Living in the Kali Yuga

[Anonymous No.17137915]

do you read in the Kali Yuga to feel comfort inside or to become a man among the ruins?

[Anonymous No.17137922]

>>17137915
What?

[Anonymous No.17137937]

>>17137915
You can't refute cooming.

[Anonymous No.17137947]

>>17137915
Even whem I'm reading the most gritty, nihilistic fiction of the past I still feel better than when I come back to modern reality. Yes, yes, I probably wouldn't live to be 70 years old in ancient Greece, and indeed I probably wouldn't survive a month in a primitive environment. At least it had meaning.
The Kali Yuga will end after our lifetime, better to know what came before it and dream that what will came after it will be like the things we read. It's hopium and copium.
More people should be accelerationists

[Anonymous No.17137971]

>omg girls are dressing up and going out to clubs to dance and have sex, this must mean we are in a dark age.

[Anonymous No.17137975]

>>17137971
Yes.

[Anonymous No.17138003]

>>17137971
It’s only a dark age because of the darkening demographics

[Anonymous No.17138014]

>>17137915
>Kali Yuga
Retard spotted

[Anonymous No.17138060]

>>17137971

The following is a but a short list of features typical of the events in Kaliyuga according to the Ithihaas and purana:

1). People recklessly and mindlessly destroy trees or groves.
2). Everyone will lack discrimination as regards food: they will eat anything and everything.
3). Passing themselves off as saintly, nefarious people will indulge in trade and commercial activity. In the garb of saintliness and spirituality, avaricious people will concentrate on amassing wealth, and find wealth is the mark of a man’s worth in society.
4). In Kaliyuga, man finds friendship only in his wife, and he regards his in-laws as true relatives.
5). People with money and wealth will be considered persons of noble birth with good qualities. People in power will steer the course of justice in their favour.
6). Impecunious and penurious people, and those who are not given to bribery will be deprived of justice.
7). People will consider going on pilgrimage to far-off places more important than honouring and serving their parents.
8). Brahmins will do the work of sudras.
9). Brahmins will abstain from sacrifices and the study of Vedas.
10). People will stop making offerings to their ancestors.

11). Brahmins will start to eat anything (i.e., they become indiscriminate in their choices of food).
12). Men will become feeble, and will have shorter life span: They will lack energy and valour.
13). During Kaliyuga, women will use their mouths for copulation.
14). Under the burden of excess taxation, householders will turn into robbers.
15). In ashramas, brahmacharis will indulge in evil conduct and pander to the desires of the world. The ashrams will be full of show-offs who are experts in the art of living off the food of others.
16). When Kaliyuga degenerates even further, Dharmic people will have shorter life span.
17). People will sell goods with false weights. There will be a lot of deceit associated with trade.
18). Towards the end of Kaliyuga, the young ones will act like old people. The conduct that suits the young is seen in the old. The old will think like children, and young people will have the intelligence of the old.
19). In Kaliyuga, people abbreviate the truth; because of this harm done to the truth, lifespans are further shortened.
20). There will be a lot of intermarriages between people from different strata of society, and miscegenation becomes the order of the day. They will behave like sudras who are devoid of austerities and truth.

[Anonymous No.17138074]

>>17138060

21). Because of the shortage of cows, people will resort to drinking goat and sheep-milk.
22). In Kaliyuga, rules about what is to be eaten are transgressed.
23). Brahmins will not observe sacred vows but will criticize the Vedas. Deluded by logic they will give up worship and yajnas.
24). At the end of Kaliyuga, the world will be overtaken by mlechha conduct. There will be no rites and sacrifices. There will be unhappiness everywhere and no festivals will be celebrated.
25). Men will rob possessions of others, even that of widows.
26). Men will happily accept gifts given even by the evil.
27). When the end of Kaliyiga is near, the Kshatriyas will be the thorns in the flesh of the world. They will not protect others.
28). No one will ask for a girl’s hand in marriage; no one will duly give away a girl in marriage. When Kaliyuga is fully ripe, men and women will choose their spouses themselves.
29). Kings, discontented with what they possess, will use every means possible to steal the property of others.
30). When kaliyuga is fully advanced, one hand will steal from the other.

31). Cowards will take pride in their bravery and the brave will be immersed in depression like cowards.
32). During the final stages of Kaliyuga, there will be no Brahmins, Kshatriyas or Vaishyas left. At the end of Kaliyuga the world will have only one varna.
33). Wives will not tend to their husbands. Men and women will eat whatever they wish.
34). People will adorn themselves with the marks of a sadhu, i.e.. there will be profusion of fake sadhus.
35). (Cooked) food will be sold at all major thoroughfares. Note: According to manusmrti selling of cooked food is a sin; this is because everyone has a right to food, whether he has money or not).
36). When Kaliyuga is fully advanced, each will act as he wishes in the name of human rights.
37). Brahmins will be oppressed by Sudras and thus tormented by the former will wander all over the earth looking for protection.
38). Sudras will expound on Dharma, and the Brahmins will listen to their discourses and serve them. Everything in the world will be utterly upside down.
39). Discarding the gods, bones set into walls will be worshipped.
40). Men will be addicted to meat and liquor and will be weak in Dharma.

[Anonymous No.17138082]

>>17138074

41). Rains will come down at the wrong time.
42). Overcome by the burden of taxation, brahmins will flee in the ten directions.
43). Friends and relatives will act only out of love for wealth.
44). Women will be harsh and cruel in speech and will love to cry. They will not follow the words of their husbands.
45). Travelers in transit (guests) will ask for food and water but will not receive it. They will be refused shelter and will be forced to sleep on the roads.
46). People will leave their own countries and seek refuge in other countries, directions, regions, etc., and will roam around the world lamenting ‘Alas, father!’, ‘Alas, son.’
47). Mutual liking between the boy and girl, and not family pedigree or social status, etc., will be criterion for selecting a spouse.
48). Cheating will be the order of the day in business relations.
49). Sexual skill will be the criterion for excellence in men and women.
50). The only mark of evil will be poverty.

51). The one who can make a great display (of his austerities, occult powers etc.) will be considered the greatest sadhu.
52). Brushing one’s hair and dressing up will be considered as substitute for bath.
53). The highest purpose of life will be to fill one’s belly.
54). Maintenance of one’s family will be looked upon as the highest skill.
55). Dharma will be followed to gain fame.
56). There will be no rule in becoming a king. Any Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya or Sudra, depending on who is the most powerful at the time, will become the king. At that time, the rulers will be so greedy that there will not any difference between them and robbers.
57). Houses will be desolate because of the lack of chanting of Vedas and absence of guests.
58) In Kali-yuga the people will be sinful, short-lived, unfortunate, slow, and unintelligent.

[Anonymous No.17138430]

>>17137947
>More people should be accelerationists
It's pointless. The more you fuel evil the longer it's gonna last

[Anonymous No.17138437]

>>17137971
>Women have rights: check
>15 year old women have right to go to club have sex: check
>White women look like a bunch of trash that even muslims hate: Check
>People find normal girls and women having 59 boyfriends and sex partners before they reach 30: check
Yes it is the definition of Kali Yuga, not to mention the fact they are protected by jewish laws and jewish agencies

[Anonymous No.17138441]

I miss going to clubs :(

[Anonymous No.17138447]

>>17138437
>>People find normal girls and women having 59 boyfriends and sex partners before they reach 30: check
What's wrong with it?
inb4 non-answer

[Anonymous No.17138458]

>>17138441
>All I want is to have fun ^^
Nonsense

[Anonymous No.17138466]

>>17138447
>What's wrong with abnormality? OMG I can't understand people who find abnormal behavior abnormal!
Please stop being an american right now

[Anonymous No.17138482]

>>17138447
If women have more than a handful of sexual partners in their youth they lose the ability to pair-bond well.

[Anonymous No.17138485]

>>17137922
Neverread. Kys

[Anonymous No.17138493]

>>17138447
>What's wrong with it?
more pre-maritial sex = more divorce
more divorce = more single moms raising children
more single moms raising children = dysfunctional society, higher crime, less educational attainment etc (this is one of the primary causes of these issues in the American black community)

[Anonymous No.17138500]

>>17138458
It is fun. You should try it!

[Anonymous No.17138506]

>>17137947
>at least it had meaning
This is your brain on literature. Books have meaning, life doesn't. The present is where you live, so it looks meaningless. The past and the future only exist in books, so they look meaningful.

[Anonymous No.17138510]

>>17138493
>>17138482
incel cope
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.17138522]

>>17138510

>inb4 non-answer
>gets several factual answers
>incel!

You're looking like an idiot here

[Anonymous No.17138531]

>>17138466
>appeal to normality
Abstaining until marriage is abnormal in the West.

>>17138493
that's a correlation at best.

>>17138482
Okay, I don't believe you. Can you explain why at least?

[Anonymous No.17138541]

>>17138522
you have no facts, just incel ideology

[Anonymous No.17138546]

>>17138493
Wouldn't be an issue if people stopped having children. Antinatalist hedonism is the way to go.

[Anonymous No.17138547]

>>17138060
>>17138074
>>17138082
This is what zero pussy does to a nigga

[Anonymous No.17138554]

>>17138531
>that's a correlation at best.

What do you mean "at best"? That's correlation as objective and undeniable statistical fact.

[Anonymous No.17138561]

>>17138547
One either gets bored of hedonism or wants something more, but yeah.

[Anonymous No.17138565]

>>17138541

>maybe if I repeat my ad hominem it will magically become an argument this time

[Anonymous No.17138572]

>>17138554
>divorce rate plummets in the middle
by that logic those with 2 partners should fuck another few before marrying or else it won't work out as well

[Anonymous No.17138577]

>>17138522
"Lies, damn lies, and statistics."

[Anonymous No.17138585]

>>17138060
>Brahmins will do the work of sudras.
I don't get this one, What does a Sudra do?

[Anonymous No.17138587]

>>17138493
>premarital sex destroys family values
Yeah that's the point. The family is the most powerful unit in limiting the two-part reach of corporations and the state into shit that's none of their business.
Look at how much control the state has in a poor single-parent household
>state provides income
>state schools the children
>state provides housing
>state fails to socialize children due to lack of father figure
>state arrests male children when they're grown up for free labor in a for-profit prison
>cycle repeats
During all of this the private sector brainwashes children into docility through various media

[Anonymous No.17138589]

>>17138493
That's a statistical argument, not a logical one.

[Anonymous No.17138595]

>>17138572

You have a very liberal take on the meaning of the word 'plummet' desu.

[Anonymous No.17138598]

>>17138595
Get over yourself!
The point made is still strong and going.

[Anonymous No.17138600]

>>17138082
>just like dark souls!

[Anonymous No.17138602]

>>17138547
>This is what zero pussy does to a nigga

No stake in this thread, but are you one of those first gen immigrant chinks that try to fit in by aping what white people pretending to be black people on Twitter say?

[Anonymous No.17138607]

>>17137971
based

[Anonymous No.17138610]

You're a fuckin clown, that's all I have to say
Kali Yuga dreamin, on such a winter's day

[Anonymous No.17138613]

>>17138602
that's pretty hot, I'd give her a warm welcome into the West

[Anonymous No.17138615]

>>17138572
Kys wtf is wrong with you

[Anonymous No.17138626]

>>17138615
>>17138595
Yes, now please make an argument or get out.

[Anonymous No.17138639]

>>17138598

What's your point? That people will 3 pre-marital partners have lower divorce rates than those with 2?

[Anonymous No.17138647]

>>17138493
>this is one of the primary causes of these issues in the American black community
Are you really sure single moms are among the primary causes and that being fucking poor, living in ghettoes with barely functional schools have nothing to do with it?
It's really astonishing how much mental gymnastic the american mind is capable of just to avoid giving money to people

[Anonymous No.17138651]

>>17138647

You have no evidence for your hypothesis

[Anonymous No.17138652]

>>17138639
>>17138572
Do you agree?

[Anonymous No.17138657]

>>17138510
seethe more tranny
>>17138531
>Okay, I don't believe you. Can you explain why at least?
You don't have to, reality exists with or without your approval. It's because the brains of promiscuous women no longer associate sexual intimacy with emotional intimacy and are therefore more prone to exit romantic relationships.

[Anonymous No.17138658]

>>17138626
They made their arguments. you have not.

[Anonymous No.17138661]

>>17138647
Not having a family makes you poorer

[Anonymous No.17138667]

>>17138657
no proof, just incel cope

[Anonymous No.17138668]

>>17138647
>Are you really sure single moms are among the primary causes

>State-by-state analysis by Heritage scholars indicates that a 10 percent increase in the percentage of children living in single-parent homes leads typically to a 17 percent increase in juvenile crime. The rate of violent teenage crime corresponds with the number of families abandoned by fathers.

>Bolstering the Smith-Jarjoura study, University of Illinois sociologist Robert J. Sampson, in a study on the differential effects of poverty and family disruption on crime, states:

>Overall the analysis shows that rates of black violent offending, especially by juveniles, are strongly influenced by variations in family structure. Independent of the major candidates supplied by prior criminological theory (e.g. income, region, size, density, age and race composition) black family disruption has the largest effects on black juvenile robbery and homicide.... The effects of family structure are strong and cannot be easily dismissed by reference to other structural and cultural features of urban environments.... The effect of family disruption on black violence is not due to the effect of black violence on family structure.

https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/the-real-root-causes-violent-crime-the-breakdown-marriage-family-and#:~:text=State%2Dby%2Dstate%20analysis%20by,of%20families%20abandoned%20by%20fathers.

[Anonymous No.17138671]

>>17138651
Are you really sure that there is no evidence that poverty and lack of education are correlated to crime way more often than single mothers?

[Anonymous No.17138673]

>>17138657
>it's just real... okay? Just accept it?

>>17138658
What arguments you dolt? Le meme graph? I already criticised that one here >>17138572

[Anonymous No.17138677]

>>17138589
>statistically people are having more premarital sex
>statistically people who have more premarital sex have higher divorce rates
>divorce is bad because it leads to a less-socialized children
>divorces overwhelmingly result in the mother getting the children
>there are volumes of studies about the negative effects of not having a father figure

[Anonymous No.17138678]

>>17138493
There is another graph that uses the data for age at first sexual experience which shows an even more linear relationship

[Anonymous No.17138687]

>>17138677
Might as well say blacks are inferior genetically because they commit more crime (poverty? what's that?)

[Anonymous No.17138689]

>>17138671

you have no evidence for your hypothesis

[Anonymous No.17138690]

>>17138661
As do a ton of other things, like descending from slaves who never had any occasion to amass wealth until about half a century ago. But yeah, single mothers surely have a stronger impact.
Also, how about being poor makes it harder to have families? How the do you provide for a kid if you are poor?

[Anonymous No.17138698]

>>17138687
Using poverty rates is a statistical argument, not a logical one

[Anonymous No.17138701]

>>17138668
>heritage foundation

might as well cite the koch bros

[Anonymous No.17138702]

>>17138668
Cross reference that with illiteracy and poverty, anon, don't use google selectively

[Anonymous No.17138703]

>>17138510
blue pilled retard kys faggot

[Anonymous No.17138704]

>>17138678
I'm willing to bet age of first sexual experience and number of partners correlate pretty well too

[Anonymous No.17138708]

>>17138690

You're just imagining all sorts of things but you have absolutely no evidence to back up your claims.
As if niggers are the only ones who were poor a hundred years ago

[Anonymous No.17138709]

>>17138698
Exactly.

[Anonymous No.17138710]

>>17138687
>Might as well say blacks are inferior genetically because they commit more crime
true they have lower IQs and greater impulsiveness associated with higher crime rates, mostly due to not having the same level of genetic adaptations to civilisation
>(poverty? what's that?)
a deflection not substantiated by any real evidence, poor whites commit less crime than middle class blacks

[Anonymous No.17138713]

>>17138698
You do the exact same thing when you correlate crime and single motherhood you absolute midwit, there's no such thing as a "statistical argument" - all scientific studies into this stuff use statistics. Go read

[Anonymous No.17138717]

>>17138704
>get into relationship
>things work out well for years
>find out her "count"
>break up because you're autistic that judges people according to what statistical group they belong to

[Anonymous No.17138736]

>>17138717
>get into relationship
>things work out well for years
>find out he raped a dozen little children
>break up because you're autistic that judges people according to what statistical group they belong to

Its ridiculous to be prejudiced against people because of their rape statistics.

[Anonymous No.17138737]

Shit thread.

[Anonymous No.17138740]

>>17138717
Cuck. Enjoy eating Tyrone's creampies.

[Anonymous No.17138741]

>>17138717
I said literally nothing but that there's probably a statistical relationship between first sexual parter and number of partners.
Now that's what I call projection.

[Anonymous No.17138745]

>>17138704
yes, a hypothesis they considered was that early sexual experiences triggered adaptation to what would be a hostile evolutionary environment where they were more live fast die young
this early sexual exposure can trigger premature puberty, interestingly the number of male relatives they were surrounded by tended to play a role in modulating this.

[Anonymous No.17138748]

>>17138701
Below is linked the article cited here

>Bolstering the Smith-Jarjoura study, University of Illinois sociologist Robert J. Sampson, in a study on the differential effects of poverty and family disruption on crime

You can disagree with heritage, but this study is legitimate, and heritage is not wrong to cite it

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2779588?seq=1

[Anonymous No.17138755]

>>17138736
Nice false equivalence retard.
In your situation that person is actually harming others.
The only reason why you would break up in >>17138717 is because of insecurity. Name any other reason except for autistic devotion to statistics in order to shield your insecurities from being exposed.

[Anonymous No.17138756]

>>17138745
That's incredibly interesting

[Anonymous No.17138759]

>>17138736
>women having consensual sex with man=man raping kids

[Anonymous No.17138769]

>>17138745
>interestingly the number of male relatives they were surrounded by tended to play a role in modulating this.
in what way? cool

[Anonymous No.17138778]

>>17138572Sage
>20% > 5%
yep math checks out. The roastie wins this discussion.

[Anonymous No.17138791]

>>17138778
>>17138778
Based

[Anonymous No.17138801]

>>17138755
Funnily enough no answers to this and
>>17138572

[Anonymous No.17138804]

>>17138737
Fuck you

[Anonymous No.17138824]

>There are really people out there that think deadbeat dads and 17 year old girls fucking strangers at clubs is a good thing
This society needs a fucking wholesale slaughter and a hard reset, jesus christ.

[Anonymous No.17138831]

>>17138824
Nice strawman. Why won't you address the arguments in which people claim that?

[Anonymous No.17138833]

>>17138824
what fun stuff is there to do at 17?
i mean this seriously. the most fun thing to do at that age is what current 17 yos are doing desu.

[Anonymous No.17138842]

>>17138708
Are you really sure I'm imagining things anon? Certainly, it doesn't take a genius to understand that if you're poor and hungry, you have motivations to steal stuff... But I'm not here to teach you anything, nor to provide a long, articulated explanation of why this is true, which you can find in many philosophers, by the way, if you ever bothered reading a book, starting from Plato and Aristotle. Pic related if a fantastic starting point if you ever want to seriously address the problem from a philosophical standpoint. Otherwise, anon, I suggest you google three words: "correlation poverty crime". You're going to have a nice evening leafing through countless studies proving me (and Plato, and Aristotle) right.
Otherwise, you can keep claiming single mothers are a "primary" reason of crime, as if they were even remotely comparable to being poor and uneducated. I don't care. I mean, from my point of view, you are the one refusing to be educated and preferring echo-chambers of equally minded idiots to blatant truths anyone can discover with a simple research.
I don't want to be blunt, but it really sounds like you may have been the nigger all along...

[Anonymous No.17138848]

>>17138824
why do you care about what people do? insecurity perhaps? resentment?

[Anonymous No.17138849]

>>17138824
>There are really people out there that think deadbeat dads and 17 year old girls fucking strangers at clubs is a good thing

They asked why it was bad, to which (You) spammed incel statistics that were easily refuted by >>17138801
and then you got butthurt and started moralizing.

[Anonymous No.17138850]

>>17137915
Reading was invented during the Kali Yuga, no human has ever read anything outside of this period

[Anonymous No.17138869]

>>17138842
based

[Anonymous No.17138874]

>>17138769
more male relatives slowed down pubertal development because it created a safer environment

[Anonymous No.17138876]

>>17138842

I accused you of asserting things without evidence, and your brilliant rebuttal is "its obviously true".

Bravo!

[Anonymous No.17138879]

>>17138849
>no reply again

yep

[Anonymous No.17138884]

Is there a correlation between incels and single moms? The they just cause muh crime isn't the only shit thing about them

[Anonymous No.17138886]

>>17138759

Yes insofar that they are both behavior I can reasonably disagree with.

[Anonymous No.17138891]

>>17138824
t. didnt get his dick wet

[Anonymous No.17138899]

>>17138886
NOW EXPLAIN WHY AS PEOPLE HAVE LITERALLY SHIT ON THIS TAKE FOR AT LEAST 20 CENTIMETERS OF POSTS

[Anonymous No.17138901]

>>17138755
Well for one being lied to about that is pretty fucking shitty

[Anonymous No.17138907]

>>17138901
What if he simply didn't ask?

[Anonymous No.17138908]

>>17138842
What's the correlation between single mothers and poor children?

[Anonymous No.17138914]

>>17138547
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.17138927]

>>17138647
>It's really astonishing how much mental gymnastic the american mind is capable of just to avoid giving money to people

Ahahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.17138935]

>>17138745
So there's a correlation between early sexual experience and accelerating the biological process of puberty?

[Anonymous No.17138943]

>>17138927
It's really astonishing how much mental gymnastics the European mind is capable of just to further deflate their collapsing currency

[Anonymous No.17138947]

>>17138060
>>17138074
>>17138082
I used to find this style of indo-doomer nostradamus-posting compelling but Vedic panic about the dharma deteriorating is really just a means of describing society at any given moment since it describes the entirety of recorded history. The golden age is always hyperreality. You aren't supposed to become a despondent schizo because you don't live in the golden age. No one is supposed to live in the golden age. You will never locate a time when this actually existed. This is why the Platonists for instance say we must journey to our true homeland. I imagine the Indian thought is similar, that the Kali Yuga is a justification for askesis, not an exhortation to engage in an endless quagmire of overly attentive sociopolitical critique.

[Anonymous No.17138952]

>>17138824
Pearl clutching of the foulest sort. I don't think it's a good thing but neither do I bemoan it as the first sign of the end times.

[Anonymous No.17138953]

>>17138907
Who fucking knows, its some dumbass hypothetical. These things are usually talked about in most the relationships I've had often casually but sometimes explicitly and if a girl honestly told me she had like 15+ boyfriends shes probably shitty and not worth dating.

[Anonymous No.17138958]

>>17138953
>These things are usually talked about in most the relationships
if you're an autist yes

[Anonymous No.17138961]

>>17138737
Roll

[Anonymous No.17138964]

>>17138908
Are poor women more likely to become single mothers, or are single mothers more likely to be poor?
From what I remember of the data a poor woman who marries and has kids will be much more successful than a more affluent woman who becomes a single mother
of course this is outside of a benefits system that seems to preferentially pay single mothers.
I have not looked t this data for a while though so the details are hazy,
I would recommend reading Camille paglia and Betina Arnt though

[Anonymous No.17138976]

>>17138953
I accept your surrender

[Anonymous No.17138994]

>>17138935
I do not recall the details of the papers I was referring to.
What I do remember is the research on precocious puberty due to stressful enviroments which was partly based on Romanian orphanages where girls were entering menarche as young as 5 years old.
So stress can significantly affect pubertal development

[Anonymous No.17139016]

>>17138958
Never talked about past sexual experiences with some significant other? Like how you lost your virginity or something?

[Anonymous No.17139023]

>>17138824
I agree with you anon. They are kids tho, can't really be mad at them. They value pleasure over temperance and common sense. They only really are effeminate scorns and are degenerates not as an insult: No. As a quality. They have degenerate from the fruit. In their lineage they once were greater in spirit.

[Anonymous No.17139024]

>>17138952
Thats because you lack conviction.
>i think its immoral but I'm gonna call out anyone who calls it immorality
Youre an ideological pussy.

[Anonymous No.17139026]

>>17139016
Stop being disingenuous and answer >>17138801

[Anonymous No.17139030]

>>17138824
there are really people out there thinking deadbeat dads and 17 year olds fucking strangers are a relevant problem during a global pandemic which is pushing the economy on the brink of collapse on a planet where the sky is on fire

[Anonymous No.17139039]

>>17138908
what's the correlation between poverty and divorce?

[Anonymous No.17139051]

>>17139030
Your brain on talmudvision

[Anonymous No.17139052]

>>17139030
>global pandemic
It's a moderately bad seasonal flu at worst.

[Anonymous No.17139054]

>>17138994
Very very interesting

[Anonymous No.17139058]

>>17138943
The eternal butthurt american. Can you take a joke about your country, for once, and not look like a bullied kid angrily trying to think of a comeback while his Alf lunchbox opens and scatters all the food on the ground while the rest of the class laughs?

[Anonymous No.17139059]

>>17138947
>, not an exhortation to engage in an endless quagmire of overly attentive sociopolitical critique.
thats basically just Evolians, not even Guenon does that

[Anonymous No.17139071]

>>17139052
I got it and coofed my head off my butt anon

[Anonymous No.17139102]

>>17139052
>"we need a plague to kill off the idiots"
-Edgy redditors
>*plague shows up and has an average age of death of 80, with a statistically insignificant increase in total deaths for the year
>wear a mask! Give your money to Amazon and disney! Your only freedom is to protest police brutality! Small businesses are racist!
-Edgy redditors when they get what they asked for

[Anonymous No.17139114]

>>17139058
I can. Sorry if my tone seemed off I was just returning fire with a joke of my own.
We don't have any money to give to poor people because it literally goes to people with yachts and racehorses

[Anonymous No.17139153]

>>17138717
>confronted with evidence of a claim
>invent contrived scenario in your head where the cause is actually just all the people you disagree with politically being mentally damaged
>Apply this contrived scenario that relies on literally every single person doing this being an autistic right winger
>aha! I've got him!

[Anonymous No.17139165]

>>17139114
Thank for the sincerity anon. Sorry if I misinterpreted your attitude. I actually like american straightforwardness a lot. And lunchboxes.
By the way, we also don't have any money

[Anonymous No.17139172]

>>17137971
This and unironically.

[Anonymous No.17139185]

>>17138947
>23). Brahmins will not observe sacred vows but will criticize the Vedas. Deluded by logic they will give up worship and yajnas.

[Anonymous No.17139195]

>>17139059
If your most famous idea is that modernity=bad past=good you should at least have noticed the past people were complaining about their present and not predicting your future.

[Anonymous No.17139211]

>>17139052
this.

[Anonymous No.17139245]

>>17139165
We also have the best cereal for killing yourself, and don't forget it.
>Reese's puffs
>lucky charms
>cinnamon toast crunch
>fucking cookie crisp which is unironically cookies for breakfast

[Anonymous No.17139250]

>>17139195
Who gives a shit if they were predicting our future? Granpa fucked only one hole in his life that was Granma. With that culture we went to the moon. Now that this is out of the picture; what will be our acheivements?

[Anonymous No.17139261]

>>17139059
You have never read Evola.

[Anonymous No.17139265]

>>17139071
Are you fat, Anon?

[Anonymous No.17139268]

>>17139030
> thinking deadbeat dads and 17 year olds fucking strangers are a relevant problem during a global pandemic which is pushing the economy on the brink of collapse on a planet where the sky is on fire
holy shit you are so bluepilled it would take years for you to become sane again.

[Anonymous No.17139299]

>>17139250
Maybe your pre-urban great-great grandfather had one partner and no his culture did not build rockets or lunar landers.

[Anonymous No.17139320]

cringe incel thread