/lit/ Board Discussion

[Anonymous No.17159798]

not sure why the last one was deleted. hm. no worry, here’s a replacement.

[Anonymous No.17159806]

I have seen more tripfags than usual lately too.

[Anonymous No.17159809]

>>17159798
Enforce this rule and ban people not respecting it:
>If you want to discuss history, religion, or the humanities, go to /his/. If you want to discuss politics, go to /pol/. Philosophical discussion can go on either /lit/ or /his/, but those discussions of philosophy that take place on /lit/ should be based around specific philosophical works to which posters can refer.
No image in the OP, or they are all marked as spoiler automatically
At least 300 characters in the OP
Ban "book for this feel" threads
Ban "book that explain this" threads
Ban thot posters
Ban people who mass reply with "based" or "cringe"
Ban underage faggots
Ban /pol/tards
Permaban anyone posting about e-celebs
Permaban anons that make twitter threads

[Nekkidbopperman !!SNo6ON4Oa6/ No.17159816]

thanks bro

[Anonymous No.17159828]

>>17159809
I’m actually okay with the 300 word criteria. Would at least filter the ‘What am I in for?’ threads.

[Anonymous No.17159872]

>>17159816
Oh look honey a new one.

[Anonymous No.17159892]

Last one: >>/lit/thread/17158235

[Anonymous No.17159898]

>>17159828
You could just filter the what am I in for threads retard.

[F. Gardner, MFA, BA (Hons.) - (...) No.17159902]

>>17159806
yeah they get annoying.

[Anonymous No.17159905]

The jannies don’t want you to find out about this

[Bret !!TofYfxGwckt No.17159910]

>>17159872
A new what?

[Anonymous No.17159914]

>>17159809
>If you want to discuss politics, go to /pol/
This rule needs to go. News and current event shit, sure but meaningful discussion around political philosophy is anathema to /pol/, and any such thread would just get bumped off before anyone even had time to write out a thoughtful comment.

[Anonymous No.17159918]

What is your home board ? (if you didn't end up directly on /lit/ on your first time here)
How and why did you end up coming on /lit/ ?

[Anonymous No.17159932]

>>17159809
>At least 300 characters in the OP
Some threads don’t need this much.
>Ban "book for this feel" threads
>Ban "book that explain this" threads
Why? What’s wrong with people getting book recommendations?
>Ban thot posters
Yes
>Ban people who mass reply with "based" or "cringe"
Based
>Ban underage faggots
Yes
>Ban /pol/tards
Too broad, but I get the sentiment.
>Permaban anyone posting about e-celebs
Too broad, for example BAM is literature and he discusses literature, but it is true the that there is plenty of e-celeb garbage here.

[Anonymous No.17159945]

>>17159905
> Implying the rest of the threads about nazi germany or white supremacy didn't go apeshit
Bias of moderation is an interesting subject but your pic isn't relevant

[Anonymous No.17159952]

>>17159905
Because they want to hide how based they are?

[Anonymous No.17159985]

>>17159905
50/100 is better than 0/100

[Anonymous No.17159987]

>>17159952
>Waaaah stop saying things I don't like
>Based

[Anonymous No.17159998]

>>17159898
True
>>17159910
Trip
>>17159918
Back in the day it was /b/. This was around 2011. Then /r9k/ circa 2014. Then /pol/ around.
Then it was all /x/. I started going to there just to read the pastas, came here around 2018. Halfway finished my first manuscript, a novel. bringing together a magazine. /lit/ is the most interactive board.

[Anonymous No.17160007]

>>17159918
/k/ and /out/

[Anonymous No.17160033]

How similar is /his/ to /lit/?

[Anonymous No.17160043]

>>17159914
make thread on Rousseau or Schmitt or someone similar and they wont be deleted. But shit threads that just say 'liberalism has failed' aren't literature, they aren't political philosophy, and they deserve to get deleted.

[Anonymous No.17160128]

>>17159918
Former /mu/tant of yore, /lit/ is my home now. I like discussing things but even in its heyday /mu/ could never really discuss stuff

[Anonymous No.17160153]

>>17159809
Name a bigger janny cocksucker then this. People that cry for censorship need to be permanently banned

[Anonymous No.17160164]

>>17160128
/mu/ seems like a hostile board. like more than most.

[Anonymous No.17160190]

>>17159809
eat a log of shit bruh

[Anonymous No.17160197]

>>17159809
The only people who disagree with this are the ones who would be kept out

[Anonymous No.17160262]

>>17160153
Seriously anyone who says the problem is not enough moderation needs to go back.

[Nick d No.17160314]

>>17159806
I'm going to start trip posting under this name

[Anonymous No.17160331]

>>17159798
filter "pseud"
filter "midwit"
filter "IQ"

[Anonymous No.17160335]

Stop letting butterfly flaunt the signature/avatar rule.

We know who she is. We have been watching her skirt the signature rule, and now post using a fugly pink avatar, and yet she is still allowed to post with her trip.

Why is she not perma-banned already?

[Anonymous No.17160346]

>>17160164
Kinda. Its biggest problem is irony. You can sense it's filled with teenagers because everyone writes in that way. Might be my bias but it seems a larger portion of /lit/ is genuine

[Anonymous No.17160381]

>>17160033
/his/ sucks ass, full of boomer tier ww2 armchair general types and eu4 players. Not much scope of knowledge, focus on specific events and factoids/anecdotes rather than overarching ideas in history. Lots of people that will disregard contemporary scholarship completely and are only interested in events in history that affirm their worldview.
/lit/ also sucks ass, too much focus on edgy 20th century novelists and russians. not enough discussion of poetry especially. 4chan also needs a philosophy containment board.

The similarity is that they both suck ass

>>17159918
from /out/ originally, also a shit board
I need to leave this site desu but I'm hooked in the whole pleasure loop thing and don't have anything else to do with my free time other than read

[Anonymous No.17160386]

>>17159918
Either /lit/ or /tv/ (/film/), I'm not 100% which came first. Still the only two I sometimes visit.

[Anonymous No.17160420]

This thread was moved to >>>/qa/3751438