[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 26 KB, 220x316, 220px-Recognitions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16995949 No.16995949 [Reply] [Original]

What the fuck was Wyatt's problem?

>> No.16996026

>>16995949
Recognition

>> No.16996041

>>16995949
he was stuck in a shitty american pomo "novel"

>> No.16996077

>>16996041
Not really pomo

>> No.16996691

>>16995949
I imagine having Aunt May as your sole parent would fuck anyone up

>> No.16996748

>>16996077
okay retard, why not?

>> No.16996754

>>16996748
because its modernist you retard

>> No.16996762

>>16996754
then explain why retard because everyone else considers it pomo except you Moore shills

>> No.16996767

>>16996691
Wyatt is Spider-Man?

>> No.16997321

>>16995949
well, if you want to know, his aunt basically created him when she suggested that god was the only one allowed to create, and it got him to start copying only, because it was a sort of workaround while still appeasing the lord. that and his fucking mother being dead, of course it's going to fuck you up. i loved the climax of that novel.

>> No.16997744

>>16996077
Gaddis is postmodern bro

>> No.16997768

>>16997744
It’s high modernism. It could have been published in 1927

>> No.16997816

>>16997768
Moorefags are just the new DFW posters

>> No.16998082

>>16995949
He realized he was in a bad book

>> No.16998222

>>16997768
>1000 page monolith in 30s America
Gaddis would have seethed even harder than he did at the reviews. Especially when there were Faulkner, Hemingway and Steinbeck releasing masterpieces in 300 pages. He would have quit.

>> No.16998228

Penis, hard penis, monstrous penis. All these things matter.

>> No.16998906

>>16998222
>Hemingway
>masterpieces
Pick one. Gaddis is Faulkner level. The other 2 are inferior.

>> No.16999113

>>16998906
Bullshit.
>Gaddis is Faulkner level
Kek. The delusion of Gaddisfags. Grapes of wrath is worth more than Gaddis' entire bibliography.

>> No.16999180

>>16999113
Even John Ford's film is better than the book. Steinbeck is a hack. Heavy handed biblical allegories etc. Not worth reading. Faulkner, Nabokov, Gaddis, Pynchon, McCarthy etc. are all better than Steinbeck and Hemingway.

>> No.17000643

>>16996767
Wyatt precedes Spiderman

>> No.17000649

>>16999180
Fitzgerald, Wolfe, James master race reporting in

>> No.17000771
File: 310 KB, 1200x1200, Ebye1nsU4AA0aT3[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17000771

>>16995949
If I ever write a book, I'll give it a long single word title, just to fuck with typographers.

>> No.17000793

>>17000649
>Fitzgerald
ngmi

>> No.17000797

>>17000793
Only pseuds dislike Fitzgerald

>> No.17001948

>>17000771
Based

>> No.17002011

>>16995949
Nabokov > Pynchon > Gaddis > McCarthy > Faulkner > James > (power gap) > Hemingway > Wolfe > Steinbeck > Fitzgerfagold

>> No.17002019

>>17002011
+ checkem

>> No.17002147

>>17002011
Complete trash list. On no earth are Gaddis and Pynchon ahead of Faulkner. Even Nabokov is stretching it.

>> No.17002174

>>17002011
Faulkner>Nabokov>McCarthy>Wolfe>Pynchon>Hemingway>Steinbeck>Fitzgerald>James>(power gap) Gaddis

>> No.17002345

>>17002011
James > Gaddis > Faulkner > Pynchon > Nabokov > McCarthy >>>>> Steinbeck > Hemingway =Fizgerald

>> No.17002381

>>16996762
>quintessential pomo novel
>mandatory bait

>> No.17002394

>>16997816
Sorry, but I’ve never heard the term — what’s a moorefag

>> No.17002405

>>17001948
incredibly

>> No.17002474

>>17002394
Steve moore. An even more irrelevant critic/biographer of an already irrelevant writer.

>> No.17003038
File: 9 KB, 187x250, soyyy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17003038

>>17002011
>nabokov at top

>> No.17003372
File: 55 KB, 369x512, unnamed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17003372

>>17002147
>Faulkner, William. Dislike him. Writer of corncobby chronicles. To consider them masterpieces is an absurd delusion. A nonentity, means absolutely nothing to me

>>17003038
Bet you haven't even read ADA

>> No.17003390

>>17003372
Not him, but Ada is some hot garbage. Well written, but that shit was dumb as fuck.

>> No.17003406

>>16995949
Why are you guys dissing Fitzgerald. Just because he wrote one of the few books normies are capable of naming doesn't mean he didn't write some absolutely perfect sentences. And he had soul