obvious marxists and the hatred for 1984

[Anonymous No.17528936]

Why is it that any time someone mentions 1984, obvious whiney marxists descend on them going
>uh, did you just heckin reference 1984
>don't you realize that is heckin cringe!
>You should read a flippin heckin book, I have some stuff you should read by a man who died of aids after being full force fisted in the ass
>it's just 1984
OR
>uhhhhhhhhhhh he was a socialist uhhhhhhhh
Okay? So was Hitler. My theory is it's just what is unfortunately typical of marxists, elitism and disingenuous obfuscation

[Anonymous No.17528975]

>>17528936
Yes. They have not an argument

[Anonymous No.17528994]

>>17528936
Foucault wasn’t a marxist you retard.

[Anonymous No.17529002]

>>17528936
Orwell was an actual socialist thought Hitler just larped as one.

[Anonymous No.17529014]

>>17528994
I just happened to think of foucault and google images after the idea of
>omg 1984 read a book!
types came to mind. If you prefer imagine I posted an image of Walter Benjamin and wrote
>we need to poz everything to pwn the fascists

[Anonymous No.17529034]

>>17529002

I would say that both Hitler and Orwell could be described as conservative socialists.

[Anonymous No.17529047]

>>17529002
>t. retard
you should actually read mein kampf

[Anonymous No.17529181]

>>17529158
no, in fact, u. PRODUCTIVE

[Anonymous No.17529184]

>>17528936
Because it's a well-read book that criticizes the ideology that they adopted due to them not wanting to work. I see this very often on Twitter: Someone with a bio full of mental illness listed as if it were achievements starts reeeeing when someone mentions 1984, so they attack the book and try to make it like it's the equivalent of someone comparing Marvel movies to real-life events.

[Anonymous No.17529207]

>>17528936
Hitler wasn't a socialist and Orwell put out anti-Soviet propaganda during WWII and supported the fascist wrecker Leon Trotsky.
Also people that go "omg my twitter got banned this is literally 1984" are a bunch of clowns. There is no real censorship occuring right now but there should be. Censorship is good and rightists belong in camps.
And 1984 is literally an adolescent tier book. People that make a big deal out of it are illiterates and haven't read anything since high school and have the philosophies of children.

[Anonymous No.17529214]

>>17528936
>So was Hitler.

[Anonymous No.17529218]

>>17529207
Are you LARPing as exhibit A or what? I would like to believe that's the case but considering you deleted your post to edit in yet another EPIC TAKEDOWN with 0 self-awareness the prospects are beginning to look grim

[Anonymous No.17529251]

1984 kinda sucks and orwell was a glownigger

[Anonymous No.17529263]

>>17529251
the argument for orwell being a glownigger is actually a significantly stronger argument for the truth the huxley was also a glownigger. If anything that would lend more credence to what they have written coming true, not less. But then, you're probably not being genuine are you anon?

[Anonymous No.17529270]

1984 is american conservatives harry potter

[Anonymous No.17529281]

>>17529270
the topic at hand is why you are a whiney weasley faggot anon, we aren't asking for examples.

[Anonymous No.17529362]

>>17529281
>explain to me why this happens
>this is the reason
>noooo how dare you do literally what I asked you to do
retard, thats literally why ppl hate talking about 1984 because it's done by retards trying to explain current events with shitty fiction

[Anonymous No.17529389]

>>17529362
>ppl
Why are you guys such dishonest faggots? Since your here enlighten us. You don't have your reddit account, your little faggot buddies will never know. What's the deal? You can just flat out say
>I think that lying regardless of how blatant and obvious it is and acting like a total disingenuous piece of shit in this way will produce what I want
Why can't you do that, even anonymously? We all know the emperor is naked anon.

[Anonymous No.17529404]

>americans get banned from twitter for saying nigger
>dude this is literally 1984 literally kgb literally hitler
sick of you fucking burger shartmart fucksticks want kim to nuke you lot

[Anonymous No.17529436]

>>17529404
boy this thread really is a bug zapper isn't it. Am I going to get 100 hot takes trying their hardest?

[Anonymous No.17529547]

>>17529404
Post your wrist you lying shrew.

[Anonymous No.17529591]

>>17528994
>Foucault wasn’t a marxist you retard.
>Foucault began his career as a Marxist, having been influenced by his mentor, the Marxist philosopher Louis Althusser, as a student to join the French Communist Party. Though his membership was tenuous and brief, Foucault’s later political thought should be understood against this background, as a thought that is both under the influence of, and intended as a reaction to, Marxism
Why do you people insist on coming to my thread to precisely demonstrate my point? Are you just this stupid?

[Anonymous No.17529637]

>>17529591
Modern day Marxists are the new nu-atheists. Same energy, different generation. Just a horde of whiny children rebelling against their parents intermixed with valid points. It's hard to sift through the abundance of abrasive juvenile kvetching to find the real valuable ideas being discussed.

[Anonymous No.17529691]

>>17529637
The literal inability to cope with people just not agreeing with them is something to behold
>orwell was a socialist
>hitler wasn't a real socialist
>foucault wasn't a marxist
>this is all relevant somehow...
>pls stop talking about 1984
>STOP PICKING ON MEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.17529725]

Maybe because it's baby's first political analogy. Or perhaps the second, after Adolf.

[Anonymous No.17529745]

>>17529591
>Why do you people insist on coming to my thread to precisely demonstrate my point? Are you just this stupid?
If you read Foucault's books rather than his wikipedia article you would recognize the irony of your post

[Anonymous No.17529764]

>>17528936
In the next episode of: Schizos arguing with themselves about useless garbage...

[Anonymous No.17529774]

>>17529745
I would? Can you cite the parts of Foucault's books that epic BTFOs 1984? Orwell was a socialist too you know anon.

[Anonymous No.17529790]

>>17529764
Why are you like this? Do you not realize that constantly being a disingenuous, hypocritical, dishonest piece of shit makes you a "bad person"? Does it genuinely shock you when people call you these things even though they describe you fully?

[Anonymous No.17529806]

>>17529745
He literally wrote a book about how mental illness is the result of capitalism. YOU are the midwit who hasn’t read any of these books.

Why do leftists just feel it fine to just lie?

[Anonymous No.17529814]

>>17529790
Rambling like this won't keep the meds away. Might as well take them.

[Anonymous No.17529838]

>>17529774
>Can you cite the parts of Foucault's books that epic BTFOs 1984?
Literally nothing to do with Foucault not being a Marxist. Foucault explicitly rejects moralistic oppression (or "suppression") narratives and economic determinism. He doesn't use dialectical materialist methods of history, at least no the extent that he uses so-called genealogical methods. He unironically borrows as much from Nietzsche as from Marx.

[Anonymous No.17529855]

>>17529814
Why are you like this?

[Anonymous No.17529867]

>>17529806
I would absolutely *love* to see you quote an argument from Madness and Civilization (or The Birth of the Clinic) that blames capitalism (or similar economic conditions) for mental illness. You can't do it because you're straight up lying.

Or perhaps you're confusing Foucault with Deleuze.

[Anonymous No.17529868]

>>17529838
Wait so am I allowed to read books that disagree with Stalin or not? Mein Kampf and 1984 aren't allowed.... is Foucault allowed or not?

[Anonymous No.17529896]

>>17529868
Such petty shitposting. I addressed specifically the point of whether Foucault was a Marxist.

[Anonymous No.17529916]

>>17529868
Okay but Hitler isn't a Marxist either and Orwell was a socialist. is 1984 cringe and am I supposed to read a book or what's the deal? Because every book I read seems to say marxism seems pretty gay, lmao

[Anonymous No.17529940]

>>17529916
meant to quote >>17529896

[Anonymous No.17529960]

>>17529916
You're allowed to read anything you want, as you well know. The reason people consider it stupid to reference "literally 1984!" for modern political developments is because every single person in the culture, including those who have never read it, say exactly that every time the government does something. If you have some specific particular point, people will probably not react to you with the same level of scorn.

[Anonymous No.17529976]

>>17529867
> This book was a history of psychology, published in English as Mental Illness and Psychology. In the original text, Foucault concludes that mental illness is a result of alienation caused by capitalism. However, he excised this Marxist content from a later edition in 1962, before suppressing publication of the book entirely; an English translation of the 1962 edition continues to be available only by an accident of copyright (MIP vii).

https://iep.utm.edu/fouc-pol/#H1

> Or perhaps you're confusing Foucault with Deleuze.
No, you just don’t know so much about the author you think you know everything about.

[Anonymous No.17529990]

>>17529960
>including those who have never read it
>every time the government does something
That's certainly the accusation isn't it. Are you sure you're not just bitching about an easily and widely understood criticism of policies you agree with?

[Anonymous No.17530013]

>>17529976
You're right, I didn't know about the existence of this book. The general point still stands--your own quote shows he disavowed it and pulled it from publication, and you won't find any such argument in the multiple works he continued to publish on the subject of mental illness.

[Anonymous No.17530018]

>>17529034
>george "the famously butthurt anarchist" orwell
>conservative socialist
retard

[Anonymous No.17530027]

>>17530018
>ted "the famously butthurt anarchist" kaczynsky
>conservative socialist
retard

[Anonymous No.17530039]

>>17529990
>That's certainly the accusation isn't it. Are you sure you're not just bitching about an easily and widely understood criticism of policies you agree with?

I am not accusing you in particular. I am pointing out how absolutely banal a comparison to 1984 is in our culture. Think about how you feel when a twitter lib calls something "literally Voldemort". It's in the same category of "political commentary".

[Anonymous No.17530086]

>>17530013
The point was that he was in fact a Marxist and did in fact write Marxist books not whether or not he edited them 10 years later.

[Anonymous No.17530087]

>>17529990
>easily and widely understood criticism of policies you agree with?
i think politics is retarded but even i can recognize that it is rather that "orwellian" is a buzz word people use to describe things they don't like. censorship is bad... 1984! noooo you can't not have democracy... 1984! private businesses exerting their power to determine what content is on their platforms... 1984!

it is like "fascism", lol. just because a bunch of retards use it as a term doesn't make it coherent. subhumans say a bunch of things they dont understand like "postmodern neomarxist" or "emergence" since they only formally understand speech yet the only actual understanding they have is that certain words correlate to bad feelings

[Anonymous No.17530088]

>>17530039
>it's just like Harry Potter
>and also they haven't even read it

[Anonymous No.17530091]

>>17529806
>He literally wrote a book about how mental illness is the result of capitalism

A lot of authors criticize capitalism through their own framework without identifying themselves with marxist ideology tho.

[Anonymous No.17530099]

>>17530027
I don't know anything about anarcho-primitivism, but what about it is conservative? Because ted had a hate boner for liberals? EVERYONE besides liberals hate liberals. Conflating anarchism, especially left anarchism, with conservatism is concentrated mental retardation. This is such a shit thread. OP is a pseud who doesn't read. Burgers stay fucking stupid.

[Anonymous No.17530117]

>>17530087
Yeah but I can tell by your anime girl avatar that you bitch and throw a hissy fit even when legitimate uses of these terms come up. In fact Zizek himself is guilty of doing exactly this during the famous
>SHOW ME THE MARXISTS, MISTER PETERSON
Zizek is a marxist and the people who quote this epic btfo are marxists, and immediately after this zizek conceded and said he also knows exactly who Peterson is talking about and doesn't like them (liberals aren't leftists, nobody is leftist, leftists isn't Marxism, we aren't anything, you can't criticize us etc). Do you never grow tired of this bullshit?

[Anonymous No.17530151]

>>17528936

[Anonymous No.17530153]

>>17530099
>unironic delusions attacked as if they were reality
Real schizo posting hours

[Anonymous No.17530163]

>>17530151
Wow that's an old image you must have some beautiful pharmecueitically engineered tits by now, young man. I don't have my PC from that far but take this comic I edited in 2014

[Anonymous No.17530171]

>>17530153
Not even good bait. This thread can die now.

[Anonymous No.17530174]

>>17530086
>The point was that he was in fact a Marxist and did in fact write Marxist books not whether or not he edited them 10 years later.

He didn't "edit" it, he completely removed it from circulation.

[Anonymous No.17530198]

>>17530117
>that you bitch and throw a hissy fit even when legitimate uses of these terms come up
i dont because i block political yt videos and avoid mainstream internet politics in general
>Zizek is a marxist and the people who quote this epic btfo are marxists
im not quoting zizek, and quite frankly dont care what he thinks about the issue there are some "post-modernists" that drew some influence from marx, but all of them radicalized it. also, none of the retards who use the term have read a single book of continental philosophy in their life so even if it is coherent it is still just a mindless buzzword lol

[Anonymous No.17530200]

>>17530171
>redditor desperately tried to apply buzzwords he has seen before

[Anonymous No.17530210]

>>17530198
Okay weeb I have a tattoo of mabel pines on my foot and a biological son so I'm a more accomplished waifuist and materialist than you. What now faggot?

[Anonymous No.17530223]

>>17528936
I'm not a marxist and think that 1984 is fucking overrated and today is just a reference point for a bunch of retarded centrists and "conservatives" who like jerking themselves off on how they live in a "free society" and hating on all those damn evil totalitarian regimes they heard about while they were 10. Orwell had a few good ideas and definitely knew how to put them in action, but that doesn't change the fact his book is only about FIGHTING DA DAMN DICKDATERS with some misery porn thrown in just to make the normies extra scared.
It's especially meh when you compare it to something like Brave New World which instead of constantly talking about how the scary the secret police and teleprompters are and instead focuses on why people accepted living in that kind of society in the first place making it not only more believable bu also making you ask questions like "Why wouldn't I want to live in this kind of place?" and so on. When you read 1984 only reason why anyone is putting up with any of the party's shit is because they'll get deleted by the secret police and that's basically all of it. it hardly makes you think, it instantly makes you jump to "Oh this is so terrible I don't want to live in here any more". Just my autist opinion though.

[Anonymous No.17530230]

>>17528936
>My theory is it's just what is unfortunately typical of marxists, elitism and disingenuous obfuscation

desu this thread as a whole seems disingenuous. You seethe over some online degenerates you probably see on twitter and make a whole thread about >muh marxists
Then obsess over whether to call authors marxists or not. The reality is nobody gives a shit about whether you think they're marxists or not, because nothing about personnal ideology is clear cut and undermining this nuance only serves retards who like to make threads to whine about trannys, freud and twitter scum.

[Anonymous No.17530245]

>>17530223
Imagine expressing yourself like this. Please be underage.

[Anonymous No.17530252]

>>17530230
>you know what, no u
I didnt read your post lol. Why are you guys like this?

[Anonymous No.17530260]

>>17530210
can i suck your dick

[Anonymous No.17530269]

>>17530245
>>17530252
Remember kids, /lit/ is shit because of fags like this anon.

[Anonymous No.17530286]

>>17528936
>Okay? So was Hitler.
Based.

[Anonymous No.17530296]

>>17530245
Expressing myself like what? Is that really the best you've got?

[Anonymous No.17530299]

>>17528936
1984 was just a book how shitty england was.

[Anonymous No.17530300]

>>17530269
Yeah I should post multiple paragraphs going TEH EPIC EBUL DICKPOTATO NOBODY I DISAGREE WITHA EVEN READS. You people truly have the self awareness of a slug

[Anonymous No.17530312]

>>17530300
>You people truly have the self awareness of a slug

Oh the irony

[Anonymous No.17530315]

>>17530296
>like what?
With the diction that you chose to employ. Do you speak english? Or are you an ESL learning from 4chan and anime? Because that would explain a lot.

[Anonymous No.17530321]

>>17530312
>n-no the u
So you bitch when people bring up 1984, right?

[Anonymous No.17530347]

>>17530315
how about you answer my actual argument instead of getting ass blasted over a way I write?

[Anonymous No.17530363]

>>17530347
you wrote a book report on 1984 and brave new world and said you prefer the latter. There isn't an argument. It also has very little to do with the topic at hand, other than indicating you may be one of the people in question.

[Anonymous No.17530368]

>>17530321
You made an entire thread to bitch about people seething about 1984. It can't get worse than that anon. Now, everybody on the thread unmasked you as a fragile autist. Its sad in a way.

[Anonymous No.17530378]

>>17530368
you wrote an entire post to bitchy whiney sceetching screaming iddy biddy. Really anon? This is the image you'd like to present? Works for me.

[Anonymous No.17530401]

>>17530368
Cope commie. He's right and look it attracted the red rats like the plague they are

[Anonymous No.17530406]

>>17528936
Hitler was not a socialist.

[Anonymous No.17530419]

>>17530406
That's right, he was a neoliberal transexual gay african pedophile jew with a scat fetish and into beatiality (n-not that there's anything wrong with any of those things!)

[Anonymous No.17530426]

>>17530419
honestly this post smells incredibly underage

[Anonymous No.17530434]

>>17530426
literal cope. Nobody underage would have been subject to that deluge of lies because the push for ableism and all of that nonsense began to rumble in the underbelly of the mainstream around 2013 or so. That was however the narrative until the end of the 2000s

[Anonymous No.17530440]

>>17530419
Are you being sarcastic?

[Anonymous No.17530442]

Read animal farm
>btfo all youse guys

[Anonymous No.17530453]

>ARE YOU BEING SARCASTIC?

[Anonymous No.17530484]

>>17530453

[Anonymous No.17530492]

>>17530363
>if you don't agree with me 100% you're the exact people I hate
You could have at the very least tried telling me why 1984 isn't actually as overrated as I claim, or disproved any of my claims, but it turns out you're only here to complain about people not liking 1984. I don't know what else I could say anon.
Funny thing is that I know of a few liberals who also love 1984 to high heavens and compare everything from China and Russia to Trump to anything from that book. They hardly want to admit that Orwellian has become a buzzword at this point. If there is one thing both the right and the left can agree on it's that 1984 needs to be referenced constantly at every possible cance no matter how overused it is.

[Anonymous No.17530499]

>>17529591
>under the influence of, and intended as a reaction to, Marxism
>yeah, that's literally Marxism
IQ89

[Anonymous No.17530500]

A lot of great discussion in this thread. Keep it up /lit/

[Anonymous No.17530503]

>>17530174
Why are you arguing the semantics? The fact remains, the guy was a Marxist, educated by Marxists, and at one point, wrote Marxist books, which inspired other Marxists. Whether he later removed them from circulation is irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.17530514]

>>17530484
Daisy is a coke addict with a diseased barren bussy and she can't act

[Anonymous No.17530525]

>>17530500
reading books =/= being literate

[Anonymous No.17530526]

>>17530492
>it's overrated
isn't an argument. If someone says "sour grapes" you don't see 12 retards jump in to say
>UH ACTUALLY AESOP IS OVERRATED
unless they are the ones getting dunked on

[Anonymous No.17530536]

>>17530514
Who the fuck is Daisy?

[Anonymous No.17530543]

>>17530536
the woman in the image attached to the post I replied to, star of the famous Disney Star Wars Trilogy

[Anonymous No.17530556]

>>17528936
Orwell was an anarcho-socialist ffs

[Anonymous No.17530561]

>>17530556
what is the relevance to why people are not allowed to use juxtapositions and analogies to 1984? I don't understand the implicit barrier

[Anonymous No.17530566]

>>17530543
>>>/tv/

[Anonymous No.17530574]

>>17530566
>uh, do you hecking know something I didn't know
>you better go to somewhere else
so this is the true power of the 1984 whiner....

[Anonymous No.17530600]

>>17530561
Orwell's doesn't argue
>Socialism bad
Like most people take him to argue

[Anonymous No.17530627]

>>17530600
most people use him to argue
>totalitarianism and censorship bad
Please deliver to me one (1) example of someone comparing socialized health care or whatever to "literally like living in 1984".

[Anonymous No.17530642]

>>17530503
I'm not arguing semantics. You're wrong--he was not a Marxist, at least not during the period he wrote all of his famous works (Archaeology of Knowledge forward). A book he wrote early in his career that he disowned and removed from circulation is very obviously not representative of his views. If you think I'm bending the truth then go ahead and cite anything in Birth of the Clinic or Madness and Civilization that supports this supposed Marxist view of mental illness. It's not there.

[Anonymous No.17530657]

>>17530642
thomas pynchon "disowned" the crying of lot 49. Doesn't matter had sex

[Anonymous No.17530669]

>>17530627
>Please deliver to me one (1) example of someone comparing socialized health care or whatever to "literally like living in 1984".

Meanwhile on Fox News, the single most watched American news network:

>"Single payer, that's code for government run healthcare, Big Brother style."

[Anonymous No.17530681]

No bruh we should just have a bunch of kikes and junta running things instead of ascending and exploring the universe

[Anonymous No.17530688]

>>17530657
You might as well cite C.S. Lewis as an example of atheism.

[Anonymous No.17530690]

>>17530669
bro

[Anonymous No.17530698]

>>17530627
He was a revolutionary anarchist who thought it was a social duty to kill a nazi
https://www.breitbart.com/tag/orwellian/

[Anonymous No.17530705]

>>17530690
>Give me ONE example of someone doing it
>No obviously mainstream media doesn't count

[Anonymous No.17530714]

>>17530698
>Please deliver to me one (1) example of someone comparing socialized health care or whatever to "literally like living in 1984".
>He was a revolutionary anarchist who thought it was a social duty to kill a nazi
So can you not do it, or?

[Anonymous No.17530727]

>>17530705
Do you think that inventing a strawman in your head is an example? It sounds like this should be pretty easy for your, post a fox news article comparing single payer health care to 1984. The ball is in your court.

[Anonymous No.17530731]

>>17530714
You replied to the example with a frog meme

[Anonymous No.17530742]

>>17530714
Orwell was a bit more socialist than a libdem tbqh you can find lots of people calling #bashthefash Orwellian

[Anonymous No.17530743]

>>17530642
>at least not during the period he wrote all of his famous works (Archaeology of Knowledge forward)
Literally semantics. You say you’re not arguing semantics then proceed to argue semantics. The guy factually was inspired by Marx and wrote Marxist theory in his early years. If you say he didn’t, you are simply lying.

[Anonymous No.17530751]

>>17530727
>Do you think that inventing a strawman in your head is an example?

It's a verbatim quote from a Fox News broadcast. Google it.

[Anonymous No.17530756]

>>17530731
refer to >>17530727 please

[Anonymous No.17530758]

>>17530743
Not that anon, but there's a difference between using some Marx and being a Marxist

[Anonymous No.17530762]

>>17530751
So you were just talking out of your ass?

[Anonymous No.17530763]

>>17530756
refer to >>17530751

[Anonymous No.17530773]

>>17530762
facebook dot com watch/?v=10156728083887908

[Anonymous No.17530784]

>>17530763
?????????????

[Anonymous No.17530790]

>>17530784
See
>>17530773

[Anonymous No.17530804]

>>17530790
a car chase eh?

[Anonymous No.17530831]

>>17530804
You're a dedicated liar.

[Anonymous No.17530850]

>>17530831
It would appear every time you put that facebook link in and refresh it brings up a random video. So just to clarify, nobody can produce one (1) example of someone using 1984 in a cringe egregious manner indicating they haven't even read it?

[Anonymous No.17530856]

>>17530600
Example
https://www.foxnews.com/media/laura-ingraham-george-orwell-decoding-the-left

[Anonymous No.17530867]

>>17530850
It's in a video that is literally the very first google result, like I said.

[Anonymous No.17530871]

>>17530856
did you frantically google fox news and orwell because I'm going to listen to this and right now she is talking about manipulation of language.

[Anonymous No.17530907]

>>17530850
>>17530856
>>17530871

Socialized healthcare is beside the point as I indicated >>17530742 >>17530698

My point is that Orwellian is equated with a left wing agenda which it certainly is in the article.

[Anonymous No.17530916]

>>17530871
>>17530856
six minutes after opening with a quote from george orwell about the manipulation of language, she talks about how government run health care means that the american government will also be paying for illegal aliens.
>>17530867
So you're implying that the entirety of everyone who has a complaint about people who use 1984 as an example is because of a 1 second clip at the beginning of a 1 minute video of a bernie sanders video? I'll admit you're right, that retard definitely said that and you had my one (1) example for my oddly specific request

[Anonymous No.17530933]

>>17528936
Was that pic during the time he fucking bodied a bunch of Maoists on the role of the courts

[Anonymous No.17530937]

>>17530907
That's because the 'left wing' are currently the ones that are suppressing expression of their own citizens retard. Imagine being (you) in 1991
>my point is that orwellian is being equated with the right wing agenda
jesus christ who cares

[Anonymous No.17530938]

>>17530916
I gave you the link for the article

[Anonymous No.17530943]

>>17530916
>So you're implying that the entirety of everyone who has a complaint about people who use 1984 as an example is because of a 1 second clip at the beginning of a 1 minute video of a bernie sanders video?

Your goalpost shifting is insufferable. You claimed no one compares single payer to 1984, I provided a counter example. I never said "Fox News caused everyone to talk about 1984".

[Anonymous No.17530947]

>>17530937
It seems like you do because you want to drag this out

[Anonymous No.17530951]

>>17530938
yes and it's about how politicians lie and the biden administration is talking out of both sides of its mouth and using euphemisms and walking back things it said in the past. These are -appropriate- examples of comparinsons to 1984. I don't know if you realize this, but the goal was not just "find someone talking about george orwell". It turns out the guy with the facebook video actually fucking delivered, why can't you?

[Anonymous No.17530979]

>>17530943
So what is your point anon? You saw a Bernie Sanders propaganda video on facebook that used two seconds of a fox news clip that you cannot find? I'll again give you, good job on baiting me into doubting you. Is that clip, in your opinion, a driving force, or at least an example of one, for why people bitch relentlessly whenever 1984 is brought up?

[Anonymous No.17530987]

>>17530951
>The democrats are criticizing Trump for having no plan but they actually mean no lockdown plan
>Wow so Orwellian, much dystopia
They are just having a democratic agenda, not lying.

[Anonymous No.17531005]

>>17530979
The clip is not a driving force of anything. It's an example of how 1984 is deployed as thoughtless criticism of government programs. How many examples would satisfy you that I'm justified in saying this?

[Anonymous No.17531026]

>>17530987
>>17531005
I don't really care anymore bros I just got 1700 basedjaks from /qa/ and I'm probably going to head off to /tv/. I think my thread has already made my point. Here you guys go also
https://www.mediafire.com/file/dwjmx8b9goeq29o/basedjaks.rar/file

[Anonymous No.17531029]

>>17531026
>probably going to head off to /tv/

Sounds about right.

[Anonymous No.17531040]

>>17531026
k

[Anonymous No.17531051]

>>17531029
/lit/ has been dying since like 2014 dude. Do you actually use this board every day? I got permabanned from 4chan from my old apartment 9 years ago for uploading this picture with the text "lol" as a thread and having 40+ bans. The final nail in this boards coffin was the wishy washy sticky after the creation of /his/. I bid you adieu

[Anonymous No.17531149]

>>17531026
>I don't really care anymore bros I just got 1700 basedjaks from /qa/ and I'm probably going to head off to /tv/. I think my thread has already made my point. Here you guys go also
>https://www.mediafire.com/file/dwjmx8b9goeq29o/basedjaks.rar/file

[Anonymous No.17531161]

>>17530223
Truth.

[Anonymous No.17531191]

If you didn't get Animal Farm you won't understand Nineteen Eighty-Four.

[Anonymous No.17531209]

>>17531191
if you didn't get animal crossing you won't understand stardew valley

[Anonymous No.17531221]

>>17531161
No, your thing has Huxley wrong and 1984 is not about "fighting the dictators", the protagonist never does that.

[Anonymous No.17531226]

>>17531209
I wouldn't know about either of those things.

[Anonymous No.17531232]

1984 is a good book, orwell was a rat though, worked for the government and informed on communists. i've never heard of leftists shitting on 1984, you're just making things up for your shitpost.

[Anonymous No.17531236]

>>17531226
then you wouldn't know about terraria either. And you call yourself /lit/. What do you do, hang out on this board and post about guenon and the western canon for a decade? What a fag

[Anonymous No.17531247]

>>17531232
>i've never heard of leftists shitting on 1984
>you're just making things up for your shitpost.

[Anonymous No.17531324]

>>17531236
Aha, I do know something one of the nephews said that Terraria is a sort of 2D Minecraft. I've not played Terraria though I'm quite familiar with Minecraft.

[Anonymous No.17531334]

>>17529207
Based, nobody can even respond to you except a weak ass "g-gay!"
Keep up the good fight of not letting retards walk around retarded.

[Anonymous No.17531353]

>>17531334
>samefagging yourself hours later
you deleted your first post lmao

[Anonymous No.17531358]

>>17531353
>disagree with me? Must be samefagging!
cringe

[Anonymous No.17531361]

>>17531358
you are though

[Anonymous No.17531368]

>>17531361
>doubling down
cringe

[Anonymous No.17531379]

>>17531368
>he doesn't know how to check for samefag
>he thought posting from his phone would hedge his chances

[Anonymous No.17531390]

>>17531379
then post proof retard
I just opened 4chan for the first time today, so I am absolutely certain that that post was not made by me

[Anonymous No.17531408]

>then post proof retard
>I just opened 4chan for the first time today, so I am absolutely certain that that post was not made by me

[Anonymous No.17531680]

>>17531408
Lame

[Anonymous No.17531694]

>>17531680
just download the wojaks >>17531026

[Anonymous No.17531734]

>>17531247
yes. exactly faggot.

[Anonymous No.17531751]

>yes. exactly faggot.

[Anonymous No.17532048]

What an insightful thread. Thanks frens