[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 26 KB, 600x315, 1607457569582.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17139549 No.17139549 [Reply] [Original]

The results are in:

https://pastebin.com/s9quypZZ

Since I don't have MS Paint, I'm not making a chart, but anyone who wants to is welcome to

>> No.17139578

>>17139549
Same old, same old. The amount of votes outside the top 10 is embarrassing

>> No.17139582

>>17139549
> de Assis on the top 100
Holy shit

>> No.17139638

Thanks, hopefully someone will come through with a chart. Indeed, the top is the expected /lit/ stuff, but overall it's a good and at points interesting list - with less reason to complain than the other list (unsurprisingly doing novels-only cuts out 99% of meme picks).

>> No.17139691

Quick correction: To the Lighthouse got 5 votes, not 4

>> No.17139729

>>17139549
Okay we got rid of meme books, but can we also remove all female authors? I think it still counts as trolling, we need a higher bar for quality.

>> No.17139734

Does anyone know what happened to the all books (not just novels) chart? Did that guy post again?

>> No.17139758

>>17139729
culling all anglo authors would be a better idea desu

>> No.17139769

>>17139734
>>17138338
the original op dipped tho and the chart is being hotly debated/contested.

>> No.17139771

>>17139734
Apparently, no, and some retard got the Google docs link and went ahead and made a chart without first figuring out how to properly process the data, much less updating the count data.

>> No.17139777

>>17139758
Why not both?

>> No.17139889

>>17139638
I'll try, but you did a shit job at setting a cutoff point. It's more a Top 114 than a Top 100.

>> No.17139913

>>17139889
Look at the number of votes retard

>> No.17139917
File: 1005 KB, 1456x3482, lit top 100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17139917

>>17139549
> 2 C & P
> Stoner > Ulysses
> half the votes of 2016 poll

tfw you were here before the great exodus

>> No.17139954 [DELETED] 

Two corrections from OP: To the Lighthouse got 5 votes, not 4, and Gargantua and Pantagruel got 6 votes, not 4

New list: https://pastebin.com/8D2mkyeY

>> No.17139960

>>17139913
spots 79 - 114 all have 4 votes; how would you make the cutoff?

>> No.17139974

>>17139954
The Death of Virgil is twice on the list (93 and 108).

>> No.17140002

>>17139917
you're right, these charts, moreso than being a 'beginners guide to /lit/-type resouce, mostly serve as a way of tracking how the userbase changes over the years. and the results are pretty depressing.

>> No.17140007

Fixed

Anons, please consult this list:
https://pastebin.com/w61KcK2J

>> No.17140013

Make it top 50
too low votes at the end

>> No.17140037

>>17139960
The 14 I don't like get cut, obviously

>> No.17140046

>>17140002
also
>that huge surge for Dostoyevsky
all because of Peterson and you know it.

>> No.17140068

>>17140037
Look at this list, not the one in OP

https://pastebin.com/w61KcK2J

>> No.17140070

>>17140002
Exactly. The fact that people have stopped reading Ulysses and that the crowd who did apparently left, is just depressing

>> No.17140111

>>17140070
for what it's worth, I do appreciate that newfags are honest enough to vote for fotm books they have read and enjoyed instead of lying through their teeth and trying to fit in.

>> No.17140232

Ulysses was actually #6 with 37 votes, I made a mistake.

Updated list: https://pastebin.com/2JsbDPfw

>> No.17140545

Well, my Photoshop just crashed when I was around the top 16 spot, so let's restart this fucking shit, fucking hell.

>> No.17140562

>>17140545
be sure to use this list anon, not the one in the OP
https://pastebin.com/2JsbDPfw

>> No.17140601

>>17140545
be prepared to receive criticism for selecting ugly covers.

>> No.17140628

>The sailor who fell with grace from the sea
Anyone read this one? How do you even fall from the sea?

>> No.17140830

>>17140601
Not my first rodeo. For the 2014 chart I used as many first edition covers as I could find.
Now I'm picking somewhat representative covers that can be read at some level of zoom out. Doesn't matter if the publisher used the most beautiful oil painting if the title and author are tiny.

>> No.17140947

>>17140046
lmao stop giving your internet boogeymen too much credit

>> No.17141411

this list is way better

>> No.17141578

**** Please look at this list for the correct vote tally ****

https://pastebin.com/Rr8Sx4SV

>> No.17141623

>>17141578
Are you fucking serious? You can't just do a shitty count and change it 5 fucking times.

Say whatever the fuck's changed between the previous last one >>17140562 and this last one. I'm around the 40's. I'm not going to go over every single line to check whatever shitty number you had to fix. Fucking hell, use your damn brain.

>> No.17141669 [DELETED] 

>>17141623
Nothing changed, just remember that To the Lighthouse has 5 votes, not 4. Now stop being so pissy.

>> No.17141690

>>17141623
The only thing that changed is that To the Lighthouse has 5 votes, not 4. Bye.

>> No.17141706

>>17141623
You're removing the genreshit with 4 votes like Dune and Hitchhiker's, right?

>> No.17141990

>>17141706
Get rid of the women with 4 votes too please

>> No.17142014

>>17141990
fuck you

>> No.17142030

did you guys really read ulysses? this book is one big meme, why would you recommend it

>> No.17142039

>>17139549
I already saw the chart earlier today you spastic retard, stop making a million lists again because mein kampf was in the chart

>> No.17142086

For the 30 or so books with 4 votes, I'll re-sort the list alphabetically by book title, and the exceeding 13 will be on a list with a note, or maybe I'll add all of them with proper covers and shit in a smaller size or something. Depends on how big the collage will end up being.

>> No.17142101

>>17142086
Sounds like a good idea anon

>> No.17142141

>>17142030
> Ulysses is a meme
It's a masterpiece. Anyone serious about literature should read it

>> No.17142248

>>17139549
Does anyone have the top books read in 2020? It was specifically only works we read in 2020, though it was functionally another top 100 of the year one. I remember the results got posted by I forgot to screencap them. If anyone could help me out it would be much appreciated.

>> No.17142358

>>17142248
Check waruso. He posted the results but no one made a chart

>> No.17142397

>>17142248
>>17142358
>>/lit/thread/S16979368
A really good list

>> No.17142564

>>17142397
Oh thanks. Definitely a very nice list.

>> No.17142848

>>17142039
Not the same list, fucking retard samefag

>> No.17142916

>>17139549
How the fuck is The Bible not in any of these lists? I'd rather have the uncurated list with Mein Kampf at the top.

>> No.17142940

>>17142916
>Bible
>novel

>> No.17143362

>>17142916
Holy shit you people have a hard time reading

>> No.17143683

>>17139549
>https://pastebin.com/s9quypZZ
Though I'm sure a lot of people will shit on this, I actually think this is an interesting list. Thanks for compiling, OP. If you do a version next year maybe try to keep a thread alive and bumped for the polling period so as to get a more substantial sample size.

>> No.17143713

>>17139549
>Moby Dick number one
List discarded.

>> No.17144029

Alright, chartfag here. Almost done with the collage. Be uploading it soon.

>> No.17144334

>>17144029
Neat

>> No.17144480

Is it ex-/b/ ironic and unironic pedos memeing lolita that high? I mean really, better than don quixote? Fuck off.

>> No.17144491

>>17139549
>https://pastebin.com/s9quypZZ
Where the actual FUCK is 1Q84? Awful list

>> No.17144508
File: 3.35 MB, 2381x6000, Top100Novels_2020v1.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17144508

Here's the chart, finally.

Here's the PSD file in case someone wants to use it as a template or fix something in Photoshop (the zip also has a lossless PNG version of the chart which is about 12 MB):
>https://www.mediafire.com/file/lpdwmna7h1vwan4/Top100Novels_2020v1.0_pub.zip/file
mirror:
>https://files.catbox.moe/cfkmrc.zip

>> No.17144626

>>17144508
based, well done and good job

>> No.17144636

>>17144508
>he put the genreshit with 4 votes on the chart
anon, I...

>> No.17144703

>>17142039
This is the non brigaded chart.

>> No.17144712

>>17144703
This is actually a list of books in the category fiction - novels.

>> No.17144794

>>17144508
Nice chart

>> No.17145369

have a bump

>> No.17145835

>>17144508
>east of eden
>hemingway

you made a mistake there dude.

>> No.17145851
File: 49 KB, 645x773, 1554667414203.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17145851

>>17140002
>>17140070
Where did the great /lit/ go... so depressing....

>> No.17145934

>>17144508
Feel free to make a new thread for the chart

>> No.17146804

>>17144508
Too few votes to call it /lit/'s definitive all time list. What is the criteria for excluding books on 4 votes each?

>> No.17147036

>>17144508
you accidently wrote 13 under Flanders Road.

>> No.17147099

>>17145835
>>17147036
Will fix
>>17146804
Your inserted that "definitive" yourself.
"Of all times" so it's not confused with the top novels published IN 2020.
>What is the criteria for excluding books on 4 votes each?
Huh?

>> No.17147111

>Parade's End
How is it?

>> No.17147119

>>17139769
How do we stop the steal?

>> No.17147534

What happened Pynchonbro's????

>> No.17147588

>>17146804
>What is the criteria for excluding books on 4 votes each?
read the bottom of the image. Alphabetical