[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 26 KB, 326x499, anti oedipus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16845685 No.16845685 [Reply] [Original]

Do I need prior reading before reading this?

>> No.16845876

>>16845685
Have you already started with the Greeks and continued with the Romans Anon?

>> No.16845894

read Nicky first.

>> No.16845965

Freud and his adventures should at least be somewhat familiar to you.
After all it is a critique on Freuds Ödipus-complex. Without knowing what it critiques, the whole book kinda goes nowhere. At least read up on that on wikipedia or something.
For everything else you can use secondary literature .
I think I used https://b-ok.org/book/941946/62a9ee to get into it. I can't say how it holds up against other secondary introduction but it did the job for me.

>> No.16846146

>>16845685
You need prior estrogen intakes

>> No.16846302

>>16845685
At a minimum: Freud, Lacan (to understand their critique)
Marx, Nietzsche, Wilhelm Reich
Most people go in blind and then complain that they don't get it.

>> No.16846306

>>16845894
"Nicky" is just a shit Deleuze, fuck off

>> No.16846324
File: 617 KB, 615x409, 1587238903869.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16846324

>>16846306
you haven't read him.

>> No.16846333

>>16846324
I have, you haven't read anything BUT him.

>> No.16846339

>>16845685
>>>
> Anonymous 11/22/20(Sun)14:16:22 No.16845965▶
>Freud and his adventures should at least be somewhat familiar to you.
>After all it is a critique on Freuds Ödipus-complex. Without knowing what it critiques, the whole book kinda goes nowhere. At least read up on that on wikipedia or something.
>For everything else you can use secondary literature .
>I think I used https://b-ok.org/book/941946/62a9ee to get into it. I ca

Perhaps read Buchanan or Holland's introduction to the text. You could read Freud's introductory lectures, some Husserl or whatever. But, honestly, it's just best if you read a book which explicitly introduces the text.

>> No.16846354

>>16846333
trips confirm

>> No.16846382

>>16846324
>>16846333
I even got the sacred Land 3:33 trips. Bow down to me accfag, it's time to branch out your philosophical education

>> No.16846559

>>16845685
nah just go for it

read marx and freud after

>> No.16846606

>>16845685
I'd tell you to get into it right away.
There's some notions you may not be that familiar with, so you could try it with Deleuze's seminars. Their translations are available in "The Deleuze seminars" page, and there he explains some things like the concepto of "flux" and gives some insights about what they're talking with Guattari. I'd argue that Deleuze by himself isn't at all difficult, but you add in Guattari and it all goes to shit.

>> No.16847513

>>16845894
I did this, do not recommend

>> No.16847538

Yes. How can you Deleuze if you have no Leuze, retard?

>> No.16847612
File: 121 KB, 614x518, 1605107533314.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16847612

>>16846382
>accfag

>> No.16848623

My backround in Nietzsche helped immensely - his influence on Deleuze cannot be overstated - and Deleuze's Nietzsche & Philosophy was the key for me.

But I think it is the spirit of the book that anyone can pick it up and struggle with it. It is a game, as Foucault says, filled with many traps. Try to view it as that.

>> No.16849018

>>16847538
Kek