Itt: Only the most based philosophers

[Anonymous No.16817369]

[Anonymous No.16817407]

Jordan B Peterson

[Anonymous No.16817416]

[Anonymous No.16817452]

THE HUSSERLINI

[Anonymous No.16817465]

>>16817369
If you think this guy is based, you're probably a virgin, under the age of 20, a neckbeard "nice guy", a racist, or all of the above.

[Anonymous No.16817471]

Nick Land
Mencius Moldbug

[Anonymous No.16817504]

>>16817465
> he says, while browsing 4chan

[Anonymous No.16817518]

>>16817369
Um, BASED department?

[Anonymous No.16817537]

>>16817465
I don't think Heidegger was any of these things, mate

[Anonymous No.16817547]

>>16817465
>t. someone whose understanding of neech comes from memes

[Anonymous No.16817566]

*gives you strength*

[Anonymous No.16817752]

>philosopher kings having orgies with unlimited wives and as many kids as possible should rule the republic

[Anonymous No.16817759]

>>16817465
Yes.

[Anonymous No.16817771]

>>16817369

[Anonymous No.16817789]

>>16817752
>all the while I bathe in all the boi pucchi I want

[Anonymous No.16817791]

>>16817369

[Anonymous No.16817793]

>>16817566
I think he's talking absolute crap a lot of the time even though on the whole scale he's interesting. The whole shit about how the Greeks don't have a notion of infinity and that their art is characterized by static forms and less movement is bullshit. He fucking compared Bach's contrapoint to Greek statues and thought that it actually proved a point.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16817817]

>>16817407
>>16817471
>>16817518
足りる!
DISQUALIFIED!

[Anonymous No.16817888]

>>16817817
Nicky is kinda based imho

[Anonymous No.16817996]

>>16817888
Trips and correct. Old Land is unironcially as impactful as Nietzsche

[Nemo !!GgBWHLRiayD No.16818324]

>>16817369
>Itt: Only the most based philosophers
That is an unintentionally accurate description of Friedrich Nietzsche, and of those of his ilk: their love for Wisdom ended where their lust for hubris began.

[Anonymous No.16818334]

>>16817996
Nietzsche could be concise when he wanted, nobody can get a coherent statement out of Land without 15 pages of amphetamine rambling first. It's like if Nietzsche's career took place entirely after the horse-whipping incident.

[Anonymous No.16818338]

>>16817996
Yep Nick Land btfo Plato and completed the system of Nietzschean idealism.

He's a delight to read and will be one of the few canon philosophers of modernity.

[Anonymous No.16818340]

>>16817369
>THE COUNT: Before anything else, I should like to suggest to you that authority should be the fundamental ground for decision. Human reason is manifestly incapable of guiding men, for few can reason well, and no one can reason well on every subject, so that it is in general wise to start from authority, whatever people say. Just balance the voices on both sides; against the ideas that knowledge originates in sensory perceptions there are Pythagoras, Plato, Cicero, Origen, Saint Augustine, Descartes, Cudworth, Lami, Polignac, Pascal, Nicole, Bossuet, Fenelon, Leibnitz, and the renowned Malebranche, who occasionally went wrong in the pursuit of truth but never abandoned it. I shall not give the names of the spokesmen for the other side, for they offend my tongue. When I am ignorant about a problem, I decide without any reason other than my taste for good company and my aversion for bad.

[Anonymous No.16818343]

>>16818334
cringe you haven't read him.

[Anonymous No.16818357]

>>16818343
>>16818338
>>16817996
>>16817888
>>16817471
Neobased and mchyper(pbuh)
>>16818334
cringe and bluepilled. go back to Rebdit tranny.

[Anonymous No.16818365]

>>16817369
You can't be a philosopher if you haven't poo pooed yourself at least once.

[Anonymous No.16818385]

>>16818357
holy hyperbasado. Uncle Nick is back frenz

[Anonymous No.16818404]

>>16818365
pooping yourself removes one entirely from the sense of self or the ego
so yes it is a requirement for being a true philosopher

[Anonymous No.16818410]

>>16817752
Refuted by Nick Land

[Anonymous No.16818426]

>>16817452

Based.
Also acceptable answer pic related.

[Anonymous No.16818433]

>>16817465
One of these traits is not like the others.

[Anonymous No.16818437]

>>16818426
refuted by Nick Land.

[Anonymous No.16818440]

>>16817407
The B stands for benzos, imbecile.

[Anonymous No.16818486]

The absolute state of accfag

[Anonymous No.16818531]

[Anonymous No.16818600]

>>16817793
post dynamic greek art (not sculptures, unless he was referring to that, too)

[Anonymous No.16818618]

negativity man

[Nemo !!GgBWHLRiayD No.16818656]

The soul can be regarded as the form of the body only in a radical, selfcongruent sense, when the body is regarded in its essential, aetheric manifestation, being totally integral to the Spirit.

The biophysical body as such, consisting of matter --imperfect substance--, does not meet the aforementioned criteria, despite its parameters being theologically/pleromatically ordered in such a way as to facilitate ontic integralness.

Body is the image of Spirit, and the form of Soul, either: through its becoming, or: in its being --through its instances, or in its suprastance.

The body should be made to be like a fine chalice, capable of being filled with, and of pouring, without spillage, Soul.

[Anonymous No.16818690]

>>16818600
Not him, but dynamism in Greek sculpture is pretty evident in the progression from the impassive, rigid Kritios Boy of the early Classical period to the incredibly dynamic Nike of Samothrace, where you can perceive the space around the sculpture. Anyway, I don't think Spengler really says Greeks were undynamic. It's more about the the Appollonian soul being rooted to the soma, the body. He doesn't say that they didn't have a notion of infinity either, just that they didn't prefer it. He cites the Greek dislike of irrational numbers, which is taken to the extreme in Pythagoreanism where it is considered a heresy.

[Anonymous No.16818697]

Mencius Moldbug

[Anonymous No.16818769]

>>16818486
He made 5 or 6 threads in the past few minutes.

[Anonymous No.16818773]

>>16817791
The only true Based Philosopher

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16818935]

>>16818690

>>16817369
Epicurus, Stirner and Nietzsche are the most

[Anonymous No.16818951]

>>16818935
Not sure why you tagged me butters.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16819007]

>>16818951
Pics

[Anonymous No.16819126]

>>16819007
oh. unfortunately she looks really different from that particular photo set. still pretty, but different.

[Anonymous No.16819369]

>>16817465
t. person who hasn't read neech

[Anonymous No.16819411]

>>16817465
read

[Anonymous No.16819473]

Charles Peirce?

[Anonymous No.16819639]

>>16817369
Not even a philosopsher and he's still based.

[Anonymous No.16819650]

>>16817465
You have to go back.

[Anonymous No.16819696]

>>16818338
Where to start with Land?

[Anonymous No.16819799]

>>16817369
I unironically think Michel Foucault was good. I like the archaelogical method or whatever he calls it. It's a good sign that people call him a crypto-normativist.

[Anonymous No.16819980]

>>16819696
Lol

[Anonymous No.16820030]

>>16817996
>>16818357
Just think, the 1990s, in his 30s, in the fucking 1990s this guy was a lvl 99 blue-haired, soother sucking cishating radfem. In the fucking 1990s this retard was setting up for the most shit show trials off liberalism and calling masculine postures rape fascism. The fucking 1990s, how did one even find rad dyke feminists back then?
This is who you choose to spam every day on this board....

[Anonymous No.16821105]

>>16817407
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.16821110]

>>16817369
My Based list coming through.

screenshotting my folder instead of making a pic

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16821134]

>>16821110
Misspelled Epicurus

[Anonymous No.16821145]

>>16817369

[Anonymous No.16821183]

>>16821134
Actually, my mistake was using a picture of Epicurus.

Why are there so many images of quotes from Epictetus who use pics of Epicurus' bust.?

My books don't have any pictures in them so this really seems like a mistake anyone could make. I am basically deciding that this face matches that person only based on internet consensus.
I am now part of the problem.

[Anonymous No.16821262]

>>16818440
it stands for BASED

[Anonymous No.16821333]

>>16818365
i pooped myself once. it was extremely unpleasant

[Anonymous No.16821486]

>>16817465
>racist
Take a look at this niggerfaggot

[Anonymous No.16821508]

>>16821486
>>16819650
>>16819411
>>16819369
>>16818433
>>16817759
>>16817547
>>16817537
>>16817504
He is right so, your replies are proof enough for that.

[Anonymous No.16821518]

>>16818773
Based on what?

[Anonymous No.16821734]

>>16820030
lmao

[Anonymous No.16822233]

>>16817369

There's a book titled "Based Deleuze", which is the only book in existence which refers to a philosopher as 'based'. Therefore, Deleuze is the only thinker in history to have a legal and substantiated claim to being 'based' until another book is written which declares a different thinker as such. QED.

[Anonymous No.16822401]

>>16818486
What's annoying about accfag is that he actually reads good stuff too. But he's such a piece of shit that it has no effect on him.

[Anonymous No.16822579]

.

[Anonymous No.16822622]

>>16817537
He was literally supporting Hitler's politics.

[Anonymous No.16822889]

>>16821518
His Ego

[Anonymous No.16823077]

>>16818334
cringe
try reading it as an exploration of the function of theory rather than trying to get a readymde idea to TL:DR

[Anonymous No.16823100]

>>16819696
Deleuze and Guattari, then Machinic Desire
or if too lazy to read frogs, Meltdown

[Anonymous No.16823111]

>>16822401
accfag is swarm
and we're coming for your Human Security System

[Anonymous No.16823659]

>>16817369
>>16817407

[Anonymous No.16824485]

>>16817817
please shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.16824576]

>>16817369
Me in my head