/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.17040901]

holy fuck. I just found out what Hegelian Dialectics actually means. I cannot believe you disingenuous motherfuckers have been acting like it has any use at all beyond a sort of linguistic astrology game like kabbalah. you absolute bastards. is all of Hegel one big inside joke to fuck with people? This is absurd

[Anonymous No.17040906]

hegel is a piece of shit who wanted to larp as scientist as desperate attempt to be taking seriously. Hegel shows the hype train of intellectualism is a mistake killing society.

hegel and Marx wanted to pass as a scientific be due to the masses being in praise of the scientific. So Marx said he was a materialist and said hisotry is materialistic.
Marx tried to so hard to larp that he even put high school maths his books, and made mistakes, but since the masses were not educated, just like today, they all viewed him as legit.
This from those people that you get ''history is a science'', ''economy is a science'', ''psychology is a science'' and so on. All those non-Stem crappy fields pushed by liberals as a science.


Then 150 years later, all the morons who idolize science and maths from popsci videos on YouTube still praise him.

So I have a question: are you one of them?

[Anonymous No.17040912]

thesis: stupid
antithesis: gay
synthesis: op

[Anonymous No.17040979]

>>17040901
Describe Hegelian Dialectics.
>>17040906
Bad copypasta

[Anonymous No.17041020]

>>17040979
>Describe Hegelian Dialectics.
Sure.
Right after you defend Hegelian Dialectics

[Anonymous No.17041045]

>>17040901
>is all of Hegel one big inside joke to fuck with people?
yes, but...

Hegelian Dialectics has some explanatory power. It was used by Hegel as a way to defend the civil state system. If the state is the central thesis statement, then it's antithesis anarchy must also conceptually exist in such a political system. And it does, at the global level. If you compare it to natural science obviously it's not going to go as far, but for explaining things like politics it's pretty effective.

IN PRINCIPLE if you take Hegel's later work in the Logic and apply all of the empty categories to any concept, you should get the logical developmental cycle of that concept across time, though it's probably a frustrating project.

[Anonymous No.17041060]

>>17040901
>actually posting thesis/antithesis/synthesis and acting like you know shit

place is getting exponentially retarded

[࿇ C Œ M G E N V S ࿇ !KNDYYIIins No.17041116]

>>17040901

>THESIS – ANTITHESIS – SYNTHESIS.

>... linguistic astrology game like kabbalah...


?

[Anonymous No.17041128]

>>17040901
I told you so.

[Anonymous No.17041145]

>>17041020
I swear I'll do it, but before I just want to know what you think Hegelian dialectics is