[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 645 KB, 995x1759, frogposter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17322028 No.17322028 [Reply] [Original]

Why doesn't this retarded spammer ever get banned? Are there any books about jannies not doing their work?

>> No.17322035

>>17322028
Abolition of Work by Bob Black

>> No.17322047

worthless thread exhibit #1: >>17320443

>> No.17322052

A plague of frogs
>>/lit/?task=search2&ghost=&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=_91408619_55df76d5-2245&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post

>> No.17322109

>>17322052
people really underestimate how easy it is to clean up this place. poster quality is pareto distributed, just getting rid of a handful of these obnoxious spamming frogposters would be enough to improve this board tenfold

>> No.17322111
File: 145 KB, 500x499, qa7n9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17322111

>>17322028
Why? All of his questions are legitimate.

>> No.17322122

>>17322028
better questions than you're asking

>> No.17322132

>>17322109
the funny thing is jannies actually manage to remove the good threads

>> No.17322165

I love the random thread spammers. Provides an insight into the workings of their mind.

>how important is have sex to be great writer
>is there an afterlife
>am i a pseud

>> No.17322187

>>17322028
Can't remember the last time a frogposter made a good thread.

>> No.17322196

>>17322028
>Are you a sex haver or a non sex haver
Well? Which one are you?

>> No.17322210

>>17322196
How can you have non-sex? Is it even possible to possess a privation?

>> No.17322286

>>17322028
people are faggots, and jannies remind you this fact.

>> No.17322453

>>17322028
i've been wanting to ask that question about sex but more generally, how important is it to not be *psychologically deficient* to write something specifically **beautiful**?
I think i'm an aspie or an autist and an incel too and never had a romance and am too old now to have one, so just how fucked am i?
i haven't been wanting to make a thread to ask it cause it would rightfully be seen as a shitpost but im dead serious, can a deficient person write good literature?

>> No.17322679
File: 109 KB, 1600x900, 1607990265140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17322679

>>17322109
what's wrong with frogs?

>> No.17322689

>>17322453
Most good writers are deficient

>> No.17322698

>>17322210
It's not so much non-sex as wei wu wei sex, if that clears it up.

>> No.17322705

>>17322689
but what if i want to write beautifully? you know like poetry and stuff, i mean william blake had sex and a wife and realistically every other author i know of that uses beautiful prose was a sex haver
do you know of any that wasn't?

>> No.17322729

>>17322705
Wasn't Goethe a volcel?

>> No.17322740

>>17322729
goethe was married wtf

>> No.17322823

>>17322705
Nietzsche wrote some good poetry

>> No.17323552

>>17322679
psyop