[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 41 KB, 128x199, 1C8CAA6F-07E9-4274-B6B9-A6DC471D0E29.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17208902 No.17208902 [Reply] [Original]

>Anamnesis
what other philosophers talk about this? I think it's fundamentally right, and probably most agree, that knowledge comes from within, I have felt this, in a very obvious and exaggerated way, many times. But I kinda want to read something with more refined labels or conceptualizations.
Any suggestions?

>> No.17208914

>>17208902
>But I kinda want to read something with more refined labels or conceptualizations.
>Any suggestions?
Why do you need to read about it? Can't you just summon up the knowledge since it "comes from within"?

>> No.17208926

>>17208914
I need to be remembered duh

>> No.17208963

>>17208926
Sounds like a cope.

>> No.17208978

schelling also holds this view, cant fully remember where he talkd about it but i think its in the first outline to a system of nature

>> No.17209271

>>17208963
it's more like you read something, but it doesn't mean shit until you figure it out, thus words that didn't have a meaning gain a meaning that (you) put in them, and then as the concept expands it's made completely (you)rs

>> No.17209789

>>17208902
you would hate to hear that the french post structuralist are actually newplatonists