Books on the Sexual Revolution.

[Anonymous No.17288317]

I have seen it referenced in many things I've read and I think its worth a closer reading. What books are redpilling on the Sexual Revolution, from what it seems its role was to destroy the roots and traditions of Western society.

[Anonymous No.17288767]

>>17288317
it didn't happen, any social "revolution" is just us catching up with our technological society

[Anonymous No.17288928]

It was a femcel uprising

[Anonymous No.17289264]

>>17288317
Screwball Asses if you want a look into the start of queer theory and how anticapitalistic the gay rights movement was in theory.

[Anonymous No.17290985]

Bump

[Anonymous No.17291007]

>>17288317
>what it seems its role was to destroy the roots and traditions of Western society.
i.e.. I want books to confirm my incel worldview that le ebil gommunism is the reason I can't have sex

[Anonymous No.17292740]

>>17291007
seethe degenerate

[Anonymous No.17292766]

>>17292740
Have sex.

[Anonymous No.17292775]

>>17292766
I have a Gf so your insult is redundant. You're a slave to your vices, its not too late to free yourself anon

[Anonymous No.17292777]

>>17291007
have sex incel

[Anonymous No.17292804]

>>17288317
You'll definitely want Sexual Utopia in Power and Adam and Eve After the Pill
>>17291007
Cope

[Anonymous No.17292819]

>>17288317
Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control

[Anonymous No.17292828]

>>17292819
Any good places to buy this for a decent price?

[Anonymous No.17292829]

Theodore Dalrymple's Life at the Bottom and any of his essay books really
Unlike other writers against the sexual revolution who approach it from a theoretical perspective involving interviews and "experts", he is an actual witness testimony of the disaster caused by the sexual revolution

[Anonymous No.17292917]

>>17292828
The author has been recently banned from Amazon because pointing out who some of the people behind Sexual Liberation were is “antisemitic” according to the ADL.
You will have to buy it directly from his website fidelitypress.com
Check out some of his talks to give you an idea on what he is about:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Z7UQs1ZCgTS/
https://youtu.be/YTjEeg6AmCw

[Anonymous No.17292981]

All you need to know is ordinary men didn't get it.

[Anonymous No.17293359]

Lot49

[Anonymous No.17293362]

>>17292828
the pdf is everywhere

[Anonymous No.17293430]

Entertainment for Atheists and women is just sex and crime stories.

This is because atheists and women have morality beyond hedonism, but still have the deep desire to see themselves and being told that they are virtuous. However, hedonists know that they are subhumans, and since nobody tell them that they are righteous, they are addicted to stories about sex and crimes which go wrong, in order to 1/ comment and gossip on the character's decisions, 2/ feel superior to the characters.

Don't forget that atheists and women are natural born schizophrenic so they dont have nay critical thinking in their lizard brain. IE they actually survive by being sex and drug addicts because they see nothing wrong with building a narrative in their little heads were they pass as righteous.

This is why also in atheism, the society is build on commentaries, by editors, journalists and the plebs, and the topics are female centered, ie about sex.

[Anonymous No.17293485]

>>17293430

[Anonymous No.17293497]

>>17293430
>atheists are natural born schizophrenic
Your post was very insightful overall. Why did you go full retard here?

[Anonymous No.17293506]

>>17293430
In a world divided between theistic enthusiasts and secularist depressives there is little patience for the atheist who nurtures a passionate hatred for God. The mixture of naturalism and blasphemy that characterizes the Sadean text occupies the space of our blindness, to which Bataille’s writings are not unreasonably assimilated. If there is contradiction here it is one that is coextensive with the unconscious; the consequence of a revolt incommensurate with the ontological weight of its object. That God has wrought such loathesomeness without even having existed only exacerbates the hatred pitched against him. An atheism that does not hunger for God’s blood is an inanity, and the anaemic feebleness of secular rationalism has so little appeal that it approximates to an argument for his existence. What is suggested by the Sadean furore is that anyone who does not exult at the thought of driving nails through the limbs of the Nazarene is something less than an atheist; merely a disappointed slave

[Anonymous No.17293538]

>>17288317
>Roots and traditions of Western society?
What are you talking about, can you specifically tell us what you mean by this, I'm genuinely curious. Is it Christianity? You a lil Jesus boy? A cock sucker of God? Or maybe you think it's pagan cultures! Yes revive... retvrn. Which? What do you want - is what I'm asking. What don't you ulike about the Sexual Revolution? Is it that sex=bad? Sex outside of marriage equal bad? New Age hippy shit? Or is it anti trad not basedpill libshits? What Adorno had to do with this - I do not know. I'm unsure. Maybe read like, uh, Vedic scripture? Yeah. Do that, learn Sankskrit. Greeks were faggots, (cocks went inside arseholes), and you ideally should avoid that - to remain based and tradpilled, so to speak - so i think you should learn sanskrit.

[Anonymous No.17293553]

>>17293538
The meds, man, the meds. Take them.

[Anonymous No.17293583]

>>17288317
Not so much about the Sexual Revolution, but there is a book about the moral decline of the West written by Robert Bork called "Slouching Towards Gomorrah" that you will likely enjoy.

[Anonymous No.17294179]

>>17288317
Look in to stuff by Stephen Baskerville.

[Anonymous No.17294408]

>>17288317
>single motherhood goes through the roof
>with this many children are now growing up impoverished
western society status: absolutely trolled

[Anonymous No.17294457]

>>17288317
> I DEMAND THE RIGHT TO KILL BABIES

[Anonymous No.17294681]

I've been asking myself this a lot: why don't people ask for the right to kill babies, let's say, before they are 3 months old since they don't have selfconsciousness already? Murder is to kill another person. A person is a rational individual of the human species, and I believe this is only attainable through selfconsciousness. Therefore, I should ask for rhe right to kill a baby before it becomes a person.

[Anonymous No.17294739]

>>17294681
because others capable of rational thought say that it's bad to, or because I want to live and wouldn't have liked getting killed as a 3 month old so I'd grant others the same. Or just societal contract theory