Yeah I’m thinking he’s back

[Anonymous No.16870916]

[Anonymous No.16870923]

>>16870916
Ironic that the selection handles look like the tears on the "crying laughing" emoji

[Anonymous No.16870936]

>>16870923
Kek

[Anonymous No.16870955]

>>16870916
lmao Peterson is brain dead from his drug coma and he is still making troons seethe. what a king.

[Anonymous No.16870964]

>>16870916
>During a tense town hall
ESL or do Americans really?

[Anonymous No.16870976]

>>16870964
Makes perfect sense to me

[Anonymous No.16870977]

The insane level of hysteria about Peterson really proves how fucking domesticated leftists are. Its at the point where they find someone like him to be threatening and edgy.

[Anonymous No.16870998]

>>16870916
I have met several people IRL who hate the fuck out of this dude, but have literally never heard a word come out of his mouth. Every one of his concrete opinions apart from abstract psychology stuff is completely in line with what any functioning adult believes as far as I can tell. It isn't even that he is that smart or revolutionary in any way, what he says just should be so inoffensive.

[Anonymous No.16871003]

>>16870976
ESL or American? I get what they're trying to say but a town hall is a building, not an event.

[Anonymous No.16871008]

>>16870998
Women have a very large tendency to prejudge him as horribly sexist, since that's what the press says that he is, and then even if they do see something he says, they say he's wrong and sexist because they've already been conditioned to see him as horrible. It's funny and sad.

[Anonymous No.16871010]

>>16870964
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.16871015]

>>16871003
A 'town hall meeting' is an event, and it's common to shorten it to 'town hall' these days. In theory it hearkens back to the day when you would gather a large group in the town hall to discuss some issue facing your community. It's taken on a looser definition over time.

[Anonymous No.16871016]

>>16871010
You haven't answered my question. Are you ESL or an Am*rican?

[Anonymous No.16871021]

>>16870923
lole

[Anonymous No.16871024]

Peterson has never been outspoken against trannies, this is the biggest bullshit I've heard. He was against legislation backing up the usage of pronouns for god knows what crazy identities people are creating. But he's repeatedly said that he is in support of using the pronouns that would make a transgender person feel at ease. (The normal ones not the xe xi xo xum bullshit).

[Anonymous No.16871035]

>>16870916
All I see are Jew ass lickers fighting each other.

[Anonymous No.16871034]

>>16871016
>t. pseud

Try a dictionary, dipshit

[Anonymous No.16871036]

>>16871034
Ah, Ameridog, then.

[fight the Chaos, take a shower No.16871038]

>>16870998
This, when did "clean your room" and "pet a cat" become alt-right values? Clown World.
>>16870916
Did it really happen?

[Anonymous No.16871041]

>>16871008
It has all been women now that you mention it kek

[Anonymous No.16871043]

>>16871024
Is it some kind of tactic? To make the person who's actually giving massive ground sound like someone who is the fringe opposition?

[Anonymous No.16871046]

>>16870955
Say what you will about Peterson (I'm not a fan), but the fact that he elicits such a visceral reaction from the bugman/troon establishment makes him an important contemporary intellectual.

[Anonymous No.16871049]

>>16871036
Yes, Toronto, US born and bred. This is my article in the OP

[Anonymous No.16871063]

>>16871003
It's a metonym.

[Anonymous No.16871067]

>>16871043
No idea what you mean here bro

[Anonymous No.16871078]

>>16870916
>these are the people calling you fragile

[Anonymous No.16871093]

>>16871024
yeah I'm pretty sure he was only against the enforcement of pronouns and language policing, which anyone with a sane mind should agree with.

[Anonymous No.16871097]

>>16871024
xe xi xo xum I smell the blood of a cis white man

[Anonymous No.16871099]

>>16870916
I wish Peterson was the boogeyman that internet journos make him out to be

[Anonymous No.16871139]

>>16870916
I really fucking hate PC and cancel culture bullshit. Why is it the people who cry the loudest find the most success? I don't care for Peterson but I'll defend free speech till the end. Same people who went after Pinker for posting an article on Twitter because it had the audacity to say that poloce violence against blacks is a complex issue that needs to be handled in a comprehensive manner rather than just abolishing the current police.

[Anonymous No.16871152]

>>16870964
a town hall meeting. it's a phrase used by businesses when staff are gathered and informed of recent company news.

[Anonymous No.16871175]

>>16871152
by staff you should specify it's only the staff retarded enough to show up to the meeting

[Anonymous No.16871194]

>>16870977
You have understand that the leftist believes that the basis of their politics is is to provide at least the bare minimum necessary for continued existence of themselves and groups they deem valid. This is why they express their explicitly political agenda as either a pre-political set of ethics or an apolitical form of etiquette (you can see this whenever they claim their motives are derived from nothing other than “empathy” or “basic human decency,” neither of which are political nor ideological in and of themselves.
Leftists genuinely believe allowing someone like Peterson to speak is a literal death sentence for a sizable portion of the population. Theirs is the politics of a cornered animal.

[Anonymous No.16871197]

>>16870916
What's wrong with those people. It'll just be another moderate self-help book. It's like the Joker craze all over again.

[Anonymous No.16871207]

>>16870916
I hope this time he's learned his lesson and won't do the TV or university campus circuit anymore.

[Anonymous No.16871219]

>>16870916
That's a lot of shits to give about a midwit jungian.

[Anonymous No.16871224]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.16871246]

>>16870916
These guys do understand it's a great thing for PRH, right? A JP book will sell very well. You want to be the publisher.

[Anonymous No.16871251]

>>16871194
This isnt true of most leftists. Its just a veey vocal whiny subset of leftism. I'm a leftist. I support free speech unabashedly. Chomsky a leftist Jew defended Holocaust revisionism and has always stood publicly against suppression of free speech.

The leftists that do this screeching aren't politically well versed, I wish they weren't relevant...society awards the loudest whiners.

[Anonymous No.16871271]

>>16871251
Chomsky recently defended political correctness on the basis that it protects the lives and wellbeing of vulnerable groups. He’s fine with social policing as long as it isn’t the state doing it. This is the bedrock of leftism, and any consistent leftist viewpoint will inevitably agree with it.

[Anonymous No.16871287]

>>16871271
He defended "political corectness" in a very vague way saying that people are free to say what they want, not free from the consequences of saying it. In modern cases, the consequence being twitter liberals calling you toxic or problematic lmao.

[Anonymous No.16871318]

>>16871287
>He defended "political corectness" in a very vague way saying that people are free to say what they want, not free from the consequences of saying it.

This is such a cop-out. Free speech does, indeed, mean you are free from its consequences, i.e. if you speak out against the government, there is no consequence from the govt. to punish your sentiment. I know that can be twisted to, "Well, if you say X, and someone assaults you, that's just a consequence." No, that person is not "free" to assault you as a consequence, by pure definition of the law.

If a freedom entails a punishment, then it's not free.

[Anonymous No.16871336]

>>16871024
Yeah his point was that the government has no right to force pronouns by law, because they don't, and the fact that it was just "preferred pronouns" was extremely vague language that could easily be abused.
The media immediately called him a transphobe for defending freedom of speech, then immediately cut to a segment about drumpf destroying their freedom of press.
Now if you don't let your 12-year-old make a permanent life decision to transition in Canada the state takes them away and transitions them for you.
Lol we're all gonna die

[Anonymous No.16871347]

>>16871139
Squeaky axle gets the grease

[Anonymous No.16871350]

>>16871318
No ones assaulting JP they're pissing fron the mouth on Twitter. This is free speech as well.

[Anonymous No.16871383]

>>16871287
You really just repeated my point in so many other words:
>He’s fine with social policing as long as it isn’t the state doing it.
Speech cannot be free in any meaningful sense if it can be micromanaged by no state actors that are more efficient and intrusive than the state could ever be at this point. I don’t understand how people so aware of the manner in which neoliberalism altered the power dynamics of society’s institutions and still cling to conceptions of any freedom which limits infringements on it to actions done by the state.
At least just be honest and say something like, “ the protection and accommodation require forms of social, and that it is a goal we should pursue.” I could even accept the argument that restrictions specifically placed on me would increase freedoms for other groups to a greater extent, thus making is our society as a whole an even freer one. But don’t constantly coerce me and tell me that I’m just as free as ever.

[Anonymous No.16871509]

>>16871383
So we're in agreement?

[Anonymous No.16871585]

Jordan Peterson is incredibly lukewarm and really just gives eloborate reasons and justifications for commonsensical self-help practices. I can respect him in so far as he has helped many lost souls to get back on their feet but if only he was anything like these faggot journalists and media figures make him out to be. They are weak people physically, mentally and spiritually, possessed by degenerate ideologies and stuck in mundane superfluous occupations. The best thing for these people would unironically be to put them in work camps for a few years.

[Anonymous No.16871603]

>>16871509
Not at all, as far as I can tell , we have several disagreements:
1. The exact consequences which freedom of speech should protect people from
2. The extent that certain consequences are even meaningful
3. The entities capable of making speech less free

The biggest qualm I have with you is the dishonest way in which you phrase your position to make. It seem more neigh than it actually is. I don’t want to assume your exact position, but most leftists ultimately hold one of the positions I paraphrased at the end of my post. If you expressed your position like that, I could at least have a conversation with you.

[Anonymous No.16871654]

>>16871383
Any idea where I can read more along this line of thought? Books or articles ?

[Anonymous No.16871783]

>>16871654

Manufacturing Consent Chomsky

[Anonymous No.16871877]

>>16871383
Next time my girlfriend says “I’m not obstructing free speech, I’m just exercising my right to boycott J.K. Rowling” can you come and explain things to her cause she won’t listen to me.

[Anonymous No.16871905]

>>16871024
Peterson's a fucking idiot the bill he protested prevented discrimination against trans and non-binary people. It didn't force people to say the right pronouns Peterson just can't read

[Anonymous No.16871917]

>>16871318
The people who protest your freedom of speech are also using their freedom of speech, you do realize this right? I hope you remember to take your meds.

[Anonymous No.16871925]

>>16871097
HahahahahahA

[Anonymous No.16871937]

>>16870916
This type of behavior should be considered unbecoming and indicative that something is wrong with a person, not the offending stimulus. This sort of behavior only happens because it is enabled and gets results. It's like letting a dog define its won boundaries and growl when you touch his food. It only happens because it's allowed.

[Anonymous No.16871944]

>>16871905
A wild troll uses an old bait, trying to catch a male pleb. So far it seems uneffective, but let's lurk a little more to see nature at work.

[Anonymous No.16872015]

>>16871654
Excitable Speech by Judith Butler
Speech & Harm: Controversies over Free Speech edited by Maitra and McGowan.

[Anonymous No.16872020]

>>16871905
I wish that was what actually happened

[Anonymous No.16872029]

>>16871877
She has a conception of free speech that wouldn’t allow for any other view.
What is iltimattrue is this >>16871917. Any you should ultimately come to the conclusion that free speech is inherently contradictory and not a value worth pursuing.

[Anonymous No.16872050]

>>16871046

This but unironically. The guy was hospitalized for abusing anxiety medication (albeit under orders to do so from his doctor.) Yet, even the world's first Neo-Postcomatosist philosopher can't stop DABBING on troons.

[Anonymous No.16872081]

>>16872029
>iltimattrue
*ultimately
Don’t know how I ended up with that.

[Anonymous No.16872180]

>>16871008
well he says horrible sexist stuff, like men and women are different, or women want compenent men like wtf. how misogynistic to point out that women who enslave themselves by working 60 hours a week would be more happy, being married, with children.
He obviously hates women

[Anonymous No.16872201]

>>16871038
>boy start cleaning his room
>boy puts himself together, finds job and friends
>boy becomes literally hitler

[Anonymous No.16872331]

>>16870964
>Manisha Krishnan
A native bongalese speaker, surely.

[Anonymous No.16872454]

>>16871336
>Now if you don't let your 12-year-old make a permanent life decision to transition in Canada the state takes them away and transitions them for you.

WHAT really?!

[Anonymous No.16872461]

>>16870916
What the fuck is wrong with anglos?????

[Anonymous No.16872501]

>>16870916
>you aren't an atheist, you just don't think you believe in God
???

[Anonymous No.16872519]

>>16871603
1. Legal trouble. Bodily harm.
2. Too broad and vague to answer. Twitter mobs aren't very meaningful in my opinion, though in certain extreme cases it's lead to firing.
3. No one should be allowed to make speech less free within the confines of the laws surrounding free speech.

I think for an act of speech to be met with consequence, their should be clear intent of violence within the words spoken. JP doesnt meet this criteria in my opinion.

The thing is though, who holds the Twitter mobs accountable? Who decides what enrages them and what doesn't. How far does their retributive free speech go? Is it a damned if we damned if we don't situation?
It's the responsibility pf feckless corporations to investigate claims against anyone they're involved with and if no instance of lets call it "violent" speech is found they should publicly state that they aren't punishing someone for speaking freely.

[Anonymous No.16872520]

>>16870916
Wouldnt be surprised if peterson's marketing team had a hand in how this story is being reported. It certainly backs up the "last sane man left on earth" persona he likes to go for.

[Anonymous No.16872541]

>>16871318
Freedom from consequence of government yes, but not from social consequences. I agree even in extreme cases like holocaust denial people should be able to speak openly, but they are not immune to being ridiculed. Assault is different from "cancel culture."
When you call obama a nigger, your boss can fire you.

[Anonymous No.16872575]

>>16872029
>Any you should ultimately come to the conclusion that free speech is inherently contradictory and not a value worth pursuing.
Leftists recognize this. Free speech is only worth pursuing for your faction, whatever that might be.

[Anonymous No.16872639]

>>16872081
And here was I googling definitions of iltimattrue

[Anonymous No.16872674]

>>16872541
Ridicule is proper and healthy, and is there just desert of hateful buffoons.
But when people start losing jobs, contracts, speaking opportunities, democratically elected officials deposed at pitchfork-point — that’s called McCarthyism or worse.

[Anonymous No.16873296]

>>16872541
>When you call obama a nigger, your boss can fire you.
If I have a private conversation outside of work that contains me calling Obama a nigger, and some third party overhears me, runs to my boss and snitches, why should I be fired?

[Anonymous No.16873405]

>>16872050
I thought it was pain killers?

[Anonymous No.16873454]

>>16871905
The bill said that using the "wrong" (actually right) pronouns was discrimination.

[Anonymous No.16873484]

>>16872541
>When you call obama a nigger, your boss can fire you
He legally can, but he shouldn't because that is a sign of an overly sensitive society. Especially when it's something like Hulk Hogan getting secretly recorded, or people getting "cancelled" for tweets they made a decade ago. "Men" these days are too weak and feminized which can actually be seen in the OP where they started crying because Peterson was published. The radical left wing is filled with mentally and physically weak people.

[Anonymous No.16873497]

>>16871003
So you're ESL. Interesting how you're trying to pretend you aren't.

[Anonymous No.16873951]

>>16870916
How the fuck can someone as bland as Peterson provoke such hysteria?

[Anonymous No.16874219]

>>16873951
Liberals are mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.16874250]

>>16873951
They are vapid and fully indoctrinated by capitalism. They cannot conceive of the fact that merits and appearance are two separate categories. They don't care that Peterson is incredibly centrist and boring. They literally just care that moderate right-wingers like him and therefore he should be cancelled.

[Anonymous No.16874277]

>>16870916
Peterson is so milquetoast. How do people this mentally ill get decent jobs while I get assfucked

[Anonymous No.16874345]

>>Rationalist
>hey what's actually good about Jordan Peterson? What does he mean?

>>neo-nazi
>idk I never read him, he makes libs seethe just like trump so he's good

[Anonymous No.16874349]

>>16873951
Peterson is actually mildly reactionary about gender roles, not full-on but he clearly wants to wind the clock back a bit. It is simply forbidden for normie conservatives to promote anything reactionary, they are only allowed to conserve whatever paradigm the progs have recently created. Peterson's great crime is to be mildly reactionary(on one subject) as a Uni prof who then became extremely famous. This category is minuscule, I actually can't really think of another person who properly fits into it.

The fact that he is so harmless generally just infuriates them more because it helps him actually convert people to his ideas who might otherwise just be progs. And they are very concerned about a pipeline leading from any reactionary position at all to the far right.

There is also quite a lot of contempt for the way he talks about 'pomo neomarxism', it is a very low status way to talk about that.

[Anonymous No.16874359]

>>16874277
Not just a decent job, he was a professor at a top university and he hasn't even read Hegel.

[Anonymous No.16874507]

>>16872541
Freedom dies to a bunch of faggots shouting NO FREEDOM FROM CONSEQUENCES

[Anonymous No.16874522]

>>16874359
I don’t need to read Hegel, Kierkegaard told me that his inability to frame his entire philosophical framework as a thought experiment makes him “merely comic”

[Anonymous No.16874537]

>>16874522
Oh Soren you madlad.

[Anonymous No.16875021]

>>16872541
No retard, what you're describing is the first amendment

[Anonymous No.16875047]

>>16872541
Yes, because when the founding fathers sat down and drafted an entire national governing apparatus they were totally thinking "Tyrannical, overreaching, unrepresentative government is bad, but tyrannical, overreaching, unrepresentative NGOs are totally fine.

[Anonymous No.16875071]

>>16874522
I think Kierkegaard is best understood after Hegel. Much of his philosophy is criticising and parodying his ideas, and because of that Kierkegaard mostly operates within a Hegelian framework. The Sickness Unto Death is a bitter, inverted parody of the Phenomenology of Spirit, and you may appreciate TSUD more if you know how he's parodying it.

[Anonymous No.16875081]

>>16870916
Never understood why this milquetoast liberal conservative causes so much buttdevestation for radlibs.

[Anonymous No.16875095]

>>16870977
Don't know if actual leftists have this reptilian reflex but rose Twatter shitlibs sure do, the kind of fags who were totally a WN a few months ago before being saved by ContraPoints or some shit and giving Tim fucking Pool as an example of how deep into the alt right they were. Just all around embarrassing individuals.

[Anonymous No.16875117]

>>16871246
They're still seething that Penguin only moves Peterson and muh dead white men instead of their dime a dozen trite whitey bad indulgences.

[Anonymous No.16875146]

His daughter is scrapping together a ghost written book from is sticky notes. Quite firm that JP is braindead from his benzo serbia covid misadventure.

Considering his daughter was dating a human trafficker I see this as the reality.

[Anonymous No.16875553]

>>16871905
>bills preventing anything
If only spree-killers complied to gun-free zone laws, right?

Statist bitch. Soon you'll see what happen when politicians don't need your pandering anymore.

[Anonymous No.16875602]

>>16875081
Nothing makes these faux-progessist activists that had everything handed to them their whole lives you can achieve meaningful purpose and transcedence by yourself. They'll never solve their problems on their own because they're incapable of that. Beind dependant on some daddy authority or another they'll never achieve self-determinance, and they just make sure anyone else never does too.

[Anonymous No.16875746]

>>16871046
>the fact that he elicits such a visceral reaction from the bugman/troon establishment
It's because he's not right leaning, merely educated enough to say outright that SJWism is nonsense based on his work experience.
So they have no reason to hate him, so they hate him even more because it checks them so bad.

[Anonymous No.16875766]

>>16875146
Serbian benzo covid misadventure

Someone should make an indie steam game where you play as Jordan Peterson exploring Jungian mind space in his coma

[Anonymous No.16877122]

>>16875766
Has he even read Jung?

[Anonymous No.16877158]

>>16870916
being this afraid of wash your penis man

[Anonymous No.16877161]

>>16870998
>>16871038
The same thing happened with Trump, though I don't even like him myself. I'm an ausfag and everyone here is obsessed with laughing at him and insulting him, but when I ask them why they dislike him I get nothing but buzzwords like sexism or racism; no discussion of policies. I didn't mean for this to turn into /pol/ nonsense but this shit is all I hear about from these nutcase coworkers

[Anonymous No.16877178]

>>16877161
Its not about trump. Its what he represents. And be represents nazi america and world war 3.

[Anonymous No.16877188]

>>16877178
> And be represents nazi america and world war 3.
I hope you’re memeing
Even Obongo was less of a ziondog than drumph

[Anonymous No.16877191]

>>16871041
Worse than the Jew. When will pol realise?

[Anonymous No.16877202]

>>16877188
Everyone knows he's the orange hitler. It doesn't matter what he did, it matters how people see him. All sides consider him to be hitler

[Anonymous No.16877421]

>>16870916
>Be a man
>Literally just exist
>Make women and soibois cry
MFW

[Anonymous No.16877490]

>>16870977
wait seriously?
what does peterson do to rattle their cages im honestly so confused. feels like hysteria.

[Anonymous No.16877503]

The reason they are crying is that Peterson is about to radicalise another 100,000 depressed young virgins.

These people feel bad for you.

[Anonymous No.16877531]

>>16877503
What does it mean to be radicalized?

[Anonymous No.16877534]

>>16877122
Jung and Dostoevsky are probably the only things he actually has read.

[Anonymous No.16877541]

>>16877534
I feel like he talked himself into that job

[Anonymous No.16877566]

>>16877531
To think thoughts that aren't approved by CNN.

[Anonymous No.16877579]

>>16877531
I was radicalised so speaking from experience, it's when people take advantage of your life not going well to push you into believing things you normally wouldn't. It's preying on the vulnerable like terrorist groups do. All sorts of political groups do, left, right, minorities, whites, quacks, cranks...

>>16877566
I'm not a leftist and don't watch television

[Anonymous No.16877582]

>>16877541
Maybe, but the way he references them is different from the way he references authors that I'm certain he hasn't read (e.g., Marx, Derrida, Foucault, etc.).

[Anonymous No.16877584]

>>16877579
>I'm not a leftist and don't watch television
Maybe you should start then so you know what wrongthink you need to avoid.

[Anonymous No.16877621]

>>16877584
How does watching mind-rotting propaganda made for people with an IQ of 70 gonna help me?

[Anonymous No.16877683]

>>16877584
Might as well stay off the internet as well

[Anonymous No.16877718]

>>16871251
>Its just a veey vocal whiny subset of leftism.

This is true, but they have gone out of their way to dominate all discourse, so non dogmatic leftists can't even speak up without getting hounded by them and effectively 'deplatformed' for not completely aligning to the *correct* viewpoints.

[Anonymous No.16877740]

>>16870916
Are we really at the stage where milquetoast, common sense bromides are controversial enough to incite boycotts? Fuck this godforsaken shithole country.

[Anonymous No.16877890]

>>16870977
My SJW ex used to get into hissy fits over this guy. It's pretty remarkable how trainable the average person is.

[Anonymous No.16877895]

>>16877490
He tries to help males instead of calling them evil.

[Anonymous No.16877922]

>>16877895
White males specifically, I mean.

[Anonymous No.16878172]

>>16871194
>You mussen understand zat ze leftist ist believing zat ze basis of zeir politik ist fur provising at least ze bare minimum neccesary for ze contunued existenbrucken of zemselven und grupen zey deem valid. Zis is varum zey are expressent der expliciten politik agendzug as eizer ein prepolitik set of ethicen oder ein apolitik form of etiket (you may observe zis ven zey claim zeir motiven ist deriven auf nil oder zan "empathy" or "basic human decency", nezer of vich are politiken oder ideelogik in and of zemselven. Ze leftist ist genuine believen allow Peterson sprachen ist ein death sentence for ein sizable porzion of ze volken. Zeirs ist der politiken auf der kornered animalen

[Anonymous No.16878475]

>>16870955
absolutely

>>16870916
"Stand up straight with your shoulders back"
"Treat yourself like you are someone you are responsible for helping"
"Make friends with people who want the best for you"
"Compare yourself with who you were yesterday, not with who someone else is today"
"Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them"
"Set your house in perfect order before you criticize the world"
"Pursue what is meaningful (not what is expedient)"
"Tell the truth — or, at least, don’t lie"
"Assume that the person you are listening to might know something you don’t"
"Be precise in your speech"
"Do not bother children when they are skate-boarding"
"Pet a cat when you encounter one on the street"

[Anonymous No.16878500]

>>16878475
>"Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them"

[Anonymous No.16878505]

this is just PR for retarded nodad incels, be sure to buy his braindead book to show those whatevers

[Anonymous No.16878511]

>>16871097
underrated

[Anonymous No.16878649]

>>16870998
Its the managerial therapeutic state corporations and globalists need a mass of compliant patient consumer units unable to think or fend for themselves. Can be relied upon to buy rainbow colored commodities and shut out wrongthink such is the role of marxists trannies lgbtsjwtfnpc cattle they are purpose engineered biopolitical clientele for neoliberalism.

[Anonymous No.16878671]

>>16877503
If you dont think this is a beautiful display of diversity and progress you might be radicalized.

[Anonymous No.16878695]

>>16877503
Lgbt cattle dont have sex they virtue signal and engage in shrill politically correct activities at the behest of their corporate masters george soros bill nye, the science guy, and their cultural marxist professors. Whatever they do is purely sanctimonious and utterly devoid of eroticism.

[Anonymous No.16878795]

>>16871905
Being against what is obviously an ideologically driven social engineering totalitarian censorshipand the sexualization of children makes you a nazi? Who would have thunk? It isnt like something similar has happened before.

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2010/07_08/2010_07_04_Fleischhauer_HowThe.htm

>Germany's left has its own tales of abuse. One of the goals of the German 1968 movement was the sexual liberation of children. For some, this meant overcoming all sexual inhibitions, creating a climate in which even pedophilia was considered progressive.


https://transanityca.wordpress.com/2017/08/13/synanon-the-brainwashing-game-and-modern-transgender-activism-the-orwellian-implications-of-transgender-politics-by-jenn-smith/

>In a slick video released on Facebook with over one million views so far, a hyper-feminized/sexualized 8 year old boy (who some have compared to a drag version of JonBenét Ramsey) is featured partying in a hypersexual adult LGBT environment and telling kids watching that if their parents or friends do not support their desire to be drag (or trans), they need to get new parents and friends. Professional quality video and editing made this call to young children to the queer lifestyle all the more appealing. As “Lactatia” speaks to his peers, while an all too happy host leers, bold text leaps out at the viewer saying “YOU NEED NEW PARENTS! YOU NEED NEW FRIENDS!” You too can be a drag queen or transgender superstar and perhaps head out on the town to party with the wild LGBT boys and “Lactatia.” If your parents won’t get on board, they can simply be replaced with a new “glitter family.”

The author of this article is xerself transgender so we can either conclude hey maybe theres a point to be made or these people are a bunch of whackjobs

[Anonymous No.16878819]

>>16874359
mean have you tried bringing up hegel or any western philosopher for that matter around your local lgbtsjwtfnpc marxist cattle? In no time you will see their little stupid cowlike eyes light up in panic. Soon enough they will start with the usual subhuman bleating "wasnt he sexist? Arent you being dangerously eurocentric? Why read books by dead white men when you could have been streaming the latest diverse and inclusive workplace comedies at netflix hulu and disneygo? What are you a russian bot trump supporter? Didnt you know reading is ableist towards people who are too retarded to read? Have you been taking your SSRIs and HRT? it is very important that you take the medication dr goldstein prescribed otherwise we will have to report you to corporate for mandatory sensitivity training".

[Anonymous No.16878830]

>>16870955
omg holy cringe

[Anonymous No.16878848]

This thread is eurocentric

[Anonymous No.16878906]

>>16872050
He often advocated for taking drugs to treat psychological disorders in his podcast, so I'm not surprised it happened to him. Wonder if he'll change what he says.

[Anonymous No.16878922]

>>16872454
Yes it's considered child abuse in Canada to refuse to agree to transition your child regardless of age. People have had their kids taken away due to refusal.

[Anonymous No.16878936]

>>16875766
Shit like this is why we still need newgrounds. The real question is this: are the highschoolers who make edgy flash games unlikely to read his books, or more likely to read his books?

[Anonymous No.16878937]

>>16878505
Bruh you're coping too hard, it's cringe my man.

[Anonymous No.16878972]

>>16878922

[Anonymous No.16878998]

Is this what happens when your rhetoric just absolutely dominates the culture war?

[Anonymous No.16879022]

>>16871287
What a fucking retarded thing to say. That's a teenager-tier take from somebody who's supposed to be a lefty intellectual.

[Anonymous No.16879069]

>>16879022
"Political correctness" is not even political it is a question of empathy and basic human decency. The discomfort you get at being asked to acknowledge your own privilege is not even one millionth of the humiliation trans people or PoC undergo every second of their waking existence from living under white supremacist capitalist heteronormative patriarchy.

[Anonymous No.16879088]

>>16872541
How is a government consequence and a social consequence any different, especially in this day and age? You're only choosing one power structure that you don't want to control you to the exception of all others. Sure, the government shouldn't toss you in jail because of your opinions; but why then would it be fine for twitter to censor your speech? Visa to cancel your credit cards? People to stalk and threaten you? And what prevents a government from hiding its oppressive actions through the use of any of the aforementioned? This "no freedom from consequences" nonsense is the sort of shit people say to distract themselves from the techno-dystopia being built around us this very moment.

[Anonymous No.16879089]

>>16879069
>not even one millionth of the humiliation trans people or PoC undergo
I wish I could make their humiliation one millions times worse.

[Anonymous No.16879095]

>>16879088
They don't say it to distance themselves, they say it because they fully support what's happening since the powers that be are on their side.

[Anonymous No.16879103]

>>16872541
>>16879088
And by "no freedom from consequences" I'm specifically referring to the social consequences you mentioned. Sorry, I might've been a little unclear. I definitely agree that government consequences in regard to free speech are abhorrent.

[Anonymous No.16879107]

At a minimum it should be illegal for financial corporations like banks to enforce any punitive measures due to their customers' speech.

[Anonymous No.16879129]

Peterson is a kike tool, but I like that he makes fags seethe.

[Anonymous No.16879165]

>>16879089
Being submissive gay queers leftists actively get off to it.

[Anonymous No.16879168]

>>16879069
If it was merely a question of empathy you'd be fine. It's not, though. It's instead asking for all of society to play along with the mentally ills' delusions, to the point of allowing male ogres to participate in women's sports. Why don't we treat schizophrenics this way? In a postmodern world, shouldn't we accept that a schizophrenic's reality is just as real to them as ours is to us?

[Anonymous No.16879241]

>>16879069
You will never meet any group of people as unempathetic as pc types. The active unwillingness to understand the people they're arguing with is their defining quality. It's been documented by people like Jon Haidt that conservatives and moderates understand liberals better than liberals understand anybody else. You've confused being a bleeding heart for walking a mile in someone's shoes.

[Anonymous No.16879328]

>>16879241
Marginalised people cannot empathize with those who want them dead. One cannit empathize with racism with sexism or transphobia. Period. It is just basic sensitivity to human suffering yes iam PC yes i am a sjw i would gladly burn every single last page of the western cannon if it meant putting an end to racism and sexism. I dont believe this is radical or political at all but the bare minimum that should be required of a decent empathetic human being. If you dont agree whole heartedly then you should not consider yourself on the left an lgbt ally or an antiracist.

[Anonymous No.16879344]

>>16879328
Decent bait, but the problem is that modern leftists actually think like this

[Anonymous No.16879347]

>>16879328
Why should I feel any empathy for niggers?

[Anonymous No.16879427]

>>16879347
some of the best people I know are niggers, and I would gladly live in a neighborhood full of niggers. you should spend time talking to more niggers so you can learn some empathy

[Anonymous No.16879458]

>>16879427
I live in the south so I've had to deal with niggers on a continual basis for my entire life. Try again.

[Anonymous No.16879484]

>>16871099
It’s the same thing with Trump. These people wouldn’t be making a big slaps if they didn’t act like ducking children.

[Anonymous No.16879494]

>>16871067
Not him, but as far as I understand
>have left, center, right positions
>claim right is actually a center position
>center becomes right
>new right is now replaced with previous far-right
>repeat until get to the state you desire
I.e. Peterson supports using some pronouns on trans people(center position), but left claims he is far-right, so now the center position is NOT the position Peterson holds all because he was branded right wing.

[Anonymous No.16879507]

>>16871905
You will never be a woman

[Anonymous No.16879551]

>>16873951

Its the bland ones that are the most dangerous, because they can't easily be painted as "literally Hitler" and thus not even worth listening to. The bland ones, you actually have to listen to them and refute them based on arguments, and that's where the left inevitably fails.

[Anonymous No.16879558]

>>16872050
I thought he took only what his doctor prescribed but committed himself to a mental institution on the account of feeling withdrawal symptoms.

[Anonymous No.16879571]

>>16870916
Why are people so afraid of a psychologist's self-help book? Is all of this drama because he doesn't want to call trannies she/her? The problems of our society are so petty lmao.

[Anonymous No.16879576]

>>16871036
Europe licks America's nutsack. Sad isn't it.

[Anonymous No.16879578]

>>16872541
Imagine being this much of a good goyim.

[Anonymous No.16879669]

>>16871251
>Its just a veey vocal whiny subset of leftism

sure....

[Anonymous No.16879704]

>>16874219
leftists are mentally ill*

[Anonymous No.16879727]

>>16871905
>>16871097
dilate

[Anonymous No.16879735]

>>16870977
When your entire worldview is delusions upon delusions, it's very easy to become insecure and have the slightest hint at someone not agreeing with you make you go apeshit. It's unreal how these people go a single say without actively thinking about blowing their head off

[Anonymous No.16879736]

I'm a marxist and I kinda like Peterson for the reason that his sheer presence exposes how liberals lack any kind of insight and their inability to deal with a conservative daddy figure. Most of his points are so easily refutable if you're well-read in marxist and postmodern lit but western liberals of course do not dare to read theory, all they do is cancel celebs on twitter and therefore lack any serious political stances. He makes liberals look fucking retarded and that's fine bc that's just how they really are.
I wish he'd grow some balls and accept the debate invitation from richad wolff. I wanna see this grown man cry in front of an audience as he googles what dialectic materialism means.

[Anonymous No.16879965]

>>16879558
It's a bit more complicated than that. He was physically addicted and underwent an experimental treatment, involving being put in an artificial coma, in some Eastern European country. This maybe left him brain damaged, although he seems to be doing a lot better now, so it might also just have been temporary aftereffects. Anyway, it's quite an interesting story.

>>16870916
The funny thing about Peterson, which the left fails to understand, is that he is arguably the worst enemy of the alt right, which makes it hilariously stupid when they brand him alt right. Just mention him on any thread on /pol/ and see how they respond. They absolutely despise him.

Peterson is very much a classical liberal. He believes in civil nationalism and individualism, which is the opposite of the ethonationalism which the alt right supports (and which is gaining huge grounds all over Europe again). But Peterson and the alt right compete for the same audience, which is dissatisfied young men who are disillusioned with their society and future.

Remember how almost 20% of men now can't find a romantic partner? Or think about how few economic opportunities people have now, how impossible it is to buy a house, how the projected retirement age is in the seventies and so on. Combine the lack of romantic and economic opportunities with a legal and educational system which explicitly discriminates against males, and mass immigration which disenfranchises them in their native countries, and you have a huge number of potentially very angry, very desperate men with nothing to lose.

Peterson's solution is to better yourself, take responsibility and so on, and also reject culture and ethnicity as being important, but instead accepting your country becoming part of a global melting pot. The alt right instead proposes racially homogenous countries and a return to more traditional gender roles. Obviously the first one aligns almost exactly with the leftist globalist agenda, but since he doesn't want to conform to speech codes, leftist identity politics and all those authoritarian aspects of the globalist left, they try to silence him. Which, ironically, leads his audience into the alt right, their worst enemy, instead.

[Anonymous No.16880016]

>>16879069
PC people are authoritarians who salivate at the idea of gulaging people. Dilate, you will never be a woman.

[Anonymous No.16880019]

>>16871046
It's all just distraction

All you tools are just suckers on the internet bread and circus.
Hint, you don't even get the bread, and the circus isn't real.

[Anonymous No.16880045]

>>16879069
I just want to remind you all that I literally called this our way earlier in the thread(>>16871194).
I honestly think these people are programmed.

[Anonymous No.16880054]

>>16879736
>Most of his points are so easily refutable
refute them

[Anonymous No.16880114]

>>16878172
Read these posts and tell me that I'm just some crazy little nazi:
>>16879069
>>16879328
I described them perfectly.

[Anonymous No.16880176]

>>16879736
dialectic materialism is not real.
Marxism is not a science.

[Anonymous No.16880244]

>>16871194
>Theirs is the politics of a cornered animal.

Despite being the current political apex predator. The leftist believes they are the underdog under all circumstances, even though they've take over all modern day institutions.

[Anonymous No.16880271]

>>16880244
Its the reverse this people are weak and are easily controlled by institutions the rainbow community is compliant bleary eyed cattle sinners eager to buy indulgences from their corporate masters afraid of thinking for themselves easily frightened if white people were to get their shit together and slaughter them it would honestly come as a relief to the lot of them.

[Anonymous No.16880276]

Shit like that really given us a taste of what "worker's control" would be like and turns it would be just a lot of retards crying about everything

[Anonymous No.16880294]

When did adults turn into people who cry over books they dont like? When I was a kid I thought reading was something that improved your character but the people whose lives revolve around literature weep over self help books. What happened?

[Anonymous No.16880298]

>>16880276
The year is 202x unders suspicion of being a white supremacist and a russian asset the house unamerican activities comitee has order you to attend a state sponsored screening of star wars XXVIII: avengers assemble, the latest disneygooglepepsico motion picture extravaganza. As you are escorted to the theater you pass by a daily prideblm mcdonalds parade with a fabulous troupe old 9-year-old boy catamites twerking before the phallic missiles of the lockheed martin float, missiles set to launch at midnight towards the eurasian heartland (mercifully) wiping the human race off the face of the earth. when you arrive at the theater, alexandra ocasio cortez and bill nye strap you into a chair forcing your eyes open clockwork orange style, the screen flickers on but instead of space adventures or superheroes the audience is treated to what looks like blurry vhs footage of a pack of bluehaired fat positive queers raping an innocent white child intersped with blipverts for the latest techproduct. The leftists in the audience chant YAS KWEEN SLAY at what they cant help but see as a beautiful and heartwarming display of diversity and progress. The queers start ripping appart the child and feasting on its bloody entrails like rabid hogs at the through. You sit on the front row and think: "gee i shouldve joined the alt right before it was too late"

[Anonymous No.16880313]

>>16871271
yeah using chomsky as an example of good leftism here is not gonna fly. the man is a liberal through and through

[Anonymous No.16880314]

>>16871024
My therapist told me (in a somewhat obscure manner) that trannies are mentally ill and need professional assistance.

[Anonymous No.16880778]

>>16880298
lmao

[Anonymous No.16880807]

>>16871024
Essentially this. All he wanted was to prevent the Canadian government from setting precedence of policing language by coating it with the "good" intention of protecting gender fluid faggots. Unfortunately, the gov got their way and can now punish people at random who didn't realize that Sarah goes by the pronoun xir and can take it even further in the future now that they have legal precedence.

[Anonymous No.16880828]

>>16870916
do people seriously think peterson is extremist?

[Anonymous No.16881009]

>>16870916
Imagine being so obsessed with a penis washing drug addict and his syncophant zoomer followers you fucking cry because someone might read his neoliberal schlock

[Anonymous No.16881011]

>>16880807
do you happen to have an example handy? just to see it for myself

[Anonymous No.16881034]

>>16878475
>"Do not bother children when they are skate-boarding"
Did he actually say this? why lol

[Anonymous No.16881038]

Yeah I think you need to work in publishing to be so fucking lame that you cry over something as banal as this guy.

[Anonymous No.16881125]

>>16881034
If he did I imagine it was a metaphor for "let kids go outside and play" or something.

[Anonymous No.16881148]

>>16881034
Taleb used that analogy as well in anti-fragility. Basically, let children get hurt and don't be over protective with them lest they grow up to be effeminate adults who cry at the slightest sign of adversity. OP's pic = case in point.

[Anonymous No.16881166]

>>16879736
>I'm a marxist
>I want to see this grown man cry
Do you want to cry, anon?

[Anonymous No.16881177]

>>16879965
>>16879735
These guys get it

[Anonymous No.16881191]

>>16870977
The only "insane hysteria" was Peterson's fearmongering about the government coming to kill you for misgendering someone, something he made up, his conspiracy theories about cultural marxists an thinking apple cider can make you ill for a month.

[Anonymous No.16881203]

>>16881191
The government is run by people who would happily put "transphobes" into gulags if they could.

[Anonymous No.16881219]

>>16881191
Find a clip (not a headline, not a tweet saying he did) of Peterson saying anything this drastic would happen.

[Anonymous No.16881223]

>>16871024
peterson always refered to me as a she in our teacher/student encounters

t. u of t tranny

[Anonymous No.16881245]

>>16881219
Literally every video he's ever made.

[Anonymous No.16881257]

>>16881191
>>16881245
Reminder that you will never be a woman.

[Anonymous No.16881268]

>>16881245
Then it should be easy for you to find one and timestamp that part

[Anonymous No.16881274]

>>16870916
I find it impressive that somebody as intellectually unimportant as Peterson can make retards seethe so hard

[Anonymous No.16881292]

>>16881268
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIeFt88Hm8s
53:28 - Conspiracy mongering about intellectual "elites".

[Anonymous No.16881307]

>>16881292
Is this where you pretend that things that everyone can clearly observe aren't real?

[Anonymous No.16881310]

>>16879704
>we're all mentally ill
ftfy

[Anonymous No.16881324]

>>16877582
>>16877541
He hasn't only read Jung, he seems to be one of the few people who understands him. Maps of Meaning led me to delve deep into Jung, and it's clear that Peterson's work is the distillation of Jung through a neurobiological lens.
Peterson has a lot of layers to him. The self help/anti-sjw aspect is important, but it's just the latest step in what's been a decades-long scientific career. Maps of Meaning is his real masterpiece, and he'll ultimately be remembered as the Christ to Jung's John the Baptist.

[Anonymous No.16881327]

>>16881307
No its the part where Jordon Peterson engages in conspiracy theories that are one step away from "the jewish question", just replacing the word "jews" with "intellectual elites".

[Anonymous No.16881334]

>>16878830
What do you mean "g"? >:^)

[Anonymous No.16881342]

>>16881327
Oh no the antisemitism boogeyman what will I do.

[Anonymous No.16881391]

>>16879965
This is so inane, peterson offers relatively effective coping mechanisms for life in a deranged, miserable environment but insists on presenting through an inherently reactionary worldview in which inequality and injustice are dismissed as personal failures whilst simulatenously promoting a vision of 'natural order'
If you accept his worldview then you have to wonder why blacks are, or average, poorer than whites in developed countries, or why majority black countries are poorer than majority white countries
He has explicitly dismissed feminism and the promotion of LGBT rights
He is fervountly anti-socialist and an apologist of heirarchy
Whether you find his opinions as offensive or you agree with them the fact is that his views are entirely compatable with proto-fascism
Peterson is a function of a capitalist society in freefall and you're gay

[Anonymous No.16881440]

>>16881292
Ironically leftists have become naive as fuck about power, the last believers in objective 'truth' and 'morality' how dare you to question the power of journalists corporations academics, the elites which obviously have nothing but our best interests in mind? They are motivated by fear of being labelled right wing more than anything. Ideal dupes for the neoliberal military industrial consumer complex. See for example the ideal woman of feminism is a literal prostitute.

[Anonymous No.16881466]

>>16881440
There is a difference between being skeptical of people in power, and anti-intellectualism. Interesting how the same people who rant and rave about "intellectual elites" and how we should all oppose them and be skeptical of whatever they say suddenly shut the fuck up when it comes to wealthy capitalists. Jordon Peterson himself does this in the video, goes on a rant about intellectual "elites" and how power corrupts and then turns around and say rich people in corporate positions have a moral incentive to be good. Its just capitalist misdirection.

[Anonymous No.16881479]

>>16881391
And lgbtsjwtfnpc ideology isnt a function of capitalism? Arent you people just focused on tearing appart the last line of defense against total commodification of life total atomization and total corporate control, to replace the family and religion, with the total prostitution of all beings, total abject surrender to capital because otherwise would be fascism? I say leftists are dupes and if daring to stand up for my way of life and freedom of consciousness against woke capitalism makes me a nazi then so be it.

[Anonymous No.16881494]

As a conservative Canadian boomer a lot of his 'psychology' stems from that. Trying to defend his retard political and economic position.

[Anonymous No.16881496]

>>16881466
Its the same rich people funding peterson the politically correct lgbt cattle the universities the corporations the left and the right. Its just the leftists that are being deployed as attack dogs against our way of life and our most basic freedom of consciousness it is natural wed see them as enemies.

[Anonymous No.16881539]

>>16881324
Yeah, I always thought that reorienting his career to become a libtard destroyer was a shame, because his Jung stuff is great. His lectures from 2015-2016 were basically my introduction to that stuff, and Maps of Meaning is genuinely interesting after you've gone through the Jung basics.
People calling him a hack forget that he was a tenured professor at a major school before he was making headlines.

[Anonymous No.16881551]

>>16881391
>He is fervountly anti-socialist and an apologist of heirarchy
NOOOOOOOO
I'M GOING INSAAAAAAANE

[Anonymous No.16881573]

>>16881391
>He has explicitly dismissed feminism and the promotion of LGBT rights

Yes how dare people be against the destruction of the family unit the normalization of pedophilia and the turning of our daughters into prostitutes.

[Anonymous No.16881590]

>>16881573
Feminism is strictly against prostitution lol
This modern brand of feminism isn't feminism in the sense of the 50s and 60s movements

[Anonymous No.16881607]

>>16881590
You're wrong, feminists today think "sex workers" are empowered women etc. etc.
There is no logic, you can't treat women as objects but at the same time you have to respect that like 50% of women prostitute themselves

[Anonymous No.16881664]

>>16871905
you will never be a woman... now hang yourself before you're an ugly sad dude in a dress

[Anonymous No.16881675]

>>16881607
they also support sharia law.. they aren't feminists

[Anonymous No.16881769]

The way Peterson discusses the condition of woman, and people in general, is more in line with the way de Beauvoir discusses the condition of woman.
He does sometimes accidentally use a prescriptive word among his descriptive statements, which has come to bite him in the butt.

[Anonymous No.16881777]

>>16880314
That's because there are far, far, far fewer "trans" people than are being hailed on social media and those that are touting that they are "trans". It's body dysmorphia, mental illness, depression, bandwagonism (not a term, but especially for those on the autistic scale, it's easier to relate to others if you're like they are), and so on. The demarcation of "trans" or any of the "exception" groups is going to tear apart major lines of society. It'll fray governance, work, and education. There's an actual problem with the removal and/or argumentation of gender with non-binary or multi-gender identification as a replacement or alternative storyline. Gay and Lesbian as a group or classification rely on the fact that there are men and women and that are in fact distinguished and different beings. We're uninventing reality here. Everyone should be alarmed of the brink a group of the human population is running so happily and haphazardly toward.

[Anonymous No.16881810]

>>16881590
Feminism has been taken over by politically correct corporate social engineers so you will be excommunicated as a false feminist if you are not pro prostitution or having cross dressing male rapists in womens bathrooms or brainwashing girls who do not fit gender roles into thinking they are transgender.

[Anonymous No.16881861]

>>16881539
>>16881324
Good to see some maps of meanings bros here. His best work by a long shot. 12 Rules never would have been popular were it not for his infamy at the time of its release.

[Anonymous No.16881904]

>>16881479
Unironically decent response

[Anonymous No.16882500]

>>16881034
>>16881125
He literally has an entire fucking chapter about it in his book, and means it literally. And yes, it's about giving kids freedom to take risks.

[Anonymous No.16882636]

Peterson comes off as a snake-oil salesman. He's probably alright, but he got popular for making trannies rage, which is funny, but not reason enough for me to read his book. I listened to him give an overview of the 12 rules and think I got enough from it. If he's made people better humans then I guess he can't be too bad of a man.

[Anonymous No.16882680]

>>16870916
>BEYOND ORDER

[Anonymous No.16882742]

>>16881391
Neck yourself, cuck.

[Anonymous No.16882749]

>>16881590
>post WWII ideology being anything other than mutations of consumerism
lol

[今晚打老虎 No.16882758]

>>16871024
which just goes to show how weak the left is, that someone like JBP is enough to trigger them.

[Anonymous No.16882769]

>>16871287
>free to say what they want, not free from the consequences of saying it
By that logic you are free to murder people, too.

[Anonymous No.16882771]

>12 more rules of life
>12 more
kek this is like a fake religion pyramid scheme like scientology just making up new levels you gotta buy into at this point

[Anonymous No.16882816]

>>16881310
leftists and liberals are mentally ill*

[Anonymous No.16882911]

The fact that these “people” are climbing to the top of virtually every corporation is pretty ominous
It’s kind of like a boiling frog. People are unaware of the sharp decline we’re going through as a result

[Anonymous No.16882915]

>>16870977
Only a tiny minority would react that way towards memerson
On the other side, conservatives all around the world are freaking out because they believe Biden will bring communism

[Anonymous No.16883985]

>>16882636
The best articulated critique I've seen from someone else is that he himself probably has good intentions but what he proposes is just not enough and will never likely be enough if a movement does not have the support of something comparable to a larger group institution. Because the 'other side' already has so much of mainstream media and other institutions to support its longevity and power.

[Anonymous No.16884047]

>>16870998
>have literally never heard a word come out of his mouth
>Every one of his concrete opinions

[Anonymous No.16884083]

>>16882758
hahahaha are you kidding me dude the right goes into a state of dementia when they think of two men holding hands or war on christmas or whatever the fuck lmaooo

[Anonymous No.16884092]

>>16870916
based as hell. I hate Peterson but I love chaos.

[Anonymous No.16884099]

>>16884083
One is the downfall of society and the other is some guy trying to help incels.
>go back

[Anonymous No.16884119]

>>16884083
By this stage of late capitalism homophobia practically classifies as a variety of anticlericalism. Sure I was for "gay rights" back in the day i used to think they were just men who wanted to dress up as women or get fucked in the ass by other man but i have come to realise the truth is far more complex and sinister. The slippery slope is totally real.

[Anonymous No.16884123]

>>16884083
>the left becomes hysterical and starts seeing visions of a second holocaust when someone is critical of the the metaphysical paradigm they're forcing on the world at gunpoint
>the right gets upset at the gradual of the cultural and aesthetic traditions tat arer sacrd to them.
I understand materialist hylics like yourself can't understand these things, but you should try to empathize with the complete beings you coexist with.

[Anonymous No.16884135]

>>16870916
Wonder what's the next one gonna be called

[Anonymous No.16884150]

>>16880807
not the government, not yet
campuses, yes

[Anonymous No.16884238]

>>16884150
I think it's one of those things that Americans fear a great deal because we know that if similar laws were passed here, NGOs would start using the courts to suppress dissent from individuals.
>>16884135
The Twelve Rules of Chaos: How the Enemies of Life Operate

[Anonymous No.16884278]

>>16880298
>a fabulous troupe old 9-year-old boy catamites twerking before the phallic missiles of the lockheed martin float
Made me kek, Anon; keep up the good work!

[Anonymous No.16884836]

>>16881391
>If you accept his worldview then you have to wonder why blacks are, or average, poorer than whites in developed countries, or why majority black countries are poorer than majority white countries
Because they are stupid as fuck, and not able to maintain or be a productive part of any type of advanced society.

>He has explicitly dismissed feminism and the promotion of LGBT rights
Only as far as they extend beyond the rights of men and straight people. He is for gender equality, gay marriage and all that jazz. Try actually listening to him.

>He is fervountly anti-socialist
Based

>and an apologist of heirarchy
For NATURAL hierarchy. If you'd actually read any left wing theory, you would know that even anarchists such as Kropotkin and Bakunin go on and on about the only legitimate hierarchies being natural, i.e. based on ability. That is exactly what Peterson is talking about, when he mentions dominance hierarchies. He is not referring to artificial power structures, but hierarchies naturally occuring due to a disparity in ability.

You sound like one of the leftist I was writing about. Please do go on attacking classical liberalism, I'm sure it will all work out very well for you in the end when you've pushed all the victims of your identity politics into the hands of the identitarian far right.

[Anonymous No.16885105]

>>16884083
Only half “the right” gives a shit about that. How do you define “the right” anyway?

[Anonymous No.16885124]

>>16881391
> If you accept his worldview then you have to wonder why blacks are, or average, poorer than whites in developed countries, or why majority black countries are poorer than majority white countries.
Because of collectivist ideologies like yours
>He has explicitly dismissed feminism and the promotion of LGBT rights
Citations needed
>He is fervently anti-socialist and an apologist of hierarchy
So based?

[Anonymous No.16885152]

>>16872541
I don't understand why we should pussyfoot around minorities.

[Anonymous No.16885215]

I hope this jewish shill takes one too many benzos so he can fuck off into a coma.

[Anonymous No.16885296]

>ready player two
>new peterson
what a week for literature

[Anonymous No.16885347]

>>16884083
>OP's pic is about how a group of grown adults has experienced an ACTUAL (not "shitposting on the internet" type) nervous breakdown over a book
Simply epic.

[Anonymous No.16885627]

>>16877579
Oh no he's going to tell the failing virgins that their problems could be helped if they got their shit together.
Truly radicalizing the youth.

[Anonymous No.16885641]

>>16879571
Even funnier, it's not even that he wont call trannies she/her. But he doesn't support the government pointing their guns at him for whether he decides to or not.

[Anonymous No.16885668]

>>16884135
Hmm, he started with 48 laws, so maybe we will get 4 books total.

>>16884238
Yeah, it'd be nice for a more offensive book. But I can't see him do it.

[Anonymous No.16887079]

>>16877683
From your mouth to God's ear.