[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 9 KB, 231x218, 1579235508848.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17433695 No.17433695 [Reply] [Original]

>nooo, you can't read both positions of the debate
>nooo, you can't realize both positions have good and bad points
>nooo, you must only read our side of the debate and blindly believe our propaganda

>> No.17433697

>>17433695
Not literature

>> No.17433701

>>17433697
>political theory books aren't literature

>> No.17433703

>>>/retarded_opinions/

>> No.17433708

>>17433695
Yes anon, debates are sophistry something that retarded midwits (like you) have had to slowly realise again and again without it taking root despite this being known since the time of Socrates

>> No.17433716

>>17433701
Which political theory books have you read? You didn’t include any in the OP, so I’m guessing none.

>> No.17434166

>>17433695
>"both" positions
You are part of the problem

>> No.17434181
File: 199 KB, 1920x1360, 39FF2158-4A09-47DB-AE01-5C61047C99B7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17434181

>>17433695
Yeah sure that’s the optimal way of an approach.