/lit/ - Literature

File: 119 KB, 1400x906, N.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Dec 2 04:19:14 2020 No.16924899 [Reply] [Original]

All philosophy after Kant is a huge waste off time and there is nothing you can do to prove me wrong.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 04:19:56 2020 No.16924905 File: 99 KB, 410x630, C19CD46A-4467-49FA-891D-BBF1429CE4D3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 04:19:57 2020 No.16924906 Can you prove your point is correct?

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 04:22:32 2020 No.16924917 File: 177 KB, 1300x1000, Karl-Pilkington.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>16924899 >Stands in your way

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 04:23:59 2020 No.16924923 I think Kant would have disagreed. There was more to be said after him and he knew that. How was antinomy to be reconciled?

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 04:25:35 2020 No.16924929 >>16924917 he looks like a cocksucker.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 04:26:47 2020 No.16924933 >>16924929 If you don't know Karl Pilkington your life is pathetic

Anonymous Wed Dec 2 04:27:49 2020 No.16924942
File: 12 KB, 270x186, A4109072-2210-49A9-91F5-E17215CD850E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>16924899

>Before passing on to consider time, however, it may be pointed out that the inexistence of an 'empty space' is enough to expose the absurdity of one of Kant's too famous cosmological antinomies: to ask 'whether the world is infinite or whether it is limited within space' is a question that has absolutely no meaning. Space cannot possibly extend beyond the world in order to contain it, because an empty space would then be in question, and emptiness cannot contain anything: on the contrary, it is space that is in the world, that is to say, in manifestation, and if consideration be confined to the domain of corporeal manifestation alone, it can be said that space is coextensive with this world, because it is one of its conditions; but this world is no more infinite than is space itself, for, like space, it does not contain every possibility, but only represents a certain particular order of possibilities, and it is limited by the determinations that constitute its very nature.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 05:08:19 2020 No.16925089 >>16924899 refuted by Plato and Aristotle

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 05:46:09 2020 No.16925224 >>16924899 Kant is incredibly overrated. Dude was legit retarded, but tbf so was everything he was responding to.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 05:52:59 2020 No.16925249 >>16924899 I agree because all philosophy is a waste of time

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 05:55:15 2020 No.16925257 >>16924899 Assuming that you mean metaphysics when you say philosophy, metaphysics in general is a huge waste of time. It hasn't seen any results, at all, since its inception two millennia ago.

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 2 05:59:17 2020 No.16925270 >YOU CAN'T PROVE ME WRONG You obviously want people to argue with you. I won't though since I don't care about what you read. Fuck you.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]