This does not mean they enjoy life or think it is worth the pain; they simply do not want to hurt others by committing suicide.


Shut the fuck up, midwit.

>> No.17529644

>>17529606
the only anti-natalists I take seriously are the ones who neck themselves. if you actually believed life wasn't worth the suffering then you'd kill yourself. so kill yourself.

>> No.17529651

>>17529606
I suffered so they shall suffer too

>> No.17529668

>>17529644
>>17529639

Another midwit on the loose, kek.

>> No.17529680

>>17529651
Well I may suffer, but surely my child won't.

>> No.17529699

>>17529606
Anon, this is not a legitimate philosophy, you're depressed and you should see a therapist. All of us natalists are having a great time, while you're off in the corner contemplating about hypothetical suffering, so I suggest you find some help and then come join us.

>> No.17529701

>>17529668
>>17529639
>I fear death
>therefore life is bad
Weak argument. Unsound logic. Unsupportable conclusion.
It's basically circular reasoning. All antinatalists start with "I fear death". They are unable to cope with death. They enjoy life. So they need employ circular reasoning "If life good why me fear death? oh it becuz life bad".
Another antinatalist cuck. lmao

>> No.17529703

>>17529606
Yes, might as well neut all animals too. Imagine being such a coward. I'm definitely not raising cowards. And my parents didn't raised one either. I'm ok with people not feeling like having children but this is too stupid, OP.

>> No.17529719

>>17529699
Where's bloomer lit chart bro?

>> No.17529722

>>17529606
>Anti-natalists don't have kids
>Die out, cultural voices fades to silence
>Natalists have kids
>Continue
It seems like everyone wins if they stay in their own lane.

>> No.17529723

>>17529639
>waaah bad things happen in life but death is scary too :(
Not only a midwit but an utter coward

>> No.17529753

>>17529703
Animals don't experience pain

>> No.17529754
File: 564 KB, 2582x1412, Bloomer Litchart.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17529754

>>17529719

>> No.17529776

>>17529754
>Cannery Row
HIGHLY recommended, I love that book.