[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

>> No.16907895

>>16907831
RC Walnut

>> No.16907906

I hate threads that point to videos.

>> No.16907922

Too much coffee can be bad for you, but a little bit is okay.

>> No.16907934

>>16907831
he was an eloquent man

>> No.16907976

>>16907831
The real question is: Does he have the making for a real historical figure of culture such as Melville or Mosely?

>> No.16908528

Bumpa.

>> No.16908743
File: 446 KB, 1243x913, jonathon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16908743

His art is terrible, and I'm not a post modernism detractor.

>> No.16908775

Jake get in contact

>> No.16908783

>>16907831
>click on one of them, called Underneath the Mind
>complains about trying to make the army gay
>shows a picture of Leonardo da Vinci next as an example of the good, strong past
>despite that da Vinci was probably a gay man
Every time. Every single time they try, and every single time they fail, and don’t even know it. Why are righttards such abominable failures at absolutely everything?

>> No.16908900
File: 271 KB, 692x1029, Bowden art.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16908900

>>16908743
He captures Hitler's outward appearance perfectly though. It's in the subtle mannerisms that he's actually quite brilliant at.

>> No.16908904

>>16908783
It wasn't his video, just his speech. Nevertheless how did you think he was even on the topic of homosexuality? Also Da Vinci was not gay, literally no evidence.

>> No.16908929

>>16907831
>JonathanBowden
Jonathan Bowden is a conservative, so he is not ''learned''

>> No.16908935

>>16908904
>Da Vinci was not gay

>> No.16908944

>>16908935
Literally no, definition of a neolib meme.

>> No.16908985

>>16908904
Even if da Vinci wasn’t gay, righttards still idolize ancient Rome and ancient Athens, two places that were very, very gay

>> No.16908989

he wrote a whole bunch of insane novels that no one has ever read

>> No.16908998

>>16908985
Right wingers are gay to this day. It's with reason that /pol/ is constantly covered in penises and transgenders

>> No.16909040

>>16908998
The reason is that it's overrun with shills and wreckers, you dumb mongoloid.

>> No.16909059

>>16909040
Yes, it most definitely isn’t because your sexual ideal of self being a 100% heterosexual body builder alpha male is horrendously unrealistic

>> No.16909109

>>16908929
>Jonathan Bowden is a conservative
nice bait nigger

>> No.16909117

>>16908985
You're so off the mark man, it's impossible to begin to express the stupidity of your remarks of calling "ancient Greece and Rome SUPER-gay".

>> No.16909124

The tragedy of Bowden:
>Bowden reads a bunch of books makes great speeches about them
>his first generation of fans listen to the speeches but don't read the books
>the latest generation of fans read the memes but don't even watch the videos

Bowden should've been a stepping stone to something greater, but instead he was an anachronism, a British right wing figure in possession of a brain.

>> No.16909133

>>16909040
Shouldn't you be discussing the difficulties of semen retention somewhere ?

>> No.16909236

>>16909040
Heterosexuals generally dont hang around message boards where people engage in black cock vs white cock wars 24 hours per day.

>> No.16909272

>>16908985
>projecting modern Western values onto foreign ancient cultures
Woah. Noble savage in the year 2020? That's pretty problematic of you.

>> No.16909291
File: 171 KB, 1124x1165, 343843f34fddec1c7bd9c0f4da5991a6abd1d36c28665cd359fee27972d88109.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16909291

>>16907831
Based and Bowdenpilled. What's your favourite speech? Mine's probably A Nietzchean Credo or Punch and Judy

>> No.16909486

>>16908998
ahhh yes if theres one thing the left is known for its heterosexuality

>> No.16909733

>>16908904
didn't you hear? Every notable man in the past is now gay, because he had a friend or something, or in case of da Vinci he draw a naked dude

>> No.16909754

Yeah. In fact, I’ve deeply read a few of the authors he speaks about and I’ve started to question whether he really read them. His takes can be beyond that of the standard /lit/ meme tier take but less than that of someone who’s actually deeply read them.

>> No.16909829

Holy hell, bros. You'll never get fucked doggy style by Mishima on stilts.

>> No.16909847

>>16909754
Go on...

>> No.16910057

>>16909847
What more do you want me to say? I recall his Evola speech being mostly good but really missing the mark in important areas. It was better than anything you’ll find on /lit/ but worse than a real rigorous serious reading. If you want specifics of the speech I just can’t recall them right now. I’d have to go back and listen again to point out what exactly but I just recall coming away from it with that impression. I mean, the guy is clearly very smart and well spoken but keep in mind he is still essentially just a traveling political rhetorician and you can tell much of what he says is just “off the cuff”. That’s impressive on one hand, but on the other it’s a bit lazy. I did really like his speech about Wyndham Lewis, which I can’t seem to find on YouTube now.

>> No.16910075

>>16910057
One of his friends got interviewed once and said he was a wide but shallow reader, he never went deep on any particular subject because he was always finding something new to obsess over. He'd go bookshopping and buy boxes worth, which is cool in one sense, but lack of discernment and focus has obvious downsides.

>> No.16910083

>>16910075
Who is this friend?

>> No.16910094
File: 672 KB, 906x799, 1442360444162.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16910094

>>16907831
I instantly know whatever someone has to say is worthless when they just post a youtube video instead of saying anything substantive. It's doubly true when they preface it with some grandiose title or claim. In short? OP is a faggot.

>> No.16910092

>>16910083
Idk some English guy, he also spoke about Bowden's favourite book being some WW1 memoir , the name of which I no longer recall.

>> No.16910463
File: 92 KB, 850x400, quote-truthfully-in-this-age-those-with-intellect-have-no-courage-and-those-with-some-modicum-jonathan-bowden-89-2-0230.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16910463

any cultured thug man in