/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17429445]

Find me a better modern Polymath

[Anonymous No.17429458]

>>17429445
My nigga get this picture of me off the internet, you kno i don't fuck wit that i tol yo ass plenty times, nigga

[Anonymous No.17429461]

>>17429445
Me.

[Anonymous No.17429481]

>>17429445
i had a jacket like that before i became a recluse

[Anonymous No.17429507]

>>17429481
You're not a recluse if you hang on social media. yes, 4chan is social media

[Anonymous No.17429512]

>>17429445
>Jewish
>Fat
>Neckbeard
>Autism
>Nasal autism voice and cadence
>narcissistic
>regurgitates philosopher-of-the-week's wikipedia
>Bro dude I think like... uh... technology is gonna... be... yeah

[Anonymous No.17429517]

>>17429507
i guess that's true, what do you call someone who hasn't left his house in months?

[Anonymous No.17429518]

>>17429507
take that back, I can't be a normie

[Anonymous No.17429524]

>>17429517
a quaran-teen

[Anonymous No.17429532]

>>17429524

[Anonymous No.17429534]

is he right?

[Anonymous No.17429568]

did you guys read any books he recommended and if so did you benefit from them?

[Anonymous No.17429575]

>>17429532
the perfect fit for the self-hating man

[Anonymous No.17429580]

>>17429532
god i wish a woman would look at me like that

[Anonymous No.17429586]

>>17429580
how hard is it to be without female attention?

[Anonymous No.17429609]

>>17429586
imagine poisoning yourself a little every morning for the rest of your life.

[Anonymous No.17429631]

>>17429580
The mouth ruins it for me. Her expression betrays a sense of disbelief and ridiculousness, as well as unrestrained revulsion. I prefer cold, overpowering contempt.

[Anonymous No.17429639]

>>17429631

[Anonymous No.17429668]

>>17429532
based dobby poster

[Anonymous No.17429685]

>>17429639
Something like that, yeah, but that's a bit too deadpan. I prefer a harder gaze and icy features. An expression radiating supreme, basically aristocratic contempt.

[Anonymous No.17429686]

>>17429685

[Anonymous No.17429694]

>>17429445
>can't read or speak German despite years and years of reading German philosophy

>>17429532
god dobby is perfect. but i would probably prefer to be belittled and cheated on by saz for all my life

[Anonymous No.17429706]

>>17429445
>>17429512
>>17429534
utterly BTFO

[Anonymous No.17429708]

>>17429686
Excellent! The combination of non-engagement, condescension and hatred is borderline perfect. I must admit that I am extremely spoiled and picky when it comes to things like this, but you've nearly nailed it. Now we understand each other, anon.

[Anonymous No.17429711]

>>17429706
Yes the boomers who stormed the capitol because they mistakenly thought they were allowed to protest like the left were big Evola fans. if only the twitter frogs who call you fat hadn't read Evola none of this would have occurred

[Anonymous No.17429722]

>>17429706
>evola
this is what happens when you make yourself too accessible

[Anonymous No.17429725]

Is this that guy that was on HydeWars smoking cigarettes or whatever

[Anonymous No.17429731]

"Kant" is pronounced like "cunt." In a sense, he is cunt bot.

[Anonymous No.17429732]

>>17429725
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOdgbhbuAhg

[Anonymous No.17429746]

>>17429445
He's right. It's honestly hilarious watching raving internet lunatics who dream of violent insurrection and hating other ethnic groups think that they're good people.

[Anonymous No.17429763]

>>17429732
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-89Z55c6RXw

is that him

[Anonymous No.17429764]

>>17429746
t. slavishly apologizes when nonwhites hate whites and dreams of liquidating kulaks

[Anonymous No.17429766]

>>17429711
>Yes the boomers who stormed the capitol because they mistakenly thought they were allowed to protest like the left
lol like clockwork

[Anonymous No.17429769]

>>17429746
you can hate ethnic groups and still be a good person.

[Anonymous No.17429772]

>>17429763
yeah i think so

[Anonymous No.17429785]

>>17429769
I guarantee you aren't a good person

[Anonymous No.17429794]

>>17429766
Yeah they were protesting the election because they wanted an audit/recount. Really not a coup

[Anonymous No.17429800]

>>17429785
can you prove that?

[Anonymous No.17429809]

>>17429794
>hey wanted an audit/recount
Which they already got:

https://www.nj.com/coronavirus/2021/01/historic-audit-of-nj-mail-in-election-is-complete-the-results-are-promising-officials-say.html

[Anonymous No.17429815]

>>17429800
Yeah. Blindly hating groups of people is not conducive to being a good person

[Anonymous No.17429824]

>>17429809
what's wrong with protesting? even if they were wrong? black lives matter protested police violence, but most cases involve blacks pulling out a gun or a knife or so; not to mention the disproportionate crime rate

[Anonymous No.17429827]

>>17429461
He and me

[Anonymous No.17429829]

>>17429809
They wanted a recount in the battleground states, specifically in the handful of cities where all the big vote dumps were. Regardless they were not trying to take over the government, they were trying to protest so that the government would listen to their demands for recount, again, because they very mistakenly thought they were allowed to protest the same way the left is.

[Anonymous No.17429833]

>>17429815
how do you know I "blindly hate" a group of people? you're making massive presumptions.
I have very good reasons to dislike a group of people who commit more crime than usual.

[Anonymous No.17429837]

>>17429824
>What's wrong with ranting and raving like a baby after it's already been proven that you lost fair and square?

[Anonymous No.17429842]

>>17429833
You already tried defending blindly hating ethnic groups earlier in this thread so it's reasonable to assume that you do so

[Anonymous No.17429843]

>>17429837
not an argument. there is absolutely nothing wrong with protesting - surely you agree? a group of people who feel wronged will act like a pressure valve, I believe it's quite natural and even healthy.

[Anonymous No.17429854]

>>17429842
I defended hating ethnic groups, not "Blindly" hating ethnic groups. If I dislike a particular group because they are statistically proven to be more violent to the rest of society, why am I "blind"? I think if you consider it, you can agree with me that my distrust is very logical.

[Anonymous No.17429860]

>>17429854
>If I dislike a particular group because they are statistically proven to be more violent to the rest of society
And you know this how?
What is the mechanism that makes them more violent? You do know this right?

[Anonymous No.17429869]

>>17429843
nah protesting doesn't do anything lmao

[Anonymous No.17429874]

>>17429860
>"and you know this how"

FBI crime data. You know they keep track of this, right? What do I care about the "mechanism" or reasons of what they do? I'm only concerned for my personal safety. Rather than wait for these crime-prone fellows to ship up, I believe it'd be better if we were to be rid of them completely.

[Anonymous No.17429886]

BLM protesting and election protesting is essentially the same: questioning a major structure/organization. There is no reason to lament one and praise another; do it for both or neither.

[Anonymous No.17429891]

>>17429874
>FBI crime data.
I asked for the mechanism that makes certain ethnic groups cause crime, not correlative data. So what is it?

[Anonymous No.17429899]

>>17429891
That is irrelevant to my concerns.

[Anonymous No.17429920]

>>17429899
there is a higher likelihood of poor people causing crime so I guess you're just gonna avoid all poor people now huh?

[Anonymous No.17429924]

>>17429920
That is also irrelevant to my concerns.

[Anonymous No.17429927]

>>17429891
Oh I get it so because black people commit more crime for reason x instead of reason y therefore it's acceptable and we should just embrace getting beaten to death on the street because it's reason x instead of reason y I get it now dude

[Anonymous No.17429931]

>>17429920
Yeah that is sensible but poverty doesn't correlate as well so it is a lesser concern

[Anonymous No.17429934]

>>17429445
What the fuck do you pseuds mean by calling yourselves polymaths?
Knowing the wikipedia article about some philosophers and having read some of the books that /lit/ constantly talks about doesn't make you a polymath.
Polymath is the equivalent idea to the modern renaissance man.
IF YOU DON'T KNOW A DECENT LEVEL OF MATH, PRATICE SOME FORM OF VISUAL ARTS, READ, WRITE, AND KNOW AT LEAST TWO LANGUAGES, AND YET CALL YOURSELF A POLYMATH, LOOK INTO THE MIRROR AND SAY "I AM A FAGGOT"

[Anonymous No.17429935]

>>17429924
Oh, I see. Anything other than posting Evola quotes under a marble statue avi is irrelevant to your concerns. Got it.

[Anonymous No.17429940]

>>17429931
>yeah that is sensible but poverty doesn't correlate as well so it is a lesser concern
lmao the literature of the correlation between poverty and crime vastly outweights the correlation between more melanin and more crime

This is your brain on /pol/ lmao

[Anonymous No.17429948]

>>17429935
I've never read Evola in my life; I'm only participating in this conversation to show that there is nothing illogical about wanting to stay away from certain violent ethnic groups. There is also nothing illogical about coming up with a solution that removes them from the equation.

[Anonymous No.17429959]

>>17429940
Oh, so if all blacks were millionaires you argue all crime would cease? I see. Is making them all rich feasible? At what financial level must they all be at so their crime level is no longer twice or thrice as much as the rest?

[Anonymous No.17429972]

>>17429959
>Oh, so if all blacks were millionaires you argue all crime would cease?
Huh? Who said that? How about starting with recognizing that on average black families are poorer than other ethnic groups in the united states and attempting to remedy that?

[Anonymous No.17429973]

>>17429940
Are you just new to this discussion? The asian stats are even funnier

[Anonymous No.17429977]

>>17429445
>"You're a polymath???"
Yes.

[Anonymous No.17429982]

>>17429973
In America, for historic reasons, poor whites reside generally in rural areas, and poor blacks reside generally in urban areas.

Because poor whites live in rural environments, and crime is intertwined inherently with poverty, they are set up to have lower crime rates, while not necessarily being more or less inclined to criminality.

Also incaceration rate is much higher because of the overpolicing in black communities
>https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2018/03/19/race-class-debate/

[Anonymous No.17429986]

>>17429972
>Huh? Who said that?

It was implied when poverty was brought into the conversation. Let's be frank; I do not believe we can ever put them at a financial level where their crime rate will decrease.

>How about starting with recognizing that on average black families are poorer than other ethnic groups in the united states and attempting to remedy that?

See above. How are we to raise the poverty line on a people so abruptly? With lower IQs on average - even accounting for financial well-being?

[Anonymous No.17429995]

>>17429986
>It was implied when poverty was brought into the conversation
No one even came close to implying we should makes all black people millionaires you utter retard

[Anonymous No.17430002]

>>17429982
So if we threw blacks into rural areas (or blacks had been thrown into rural areas in the past), you argue that whites would overwhelmingly commit more crime than urban blacks? Fascinating. Not quite sure I buy it.

[Anonymous No.17430005]

>>17429982
You are admitting you were wrong about the poverty/race correlation then? Do you have a source that shows that the disparity is due to the rural/urban divide? For example showing that white crime rates rise to the same level as black when whites live in an urban area?

Also is it really 'overpolicing' if the crime rates are an order of magnitude higher?

[Anonymous No.17430006]

>>17429986
>How are we to raise the poverty line on a people so abruptly? With lower IQs on average - even accounting for financial well-being?
So I guess that means the opoid epidemic affecting whites in the midwest is entirely due to...genetic reasons? Huh problem solved I guess. Should've had a higher IQ skull shape so they wouldn't be so predisposed to being druggies I guess

[Anonymous No.17430008]

>>17429995
That was hyperbole, calm down my jewish friend.

[Anonymous No.17430012]

>>17430008
>It was implied when poverty was brought into the conversation
So where is it made clear that it's a hyperbole? Not seeing that anywhere here...hmmm

[Anonymous No.17430014]

>>17430006
The flyover whites probably do have a lower IQ, in fact our learned academics are very fond of pointing out exactly that 'dumb white trash rednecks' remember? In any case with both the whites and blacks there are of course other factors than IQ, all that's being said here is that IQ is a factor.

[Anonymous No.17430019]

it never ends...

[Anonymous No.17430023]

>>17430006
>So I guess that means the opoid epidemic affecting whites in the midwest is entirely due to...genetic reasons?

Not sure why you're bringing this up, but actually certain genes do lend certain ethnic groups to more of a disposition to addiction. So, yes? So therefore, it's not shocking that blacks may in fact be genetically inclined to a criminal disposition? :D

[Anonymous No.17430024]

>>17430014
cool so it's not the only factor so why not focus on the things we can improve instead of autistically obsessing over one data point? Should we just let everyone in the midwest die from an overdose because maybe a study says they're low IQ?

[Anonymous No.17430035]

>>17430019
It will not end until blacks are either deported or successfully become a majority.

[Anonymous No.17430040]

>>17430024
>why focus on it
Because if you don't admit you will go searching for other causes, which you will have to invent, and which cause problems of their own. By all means let's 'not focus on it', but that means also 'not focusing' on the disparities so much in the first place.

[Anonymous No.17430047]

>>17430024
>cool so it's not the only factor

That was a different anon; but I already made my case. It's not "autistic" to dislike an ethnic group because they overwhelmingly commit crime in my society. It's logical and commendable. The Why's and Wherefore's are ultimately irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.17430049]

>>17430040
>which you will have to invent
So poverty is a made up invention now? Woah...

[Anonymous No.17430058]

>>17429532
Oh Dobs

[Anonymous No.17430064]

>>17430047
>It's not "autistic" to dislike an ethnic group because they overwhelmingly commit crime in my society.
it's stupid because you can't even point to a single mechanism that explains why they cause more crime. You can't even differentiate if it's just by happenstance or something instrinsic to them.

If you take a good kid and bring him up in a shitty environment, chances are he might be shitty. I don't think that's a good reason to hate him or think that the person is intrinsically shitty or that it's because of his bloodline that he's a shitty person

[Anonymous No.17430068]

>>17430049
No I mean 'white supremacy' as the explanation for the disparities. Factor in poverty by all means since there is a correlation.

[Anonymous No.17430077]

>>17430049
How long should we put up with the Negro until they are middle-class? How many centuries will this take? What if it's not possible; what if it's a circle that cannot be squared? What if they still commit an overwhelming amount of crime? How much money, how much time, and how many lives should we spend?

[Anonymous No.17430078]

>>17430064
>it's stupid to not walk through a Detroit ghetto at night because neuroscience and genetics are not yet understood

[Anonymous No.17430086]

>>17430068
Huh? White supremacy? What are you even talking about? No one mentioned anything about that.

Gosh, it must be so tiring being a /pol/schizo and getting irrationally angry about everything