/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17372129]

Is Daniel Haqiqatjou the Julius Evola of the 21th century? I mean, it makes sense since Evola called Islam the superior big religion.

[Anonymous No.17372138]

>>17372129
>Is Daniel Haqiqatjou the Julius Evola of the 21th century?
No
>I mean, it makes sense since Evola called Islam the superior big religion.
He didn't

[Anonymous No.17372188]

I know who he is but what exactly is he?

[Anonymous No.17372212]

>>17372129
Fucking hell I wish I could be religious. I cannot imagine how nice it must feel to legitimately believe that there is a benevolent father watching you and loving you. Imagine feeling the pull to SERVE and love such a father, a God.

[Anonymous No.17372249]

>Islam the superior big religion.
You must be thinking of Guénon?

[Anonymous No.17372359]

>>17372138
>>17372249
I ment monotheist religion, he called Islam more superior than the other Abrahamic religions, because it's more traditionalist. He was a bigger fan of Hinduism and other forms of Paganism, because he liked to LARP.

[Anonymous No.17372424]

>>17372129
No lol. He's irrelevant, as are all of these Salafi e-celebs.

[Anonymous No.17372445]

>>17372212
Just be religious then, you coward. It literally is 100% your choice.

[Anonymous No.17372464]

>>17372359
>hcalled Islam more superior than the other Abrahamic religions,
No he didn't

[Anonymous No.17372472]

>>17372212
>father
ngmi

[Anonymous No.17372480]

>>17372464
Yes, he did. https://islam4europeans.com/2018/09/30/evolas-thoughts-on-islam/

[Anonymous No.17372508]

>>17372480
In Evola's quotes from this article it's specifically sufism, not islam as a whole.

[Anonymous No.17372627]

>>17372508
Most of what he says there is not unique to Sufism by any means

[Anonymous No.17372688]

Let this thread serve as a warning of what may happen to you if you shallow too many redpills. I hate these slimy faggots, always hiding behind the leftie catchphrase of islamophobia everytime you criticize them, and then go on to argue for the most intolerant type of illiberalism imaginable. Weasels!

[Anonymous No.17372705]

>>17372627
Notice how he said “those religions which conquered the West” specifically taking care to not make Christianity as a whole but rather alluding to particularities with Christianity and I’m supposed to expect that I should take a generalizing of Islam at large on authority, of which there is none in this article anyway.

[Anonymous No.17372713]

>>17372212
And what basis do you have for not being religious?

[Anonymous No.17372730]

>>17372705
You're so desperate to make it say what it doesn't.

[Anonymous No.17372757]

>>17372730
Not only is it a direct quote from the article

> Evola characterized Islam as “a tradition at a higher level than both Judaism and the religious beliefs that conquered the West.”(2)

But the context within the cited book, Revolt Against the Modern World, make it clear that the author of the article’s conclusion is the one that is doing what you’re claiming I am doing.

Does anyone read on this stupid board?

[Anonymous No.17372762]

>>17372757
In fact, if Evola were to be so embracing of Islam at large to the degree that the author of the article and posters here are implying it would make him absurdly disingenuous and actually contradictory as an author. It would destroy any shred of credibility he ever had.

[Anonymous No.17372798]

>>17372762
Why? Christianity fell to modernism and liberalism, even during Evola's time, while Islam managed to continue a 1400 years old tradition and continues with revivals of the tradition despite any liberal, globalist imperialism.

[Anonymous No.17373062]

>>17372212
Believing in God or whatever was a meme made up by 19th century protestants. Its plenty to understand the creation theory of God the creator and hear the exploits of God on Earth Jesus and then just go to a church of your liking. Some people have access to higher spiritual or esoteric knowledge but not all of us.