[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 94 KB, 229x305, julius_evola.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955191 No.16955191 [Reply] [Original]

>do yoga (yoga of power)
>do drugs (ride the tiger)
>have sex (ride the tiger; metaphysics of sex)
>christianity bad (almost all his book but esp. men among the ruins)
>marriage bad (ride the tiger)
How is this guy not literally r*ddit? Everything he says is something I imagine a r*dditor fedora tipper edgelord would say.

>> No.16955203

4channel is for r*dditor fedora tipper edgelords

>> No.16955209

Reminder that people like OP either haven't read Evola or were filtered hard so they resort to shitty takes like this.

>> No.16955212

>>16955191
It's about the underlying thoughts and how these conclusions were come to.

>> No.16955214

>>16955191
>>16955203
You haven't read evola

>> No.16955215

>>16955191
If you came back with those conclusions, you are the one who is reddit.

>> No.16955229

>>16955209
t. hasn't read evola

>> No.16955234
File: 193 KB, 800x371, 1601571287714.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955234

>>16955229

>> No.16955246

>>16955229
Fuck off please

>> No.16955275

>>16955214
hasn't read evola

>> No.16955278
File: 44 KB, 362x578, 4f01544e8c00d89173587f7d5343d733.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955278

>>16955191
How did this incel do yoga in a wheelchair?

Sheikh Guénon (PBUH) had tantric orgies with his harem of beautiful Arab concubines, initiating them into the Eastern mysteries while giving them mindblowing multiple orgasms.

At the same time, Evola was in his dimly-lit office in Rome, slowly transforming into a statue of Plotinus.

>> No.16955292

>>16955191
he's a larping idiot

>> No.16955291

>>16955275
How did it feel to get filtered so hard?

>> No.16955295
File: 25 KB, 395x373, EObdnYcUUAIReng.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955295

>>16955209
>>16955214
>>16955215
>NOOOOOO YOU CAN'T POINT OUT THAT MY BASED FASHY GOY WRITER ACTUALLY HAS MORE IN COMMON WITH R*DDITOR FEDORA EDGELORDS THAN ANYTHING ELSE OMGGGG NOOOOOOOOO

>> No.16955300
File: 148 KB, 800x789, 1607213138659.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955300

>he's a larping idiot

>> No.16955301

>>16955295
>evola
>fascist
ya haven't read him

>> No.16955311
File: 47 KB, 600x450, tumblr_m2shy4dIV61ru44ono1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955311

>>16955301
>actually i'm a superfascist

>> No.16955318

>>16955295
>>16955300
Reminder that people like this either haven't read Evola or were filtered hard so they resort to reddit tier bait like this.

>> No.16955325

>>16955311
Retard, super (supra) meaning beyond, dumb faggot. He was put on trial for being fascist.

You read his Wikipedia article, dumb fuck.

>> No.16955328

>Ιn this epoch οf dissolution it is hard for the differentiated man to become involved in marriage and family in any way.

>> No.16955331

>>16955311
>doesn't know what superfascist means

>> No.16955334
File: 982 KB, 1920x905, wolfgang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955334

>>16955191
read Wolfgang Smith!

>> No.16955344

>>16955191
He's literally an incel that studied hinduism.

>> No.16955345

>>16955325
Cope and seethe, evola was a fascist who was mad fascism was getting closer to catholicism so his gaylord fedora tipper autism was offset and he wrote cope books cope-critiquing fascism all the while agreeing with most of it

>> No.16955352
File: 128 KB, 1075x532, 1607216000975.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955352

>>16955311

>> No.16955357

>>16955345
You don't even know what fascism is.

>> No.16955375

>>16955345
Congratulations, you've read a wikipedia article.
>>16955357
You're being baited by some bugman

>> No.16955380
File: 217 KB, 1080x1349, 1606623312266.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955380

>For the process to proceed differently, it would go schematically as follows: at the point in which the drug frees energy Χ ίη an exterior way, an act of the Self, of "being," brings its own double energy, Χ + Χ, into the current and maintains it υρ to the end. Similarly, a wave, even if unexpected, serves a skilled swimmer with whom it collides by pro- pelling him beyond it. Thus, there would be nο collapse, the negative would be transformed into positive, nο condition οf passivity would be formed with respect to the drug, the experience in a certain way would be deconditioned, and, as a result, one would not undergo an ecstatic dissolution, devoid οί any true opening beyond the individual and only substantiated by sensations. Instead, in certain cases there would be the possibility of coming into contact with a superior dimension οf reality, which was the intention οf ancient, nonprofane drug use. Το a certain degree, the harmful effect of drugs would be eliminated
Evola teaching you how to smoke weed

>> No.16955390

>>16955375
>>16955209
>>16955214
>>16955215
I'm posting quotes faggots
see >>16955328
>>16955380
>hur dur marriage bad drugs good

>> No.16955391

>>16955380
You're putting way too much effort into this lmao

>> No.16955402

>>16955390
>I'm posting quotes faggots
No you're still posting shitty bait, tranny

>> No.16955429
File: 53 KB, 600x800, EfS-wTUXgAEZlsv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955429

>(have sex) Lacking anything better, he takes stock of the free space that is opened when important sexual and erotic matters are rendered less important, though not discounting what they can offer οn their own level.
>(do drugs) For the process to proceed differently, it would go schematically as follows: at the point in which the drug frees energy Χ ίη an exterior way, an act of the Self, of "being," brings its own double energy, Χ + Χ, into the current and maintains it υρ to the end. Similarly, a wave, even if unexpected, serves a skilled swimmer with whom it collides by pro- pelling him beyond it. Thus, there would be nο collapse, the negative would be transformed into positive, nο condition οf passivity would be formed with respect to the drug, the experience in a certain way would be deconditioned, and, as a result, one would not undergo an ecstatic dissolution, devoid οί any true opening beyond the individual and only substantiated by sensations. Instead, in certain cases there would be the possibility of coming into contact with a superior dimension οf reality, which was the intention οf ancient, nonprofane drug use. Το a certain degree, the harmful effect of drugs would be eliminated
>(don't get married or have kids) Ιn this epoch οf dissolution it is hard for the differentiated man to become involved in marriage and family in any way.
THANKS R*DDIT.

>> No.16955443

>>16955429
You're putting way too much effort into this lmao

>> No.16955460

>>16955443
i'm owning these r*ddit faggots epic style B)

>> No.16955483

>>16955429
>incel is mad because a philosopher is telling him to pump and dump thots

>> No.16955487
File: 12 KB, 258x245, 354deaa3770912621bb816da070346ab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955487

>all the r*dditor evolafags leaving the thread once i start posting quotes
OH NO NO NO another victory for 4channel . c o m

>> No.16955488
File: 40 KB, 479x720, you.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955488

>>16955460

>> No.16955490
File: 2.61 MB, 960x506, 1607213601646.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955490

>>incel is mad because a philosopher is telling him to pump and dump thots

>> No.16955494

>>16955483
>>16955490
t. mad r*dditor

>> No.16955496
File: 99 KB, 768x1024, HLCqQKBLlr47y4C2RuKIrEPXwhjddomFZBiKghsfHmI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955496

>>16955487
You're putting way too much effort into this lmao

>> No.16955508

Cringiest thread on /lit/ rn

>> No.16955514

>>16955508
And that's saying something

>> No.16955533

>>16955490
you posted a photo of an incel reading a comment that hurt his feelings

>> No.16955633

ITT insane amount of seething redditors

>> No.16955646
File: 234 KB, 630x930, 1607203066010.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955646

>you posted a photo of an incel reading a comment that hurt his feelings

>> No.16955693

>>16955191
>do yoga [if you want] (yoga of power)
>do [not] do drugs, unless you're super sure about it (ride the tiger)
>have sex [if you want] (ride the tiger, metaphysics of sex)
>christianity bad [this is true]
>marriage bad [for men today] [this is also true]

>"How is this guy not literally r*ddit? Everything he says is something I imagine a r*dditor fedora tipper edgelord would say."
Thank you for being gay.
>>16955229
>>16955234
>>16955295
You do know that people can literally pick up the books themselves and see reality for themselves, right? You're fooling no one.
>>16955380
Based retard, trying to decontextualise and contrive a quote into the opposite meaning but still leaving the "harmful effect of drugs" part in.

>> No.16955701

>>16955693
>You do know that people can literally pick up the books themselves and see reality for themselves, right? You're fooling no one.
I did, what do you think you're accomplishing by shouting random out of context quotes into the void?

>> No.16955709

>>16955701
I am not posting any out of context quotes, I assume the one doing that is OP.

>> No.16955729

>>16955693
read the quotes faggot and stay mad incel >>16955429

>> No.16955736

>>16955729
What's your point? I can't tell if you're defending or attacking Evola's position. Am I supposed to seethe at the quotes of that post?

>> No.16955757
File: 386 KB, 1920x1920, 1603879998856.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955757

why is it that noone ever replies to anything with any sort of substance beyond "you havn't read him " or "your gay" and basedjacks

i dont even have a dog in this fight im just curious to see if OP is right or hear some examples that show he is wrong

>> No.16955760

>>16955736
of course you're confused, you don't have two IQ points to rub together keep seething r*ddit

>> No.16955766

>>16955757
>im just curious to see if OP is right
you can read the quotes for yourself and see what you think >>16955429

>> No.16955781

>>16955757
It's because OP has deliberately made a post that is both indescribably wrong and obviously malicious. If you're actually interested, here's my reply here >>16955693. I shed some light on the statements OP makes, though that doesn't mean much other than refuting OP's brazen attempts at character assassination.
>>16955760
I think I'm confused because you're pretending to be retarded for the sake of trolling le evolafags. The act threw me off at first, you see.

>> No.16955797

>>16955781
you literally refuted nothing, he can read the quotes for himself retard

>> No.16955820

Evola chads fuck bitches get money and dont marry no bitches because we about keeping our stacks no thot gonna try take half of that

>> No.16955823

>>16955797
There is nothing to refute dumbass, you're just dropping vague accusations and decontextualised quotes. He can read the quotes if he wants, he can also go read the books too - all the better. Nothing Evola says is even objectionable, you just try to cut the most important reservations Evola includes in his recommendations in order to present him as some sort of libertine hedonist when he's anything but.

>> No.16955827

>>16955820
>proves evolafags are just spiritual blacks

>> No.16955832

>>16955823
t. hasn't read evola

>> No.16955842

>>16955832
epic funny owned xdddd moment
>>16955827
das rite wyteboi, cower in fear

>> No.16955924
File: 1.20 MB, 1440x1440, Filtration system.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16955924

This arrived for you anons

>> No.16955944

>>16955827
least im not a materialist mayo monkey, ya get me incel

>> No.16957287

>>16955944
mad

>> No.16957309

>>16955301
You can hardly read two lines of him without a reactionary comment

>> No.16957445

>>16955429
This actually looks interesting.
>Lacking anything better, he takes stock of the free space that is opened when important sexual and erotic matters are rendered less important, though not discounting what they can offer οn their own level.
>Ιn this epoch οf dissolution it is hard for the differentiated man to become involved in marriage and family in any way.
How exactly can anyone read this and come to the conclusion that Evola is telling people to live like libertines?

>> No.16957526

>>16955827
Das rite nigga, we wuz Brahmin n shit.

>> No.16958130

>65R
>17P

Why is this board under attack?

>> No.16958327

>>16955191
sounds pretty stupid, degenerate and liberal desu

>> No.16958458

>>16955295
>FASHY GOY
It's like you're not even trying any more

>> No.16958487

>>16955191
you're a fucking idiot

>> No.16958488

>>16955191
>thing good
>other thing bad
is there any book you couldn't dismiss by reducing it to this level?

>> No.16958521

>>16958327
That's what happens when a stupid degenerate liberal tries to summarize Evola but doesn't understand him

>> No.16958549

>>16955693
The first four are essentially the same thing: use a physical method to kickstart a process you then overcome and control. Which people have been doing for thousands of years outside of Op's false dichotomy of blind indulgence vs straight-edge repression.

>> No.16958591

>>16955209
they're probably discord raiders who pass memes to eachother

>> No.16959174

>>16955278
>(PBUH)
kek'd

>> No.16959185

>>16955311
Look retard now you understand what superman means.

>> No.16959227

>>16955191
None of this is even accurate. You’ve never read his books.

Why do you spergs insist on making these threads over and over and over again? Read him or don’t.

>> No.16959238

>>16957445
Read him and you’ll realize that’s a stupid question.

>> No.16959338

>>16957445
>>16959238
It isn't a stupid question. Evola tells everyone to live freely, but the type of freedom he advocates for has nothing to do with the hedonistic indulgence of the stereotypical libertine.

>> No.16960051

>>16959338
>Evola tells everyone to live freely
He doesn't.

>> No.16960535

>>16960051
He does. Have you read him? True freedom is Traditional and has nothing to do with liberalism, libertinism or hedonism. "A man has as many masters as he has vices."