The Coming Insurrection

[Anonymous No.17229024]

Have you marxists of /lit/ read this? What do you think?

[Anonymous No.17229056]

>>17229024
I hope they keep reading

[Anonymous No.17229064]

>>17229056
they need to unironically read Guenon

[Anonymous No.17229095]

>>17229024

Julien Coupat and all his idiot jew friends have a very peevish, annoying style which is also on full display throughout Tiqqun. That they predicted 2020 is not to their credit.

[Anonymous No.17229139]

>>17229024
My opinion is that it’s basically the weakest attempt at articulating a version of ‘communization theory’ in the wave of attempts that have gone during the 21st century.

I’d point towards the work in End Notes as being generally stronger and more carefully thought out version of that sort of ultra left current.

[Anonymous No.17229176]

Published in 2007, has the insurrection come yet?

[Anonymous No.17229202]

>>17229024
I feel like so much current post-left/ultra left anarchism is just re-inventing the wheel from Marx or Stirner

[Anonymous No.17229213]

Worthless. Marxism-Leninism already has all the theoretical answers we need. The only issue with MLism is in MLs not MLism as such.

[Anonymous No.17229236]

>>17229213
>Marxism-Leninism already has all the theoretical answers we need
Marxism is just seculuarization of Christinity; theory that is in fact unprovable theology. The defeat of communism by the democratic revolutions of 1989 ended that non-sense of ever. Only retards and pinkos push that commie non-sense. If anything, we need white terror against people calling themselves marxism-leninists

[Anonymous No.17229249]

>>17229024
Jokes on you, I can't read

[Anonymous No.17229253]

>>17229176
Yeah, I don't think it is.

[Anonymous No.17229273]

>>17229213
This. There's even a French marxist who wrote a pamphlet to mock them called "I feel it coming" (Je sens que ça vient, ed. Delga) lmao

[Anonymous No.17229280]

>>17229024
"the invisible committee" is just the pseudonym of the publishers, who effortlessly string together commie nonsense and then shill it heavily to keep their failing business afloat in case MIT doesn't bail them out

[Anonymous No.17229283]

>>17229213
but Hitler refuted Marxism-Leninism

[Anonymous No.17229312]

>>17229283
was that before, or after, the Red Army conquered Berlin?

[Anonymous No.17229325]

>>17229312
After the Lend-Lease program

[Anonymous No.17229337]

>>17229283
No, Reagan did

[Anonymous No.17229350]

>>17229283
No, but these people certainly did

[Anonymous No.17229356]

>>17229213
>Marxism-Leninism-Maoism already has all the theoretical answers we need.
FTFY

[Anonymous No.17229363]

>>17229337
you mean Osama?

[Anonymous No.17229803]

>>17229024
es muy bueno

[Anonymous No.17229993]

>>17229176

The sequel "To Our Friends" explicitly claims vindication in terms of the then-current Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street protests. Given 2020 yesterday, it is difficult not to see this cancer everywhere. t. live in central Minneapolis

[Anonymous No.17230893]

>>17229024
>marxists of /lit/
more like tourists from bunkerchan

[Anonymous No.17231248]

>>17229024
>marxists
>marxists of lit

[Anonymous No.17231371]

>>17229350
I saw this guy twice IRL, last time in 1982.

[Anonymous No.17231390]

The Raw Material for a Theory of the Young Girl is much better, and would get much more love here on /lit/.

[Anonymous No.17231705]

>>17229024
Kinda cute. But felt very shallow and utopian. It reads like it was for outsiders who aren't really following the current political economic debates or really understand working class hegemony

[Anonymous No.17231712]

>>17231705
Try >>17231390

[Anonymous No.17231715]

who /marxistsfortrump/ here

[Anonymous No.17231718]

>>17231390
I skimmed this, maybe a decade ago? I think it was a critique of marketing that felt sexist and flip. better is studying the cultural logic of neoliberalism more generally, or how the labour process reproduces itself, instead of getting caught up in sort of a gendered understanding of consumerism.

[Anonymous No.17231720]

>>17231718
but actually I read it awhile ago lol so maybe it was better than I remember :-)

[Anonymous No.17231723]

>>17229024
What did you think of it Op? Didn't the author's try to sabotage a commuter train in France at some point?

[Anonymous No.17231735]

>>17231718
>in sort of a gendered understanding of consumerism.

I mean, it's a hard pitch to sell but the 'girl'/gender aspect of it isn't entirely relevant. They explain as much in the intro that the steroetypical spiky haired clubbing man is just as much a 'Young Girl.' 'Jeune Fille' was meant more as an archetype. I think, while, a bit repetitive after the first half, the fragments are interesting bits of true criticism at the crossroads of Marxism and anti-globalism.

[Anonymous No.17231754]

>>17231735
I'll check it out again. Was it calling out consoomer NPCs?

[Anonymous No.17231766]

>>17231754
>Was it calling out consoomer NPCs

There is no such thing as NPCs, so no.