/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17526922]

>removed everything good from Nietzsche and created a bluepilled globohomo version of him
>fused him with 3 jews
>unironic Marxist despite being a """Nietzschean"""
>gay
>is the patron saint of trannies
>created accelerationism
>was a pedo
>thought that not cutting your dick off was fascism
>killed himself
Cringe. Literally the worst philosopher

[Anonymous No.17526943]

That's what I call Riding the Tiger.

[Anonymous No.17526953]

>>17526922
>>removed everything good from Nietzsche
I'm sure you mean the fascism but I'm sorry to inform you Nietzsche wasn't fascist and never will, no matter what /pol/ tells you.
>>fused him with 3 jews
Why does this matter? Nietzsche despised antisemitism.

[Anonymous No.17526956]

>globohomo
people that unironically use this word should be lobotomized

[Anonymous No.17526973]

>>17526922
go back brainlet rat

[Anonymous No.17527005]

>>17526922
he killed himself at 70 and only because his illness was probably unbearable at that point, he lived a decently long life other than that. dunno why people bring up his suicide at all

[Anonymous No.17527007]

>>17526953
Neither he was socialist or a cringe commie. He opposed egalitarianism, socialism and similar ideologies. His interpretation of Nietzsche is truly flawed in many ways. Dilate.

[Anonymous No.17527116]

>>17527007
>His interpretation of Nietzsche is truly flawed in many ways.
one example?

[Anonymous No.17527143]

>>17526973
Hey anon, some people just don't like jews, you don't need to throw a tantrum about it every time

[Anonymous No.17527161]

>>17527143
this

[Anonymous No.17527174]

>>17527143
it just worsens already shit quality of discourse on this site
>guys ooga booga he was a jooo!! AAAAA I'm going INSAAAANEEE debunked discredited thrown in the trash

[Anonymous No.17527220]

>>17527174
Go to leftypol if you want an echo chamber pussy.

[Anonymous No.17527229]

>>17527220
go to /pol/ if you want to circlejerk nazi trash

[Anonymous No.17527235]

>>17527229
Are you jewish? Be honest with us we won't bully you

[Anonymous No.17527243]

>>17527229
you first liberal and possible kike

[Anonymous No.17527281]

>>17526953
>>17526956
>>17526973
>>17527116
>>17527174
>>17527229
GOTT'EM lmao
trannies big mad.

[Anonymous No.17527284]

>>17526956
Imean these "people" are basically just purpose engineered biopolitical clientele for neoliberalism, they dont breed, dont think, can be relied upon to buy rainbow colored indulgences from disneygooglepepsico and shut down anyone who deviates from the global HR NYT dnc party line even on the slightest. Being homo or transphobic is the anticlericalism of our time. I refuse to believe these people even have sex, they virtue signal and engage in shrill politically correct activities at the behest of george soros and their marxist proffesors, whatever it is they do is purely sanctimonious and utterly devoid of eroticism. If anything they are a disgrace to true perversion and sodomy, the divine marquis (de sade) would feel nothing but the utmost contempt for them, besides all the remaining recalcitrant libertines have long decamped for the greener pastures of the radical right.

[Anonymous No.17527299]

>>17527235
>>17527243
lol your pol is showing, shoo shoo away little mongoloids. this is a nietzsche thread, both lefties and pol retards get the bullet

[Anonymous No.17527301]

If you wrote after 1920 and you don't have at least one sentence of modal or predicate logic in your book, I'm not reading your cringe conty shit

[Anonymous No.17527309]

>>17527301

[Anonymous No.17527320]

>>17527007
based nietzche

[Anonymous No.17527332]

>>17527299
Nigger please. Most worthy continental philosophers throughout history have been racist. Aristotle, potentially Plato, Augustine, Kant, Kierkegaard, Schmitt. Nietzsche was probably anti-semitic, which is the only common ground I have with him.

[Anonymous No.17527335]

>>17527309
>implying the germans didn't invent analytic philosophy
>implying you aren't a pseud who jerks off to retards like Althusser

[Anonymous No.17527336]

>>17527332
Hegel was racist too

[Anonymous No.17527340]

>>17527301
>modal

[Anonymous No.17527352]

>>17527336
I'm not huge on him but damn that's based (as well as his panentheism).

[Anonymous No.17527355]

>>17527332

nigga did you just call Aristotle and Plato continental philosophy, this is actually the smallest brain Phil take I've ever seen on /lit/

>they lived on the continent so it must be continental

[Anonymous No.17527374]

>>17527332
they were racist because they were strong and didnt care much about other races, not enough to build their whole worldview around da jooooooooooz. Pol retards like you on the other hand are weak, have no ideas and virtues of their own and to compensate it they turn to da jooooooooos and build their whole worldview around ressentiment, also
>Nietzsche was probably anti-semitic, which is the only common ground I have with him.
go read nietzsche you stupid faggot

[Anonymous No.17527395]

>>17527355
>they lived on the continent so it must be continental
The absolute [united] state[s] of this board lmao

[Anonymous No.17527407]

>>17526922
Bro you misread Deleuze.
Take the ontology of him and decouple it from your idea of his political views and you get Nietzsche's Sentiment coupled with Kant's rigour.
Deleuze was never that much against Fascism as he was against bureaucracy. His thought is one that affirms creation and decision at every moment, how can that not be an authoritarianism for those that are willing to conquer new territory? Deleuze doesn't hate authority, he just wants it to be creative and daring.
And that's why Deleuze was more rightwing than he himself would have believed. Guattari was cringe tho.

[Anonymous No.17527410]

>>17527355
I regard most Philosophy before the 19th and 20th century as Continental, though some of it may have a more logical focus.
>>17527374
Nietzsche was a relativist on truth, cringe, Nietzsche thought Christianity was slave-morality in its altruistic tendencies, which is an autistic perspective, Nietzsche thought that the attainment of power is satisfactory towards happiness, which I find baffling. I quite like Schopenhauer, especially his views on suffering and asceticism, but Nietzsche bastardized his philosophy. Nietzsche's anti-Semitism is his only redeemable trait to me.

[Anonymous No.17527422]

>>17526922
I mean have you tried bringing up western philosopher for that matter around your local lgbtsjwtfnpc marxist cattle? In no time you will see their little stupid cowlike eyes light up in panic. Soon enough they will start with the usual subhuman bleating "wasnt he sexist? Arent you being dangerously eurocentric? Why read books by dead white men when you could have been streaming the latest diverse and inclusive workplace comedies at netflix hulu and disneygo?how is this comductive to the electoral ends of the democratic party? You should know reading anything besides the NYT or YA literature is ableist against those who are too retarded to read. What are you an alt right russian bot trump supporter? Have you been taking your SSRIs and HRT? it is very important that you take the medication dr goldstein prescribed otherwise we will have to report you to corporate for mandatory sensitivity training"

[Anonymous No.17527428]

>>17527410
who cares about your preferences, this isnt your blog

[Anonymous No.17527451]

>>17527284
Read that post again. I was talking about imbeciles like you. You should be lobotomized.

[Anonymous No.17527455]

>>17526922

>Bluepilled
>Globohomo
>Jews
>Muh Marxism
>Gays, trannies

Get the fuck off this board and slither back to /pol/ if you can't have real dialogue about philosophy.

[Anonymous No.17527457]

>>17527428
I gave reasons as to why he's overrated after someone insinuated that I'm unaware of his Philosophy. Faggot.

[Anonymous No.17527470]

>>17527407
The healthy response to reading deleuze and foucault is not to become a resentful idpol tranny but to move to the west coast drop lots of psychedelics, get swole, become the CEO of a blockchain nootropics startup or military industrial war machine surveillance contractor/ polyamorous cult.

[Anonymous No.17527477]

>>17526922
>gay
didn't he have a qt gf?

[Anonymous No.17527479]

>>17527470
BASED

[Anonymous No.17527486]

>>17527335
>implying the germans didn't invent analytic philosophy
they didn't

[Anonymous No.17527489]

someone should wipe out every pol retard on this board

[Anonymous No.17527494]

>>17527407
>he just wants it to be creative and daring.
and that's why he was a marxist and a communist, thanks.

[Anonymous No.17527495]

>>17527332
Wait, you like philosophers in terms of whether or not you share views with them? That's the most reddit, most womanly reason to like them.

[Anonymous No.17527512]

>>17527495
Well I also acknowledge originality of thought but largely focus on those sharing my same values (as a Christian and idealist)

[Anonymous No.17527513]

>>17527486
Why is that the defenders of continental philosophy are so obsessed with historicism yet know nothing about the history of philosophy?

[Anonymous No.17527525]

>>17527407
Please kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.17527527]

>>17527470
> Implying the swole west coast psychedelic using CEOs of a blockchain nootropics startups and military industrial war machine surveillance contractors are not in idpol tranny polyamorous cults

[Anonymous No.17527531]

>>17527407
>was never that much against Fascism
Please read Anti-Oedipus

[Anonymous No.17527537]

>>17527525
cope from someone who doesn't understand left/right. every person is left centre or right you just don't know what they mean and you don't understand people in general

[Anonymous No.17527539]

>>17527512
You're a Christian yet anti-semitic and racist?? How does that work?

[Anonymous No.17527540]

>>17527470
>>17527527
Need to become a fund without hedges.

[Anonymous No.17527548]

>>17527539
Read some history books.

[Anonymous No.17527560]

>>17527512
How are you a Christian and an idealist? I know this word is overused here but that's literal gnosticism.

[Anonymous No.17527563]

>>17527407
>Deleuze was never that much against Fascism
only on /lit/ you get to read shit like this

[Anonymous No.17527567]

>>17527548
I'm talking about the principle. You can't be Christian AND racist.

[Anonymous No.17527588]

>>17527563
There are lengthy passages in TP explaining how capitalism creates the third world even inside metropoles concluding that we should all become Black and female ethically speaking. Totally a fascist.

[Anonymous No.17527631]

>>17527560
Okay so I believe God to be both immanent and transcendent through the trinity. He manifests himself in three aspects. Panentheism just makes sense to me. God is the single irreducible substance, but that substance has modes and attributes.
>>17527567
Yes I can. Though I believe most people can be redeemed, there are definitive opponents towards the faith and our believers. Jews have been quite antagonistic throughout history, and since the 19th century, their cultural and moral subversion has become obvious. Western culture is near the brink of death thanks to the work of (((some))) people. This decadence has a source of origin. My feelings towards Jewish people could best be described as immense distrust. An individual Jew could become a good person and Christian, but when collectivized a devious emergent phenomenon is manifested (the whole is greater than the sum of its parts).

[Anonymous No.17527644]

>>17527631
>God is the single irreducible substance, but that substance has modes and attributes.
Literally Spinoza, banned from Abrahamic theology

[Anonymous No.17527670]

>>17527644
Pantheism and Panentheism are distinct beliefs anon. Hegel was a Lutheran Panentheist. Even modern theologians admit (weak) Panentheism to be compatible with Christianity.

[Anonymous No.17527672]

>>17527644
what do you expect from a young schizo without directions in life. They adopt everything in their way.

[Anonymous No.17527686]

>>17527644
>>17527670
>>17527672
video related

[Anonymous No.17527695]

>>17527686
oh shit I forgot to paste this: https://youtu.be/_xki03G_TO4

[Anonymous No.17527697]

>>17527631
>God is the single irreducible substance, but that substance has modes and attributes.
So you're a Spinozist i.e. an atheist?

[Anonymous No.17527705]

>>17527695
who cares, youre a christian and antisemite and thats enough schizo magic for me to disregard you completely you larping faggot

[Anonymous No.17527710]

>>17527428
you're a faggot
>isn't your blog
you're just upset at his post

[Anonymous No.17527714]

>>17527670
Ah yes my favorite sorceror, Hegel, is an expert on Christian dogma

[Anonymous No.17527724]

>>17527697
Do you not know the difference between Pantheism and Panentheism? Come on.
>>17527705
Even Kierkegaard was an anti-semite. Your beliefs are unsurprisingly informed by propaganda.
>>17527714
lmao. I personally prefer Schopenhauer as he is far more readable, but Hegel has historical significance.

[Anonymous No.17527735]

>>17527724
>Even Kierkegaard was an anti-semite
you're saying likes thats an argument. Anti semitism is incompatible with the Bible

[Anonymous No.17527738]

>>17526956
It's global homogeneity. Retards who get triggered at dumb shit and can't discuss things with some degree of civility shouldn't be on the board.

[Anonymous No.17527745]

>>17526922
>>removed everything good from Nietzsche and created a bluepilled globohomo version of him
No. And Deleuze's text explicitly states that Nietzsche was against socialism. Also the people who say globohomo are the most controlled of them all. They're somehow the even shittier side of the same worthless coin.
>>fused him with 3 jews
Meaningless statement.
>>unironic Marxist despite being a """Nietzschean"""
Not as unironic, also not surprising.
>>gay
He was married to a woman and had two kids.
>>is the patron saint of trannies
He rejected identity politics as well as metaphysical identity.
>>created accelerationism
That was Marx. D&G barely mention it despite all the memes.
>>was a pedo
Probably not.
>>thought that not cutting your dick off was fascism
He didn't, but I bet OP is very tempted to avoid fascism this way.
>>killed himself
Based. The courage of suicide when life becomes unbearable is to be admired and I bet OP would piss her panties at the thought.

[Anonymous No.17527750]

>>17527697
pic related
>>17527735
hmmm what is the Synagogue of Satan

[Anonymous No.17527757]

>>17527220
>>17527229

[Anonymous No.17527771]

>>17527745
not trying to argue but accelerationism is based on a paragraph in anti-oedipus in the main

[Anonymous No.17527774]

>>17527724
>Do you not know the difference between Pantheism and Panentheism? Come on.
Seems like pure doxography to me. It is clear that Spinoza repudiates the revelatory, hieratic theology of Judeo-Christianity.
>lmao. I personally prefer Schopenhauer as he is far more readable, but Hegel has historical significance.
Significance to who? Schizos? Hegel is an atrocious writer, that's why so many interpretations flourished.

[Anonymous No.17527793]

>>17526922
Rent free.

[Anonymous No.17527831]

>>17527774
My influence from Spinoza only stems from his dual aspect monism and his pantheism, which I modify into Panentheism as I'm not an atheist. Watch the video I linked above. Regarding Hegel, he was probably the first to see history as a dialectical process of unfolding, one which is constantly progressing. Modern day progressivism and technophiles share that in common much to my disagreement. You're right that he's a terrible writer but he's still important in the history of Philosophy. Schopenhauer came about as a reaction against him. Kierkegaard studied Hegel and Schelling, and his later Philosophy was also a reaction against Hegelianism. Psychoanalysis is also influenced by Hegel. You get the idea.

[Anonymous No.17527848]

>>17527336
wtf i love and understand Hegel now?

[Anonymous No.17527865]

>>17527374
Trying to strawman other people to make yourself feel better is literally a cope FYI.

[Anonymous No.17527873]

>>17527848

[Anonymous No.17527887]

>>17527793
>>I just saw a tranny and NOW MY PEE PEE IS HARD
Bruh

[Anonymous No.17527888]

>>17527831
Potäto, Potāto, both are heresies but you do you. I think you could go Kant->Schopenhauer->Freud if you wanted to understand psychoanalysis of the unconscious mind/will/a priori; Hegel is for a different specialization entirely.

[Anonymous No.17527894]

>>17527332
>Nietzsche was probably anti-semitic, which is the only common ground I have with him.
Someone post the quotes, I can't care about /pol/tards anymore.

[Anonymous No.17527898]

>>17527116
He literally portrays him as socialist which is completely inaccurate. While Nietzsche wasn't definitely a fascist, he certainly wouldn't have been a socialist

[Anonymous No.17527908]

>>17527898
>He literally portrays him as socialist
In what way?

[Anonymous No.17527913]

>>17527894
you think schizos will care about those quotes? they are demented
>>17527898
>He literally portrays him as socialist
source?

[Anonymous No.17527927]

>>17527898
Maybe you've mis-understood Nietzsche because you try to put him into false left or right spectrum because your low brain wave activity can overcome such phantasms?

[Anonymous No.17527929]

https://onscenes.weebly.com/philosophy/nietzsche-and-the-fascists-georges-bataille

[Anonymous No.17527986]

>>17526922

Foucault also was marxist despite being nietzschean, so that is not outstanding.
How is he the saint of trannies, like what for, I've never heard of that.

[Anonymous No.17528022]

>>17527007
>>17527898
He never argued that Nietzsche was an egalitarian.

[Anonymous No.17528064]

>>17527410
>I regard most Philosophy before the 19th and 20th century as Continental, though some of it may have a more logical focus.
Retarded take.

[Anonymous No.17528067]

>>17527986
>Foucault also was marxist

Jesus Christ people. Could you read anything by Foucault before passing the judgement on him?

>Marxism exists in nineteenth-century thought like a fish in water: that is, it is unable to breathe anywhere else

[Anonymous No.17528089]

>>17527548
It’s literally a logical contradiction.

[Anonymous No.17528091]

>>17528067
Oh this is not a judgement, just the common reception.

[Anonymous No.17528116]

>>17527631
Why do psueds on this site take random bullshit from whatever ideology and mash them together into an incoherent ideology?

[Anonymous No.17528122]

>>17528089
Incorrect faggot.
>>17528064
Gonna cry?

[Anonymous No.17528129]

>>17528116
He's probably under 30

[Anonymous No.17528139]

>>17527320
savage quote

[Anonymous No.17528145]

>>17527986
>How is he the saint of trannies
He isn't. /pol/ just likes to project their obsession with trannies everywhere.

[Anonymous No.17528163]

>>17526922
Sounds based desu

[Anonymous No.17528190]

>>17527332
Aristotle and Plato weren't racist so much as elitist. Aristotle def thought the Greeks were superior but I'm sure he wasn't some seething faggot who couldn't acknowledge a great man of another race

[Anonymous No.17528202]

>>17528145
thanks fofr the reply. just, what do they reason it with, which book.

[Anonymous No.17528217]

>>17527750
It’s unchristian to condemn an entire race.

[Anonymous No.17528224]

>>17528190
Yeah I agree

[Anonymous No.17528234]

>>17528217
nah

[Anonymous No.17528243]

>>17528217
It's actually very Christian to be a brash retard who sentences others to eternal suffering for being disobedient.

[Anonymous No.17528260]

>>17528202
I assume OP is talking about the "becoming-woman" concept which has little to nothing to do with trannies.

[Anonymous No.17528262]

>>17528122
>>>17528089 (You) #
>Incorrect faggot.
>>>17528064 (You) #
>Gonna cry?

[Anonymous No.17528293]

>>17528243
Watch this retard: https://youtu.be/tiYf6ITgWbk
>>17528262
None of my posts remotely suggest a predisposition towards neoconservatism. You could have at least guessed my liking to Ted Kaczynski.

[Anonymous No.17528470]

>>17527407
>Deleuze was never that much against Fascism
read the first few pages of anti-oedipus

[Anonymous No.17528471]

>>17526922
I honestly though you were talking about Foucault despite Deleuze's pic

[Anonymous No.17528507]

>>17527745
he signed a letter arguing that the age of consent should be abolished

[Anonymous No.17528532]

>>17528293
maga wasn't a neocon movement, it was populist. The actual trump admin was just more neocon stuff for the most part but that wasn't the spirit of the maga retards

[Anonymous No.17528553]

>>17528532
You keep saying neocon when you should be using neoliberal.

[Anonymous No.17528561]

>>17528532
fair enough
>>17528553
Trump is a Zionist, so he's neocon not neolib. Biden is neolib for sure.

[Anonymous No.17528580]

>>17528553
Whats the difference? Neocons do a few tax cuts, and are marginally less gun-grabby. It's the same shit in all ways that matter

[Anonymous No.17528583]

>>17527374
>"Why do Jewish professors blame whites for black people having issues in college when 50% of college presidents are Jewish? That doesn't seem very fair to me."
>OMG YOU TOTALLY BASE YOUR ENTIRE EXISTENCE AROUND JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS, YOU HAVE RESSENTIMENT AS YOUR FUNDAMENTAL PILLAR OF EXISTENCE!!
pic related

[Anonymous No.17528630]

>>17527410
>Nietzsche was a relativist on truth.
Wrong.
>Nietzsche thought Christianity was slave-morality in its altruistic tendencies
Wrong.
>Nietzsche thought that the attainment of power is satisfactory towards happiness.
Wrong.

[Anonymous No.17528748]

>>17527301
you do know that quantified modal logic is a thing, right?

[Anonymous No.17528785]

>>17528293
>Watch this
No

[Anonymous No.17528847]

>>17527486
>who is Frege

[Anonymous No.17528910]

>>17528507
That was a common belief in France at the time. He’s unlikely to a pedophile,

[Anonymous No.17529156]

>>17528910
>Everyone else was doing it therefore it's fine
Heard a lot of that at Nuremberg

[Anonymous No.17529230]

Talking about postmodern philosophers to pol retards is like talking advanced physics with a toddler

[Anonymous No.17529248]

>>17528507
I'm pro-pedophilia and I'm not even a pedo. Cope

[Anonymous No.17529256]

I swear /lit/ was in a better place when I started reading Deleuze a little more than a year ago. There where regular threads on him with actual insight.
Now it's just shit like this sorry excuse of a thread.
>muh globo homo
>muh jews
Embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.17529261]

>>17529230
advanced physics actually accomplishes stuff, don't degrade it by likening pomo philosophy to it

[Anonymous No.17529274]

>>17528507
That was just the French being retarded in general. The logic was that you have to take as much power away from the state as possible so instead of going the way of consistency (making kids less responsible for their actions as well as their sexuality) they went the way of abolishing the big bad bourgeois property defending state by arguing against all regulation, including the one banning pedophilia. There's no excusing their Frenchness though, but it doesn't make them all pedos.

[Anonymous No.17529317]

>>17529261
silence, anglo

[Anonymous No.17529324]

>>17529317
You are absolutely not worthy of the respect that physicists earn

[Anonymous No.17529326]

>>17527986
>Foucault also was marxist
LOL

[Anonymous No.17529328]

>>17529261
But it does accomplish something. It creates some concepts that are pretty easy to understand for anyone with half a brain, such as becoming woman, which can be used to bait out literal retards who think it's about trannies.

[Anonymous No.17529330]

the more I read about this dude from seething rightoids the more I feel like reading his work.
So where do I start?

[Anonymous No.17529336]

>>17529230
>>17529261
The autistic lizard brain of the Anglo is poisoned by positivism

[Anonymous No.17529340]

>>17529330
https://www.amazon.com/Based-Deleuze-Reactionary-Leftism-Philosophers/dp/1734452900

[Anonymous No.17529342]

>>17529324
cry more faggot
two sweaty balls of one dirty french frog postmodernist are worth more than all circlejerking that is happening in science currently

[Anonymous No.17529351]

>>17529330
Nietzsche and philosophy is a good start, also his little book Negotiations

[Anonymous No.17529358]

>>17529342
It's very pathetic how philosophers even ape the style of technical language that physicists use because they actually require it and it means something

[Anonymous No.17529395]

>>17529330
With "Nietzsche & Philosophy" (1960). There's also "Letter to a Harsh Critic" in "Negotiations" (1990) which spoonfeeds you what to expect from his texts, just gloss over the psychobabble if you have to, Deleuze moved away from that eventually. Let me see if I can find that old pasta with secondary authors and a bibliography.

[Anonymous No.17529402]

>>17529358
>noooooooooooo nooot my sciencerino noot my precious hecking technicalino language!!!! YOU CANT JUST use scientific concepts outside of their original context AAAAA I'm going insaaaaaaaneeeee

[Anonymous No.17529411]

>>17528630
pic related
>>17528785
have fun in hell faggot

[Anonymous No.17529416]

>>17529402
You can use them all you want and never accomplish literally a single thing but jerking each other off over gibberish

[Anonymous No.17529430]

>>17529395
Found it.

A decent short summary / intro to D&G:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EHnrE3j9kg

A longer introduction, but possibly my favorite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lajsoQJ0V6A

A lot of the stuff here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4CtHPqv6eKr8pYqe8qEoEA/videos?disable_polymer=1

Everything by Manuel DeLanda:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=manuel+delanda

A bit more on the Nietzsche-Deleuze relation through Klossowski (who dedicated his book about Nietzsche to Deleuze):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7l7ZAKZZZU

More on the Deleuze-Nietzsche relation (the entire series is fascinating if you're into Nietzsche):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFFxnf92XqY


The Deleuze for the Desperate series:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GS35vUMhww4

Derrida's lecture about Deleuze (mistitled, it's about Stupidity not Forgiveness):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_r-gr3ccik

There's probably a lot more, there are Vimeo videos as well which don't feature on Youtube.

Pirate Deleuze's Abecedaire (it should have English subtitles) as I can't find it streamed in full online anywhere.

As for the books, you could start with the essay and interview collections (in no particular order): Dialogues, Negotiations, Desert Islands, Two Regimes of Madness, Essays Critical and Clinical. "Letter to a Harsh Critic" in Negotiations is short (about 7 pages) and tells you how to read his texts. Better yet, jump straight into Nietzsche and Philosophy (read the intro as well) since it sets up the entire framework that Deleuze will operate in. Deleuze's courses are also pretty accessible and translated in several languages: https://www.webdeleuze.com/


A decent bibliography:
https://immanentterrain.wordpress.com/biblio/

[Anonymous No.17529443]

>>17529416
>nooooooo you cant just write something without SUBSTANCE where are your argumeeeents AAAAAAA, where are the LOGIC and FACTS. Is that a methaphor?????? NO WAY! I'm goiNG INSAAAAAAANE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.17529450]

>>17529330
Look up his lectures on Kant: Synthesis and Time. Follow that up with Nietzsche and Philosophy, Spinoza: Practical Philosophy and Bergsonism. After that read some of his other lectures and the Postscript to Societies of Control. At this point you are probably ready to jump into the big texts, do so in this order:
>Logic of Sense
>Difference and Repetition
>Anti-Oedipus
>A Thousand Plateaus
>What Is Philosophy
Bonus: The Fold, Desert Islands, the Cinema books, book on Francis Bacon (the Artist), his other Spinoza book, his book on Masochism, Essays, book on Foucault and the book on Proust and Signs.

[Anonymous No.17529461]

>>17529330
His books on other philosophers (especially the ones on Spinoza, Nietzsche and Bergson)
You also want to be somewhat well read on philosophy overall if you want to understand anything at all

[Anonymous No.17529486]

>>17529340
Anything but this.

[Anonymous No.17529501]

>>17529450
Proust & Signs and Coldness & Cruelty should be prioritized over some of his other works (except Nietzsche & Philosophy) imo. They're for the most part more accessible than many of his other books.

[Anonymous No.17529513]

>>17527477
name something gayer than fucking wom*n

[Anonymous No.17529553]

>>17526953
when considering a broader scope, fascism/nazism largely holds to the same assumptions and basic tenets, not to mention rhetoric and aesthetic, as socialism/communism. which means a criticism of one's assumptions is a criticism of the other. the exception is racialism though the racialism of today is much stronger and more prevalent than in nazism, where it was fairly minor and on its way out, and absent in fascism.

[Anonymous No.17529576]

>>17526956
it means globalism and homogenisation. i.e. monoculture + world political orthodoxy.

[Anonymous No.17529683]

>>17529411
Hell is a condition of the heart

[Anonymous No.17529757]

>>17527750
Is Spinoza not a panentheist by how this image portrays panentheism? I thought he viewed the "universe" (which I take to mean extension, physicality) as just one aspect of god's infinite aspects.

[Anonymous No.17529873]

>>17529683
pseud
>>17529757
Spinoza doesn't believe in a transcendent God. 'God' and 'nature' are both synonymous with one another to him, hence his atheism. I believe in the Christian God, thinking him to both be immanent and transcendent, which results in Panentheism.

[Anonymous No.17529884]

>>17529576
I'm sure /pol/tards mean "gay" by the homo, as in making the whole world gay.

[Anonymous No.17529890]

>>17529873
How is his god not transcendent if he believes in other aspects of god beyond the physical world?

[Anonymous No.17529978]

>>17529890
Let's go back to the part about 'God or Nature'. Spinoza doesn't believe in the conventional God up there in the heavens. His God is simply nature, or the cosmos. He's a pantheist in that everything to him is of nature and hence everything is God. He's also a monist, meaning he believes solely in one irreducible substance which to him is God. God has two aspects, mind and matter, and two identifiable modes in human experience, thought and extension. Body is of the attribute of extension and soul the attribute of thought. Let me be clear, my knowledge of Spinozism stems from lectures, not the primary text (Ethics). But I hope this clears things up. Once again though, Spinoza is a philosopher of immanence, not transcendence. He does not believe in a transcendent God.

[Anonymous No.17529994]

>>17529978
And that makes the glass grinding Jew an atheist

[Anonymous No.17530001]

>>17529994
Technically yes

[Anonymous No.17530033]

>>17529978
Well I haven't actually studied Spinoza, but I was reading something about him recently and maybe I'm just confused but I thought he believed god had infinitely many attributes with thought and extension being only the two that are known to us. If I'm wrong then fair enough, but if not it wouldn't seem right to call him a pantheist.

[Anonymous No.17530080]

>>17530033
Right, he thought that given the limitations of our experience, we could only identify two attributes to 'God', though an infinite amount of attributes could exist. Also I found a concise video on Spinozism you might find useful: https://youtu.be/uBsTxJBzczg