[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 97 KB, 803x996, Schelling.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17446812 No.17446812 [Reply] [Original]

The man, the myth, the legend

>> No.17446837

>>17446812
Based, Schelling is the most underrated thinker of the 19th century.

>> No.17446926
File: 33 KB, 362x380, schopenhauer-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17446926

>>17446812
Pic unrelated? Here I've got a better one.

>> No.17447225

Basic gestalt on Schelling?

>> No.17447358

>>17447225
Kinda like if Hegel and Deleuze would adopt a child and have an endless lawsuit over custody over it.

>> No.17447389

>>17447358
Fine a slightly more advanced gestalt?

>> No.17447433

>>17447225
A poetic and readable reformulation of Kant's philosophy. Miles above the literary vomit of Fichte and Hegel.

>> No.17447466

>>17447433
Where should I start?

>> No.17447625

>>17446812
More like the man, the myth, the positive.

>> No.17447652

>>17446926

Schopenhauer is basically the dude that comes into the German idealist scene and takes a massive shit on top of it.

Schelling was obviously the highest point, and Kierkegaard is the natural continuation.

>> No.17447661

>>17447652
idk why Schopenhauer hates on Schelling that much when their systems are really similar. He says something like Schelling is trying to speak about the unspeakable too much and lumps him in with Fichte and Hegel

>> No.17447801

>>17447661
>Schopenhauer hates on Schelling that much
He didn't hate him, just considered him an underperforming thinker. Fichte and Hegel on the other hand...

>> No.17447810

>>17447801
Not the anon you're replying to, but Schopenhauer pretty much never gives ANY credit to Fichte, Schelling, Hegel and the like.

>> No.17447878

>>17447810
He actually gives some credit to Schelling, either in Foundations of Morality or On the Freedom of the Will - I can't remember which, for presenting Kant's metaphysics in a more poetic way and even quotes him for the reader.

>> No.17447975

>>17446812
Why is he such a cunt.

>> No.17447987

>>17447975
Too high IQ

>> No.17448004

>>17446812
Where should I start reading him.

>> No.17448067

>>17446812
What’s so legendary about him?

>> No.17448079

definitely the best-looking critical philosophist

>> No.17448191

>>17447878
Why does he bag Schelling so much everywhere else then?

And if you could, if you'd be polite enough, to explain what Schopenhauer did take out of Schelling in those works?

>> No.17449478

Bump.

>> No.17449482
File: 129 KB, 344x464, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17449482

>>17448079
Most interesting looking for sure.

>> No.17449870

>>17448191
>Why does he bag Schelling so much everywhere else then?
He accuses him of stealing Kant's work and presenting it as his own. He usually gets the big insults when he discusses the German idealists of his time as a group.

>And if you could, if you'd be polite enough, to explain what Schopenhauer did take out of Schelling in those works?
He took Schelling's exposition of Kant' empirical and intelligible character.

>> No.17450685

>>17447652
>Schopenhauer is basically the dude that comes into the German idealist scene and takes a massive shit on top of it.
No, not at all. He's the true successor of Kant, to say otherwise would be intellectually dishonest. He intricately takes apart Kant's epistemology whilst working within his transcendental frame and makes distinctions between things Kant failed to discern. Read his doctoral dissertation in which he ties all of the loose ends of Kant's philosophy, in conjunction with making transcendental idealism compatible with his own conception of the Will.
>and Kierkegaard is the natural continuation.
Oh, right, I'm conversing with a christcuck. Of course you wouldn't enjoy Schopenhauer. German idealism is inherently atheistic, at least at its conclusion, in which a distinction between object and subject ceases to exist.

>> No.17450737
File: 103 KB, 335x266, 1582565698840.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17450737

>>17450685
>Oh, right, I'm conversing with a christcuck.
>German idealism is inherently atheistic

>> No.17450804

>>17450737
Not arguments. Imagine thinking the right thing to do after reading the apotheosis of a philosophical movement such as German idealism is to follow through with the likes of Kierk.

>> No.17451886

>>17450804
I wasn't that anon, so I don't think Kierkegaard is exactly "the next step" to German idealism, other than his existentialism offering a necessary realism. Kierkegaard is still a great thinker.

Also I'm saying you're retarded for using the word "Christcuck" and thinking German idealism is "inherently atheistic".