/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16955464]

>Big 5 personality traits
>Favorite book
https://www.truity.com/test/big-five-personality-test

[Anonymous No.16955478]

>>16955464
Ah yes it's time for me to go to bed, quality of threads always drops when the burgers start posting

[Anonymous No.16955479]

>>16955464
Thus Spoke Zarathustra

[Anonymous No.16955528]

>>16955464
Tough to say.
I relate to both Great Expectations and The Death of Ivan Ilyich heavily.

[Anonymous No.16955572]

>>16955464
World as will and representation

[Anonymous No.16955626]

>>16955464
The Waves by Virginia Woolf

[Anonymous No.16955640]

In Search of Lost Time

[Anonymous No.16955655]

>>16955479
>Agreeableness 4
do you hate people, anon?

[Anonymous No.16955703]

>>16955655
Yes, that's why I like Nietzsche

[Anonymous No.16955843]

Frankenstein
I'm a huge push over, deal with extreme anxiety constantly, and hate confrontation

[Anonymous No.16955876]

>>16955464
>helping advertisers target you even better in return for a horoscope
No thank you sir.

[Anonymous No.16955882]

>>16955464
The Book of Disquiet

[Anonymous No.16955892]

>>16955626
You're a woman

[Anonymous No.16955913]

>>16955464
The Will to Believe

[Anonymous No.16955928]

A Canticle for Leibowitz

[Anonymous No.16956154]

>>16955843
>>16955913
>>16955928
based

>>16955479
not based

[Anonymous No.16956184]

>>16955478
>/lit/
>burgers
Send your bot back to /pol/ retard.

[Anonymous No.16956282]

The Book of Disquiet.

[Anonymous No.16956288]

>>16956282
Literally me

[Anonymous No.16956296]

>>16956288
Hello my kindred spirit.

[Anonymous No.16956553]

>>16955464
I like “The Elementary Particles”, and the Iliad. I separate classics from modern lit in categorization.

[Anonymous No.16957447]

bump

[Anonymous No.16957460]

>>16955876
5 factor model is 100% empiricist

[Anonymous No.16957567]

The Talmud

[Anonymous No.16957620]

>>16955876
>seeing ads and purchasing books Anno Domini 2020
shiggy

[Anonymous No.16957662]

>>16955464
I don't have a favorite book just yet, I only really started reading last year. I prefer Jung's types over OCEAN.

INFP 4w5

[Anonymous No.16957671]

>>16957662
Hello INFP fren

[Anonymous No.16957683]

>>16957662
>>16957671

Tik tok tik tok

[Anonymous No.16957693]

>>16955464
MBTI is more useful.

[Anonymous No.16957726]

>>16957662
>>16957693
Why? because you can't LARP as a troubled artist or scheming machiavellian with the big 5?

[Anonymous No.16957751]

>>16957683
I got "empathetic idealist on this one too" I don't agree with suicide so the clock ain't for me

[Anonymous No.16957758]

>>16957726
say again?

[Anonymous No.16957769]

>>16957726
No because MBTI tells you a lot more while OCEAN is just a test that gives you a percentage score.
MBTI isn't decided with a test, cognitive functions have a lot of depth into them and there is more writing on it than OCEAN.

Can the aggression.

[Anonymous No.16957867]

>>16955464
>a room of one’s own

[Anonymous No.16957985]

/smartbutlazy/

[Anonymous No.16957989]

i am an unhinged empath i LARP as that character from psycho-pass 3 and can even do parkour like him (coincidentally).

hard to say a favourite, i'm not that well-read and don't want to say what lit wants to hear, but i liked the tartar steppe a lot.

[Anonymous No.16958003]

>>16957693
>>16957726
>>16957769
i thought big 5 was the only scientifically decent one and the rest were bullshit?

[Anonymous No.16958052]

>>16957985
O doesn't mean you're smart

[Anonymous No.16958140]

>>16958003
Personality tests are not very good, just go to a psychiatrist if you’re actually concerned about your character.

[Anonymous No.16958199]

>>16958140
i don't trust psychiatrists, personality tests, or you

[Anonymous No.16958211]

>>16958199
Checked

[Anonymous No.16958231]

>>16958140
>go to a psychiatrist
Go to reddit

[Anonymous No.16958258]

the tale of genji

[Anonymous No.16958262]

>The Brothers Karamazov

[Anonymous No.16958336]

>>16958140
Why don't you just think or introspect? Do you really need another person or a test to tell you your personality if you are a rational and sane person?
The only reason people use these tests is to have an easy marker for other people to know their personalities, something like an image or a four letter word. You don't learn anything new with a test or psychologist, all you're telling them are things you already know (and in the case of a test, a lot less accurately).

[Anonymous No.16958358]

The Count of Monte Cristo

[Anonymous No.16958359]

>>16955464
I have no idea what this means, but my favorite fiction book is Story of the Eye.

[Anonymous No.16958386]

Crime & Punishment or Grendel

[Anonymous No.16958390]

>>16955464
Moby Dick

[Anonymous No.16958496]

Frequent lurker who doesn't read

[Anonymous No.16958623]

>>16955464
No one favourite book, but Proust and Henry James are in my default S-tier

[Anonymous No.16958629]

>>16957567
>Talmud
>low neuroticism

Nice try, goy

[Anonymous No.16958684]

>>16955464
>>16955464

it is interesting to see all the high openness, low to mid conscientiousness and low extraversion combined with a medium to high neuroticism.
It's interesting since this is in no way representative of the rest of society, and that may not seem like a big thing, but people here are forming the world views of eachother. And when you have abnormals forming eachother's world views, things get skewed.

>hurr durr we are smarter than the sheeple and thus our world view is more correct.

no. your high neuroticism makes you have a negative bias of things and thus you cannot interpret things other than through your negative bias. And hence we have the light circlejerk which is /lit/ and in the worse cases we have /pol/

tl; dr - go outside. Talk to people. Chances are they are more right about somethings than you.

[Anonymous No.16958925]

>>16955464
bump

[Anonymous No.16959178]

>>16958684
>tl; dr - go outside. Talk to people. Chances are they are more right about somethings than you.
No, I don't think I will

[Anonymous No.16959305]

>>16955464
THE book

[Anonymous No.16959324]

>>16958684
Not everyone fits that.

>>16958623
>>16958390
>>16955528
Don't fit.

[Anonymous No.16959329]

>>16958336
i guess it might help for prompting introspection but the approach most people have to it is hostility or surrender (they see themselves as a hopeless victim to be saved though probably don't actually want to become not-victim) so maybe it's not so good.

[Anonymous No.16959352]

>>16955478
most of them were going to bed when you posted that though, now they're waking up

t. burger at 9 am that never went to sleep

[Anonymous No.16959389]

MBTI has more SOUL

[Anonymous No.16959424]

>>16955464
>https://www.truity.com/test/big-five-personality-test
>>unlock to see full report
I knew I dropped the 'ocean is better than myer's' shit for a reason.

[Anonymous No.16959504]

>>16957683
This chart isn't so useful because it's not weighed depending on the population. For example INTJ are only 2.56% of suicides but they are also the third rarest personality type at 2% of the population.

[Anonymous No.16959526]

>>16958003
None of them are scientifically good. However, big 5 was preferred by marketing departments to target demographics as it can be easily quantified and is cheaper to establish. That's what caused it to become more popular among corporations. MBTI is still preferred by entities who need qualitative assessments and are not overly considered with cost considerations, such as intelligence agencies evaluating human sources.

[Anonymous No.16959588]

>>16957662
Oh I'm infp as well

>>16957671
hello

>>16957683
INFP is the hardest to obtain money with. It's the least friend having one, the most unsatisfied career wise and such. As a male with that you're fucked, with how men are 75 percent of all suicides and all. That and me personally by elementary school i was wishing to go to heaven RIGHT THEN and was forced to stay alive with fear of hell. By 16 I decided it was time to die soon, and am agnostic and a drunkard that lives as a forever neet instead of dying now at age 31. I was going to make a deadline of 25 to die if still unhappy by age 16, but by 22 I started heavily drinking. Now my health is wrecked though, so tick tock indeed. It just ain't snappy.

[Anonymous No.16959594]

>>16959504
>intj is rare
>the judge persona personality
>very rare
I doubt it. Doubt the shit out of it.

[Anonymous No.16959630]

>>16959588
t.

>>16959594
>>16959424
>>16959352


/bye

[Anonymous No.16959635]

>>16959424
Big 5 isn't a proprietary thing, there's many versions
Some are free

[Anonymous No.16959640]

>>16957726
>>larp yiikes oof ooof yiiiikes

[Anonymous No.16959660]

>>16958003
Big 5 is the only one actually used in psychological research

[Anonymous No.16959742]

>>16955464
Moby Dick

[Anonymous No.16959760]

I’m not going to this again, but I remember I got neuroticism as the main one on the big 5, always INFP on MBTI and a tie between 4, 5 and 9 on enneagram

my favorite book is probably brothers karamazov

[Anonymous No.16959783]

>>16959760
Ok, I did it. Yea, same shit
Also apparently I’m the only person who scored 0% on something

[Anonymous No.16959850]

>>16959783
Also, it says I probably have only a very moderate interest in art and probably have conventional hobbies due to my moderate score in openness, which couldn’t be farther from the truth. I just hate it when they ask me to say whether or not I’m an abstract person — I always leave it on neutral because I find it pretentious as fuck to say I am, though I do enjoy philosophy and art. Who the fuck says that about themselves without thinking they’re being at least somewhat ridiculous?

[Anonymous No.16959873]

>>16955464
I unironically like reading newspapers and periodicals

[Anonymous No.16959922]

The Book of Disquiet

[Anonymous No.16959931]

INFJ
The Holy Bible, Kino James Version

[Anonymous No.16959997]

>>16957693
Not really, big five is more useful, the reason being that there's a lot of research published in relation to the big five and near zero research published related to MBTI

[Anonymous No.16960019]

>>16959997
>there's a lot of research published in relation to the big five
Only because it is more metrically tractable. No relation to usefulness.

[Anonymous No.16960030]

>>16958262
jesus anon, you're perfect

[Anonymous No.16960046]

>>16960019
You can't compare thousands of innovative articles published to hundreds of forum threads among users in personality cafés that believe they have a very special introspective idea about who they are, but little do they know, that it has been mentioned in many other threads, and it's mentioned yet again because of it's the comfy fun that they're already accustomed to. Never even reaching the depths because unlike the researchers they'll probably never meaningfully question their own approaches.

[Anonymous No.16960062]

>>16960046
Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.16960068]

>>16960030
He agrees with you

[Anonymous No.16960085]

>>16960062
Excuse me, but how is that an argument?

[Anonymous No.16960102]

Plato and Aristotle’s complete works

[Anonymous No.16960783]

Le Docteur Pascal

[Anonymous No.16961576]

personality flows like water, a personality "test" that is less than 1000 questions is retarded

[Anonymous No.16961686]

>>16959640
Too close to home?

[Anonymous No.16961768]

First Dark Tower book

>inb4 that doesn't mean I'm in fucking love with the rest of the series

[Anonymous No.16962421]

>>16957867
Oh yours is similar to mine n.n >>16955626