/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17209858]

Thoughts on this?

[Anonymous No.17209878]

>>17209858
KYS

[࿇ C Œ M G E N V S ࿇ !KNDYv0apRY No.17209893]

«MIGHT IS RIGHT» FOR ZOOMERS, AND DUMBER.

[Anonymous No.17209898]

>>17209858
Okay, kind of forgettable, but gets lots of points for making all the right people seethe (e.g. cum genius).

[Anonymous No.17209955]

>>17209858
If you're looking for a term to describe the trendy revival of reactionary vitalism, Ernst Bloch knocks it out of the park with "complete Tarzan philosophy" (from The Principle of Hope, Vol. 1)

[Anonymous No.17210124]

>>17209858
I enjoyed it. What he said about growing up in “owned space” resonated with me a lot. Also, the broken english is underrated as a literary device.

[Anonymous No.17210144]

>>17209858
BTFO'd by dialectics god Ted Metrakas/@FredNietzky
https://tknk.io/pHOi

[Anonymous No.17210151]

>>17209955
What's that mean? I've read through that chapter and it just seems like psychobabble.

[Anonymous No.17210164]

its a meme for stupid people and chuds

[Anonymous No.17210173]

>>17210164
Good boy, you've repeated the training perfectly. Here's a treat.

[Anonymous No.17210214]

>>17210151
It’s peak pseud. Just name drop a bunch of people and terms, never staying or explaining one for too long

[Anonymous No.17210225]

>>17209858
again with this thread. It's a fun read, check out his podcast, fuck off

[Anonymous No.17210236]

>>17210214
That's all I got. It reads like a rushed undergraduate essay, occasionally a clear idea seems to form and then vanishes as soon as it's introduced. Is all continental philosophy like this?

[Anonymous No.17210288]

I just finished it a couple days ago. The first 3 parts are pretty good. Obviously some of it is just edgy memery, but overall I find him to be well read and interesting.
>>17210124
I agree, when I read that it reminded me of all the times I felt rage at the sight of a fence between myself and an open space.

[Anonymous No.17210298]

Nietzscheism for CHUDs

[Anonymous No.17210313]

>>17209893
lol this

[Anonymous No.17210389]

>>17209858
this is how continental philosophy is meant to be done: fun and poetic, not abstruse and academicised

[Anonymous No.17210436]

found it fairly boring desu

[Anonymous No.17210458]

>>17210288
There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me,
A sign was painted, said: Private Property,
But on the back side it didn’t say nothing,
This land was made for you and me.

[Anonymous No.17210627]

If it was just the fact that I disagreed with the “politics” of this book, the score wouldn’t be so slow. The author, either a 20-something year old repressed man child who is probably gay but hates that fact about himself, decides that everyone who isn’t white, male, or in shape, is basically an animal and deserves death. The author also thinks that it’s a great idea to not write proper sentences. But the best thing about this vomit of words is that it’s just a large collection of “high-brow” words that don’t even make a point. Like I said, if it was just that I didn’t agree (which with his racist and homophobic points I clearly don’t agree) this book wouldn’t be a problem. He makes basically zero points by wasting your time reading the trash while throwing in alt-right internet terms of hate. Avoid at all costs if you have a life, read on if you hate yourself and want to read nothing of substance. Ps. The author would do well to get some therapy.

[Anonymous No.17210636]

>>17210298
>Oh no, not le CHUD's!

[Anonymous No.17210641]

>>17210636
Chud detected. Have sex.

[Anonymous No.17210672]

>>17210641
More sex than you lol. Girls dont get wet from the fact that you voted for Biden

[Anonymous No.17210696]

Why do chuds get so mad when you call them that? They always reply to that word. It’ll probably happen to this post. Chud. Try to resist

[Anonymous No.17210722]

>>17210696
>Why do chuds get so mad when you call them that? They always reply to that word. It’ll probably happen to this post. Chud. Try to resist

[Anonymous No.17210733]

>>17209858
isn't the author a literal pole smoking queer?

[Anonymous No.17210745]

>>17210733
No?

[Anonymous No.17210747]

>>17210733
Do these look like the rosy cheeks and soft eyes of a homosexual to you?

[Anonymous No.17210808]

>>17210747
>i will never get ravaged by this CHUD
it really hurts bunkersisters

[Anonymous No.17210869]

>>17210808
Turns out he has an undergrad math degree from MIT and Doctorate from Yale. If anything doxxing him strengthened his credentials

[Anonymous No.17211776]

>>17210636
NGL am impressed how easy out-CHUD Nietzsche be
ps. nice selfie

[Anonymous No.17211801]

>>17211776
I think this book really triggers you because it contends that men aren't equal, and you turn up relatively low on the distribution of value

[Anonymous No.17211901]

Self-help for right wing guys

[Anonymous No.17211927]

>>17210627
You will never be a woman.

[Anonymous No.17211958]

>>17210124
"Life, at its most basic, is struggle for mastery of space" probably his best idea in the book, but part four and its woman hating are a good second
>>17210164 hey I'm both of those things and I loved it
>>17210225 its a very fun book, his podcast is not as fun for me, the michael anton review was a great summary of the book for normies
>>17210627 " """therapy""" will improve anybody" opinion discarded

[Anonymous No.17212007]

>>17211801
post body

[Anonymous No.17212013]

>>17211958
I really enjoy his podcast personally. The episodes about Venice and All Castes are Racial are my personal favorites. He also has a really good rundown on the civil violence in Argentina in the 70's. Its a lot different from the book so I get why its not everyone's cuppa

[Anonymous No.17212017]

>>17210722
wow you actually did it

[Anonymous No.17212150]

>>17212017
Dilate

[Anonymous No.17212342]

>>17212013
This

I didn't like the podcast initially, his fake accent and mannerisms were dumb and off-putting. But after a few eps I got into it, it's a very good show for book recommendations. The most recent ep featured segments from Beyond Good and Evil that genuinely helped me understand it better, sometimes Nietzsche is much clearer when read aloud

[Anonymous No.17212561]

>>17210627
>everyone who isn’t white, male, or in shape, is basically an animal and deserves death
You are literally making shit up

>it’s just a large collection of “high-brow” words that don’t even make a point.
It is more impressionistic than normal “philosophy” and obviously tongue in cheek to some extent.

>homophobic points I clearly don’t agree
I didn’t find it homophobic at all. I know several gay people who would strongly agree with his view of why homosexuality happens. Just because something deviates from the mainstream narrative on identity politics, it doesn’t make it a phobia.

[Anonymous No.17213187]

Meme book for zoomers with some funny lines.

[Anonymous No.17213379]

[Anonymous No.17213417]

>>17212561
>>17211958
>>17211927
I guess "score" didn't give it away?

[Anonymous No.17213805]

>>17212561
>>17211927

This is from Amazon Review of the book

[Anonymous No.17213821]

>>17213379
Is that Nick Mullen?

[Anonymous No.17213982]

>>17213379
what does Nick Mullen even believe in? Is it just Gen X nihilism?

[Anonymous No.17213992]

Look what a disgusting place /lit/ has become.

[Anonymous No.17214018]

>>17213982
He's made bank by having irony as his entire personality

He's in good shape but he's literally the opposite of what BAP promotes, no wonder he hates it

[Anonymous No.17214032]

>>17214018
CAn you elaborate more on this? I use to think BAP had views sort of similar to Mishima like the "pro-violence" one but lately he just seems more like a traditional conservative with the veneer of wacky fringe internet right wing racism and muscles

No clue what Mullen believes or how it differs

[Anonymous No.17214289]

>>17210733
You decide

[Anonymous No.17214373]

>>17213982
He has some vaguely libertarian and some democratic socialist views, but has contempt for anyone who takes a solid stance or cares about anything like that too much.

[Anonymous No.17214383]

>>17213417
>>17213805
kek. got me

[Anonymous No.17214389]

>>17209893
what makes someone like this?

[Anonymous No.17214708]

>>17210747
this man has "gay face"

didn't he go to school with jim from the office?

[Anonymous No.17215983]

>>17214289
lmao

[Anonymous No.17216722]

>>17213982
>what does Nick Mullen even believe in? Is it just Gen X nihilism?
I don't know why he would considering he's a millennial.

[Anonymous No.17216726]

>>17215983
>he discover photo
is he ESL?

[Anonymous No.17216745]

>>17216726
Technically yes, but he's fluent in English and has been since childhood. The caveman speak is a pseud filter (as he explains in his book; as these threads always demonstrate, it works).

I think that at some level it also probably helps put more stuff in tweets. Twitter is garbage and I'm hoping it dies after Zrumph leaves office, of course.

[Anonymous No.17216811]

>>17209858
He quite obviously ripped the majority of the book from wikipedia and thinks "slav with ESL prose making fun of the le peabrained academic philosophers" gimmick is supposed to be entertaining but if your IQ is above 100 it's very transparent that it's just a dishonest copout. His sub-90IQ underage followers will likely eat it up though.

[Anonymous No.17216851]

>>17216745
>i was only pretending to be retarded
at least it's good marketing, because morons believe it (as these threads always demonstrate, it works)

[Anonymous No.17216874]

>>17209858
Right wing twitter repackaged as a book
Exactly the reason poltards have been shitting up lit with it for months now

[Anonymous No.17217681]

>>17209858
it's kino

[Anonymous No.17217758]

>>17215983
>>17217681
these people are no better than teenage "influencers" and tiktokers
fucking pathetic homosexuals

[Anonymous No.17217773]

>>17210144
>https://tknk.io/pHOi
This was a good review I thought, thank you anon.

[Anonymous No.17217836]

>>17217758
Seethe

[Anonymous No.17217853]

>>17217681
wtf I love wrestle-fuckers now?

[Anonymous No.17218106]

>>17210641
>Chud detected. Have sex.

[Anonymous No.17218202]

>>17217758
Be more secure.

[Anonymous No.17218223]

>>17216851
Well, looks like the only way to find out is to read the book. It's on libgen, and is short.

[Anonymous No.17218241]

>>17218223
Are you seriously saying that I have to read a book before having an opinion on it?

[Anonymous No.17218271]

>>17218241
Yes.

[Anonymous No.17218296]

>>17217853
still not enough for me, boring cunt got cut for a reason

[Anonymous No.17218379]

>>17210696
Nooooooooooooo

[Stoner Thread No.17218447]

>>17210173
based!

[Anonymous No.17218509]

>>17216726
People really cant tell he's doing that for a laugh?

[Anonymous No.17219120]

>>17213379
wow so randum and edgy XD i wanna be a kike brooklyn kid now

[Anonymous No.17219521]

>>17217758
This, Mishima, this guy, Evola, these retards worship either repressed homosexuals, actual faggots or absolute cowards.

[Anonymous No.17219685]

>>17219521
homosocial!=homosexual
reeee

[Anonymous No.17219734]

>>17209858
Pretty funny book, podcast is better.

[Anonymous No.17220125]

>>17210164
>>17210627
>>17210641
>>17210298
>>17217758
>>17219521
>>17216851

[Anonymous No.17220141]

>>17209858
Someone rip his podcast and poast it
I will not pay him a single penny

[Anonymous No.17220611]

>>17219521
>these retards worship either repressed homosexuals, actual faggots or absolute cowards
this is just projection anon, none of the writings you mentioned are any of those things, evola is really influential in perrenial philosophy.

[Anonymous No.17220635]

>>17210144
>naturalistic fallacy
stopped reading there

[Anonymous No.17220838]

>>17216726
Well, he did discover photo.

[Anonymous No.17220851]

>>17219521
Where did you get Mishima from in all of that? lol

[Anonymous No.17221220]

>>17209858
Its very white pilling. He definitely has a more Mediterranean perspective with his focus on aesthetics and arts. Some really goods points on younger males and their lack of masculinity. It's a short read and we'll worth it if you're tired of the normal right wing banter.