[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 326 KB, 665x618, 1598757807787.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16813790 No.16813790 [Reply] [Original]

Why should i read about economic?
What should i look for?

what a poor young man should do?

>> No.16813808
File: 11 KB, 264x400, 178506160.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16813808

read it because it really do be like this

>> No.16813828
File: 328 KB, 580x509, 1522703386091.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16813828

>>16813790
You bringed back an unhealthy obsesion with agatha, thanks anon.

>> No.16813832

There is zero reason to read economics. It's literally theoretical money printing.

>> No.16813846

>>16813832
if your a keynesian yes

>> No.16813849

>>16813828
Who is she?
She is so cute
I bet she has a nice pussy

>> No.16813857
File: 395 KB, 809x722, 1517927615085.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16813857

>>16813849
Threemilk top tier jew bussy

>> No.16813938
File: 156 KB, 1242x957, 1586478003288.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16813938

>>16813790
I don't have the slightest idea how to recommend economics books to someone because I don't know how much or how little the average person knows.

This >>16813808 would probably be my best guess of where to start if you just want a high level discussion. If you wan to know something useful for more than a drunk discussion with your friends, then Varian's Intermediate Microeconomics is where you would start if you were taking a university course.

You would round probably also be taking something similar to Mankiw's Macroeconomics and a maths unit at the same time.

>> No.16814030

>>16813790
Economics is interesting as far as it being a calculus for ideas as to how people act goes. Economics by and large deals with choice, the factors of that choice, and various ways in which people make choices in their particular circumstances.

What tradition of economics you want to focus on is another matter.

Marginalist economists by and large agree on enough of theory to be "the same", even if they disagree on proving it. Marginalist means those who take their economics from Jevons, Walras, or Menger who all got to the same very general conclusions at the same time. Marginalists focus on the equalization of price to preference across the economy, meeting an eventual equilibrium point. Information disperses through price changes and adjusts everyone's preferences across each other. You could reasonably start with any textbook or introduction like >>16813808 >>16813938 suggest before moving up. I myself am a fan of David Friedman. Steven Levitt is also good with how his Freakonomics series uses the tools of economics to puzzle out why people do what they do. Steven Landsburg and Peter Leeson does much the same and you could profit off of them.

Marxists take choice and the substrate of how a choice is reached to another level than the marginalists in ways I think they should take note as far as the propaganda section of the selling of their approach goes. Declaring the relative orthodoxy of the position as opposed to the more "ah, but this is what the marginalists leave out and get wrong"-style is more seductive to the common person. In any case, Marxists derive their analysis from their conception of how profit is attained as well as the means by which one is presented with the choices at hand as well as the wider societal implications and layers of the manner by which profit could be attained. Ernst Mandel might be your man as well as Richard Wolff on Marxian econ.

There are more traditions but these are the main two branches of Classical Economics

>> No.16814197
File: 109 KB, 781x1000, 1597597537175.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16814197

>>16813938
>>16813808
>>16814030
Merci anon

>> No.16814228

>>16813857
I watched her outside of 4chan and was sad you faggots made her quit

>> No.16814559

>>16813808
Bait

>> No.16814576
File: 55 KB, 900x900, 1508796250197.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16814576

books for this feel?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iqj2fvtcLjk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BTd844XLGI

>> No.16814606

>>16814576
I hope she recovers from whatever illness she's bearing

>> No.16814617

>>16814606
what illness?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItOGQiZzvOg

>> No.16814622

>>16814617
This was honestly the video that killed her.
Addressing 4chan upfront is the literal worst thing you can possibly do in this situation beyond doxxing yourself.

>> No.16814626

>>16814617
Terminal judaism, probably. It's so sad to see a child with such sickly pallor. I cry every time

>> No.16814663
File: 156 KB, 1080x724, Screenshot_20201118-134920.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16814663

Read actual first year textbooks and not meme philosophy by right/left wing hucksters. Once you've gained a basic ground knowledge in orthodox economics is when you can decide to look into more niche schools of economic thought such as Real business cycles and neoKeynesian thought. Don't read austrians or postkeynesians any other such meme economics just stick with real life.

>> No.16814669

>>16814663
>t. slightly-left-of-center wing huckster

>> No.16814681

>>16814663
>textbooks
Oh no no no

>> No.16814878

>>16814663
Ok i will listen to you anon

>> No.16814894

>>16814626
She's anemic

>> No.16814906

>>16814894
It's unfortunate. Jews are riddled with so many congenital defects, we really should just put an end to them already.

>> No.16814932
File: 995 KB, 1883x800, 1576881782403.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16814932

>tfw no genetically inferior Jewess gf to make love to, gently as to not hurt her feeble body, quietly in the attic as to not alert the Nazis below.
What's even the point...

>> No.16814958

>>16814906
Could you really hurt Agatha?

>> No.16814978

>>16813808
>conservative propaganda written by Milton Friedman's personal Uncle Tom apologist

>a good start

>> No.16815011
File: 296 KB, 1280x1707, 1568615985492.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16815011

Look what you did guys

>> No.16815020

>>16815011
She's lesbian, I wouldn't blame /r9k/

>> No.16815043

>>16813790
depends. do you want to get rich or do you want to understand economics?

>> No.16815074
File: 731 KB, 720x870, 1587266930341.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16815074

>before college
>>16815011
>after college
Memes aside, she went emo dyke after her friend committed suicide, 8ch (4chan wasn't really the one doing the major harassment, she conflated the two) was only a secondary reason.
>>16815020
Her being lesbian doesn't mean she has to act like a dyke. Besides, nearly all "lesbians" are only so out of circumstance (aka being ugly), hatred of men, or as a phase. Her reasoning for why she thought she was lesbian basically boiled down to she had a dream that she was with a girl (not even sexually) at a carnival. She was confused; before hand she identified as asexual and now there is a rumor that she admitted that she is now bisexual. Women aren't really consistent enough to be one way or the other.

>> No.16815078

>>16815074
why women why

>> No.16815082

>>16815011
Is there any porn of her

>> No.16815136

>>16815074
>her friend committed suicide
i've read this posted before but what's the source?

>> No.16815139

Fuck off retaed

>> No.16815179

>>16814030
Econ masters student here. This anon is correct.

The one thing which I would say is that as an academic discipline, economics is inherently given to having very strong orthodoxies (I would argue that this is because of the close proximity that economics has to political decision-making) but don't fall into the meme trap of reading Thomas Sowell and thinking that the neoclassicals are "correct". Economics is actually a very fluid field and relaxing certain assumptions radically changes the conclusions.

If you're serious about it, I would advise you to read broadly and don't be afraid to read outsider thoughts, and yes, that even includes guys like the Austrians and neo-Marxists.

>> No.16815197

>>16815136
>i've read this posted before but what's the source?
Lmao there is an entire book, website, and hour long interview about it.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08BZYWLCQ/ref=tsm_1_tp_tc
https://www.atributetoelle.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sT6T-_P7j5c
So much ruckus for a wheelchair-bound kike that was a massive pseudo-intellectual hipster. I only feel bad that Agatha was so attached to her for her lost to hit her that hard.

>> No.16815238

>>16815197
damn i've watched this video they did together but didn't even know she was dead.
skip to 0:44
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkTkxohIxas&t=44s

>> No.16815241

>>16815179
Based

>> No.16815256

>>16815238
>"you always say you're not afraid of death"
i wish that were me. i'm too much of a pussy to end it

>> No.16815296
File: 16 KB, 383x383, R7x66D1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16815296

>>16815256
>>16815238
>rolls eyes when agatha says everyone is afraid of death
oof

>> No.16815305

>>16815238
Agatha said in a Q&A once that her greatest fear was being forgotten and she literally got monkey pawed because she wants to be forgotten now but there are still a sizeable amount of anons still obsessing over her (granted, obsessing over her old self, most have a major disdain towards how she is now) to this day.
Shouldn't have been so cute.