/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17326399]

Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori Apriori

[Anonymous No.17326405]

>>17326399
quality post OP! Thank you very much :D

[Anonymous No.17326412]

>>17326399
That's the COPR experience alright

[Anonymous No.17326426]

>>17326399
a priori, anon.

[Anonymous No.17326431]

>>17326399
Buy a dictionary and try again

[Anonymous No.17326444]

>>17326399
The difference between a posteriori and a priori knowledge:
I have a posteriori knowledge that OPs pic is actually not Immanuel Kant but Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi
but I have a priori knowledge that OP is a faggot.

[Anonymous No.17326464]

>>17326444
Do the synthetic/analytic

[Anonymous No.17326503]

>>17326444
It all makes sense now.

[Anonymous No.17326513]

a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori a posteriori

[Anonymous No.17326523]

>you can't prove or disprove god with human reason but i believe in him anyway lol
wtf did kant mean by this?

[Anonymous No.17326531]

>>17326523
It means he's based, just like Descartes.

[Anonymous No.17326540]

>>17326523
It means he's coping, just like Descartes.

[Anonymous No.17326546]

>>17326531
Descartes thought the opposite of Kant. God is there from logical, metaphysical (and esthetical) considerations but isn't much involved in moralfaggotry.
Which is indeed the based opinion.

[Anonymous No.17326587]

Very true

[Anonymous No.17326593]

>>17326444
lel

[Anonymous No.17326594]

>>17326399

[Anonymous No.17326607]

>>17326594
I just picked the most handsom one, the other ones on google images looked like gremlins.

[Anonymous No.17326613]

>>17326607
>the other ones on google images looked like gremlins
That's because they were pictures of Kant.

[Anonymous No.17326628]

>>17326523
that he's the Lutheran Aquinas
>Reason is the devil’s whore as it can do nothing else but slander and dishonour what God does and says

[Anonymous No.17326670]

>>17326607
>>17326613
>Kant's face when.
Why do I feel these feels?
He doesn't know...he's dead.

[Anonymous No.17326742]

>>17326670
It's precisely because he's dead, anon. Your sense of honour reacts with disgust to the abuse of dead people.

[Anonymous No.17326827]

>>17326742
You're probably right, I don't like when people speak ill of the dead.
I'm not typically emotional about these things though but for some reason that got to me...

[Anonymous No.17327088]

>>17326670
was the painter elevated or was Kant sitting down like a child when this portrait was bring made?

[Anonymous No.17327107]

>>17327088
Kant was a manlet lol, like 5 ft something.
This painting is POV talking to Kant.

[Anonymous No.17327120]

"There is incomprably more knowable a priori than is currently known." -- Kurt Godel

[Anonymous No.17327519]

>>17327120
Based Goedel poster.

[Anonymous No.17327569]

>>17327107
wait really? LOL why even consider that little manlet as a philosopher, little bitch is just reeeing

[Anonymous No.17327740]

>>17327107
>avoiding direct eye contact because of severe autism

[Anonymous No.17327801]

>>17327107
>>17327740
kek, this has forever changed how I see this painting ngl.

[Anonymous No.17328092]

>>17327107
>"eyo man you got a cigarette?"
>"....transcendental"
>whatchu say?
>"....mmmmmmmph antinomies..."
>"you are fucked up man"

[Anonymous No.17328278]

>>17326523
Read the second critique, on there he argues that the existence of God and the immortality of the soul should be presupposed in practical reason. He even gives a moral/teleological argument for God’s existence.

[Anonymous No.17328376]

>>17328092
Do you think he was mellow all the time or did he get hype sometimes?
>What's good nigga? We rep Königsberg ova' here! Shieeet, I was born here, I live here, Imma die here too!

[Anonymous No.17328620]

>>17326399
A priority of yours is to get back in your cage wagie

[Anonymous No.17328680]

>>17327120
Gödel was beyond based

[Anonymous No.17328718]

>>17326399
Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based Based

[Anonymous No.17328732]

>>17326399
Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook Spook

[Anonymous No.17328771]

>>17328732
actually cringe. do you have a reddit to go back to?

[Anonymous No.17328802]

>>17328771
reddit is a spook

[Anonymous No.17328891]

>>17326464
The a posteriori knowledge that OPs pic is actually not Immanuel Kant but Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi is clearly synthetic, since the identity of the subject of the painting is not entailed by the concept of OP's pic, nor by the sensible representation of that painting.
The a propri judgement "OP is a faggot" is analytical, since being a faggot derives from the concept of "OP": one cannot think about the OP without thinking he's a faggot, just like one cannot think about a body without thinking its extension

[Anonymous No.17329574]

>>17328376
well some sources say he liked to dress fancy, go to parties and play ball.
billards that is.