Jonas Čeika

[Anonymous No.17045972]

Post your favourite contemporary philosopher
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WCLex4TCw4XNU-RsARI5bC0BExuVXsUa/view?usp=sharing

[Anonymous No.17045978]

>>17045972
I just watched his debate with the distributist today. Cuck got completely BTFO’d and revealed to be a complete brainlet.

[Anonymous No.17045993]

>youtuber
>first reply is "I watched his e-streamer meme debate, BTFO BRAINLET EPIC FAIL" mindless zoomer babbling

You reap what you sow

[Anonymous No.17046005]

>>17045978
Link?
>>17045972
I am my own favorite contemporary philosopher.

[Anonymous No.17046015]

>>17046005
https://youtu.be/6MRKwlTZkfo

[Anonymous No.17046022]

>>17045978
If that's all you've obtained from that talk then you're a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.17046042]

>>17046022
No, I thought there was much more to it, in particular I think it shows how the marxist economic critique is clearly inferior to the third positionist critique. I’ve always wondered whether economic factors truly are primary and felt like this debate helped develop that idea. But also Cuck got BTFO’d hard.

[Anonymous No.17046047]

>>17045978
>>17046015
>internet debate
holy cringe

[Anonymous No.17046064]

>>17046015
LOL NIGGER YOUTUBE COMMENTS

[Anonymous No.17046066]

>>17046015
Oh I thought the debate was today, but you meant you watched a two year old video today.

[Anonymous No.17046081]

>>17046047
Yeah. But I mean, this is the closest thing we have right now to a Socratic forum. If I want to go hear someone speak I might as well turn on youtube, the alternative are today’s shitty public intellectuals. Its low, but whatever man, lets people enjoy things.

[Anonymous No.17046091]

>>17046064
Kek
>>17046066
Yeah

[Anonymous No.17046102]

>>17045972
Yes. I quite enjoy his videos.

[Anonymous No.17046134]

>>17045972
This man Gregory B. Sadler has one of the best philosophy channels in my opinion. His video's aren't bite sized and edited for entertainment, but they're very thorough and he talks about a wide range of philosophy.
Of particular interest is a series where he meticulously reads each passge of Hegels Phenomenology and helps the viewer understand what Hegel was stabbing it. He knows German well and is a career philosophy professor so his explanations are concrete and effective.

Here's a bookshelf review of his. https://youtu.be/wCsLFSR_Y94

[Anonymous No.17046148]

>>17046134
isn't he a big fat person?

[Anonymous No.17046152]

dont eat de animals

[Anonymous No.17046185]

>>17046148
Yes he is. And although I'm relatively skinny, I find that his largeness only adds a bit of joviality and warmth to his papa bear personality. Idk man fuck, he's American, what'd u expect

[Anonymous No.17046238]

>>17046134
Cool bookshelf, funny he has nearly no analytic works.

[Anonymous No.17046259]

I’d consider watching his videos if his name weren’t so cringe. There’s no way to frame being a duck as a good thing, so trying to reclaim the word is a futile endeavor.

[Anonymous No.17046305]

I'm in love with the CoCo

[Anonymous No.17046423]

>>17046259
Good thing he renamed his channel then.

[Anonymous No.17047715]

>>17046238
Yeah, he has a few though. Witti, Moore, and Whitehead. Iirc. At least I knownye has videos about wittgenstein and has mentioned Whitehead.

[Anonymous No.17047779]

>>17046042
economic factors are never primary

[Anonymous No.17047804]

>>17047715
I would like it if he had more. I can't be the only person who likes both traditions. We won't get the next Kant til somebody does.

[Anonymous No.17047967]

>>17046042
Economic factors are completely primary, regardless of what post-modernist hacks say. Post-modernist are just grifters trying to sow doubt and pessimism within the working class and are class struggle denialists.

[Anonymous No.17048038]

>>17046259
He wasn't trying to reclaim "cuck," he was presenting the argument that as all modern political discussion was cucked by the realities of the capitalist power structure, all philosophy and politics are that of cuckdom. Or some shit like that.

[Anonymous No.17048881]

>>17047804
It is underated, but I think what happened was it got too complex and algebraic. Try to read one of Putnams masterpieces without a working knowledge of modern physics.

[Anonymous No.17049000]

>>17045972
Nicholas J. Fuentes

[Anonymous American No.17049050]

>>17046134
Sadler makes great content. I don't know if I would have ever understood The Preface to The Phenomenology of Spirit, if I hadn't watch Sadler's Half-hour Hegel series.

[Anonymous No.17049290]

>>17045972
>emancipatory leftist interpretation of pop-culture phenomenon, ad infinitum
Does this faggot ever do anything new?

[Anonymous No.17049344]

>>17048038
Holy cope

[Anonymous No.17049365]

>>17045972
>>17048038
wtf is this Commie Cringe?

[Anonymous No.17049392]

>>17048038
Nah he just didn't put that much thought into it. He said did it as a joke off of the channel "redpilled philosophy" and didn't expect his channel to get as big as it did. The fact that he changed it shows he probably regretted it to some degree

[Anonymous No.17049401]

>>17045972
He's not really a philosopher though. He's a good essay writer, clearly he's well read and was made for academia but I don't really see him as a brilliant mind or anything. He's an intelligent young guy and I'm sure he'll have a good career as an educator

[Anonymous No.17049423]

>>17049050
I know, glad I found him.

[Anonymous No.17049442]

>>17045978
Cuck did lose but only rhetorically

[Anonymous No.17049482]

>>17049000
> 9000

[Frater Asemlen !XS8vrClKs2 No.17049506]

>>17046305

I like him, Daniel bonevac just kinda spergs about any topic that interests him without any rhyme or reason between videos, feels like he’s much more passionate because of that.

[Anonymous No.17049701]

>>17045972
How about reading philosophy yourself instead of listening to your virtual commie friend regurgitate it to you

[Anonymous No.17049863]

>>17049442
That's the only way to lose (and win)

[Anonymous No.17049913]

>>17049701
shut up, dummy
I do both because I don't have any friends to discuss the stuff I read

[Anonymous No.17049937]

>>17049701