[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 21 KB, 200x310, 567610 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17303664 No.17303664 [Reply] [Original]

Do I have to re-read it and apply the rules of analytical reading?
Also, has the field of educational psychology progressed since then?

>> No.17303691

>>17303664
A lot, anon. This book is definitely not optimal by today standards. But still works, so whatever. And anons have allergies to textbooks.

>> No.17303697

>>17303664
The field probably not but you should develop your metaphysics prior to an educational psychology or literary theory

>> No.17303702

>>17303691
So what is ideal nowadays?
any recs

>> No.17303709

>>17303691
Educational psychology by definition has done nothing except make studies which change nothing. The trivium-quadrivium split is miles ahead of "if you eat corn flakes 30 minutes before a test and blink twice your grade could go up 0.035 points".

>> No.17303715

>>17303664
How do I read this book bros?

>> No.17303716

>>17303664
this book is a troll. nobody follows the full rigors it prescribes. it's a joke.

>> No.17303727
File: 470 KB, 994x768, 1601875783071.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17303727

>>17303716
Because it doesn't align w their metaphysics. My ethics follow naturally from myself because it only helps.

>>17303715
Saved from other thread

>> No.17303737

>>17303702
I don't. I did read a book named "How to read Philosophy," but it is in Portuguese. It is definitely better than the chapter about that on that book and I think it is almost the same size. There are some other stuff too, I usually notice that on textbooks, anon. If you 'meta-read' modern Psychology textbooks they are easy to spot. So there must be a better book about such things.