Marquis de Sade on how to educate plebs

[Anonymous No.16801591]

>it’s a common policy for every state man to maintain between the citizens the highest degree of corruption; while the individual becomes gangrenous and weaker with the delights of debauchery, he won’t feel the burden of his chains, and he could be subdued without notice.
>Therefore, the true policy of the State is to multiplicate all possible means for the corruption of the individual. Plenty of spectacles, luxury, cabarets, whorehouses, a general amnesty for all crimes of debauchery; these are the means that will subdue you to men.
>O you who want to rule over them! fear virtue in your empires. Your people will be enlightened when she reigns, and your thrones, which only lay on vice, soon will be overthrown: the wake of the freeman will be cruel for despots, and, when vices no longer entertain their leisure, he will desire to dominate as you do. (...)
>1) I establish that all women and men leave their private parts almost totally uncovered, especially the buttocks. (...)
>3) The principles of simple nature will replace the ones of morality and religion in public schools. Every teenager of 15 years old, from one sex or the other, who cannot find a lover will be dishonored, humiliated before the public opinion; (...) lacking a lover, the teenager from one sex or the other will be forced to present a certificate at least that proves that he’s been prostituted and he's is no longer a virgin.
>4) The Christian religion will be severely banished from the public office; there nothing will be celebrated but debauchery. (...)
Well, someone has been reading De Sade recently!

[Anonymous No.16801608]

>>16801591
>the wake
*the awakening
sorry for the bad translation, I did it myself

[Anonymous No.16801633]

>>16801591
>delusional satire becomes truth

truly we are living in hell

[Anonymous No.16801653]

the skin. so soft. so lovely and full of life. I take a bite. another bite. she screams. I cover her mouth. she's mine. her soft skin on my tongue. I lick her clean. I lick her... bum . mi amor, she says. not my bum. I call her a slut. so beautiful. my darling.

[Anonymous No.16801657]

>>16801633
>delusional satire
It never was a satire.

[Anonymous No.16801658]

>>16801591
the frog prophet

[Anonymous No.16801662]

>>16801633
Wasn't satire, just the ramblings of an insane and depraved individual. At least his son had the decency of burning his unpublished writings, but it would have been better if they burned Sade at the stake before he could write them instead.

[Anonymous No.16801665]

>>16801591
Girl on the right making me want to advocate for cannibalism

[Anonymous No.16801671]

>>16801591
twerk twerk twerk

[Anonymous No.16801689]

>>16801591
I'm going insane living in a puritan society anons, I can't take it. I want to go to the first world and be a hedonist to my heart's desire.

[Anonymous No.16801690]

>>16801591
>POOPA

[Anonymous No.16801696]

>>16801662
>Wasn't satire, just the ramblings of an insane and depraved individual

Whynotboth.jpg
But no, Sade's writing were a critique of the specific concept of Good of the time, Providence. He showed an inverted vision of that world, where people where not blessed for their virtues, but for their vices.
Sade didn't believe this was the case, he was just mocking the naivety of the masses in front of the obvious.

[Anonymous No.16801705]

>>16801653
posts like this one are the only reason I still browse /lit/

[Anonymous No.16801724]

>>16801696
He was serial rapist and torturer, as well a faggot obsessed with anal sex. His defense of his degenerate lifestyle was genuine.

[Anonymous No.16801748]

>>16801653
>mi amor, she says. not my bum

[Anonymous No.16801764]

>>16801724
>He was serial rapist and torturer, as well a faggot obsessed with anal sex. His defense of his degenerate lifestyle was genuine.
This misunderstanding also perfectly fits modern "irony", absolutely wonderful Poe's Law at work here.

[Anonymous No.16801775]

>>16801724
Straight dumb

[Anonymous No.16801783]

>>16801662
>At least his son had the decency of burning his unpublished writings
Cringe son. It would have been kino to read that stuff. Thankfully 120 days of Sodom survived.

[Anonymous No.16801795]

>1)
>3)
>4)
what happened to 2_?

[Anonymous No.16801827]

>>16801591
Anyone else think these small butts are way hotter than the baboon tier asses being promoted right now?

[Anonymous No.16801848]

>>16801827
Personally I prefer something in between. The butts in the OP are too childlike and baboon tier asses are too gross.

[Anonymous No.16801863]

>>16801827
Of course, baboon asses are being promoted because whites are becoming a minority

[Anonymous No.16801875]

>>16801863
sucks to be you

[Anonymous No.16801909]

>>16801795
There were 9, I just put what I found more relevant in our current world.

[Anonymous No.16801914]

>>16801827
>re way hotter than the baboon tier asses
of course.
The reason the sheboon asses are being promoted is for the subhuman people (you know niggers) who consume that medium. If you find yourself in a situation where your media is being blasted with baboon asses, you are engrossed in subhuman media and should probably turn it off.
Those OP butts are absolute prime late teen to early twenties girls butts.

[Anonymous No.16801928]

>>16801827
>Anyone else think these small butts are way hotter
This is not an opinion, it's a fact.

[Anonymous No.16802086]

>>16801827
t. Padraig McKenzie

[Anonymous No.16802093]

what’s wrong with these whores? why don’t they have asses? aren’t women supposed to have asses?

[Anonymous No.16802101]

>>16802093
From your post, I know what color you are.

[Anonymous No.16802121]

>>16802093
see >>16801914

[Anonymous No.16802140]

>>16802101
>>16802121
owie owie owie courtney baby every time i thrust into your big slimy pussy your pointy ass bones stab me! my hips are bruised you stupid bitch OWIE OWWWWWW

[Anonymous No.16802273]

>>16802140
>pointy

[Anonymous No.16802300]

>>16802273
ouch! these asses poked my eyes

[Anonymous No.16802319]

I am once again staring at the ass

[Anonymous No.16802325]

>>16801827
t. white roastie

[Anonymous No.16802327]

>>16801827
Absolutely

[Anonymous No.16802331]

>>16802140
>>16802300
Shut the fuck up. Leftards accuse whites of imposing our beauty standards on the other races but the Jews are trying to impose their subhuman standards on us.
I always get sad when I see a white girl with tribal tattoos, piercings so she looks like a bovine and ass implants to be a "PAWG", twerking in an animalistic display of sexuality. All I see is an abased human being, twisted and degenerated.

[Anonymous No.16802398]

>>16801827
i prefer medium but these are well within east asian beauty standards btw. the important thing is shapeliness really, no overfat arse looks good for this reason.

[Anonymous No.16802422]

>>16801653
Yeah tho, I have an issue with the primal desire to chomp and bite during sex, especially the asscheeks

[Anonymous No.16802438]

>>16802331
would

[Anonymous No.16802446]

>>16801591

[Anonymous No.16802476]

>>16802331
>dimples
That's cellulite, porky.

[Anonymous No.16802489]

>>16801827
flat ass white roastoid cope

[Anonymous No.16802490]

>>16802438
Do you have any self-respect at all? Any standards?
Her ass implants are gross af. She has cellulite and yet deludes herself into thinking she's hot.
Instagram models promote obesity.

[Anonymous No.16802493]

All you anglos in this thread, you know nothing about asses. You always were "tits people". You can't tell the diference between a well rounded, well nourished ass and square one. You far too young in Asstetics.
It will literally take AGES before you become real bunda conosseirs.
ITT: Anon From the Land of Butts

[Anonymous No.16802525]

>>16801827
Why it it just about the size of the butt and not just the hips in relation to the rest of the body

[Anonymous No.16802566]

>>16801827
It's not special or difficult for a woman to have a big ass. What we really like are visibly broad hips and muscular buttocks not covered by a 3" layer of fat.

[Anonymous No.16802754]

>>16801914
>If you find yourself in a situation where your media is being blasted with baboon asses, you are engrossed in subhuman media and should probably turn it off.
Anon, I'm always on the lookout for red flags like these and I feel like this one will be very useful. Bad taste in women really shows if you're talking to a subhuman.
Also, looks like I'll have to leave this board after merely a day given the posts ITT.

[Anonymous No.16802789]

>>16802490
Standards have turned me into a sexless man. I refused to fuck many mediocre pussy back in the day when I had the chance. I regret it. Bukowski was right.

[Anonymous No.16802792]

>>16802493
All your women are fucked by hundrends of niggers by the time they turn 18. I pass.

[Anonymous No.16802813]

>>16802789
>Standards have turned me into a sexless man.
what turned me into a sexless man was what this anon said >>16802792
the last few women I dated before turning volcel were vomit inducing and sadly they were regular people

[Anonymous No.16802860]

>>16802754
>Also, looks like I'll have to leave this board after merely a day given the posts ITT.
True. It surely is in your interest and for the better.
>but sadly: see you tomorrow anon.

[Anonymous No.16802869]

>>16801827
Yes.

[Anonymous No.16802885]

>>16802792
Our age of consent is 14, dumbass.
ITT: Sometimes feels great being a latino.

[Anonymous No.16802929]

>>16802885
>Our age of consent is 14, dumbass.
Doesn't change what I said. I rest my case.

[Anonymous No.16802990]

>>16802140
t. juicy assed roastie

[Anonymous No.16802999]

>>16801591
Thank you, very well-argued review

[Anonymous No.16803002]

>>16802885
>>16802493
>land of the bundas
Aren't you Brazilian? All you women fuck niggers everyday, man. Sounds like a bad deal.

[Anonymous No.16803009]

>>16802929
Most girls loose their virginity at 13-16 around here, anglotard. So is a quite achievable goal being their first one if you're a twenty something and live here instead of your cold country with its puritan laws.

[Anonymous No.16803039]

>>16803002
So I'm pretty well-off since I'm a nigger too. Kek

[Anonymous No.16803248]

>>16802525
Proportionality of all her different elements is critical.

[Anonymous No.16803308]

>>16802493
this is not even a nice body—thus not a nice ass. the way her flab hips drop off into twig legs and how the ass itself does not even begin until about 2 inches inward from her outer figure are absolutely repellent. saggy octoroon NIGGER.

[Anonymous No.16803384]

>>16803308
Show me what you think is a good ass then, faggot. I wanna see if you're a connoisseur.
Don't be a coward.

[Anonymous No.16803389]

>>16803039
Gross!

[Anonymous No.16803404]

>>16803009
Do you guys see those 20-something guys fucking teenagers as pedophiles or is considered normal?

[Anonymous No.16803405]

>>16803308
I do not keep a collection of ass pictures you fucking loser.

[Anonymous No.16803419]

>>16803404
I think only Americans care.
There are laws where you can have like a 4 year gap or something, but I've seen Americans legit call people pedophiles for having sex with a 17 year old.
That's an offense everywhere but Americans just throw that word around like nothing and it's crazy.

[Anonymous No.16803432]

>>16803419
There's even a subreddit dedicated to shaming and exposing these "pedophiles." I even saw one where people were attacking a 24 yo guy who was in a relationship with an 18 yo woman. As long as you're with a teenager, they see you as a weird pedo. It's crazy.

[Anonymous No.16803442]

>>16803405
Bummer.

[Anonymous No.16803444]

>>16801827
homosexual detected

[Anonymous No.16803587]

>>16802885
>big casada exibicionista
Ghiraldelli, é você?

[Anonymous No.16803684]

>>16803432
14 is normal and when parents ought to marry off their daughters.

[Anonymous No.16803694]

>>16803444
NIGGER

[Anonymous No.16803735]

>>16802331
Based

[Anonymous No.16803737]

>>16801690
came he for this

[Anonymous No.16803760]

>>16801689
I was tormented by extreme amounts of libido until 30. The years 14-24 were the worst.
This amount of energy should have been transformed into work. We need more restrictions and puritanical guidance not less

[Anonymous No.16803802]

>>16801848
Best answer in this thread. Women in general should have some meat but not venture into unhealthy obesity.

[Anonymous No.16803832]

>>16803419
>>16803432
This guy gets it.

>>16803404
But answering your question. People used to don't mind it too much, as I said, if you're a twenty something (or even a little bit older). Also, it really helps if you have "good intentions" with the girl, if you go to their house, talk with their parents, show them you're a nice guy. They'll probably be quite chill about it.
Because that's part of our traditions and folklore afterall, quinceañera is still a thing in most latin countries:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinceañera
Now, the troublesome part is:
People are gradually forgeting the MEANING of their traditions (A global trend I know). Thus the above party is still fully at vogue, with lower income parents saving up their money the whole year just for it. But I feel sometimes they don't actually sense what it really stands for nowdays.
Worse, radical feminists and mengine alike are gradually and steadlly trying more and more to shame the practice. A reflex I think of another turn of the alien invasion of anglo culture and morals into our daily lives. A proof is they even "preach" this kind of thing with reposts in english so is quite easy seeing from where they are getting their "ethics".
I foresee changes in legislation in these countries in the next years, if the things keep going this way.
So in sum: Murrican politics ruining everything as always.

[Anonymous No.16803868]

>>16801827
Those small butts are only appealing because they are very young. Otherwise you would prefer something a bit bigger at least.

[Anonymous No.16803895]

The /lit/ niggerfication and its consequences have been a disaster for the patrician class

[Anonymous No.16803900]

I like butts of all sizes, EXCEPT when they're completely flat.

Absolutely flat butts are almost morbid to look at.

[Anonymous No.16803920]

>>16801848
you are evidently incapable of appreciating subtleties and your nigger ancestry is showing

[Anonymous No.16803960]

>>16803920
Have you seen old paintings of naked European women? You know, the ones considered attractive? They have thick and curvy bodies. That's what's always been considered feminine. Stick tier girls with flat bodies are a modern thing, pushed by the modelling industry. The manly think is to like women with fertile bodies ready for fucking.

[Anonymous No.16804026]

>>16801653
basado

[Anonymous No.16804113]

>>16801591
Nice. Is this from "Français encore un effort..."?

[Anonymous No.16804133]

16803960
You have shit taste.

[Anonymous No.16804150]

What was going on with de Sade? Was he a coomer, just shitposting or actually making very forward thinking and revolutionary satires of contemporary society?

[Anonymous No.16804151]

16804133
It's the European manly taste.

[Anonymous No.16804195]

>>16804150
All three.

[Anonymous No.16804198]

>>16802489
kek

[Anonymous No.16804323]

>>16804113
No, from Juliette

[Anonymous No.16804470]

>>16801827
Of course. A woman's ass should be small but shapely. Nice and tight, fit for a fucking

[Anonymous No.16804570]

>>16803960
patrician tastes

[Anonymous No.16804655]

>>16803960
Good take.

[Anonymous No.16804741]

>>16801827
Obviously.

[Anonymous No.16804786]

>>16804741
this is a stick, not a woman. might as well fuck a skinny tranny at this point.

[Anonymous No.16804805]

>>16804786
>burger

[Anonymous No.16804810]

>>16801764
>>16801775

[Anonymous No.16804811]

>>16804786
Weak. The Artemis archetype is prime feminine material. All this fat-arse worship is just lowering the bar so US "women" can still persuade themselves they can compete.

[Anonymous No.16804826]

>>16803960
>They have thick and curvy bodies.
Wrong. Woman with those qualities were preferred because it meant they could bare children without complications. With our technology today men back then generally would then choose skinny curvy feminine women.

[Anonymous No.16804869]

>>16804811
I never said anything about fat-arses. Women with nice bodies and curves are a staple of European culture. Stick women are a meme for the modelling industry and fat-arse women are for instagram and porn. See: >>16803960

[Anonymous No.16804871]

>>16804826
This just sounds like you passing off your opinion as fact. I am a man alive today and I think 25%-35% looks best.

[Anonymous No.16804883]

>>16801653

[Anonymous No.16804885]

>>16804869
>Stick women are a meme for the modelling industry
Red-pilled take.

[Anonymous No.16804901]

>>16804871
I agree, 30% is definitely perfection.

[Anonymous No.16805040]

>>16801591
I want to beat up those little pussies and make them cum even if they were shy and didn't' want to. Than I'd power stroke them out, stretching them deep and wide before explosively blasting my DNA all over their little cervixes. Finally I'd hold them tight and whisper in their ear "Rape baby or death is the only way" before letting them slowly crumble to the floor.

[Anonymous No.16805075]

>>16801653
Based

[Anonymous No.16805076]

>>16803442
>Why can't my son do math or swim and why is he afraid of dogs?

[Anonymous No.16805079]

>>16803960
Correct answer

[Anonymous No.16805082]

>>16803802
based

[Anonymous No.16805092]

>>16803960
Makes sense. Most of the fashion industry is run by faggots so it's not surprising that they push the image of women who are built like twinks.

[Anonymous No.16805103]

>>16803868
No. Also these aren't small. They're normally developped.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16805160]

[Anonymous No.16805175]

>>16803960
>>16804885
Thin women were appreciated as soon as we had more access to food. In general, signs of physical health in women like being a bit muscular started being more appreciated in the 19th onward. Thin women are considered elegant from then on. We have no food shortages anymore, Anon ; if anything, I suspect a rather "thick" woman will be shit with kids because she can't even discipline herself.
Also the standards of paintings are very codified. They reflect what is seen as elegant in that particular context, not really the tastes of the painters or even the period.
Ask yourself also why being thin is something the fashion and modelling industry cared about. And not only that, but cinema as well. Sure, there are fags in both fields who thus like bodies that are less feminine. But it is also, I think, an inherently more charismatic and refined body shape. Precisely because it's not exaggeratedly feminine, just like the typical attractive male actor of the 50s wasn't a bodybuilder, it brings forward manneurisms, natural physical traits, makes you consider the person's face rather than their body, etc.
Now all that being said, I don't think the type of body >>16804869 likes are for nigs either. I don't think there's anything wrong with up to 35% in that pic >>16804871 or whatever. Even a woman that's a bit chubby, I can be attracted to her if she doesn't have huge tits and asses and is rather short ; because she still hasn't got a grotesquely sexualized body that overrides any other physical (and even psychological) caracterstics in my impression of her.

[Anonymous No.16805180]

>>16801591

[Anonymous No.16805182]

>>16805092
Famous movie actresses have always often had thin bodies as well, and singers as well. The fashion industry goes to the extreme but the trend throughout the 20th century was being slim.

[Anonymous No.16805188]

>>16805180
This thread is a good, interesting question about a particular literary figure. Just because retards derailed the thread doesn't mean it wasn't good to begin with.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16805189]

>>16805180
This cartoon is for shaming blowjack posters. Cease posting this at once!

[Anonymous No.16805191]

>>16805180
It isn't irrelevant, it's related to the content of the thread

[Anonymous No.16805204]

>>16801591
Yet young people have less sex now than they had in the 60s, maybe than they've ever had.
De Sade's wish hasn't been granted. What you mistake for a sexualization of society is just the enslavement of sexuality to the abstract laws of the market and the social mores of the elites (De Sade wasn't an egalitarian either...).
>>16803760
That's because you literally didn't fuck.

[Anonymous No.16805209]

>>16805204
>Yet young people have less sex now than they had in the 60s
This isn't true. You're making the mistake of assuming internet cultures are reflective of reality.

[Anonymous No.16805225]

>>16805209
It's a fact that more young people today, especially male, declare having no friend or no partner. I'll look it up because I'm less sure of it, but I remember also reading that young people have less sex per week now than they had in the 60s.
I have a lot of friends from 17 yo to 26 yo, most quite popular, in France - a country that doesn't have the reputation of being particularly prudish. They've all had from zero to five or six partners in their life ; and I count one-night-stands there. I know for a fact my parents, at the same age, had had double the amount, if not more. From personal experience, I suspect at the very least that young people have less sex now than they had in the oh-so-dreaded years of sexual liberation, late 60s to early 80s. Keep also in mind the impact the AIDs crisis had.

[Anonymous No.16805228]

>>16805209
There's that, it doesn't go very far back but it seems difficult to me to see how it could, given the nature of the matter.

[Anonymous No.16805233]

(cont.)
>>16805228

[Anonymous No.16805234]

>>16805209
https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/2015/ss6506_updated.pdf
Retarded person.

[Anonymous No.16805236]

>>16805234
pg 28, btw

[Anonymous No.16805240]

>>16805160
Does butterfly have no butt???
Buttlessfly. Lol

[Anonymous No.16805250]

>>16805228
>>16805234
I don't buy it. Perhaps less men because a smaller pool is hording. But there is not less sex happening.

[Anonymous No.16805264]

>>16805250
Nope. Pg 29 of the CDC study shows that the number of people having a lot of sex is also decreasing (from 16% in 1991 to 11% in 2015). The reason for the logical dissonance on your point is that you only see a part of the world. I wouldn't doubt that upper-middle-class urban White people have more (or at least a similar amount) of sex as they did in 1960. However, that's not everyone. Remember, black, and in general poor, sex rates used to be sky high. They became wealthier (comparably) and therefore have less sex now than they did then, entirely independent of whatever cultural shift was happening.

[Anonymous No.16805278]

>>16805225
>Keep also in mind the impact the AIDs crisis had.
This is very important, good point.

>>16805264
I just don't buy it, man. This study isn't convening. I lived near some projects in New York some years ago. Everyone there is having a lot of sex.

[Anonymous No.16805300]

>>16801591
>I establish that all women and men leave their private parts almost totally uncovered, especially the buttocks.
Were all Gauls this horny?

[Anonymous No.16805303]

>>16805278
A lot is not so much. Note page 28: 28% of black men having sex 4 or more times sounds like a lot, right? Well's it's pretty low compared to what they were doing before.
NYC projects is probably also the group with the highest sex in the country - young, black men in an extremely urban environment sounds like an outlier group to me.

[Anonymous No.16805322]

>>16805303
I don't trust the CDC so there's no point in that citation. I will however gladly listen to your own synthesis. Projects is an outlier sure. How do you feel about an average American college campus?

[Anonymous No.16805331]

>>16805225
>I know for a fact my parents, at the same age, had had double the amount, if not more.
that's kinda weird
not that they had double that, but that you know it for a fact

[Anonymous No.16805333]

>>16805278
I don't think that upper class whites are having a blast while the poor and the blacks weep in a corner. I'm not sure how good poverty or IQ or any of those things is as an indicator of socialization ; but the factor here is this, socialziation. Or do you think this all-pervading loneliness will have no impact? I know from their diaries and personal account that my grandparents were hanging outside, frolicking with the village's young girl on their free time and going to the ball every week-end. The watchful eyes of our old French Catholic priests never really had the power one would imagine they'd have tody ; they provided a moral context, but didn't prevent anything. They had a whole lot more of extramarital sex than young people in that very same village do nowadays, where there is no communal life left. Not to speak of marital sex itself ; if your relationships don't last long, you spend most of your time celibate.
There's been no liberation of sexuality, all the fantasms and tastes that were previously either in your head or realized in action have simply been thrown into the meat-grinder of commodity production and information technology. People's tastes are more molded and satisfied by porn. But the underlying *social relations* that make people become sexual partners have been degraded. The problem, therefore, is not even porn. The problem, I'd assert in this domain like in many others, is that techno-economic developments go in that direction and we have no instruments to redirect it.

[Anonymous No.16805338]

>>16805331
My mom mentionned how many partners she had before my dad once. She was drunk and it was an otherwise nice discussion ; I told her I didn't wanna hear about it and we changed subjects.

[Anonymous No.16805341]

>>16805322
Lots of sex. Most people lose their virginity at age 19-21. Constant sex. I wouldn't consider 19-21 "young people," though.

[Anonymous No.16805349]

>>16805322
Also, this is a poll. It's not like it's a position or opinion; there were real people they asked, all of which is public.
What would be the endgame for lying here?

[Anonymous No.16805803]

>>16804871
I added 'generally' for people like you, do I need to write it in full caps?

[Anonymous No.16806001]

>>16805338
mothers love to be incestuous

[Anonymous No.16806254]

>>16801591
good God, I want to marry the ass on the left

[Anonymous No.16806317]

>>16802422
imagine having a gf who dislikes having her butt chomped

[Anonymous No.16806373]

>>16805228
>Young men driving the decline in sex
K E K
the whores who you were supposed to fuck around with, at least "back in the day" (meaning pre-internet), have insanely high standards nowadays due to the endless stream of praise they recieve online for showing a bit of skin.
the reason the number of men who don't want to bother with dating and chasing sex is increasing because "the game" has become revolting: girls get compliments from creeps they would never even consider as a partner, yet it still inflates their ego to the point they believe they're ENTITLED to a partner who fills every wish they have, just like how incels believe they're entitled to sex.
honestly it seems like bit of a horseshoe theory type of meme, now that i've put it into writing.
the standards of young women are at an all time high while society's treatment of young men is at an all time low.

you tell me what you'd rather do:
waste days on end courting a girl who shows no interest because that's "how it's supposed to work", take her out and finally manage to call her your own, only to have her cheat on you or dump you for the next sucker when she gets bored
OR
jerk off and coom to a 2d girl whose sole existence is for you to pull up her tab when you need to blow a load, make a comfy cup of coffee and watch videos which give you a sense of community without the fear of pain and rejection. even if it's fake, it's an illusion worth choosing over the reality of today's "dating scene".

[Anonymous No.16806405]

>>16806373
before i get called out for being an incel or whatever, i am my girlfriend's first partner both sexual and romantic; she also says she wants to marry, and i'm happy i have her.

before her, however, the shit i had to put up with trying to find a girl:
>multiple fatties waiting to be approached, and acting like they are appealing once approached
>an extremely good looking girl said she doesn't want a relationship with me YET because she's young. she contacted me recently, asked how my gf is doing and if i want to go for drinks. left her on read, blocked her and laughed with the boys.
>another beautiful girl who i thought was nice turned out to be juggling three guys at once. got fairly friendly with one of the two other cucks, we both told her to go die but the third one was too much of an enabler to have any self-respect

and many other similar, slighy less eventful stories.
world's become a sad place.

[Anonymous No.16806412]

>>16806373
How is it not just purging the bottom 20% of men? In my experience, men are still the ones dominating the relationships and dumping the women. I do agree it's asymetric though since the bottom 20% of women are still doing fine.

[Anonymous No.16806433]

>>16801591
>>4) The Christian religion will be severely banished from the public office; there nothing will be celebrated but debauchery. (...)
based but he forgot
5) install islam and sharia

[Anonymous No.16806437]

>>16806433
That's kind of incompatible with celebrating debauchery, no?

[Anonymous No.16806451]

>>16806437
it's so the shock is bigger

[Anonymous No.16806459]

>>16806412
exactly what you said: the male bottom 20% should, in general, match with the female bottom 20%.
it used to be that the worse you looked, the more effort you would put into yourself character-wise.
i looked like i was 13 until i was 19y/o, so naturally i developed character in order to still get invited places and have a chance with girls.
that's something i don't see often, in my experience. the average girls think they're hot shit because they get a few creep one-liners on instagram from guys obviously trying to bone them, the fat girls get no attention yet they justify their lack of personality by pointing to the average girls and saying "hey, she isn't a looker but she's doing fine!".

the effort bar for guys is rising steadily while the girls cease to put any effort into themselves, calling it "liberation" and whatnot.

[Anonymous No.16806470]

>>16806459
>exactly what you said: the male bottom 20% should, in general, match with the female bottom 20%.
I agree on principle but historically I don't think that's what happens. In pre-agricultural times and many agricultural societies, very few men get all the girls. We're moving towards a very mild version of this where only the bottom males are weeded out.
>the effort bar for guys is rising steadily while the girls cease to put any effort into themselves, calling it "liberation" and whatnot.
I agree, although I don't see what it's the liberation of exactly. Seems to me like it's the product of particular ("egalitarian") social norms, not the spontaneous result of people doing what they want.

[Anonymous No.16806519]

>>16803960
They used to use male models for the bodies because for obvious reasons they couldn't very well go around having naked women standing in front of them in those restrictive days.

[Anonymous No.16806521]

>>16806470
>In pre-agricultural times and many agricultural societies, very few men get all the girls
i disagree heavily, you're right about the hunter-gatherer tribes but the desired traits changed after agriculture was developed and people began valuing long-term stability over the impulsive values of hunter-gatherers, thus leading to a prevalently monogamous tradition.
exceptions exist, as always, but an emperor's harem is not a valid counterpoint to the plebs' monogamy.

>I don't see what it's the liberation of exactly
sorry, didn't word it properly.
it's not a liberation, it's the perversion of the idea of liberation from colonialism, sexual and racial discrimination.
in specific i fly into a fit of rage whenever i see the "heterosexual white male" boogeyman used by any person, doubly so if used by a person whose titles demand respect.

the "western values" in anglo countries being upheld mostly by the asian minority speaks volumes of how the morals of society are in rapid decline.

[Anonymous No.16806529]

>>16801591
Honestly I'm tired of seeing disgusting roasties in the OP. Today is the day I disable thumbnails.

[Anonymous No.16806536]

Are these butts asian?

[Anonymous No.16806555]

>>16801591
Friendly reminder to burn every De Sade book you encounter

[Anonymous No.16806562]

>>16801662
>At least his son had the decency of burning his unpublished writings
Based son, thank god

[Anonymous No.16806573]

>>16806536
Asians usually have much lower butts, at least naturally.

[Anonymous No.16806576]

>>16805341
You would consider them children?

[Anonymous No.16806694]

>>16801591
Fuck this shit, ehough internet for today, Im going back to reading

[Anonymous No.16807189]

>>16805803
>generally
proof or my point still stands.

[Anonymous No.16807325]

>>16804871
20-30 is where it's at. 15 and 35 are tolerable.

[Anonymous No.16807340]

>>16807325
Agreed.

[Anonymous No.16807900]

>>16801653
Biting ass cheeks is life

[Anonymous No.16808083]

>>16807900
life of a orbiter

[Anonymous No.16808099]

>>16802331
I don't care about dimples or cellulite, but I have a problem with whores showing their asses on social networks!

[Anonymous No.16808195]

>>16804811
Artemis and her equivalents were often portrayed as voluptuous in the oldest sources. The vision you have of the Greek goddesses is a neo-classical invention.

[Anonymous No.16809188]

>dude sex lmao

[Anonymous No.16810695]

>>16808195
>Artemis, Goddess of the Hunt, known as the "Diana of Versailles", as exhibited in the Louvre Museum, Paris, France. 2nd century CE copied from a Greek original dating to 330 BCE.

[Anonymous No.16811678]

>>16804811
artemis was an asexual virgin lol

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16811751]

>>16811678
She is the maiden to Selene’s mother and Hekate’s old woman. The invader’s Olympian order adopted her as Apollo’s sister and they insisted she stay virgin, but later made her hunt the very animals she was supposed to be a protector and midwife for.
Okay crescent moon is her bow now, and she’s a tough athletic babe that baths with all the wood nymphs and sylphs. It’s heavily inferred she’s a lesbian

[Anonymous No.16812091]

>>16805228
>Young Men Driving the Decline in Sex
Fucking kek! Females whoring themselves out to the top 20% of men while ignoring the rest is someone the incels' fault. Letting the Jews run the media was a mistake.

[Anonymous No.16812097]

>>16811678

[Anonymous No.16812190]

>>16806412
>How is it not just purging the bottom 20% of men?
It's more like the bottom 80%
NOBODY is winning with this equation. The only "winners" are the top 20% of males who get endless fucks when girls with inflated egos hit estrus once a month. I'm an oldfag. My entire generation is filled with roasties who are now approaching 40 and are incredibly unhappy. Even the chads are happy because they got so used to a firehose supply of pussy that they took it all for granted. Yes some of those guys married and had families but many are cheating because as long as they keep their good looks and good job the pussy firehose never ends. Nobody is winning. I'm not an incel but I'm also not married yet. This is my perspective.

[Anonymous No.16812204]

>>16812190
>Even the chads are happy
meant to say Even the chads are UNhappy...

[Anonymous No.16812215]

>>16812190
huh?

[Anonymous No.16812272]

>>16801591
Is this biography any good?

[Anonymous No.16813864]

>>16810695
>330 BC
this is hellenistic, you might as well say lotr is actual germanic mythology
anyway, i hope you aren't implying roman copies intended to simply create a 1:1 imitation of the original

[Anonymous No.16813872]

>>16811751
Have you read "Diana at Her Bath"? It's really good

[Anonymous No.16814683]

bumping for more butt posts

[Anonymous No.16814692]

>>16814683
please no, I can't concentrate with this thread on the catalog

[Anonymous No.16814775]

>>16814692
Concentrate on what? This is /lit/.

[Anonymous No.16814901]

>>16814775
Writing! Every now and then I look at the catalog to see if I got (you)s, but when I see the butts I'm still thinking about butts when I alt-tab away.

[Anonymous No.16815134]

>>16803960

[Anonymous No.16816301]

>>16812190
>>16812091
Well apparently that's not true. The stats don't say 80% of males are single and sexless. The majority of young men are in couples, and in my experience these work out.
I think you anons know too many incels, so you think they're representative. I'm an incel so I'm not here to defend the way the 'dating market' is structured or anything, but this is a cope. It really is more something like the bottom 20% of men who are struggling.

[Anonymous No.16816320]

>>16806521
>i disagree heavily, you're right about the hunter-gatherer tribes but the desired traits changed after agriculture was developed and people began valuing long-term stability over the impulsive values of hunter-gatherers, thus leading to a prevalently monogamous tradition.
>exceptions exist, as always, but an emperor's harem is not a valid counterpoint to the plebs' monogamy.
I agree generally, that's why I said in pre-agricultural time and in *many* agricultural societies. I agree not in most agricultural societies. But if you go to the tribal middle east, polygamy is very common, it's not a phenomenon that is and was reserved to the royalty.

I'm not sure what you're saying in the rest of your post, answering to that second quote.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16816323]

>>16815134
Wrong period

>>16813864
Fatties became popular in the baroque period

[Anonymous No.16816330]

>>16815134
Nordic and Med androginy, Aryan taste for thin women confirmed.

[Anonymous No.16816647]

>>16801653
baste

[Anonymous No.16816991]

>>16804871
thats because you're high t my dude

[Anonymous No.16817023]

>>16806373
have sex incel

[Anonymous No.16817048]

>>16817023
dilate

[Anonymous No.16817081]

>>16817048
thanks for the defense anon but i'd rather you don't enable retards like him.

[Anonymous No.16817116]

>>16812190
bizarre, I just learned the word estrus from a six hour long dark souls commentary, then I come to this thread and see it used

don't come at me with the reddit meinhof phenomenon either, it is much more likely a synchronicity than mere coincidence

[Anonymous No.16817126]

>>16817116
That's estus, not estrus
Unless the potion makes you horny

[Anonymous No.16817192]

>>16817126
the person who made the video explained his theory that estus was a play on the word estrus, with some other metaphors for woman/motherhood in related things, thus me learning the word

[Anonymous No.16818176]

bump for more petite white girl butts

[Anonymous No.16818607]

>>16805180
They have flat asses

[Anonymous No.16818620]

>>16818607
>>16818176
Stop bumping coomer shit threads

[Anonymous No.16818672]

>>16818607
t.baboon

[Anonymous No.16819071]

>>16801827
I actually like both, big and small.

[Anonymous No.16819088]

>>16801662
extraordinarily based

[Anonymous No.16819096]

>>16819071
Eww. These ass implants always look bad and even worse, they all look the same! Once you seen one Instagram "PAWG", you've seen them all.

[Anonymous No.16819112]

>>16801608
What book did you translate this from?

[Anonymous No.16819212]

>>16801863
what are you talking about? whites have huge baboon hottentot venus asses now

[Anonymous No.16819223]

>>16819096
those aren't implants

[Anonymous No.16819235]

>>16819212
Those are implants and they look terrible. They hide their cellulite with angles and photoshop. Extremely unhealthy.

[Anonymous No.16819239]

>>16801653
More like that pls

[Anonymous No.16819247]

>>16819235
lol they're not implants dude, get over yourself

[Anonymous No.16819261]

>>16819247
You are extremely naive.

[Anonymous No.16819286]

>>16819071
>>16819212
>>16819235
>>16819247
>>16819261

[Anonymous No.16820321]

>>16804871
That change from 40% to 45% is bullshit. 45% is twice as wide as 40%, even though there's little difference from 25% to 35?

[Anonymous No.16820364]

>>16801653
is this a quote from a book?

[Anonymous No.16820489]

>>16801724
he claimed to be a serial rapist and torturer. worst thing they got him for was giving cantharides to some whores that one time. he was sent to the bastille and later to charenton because of his political leanings, not because he fucked whores.

[Anonymous No.16820499]

>>16803802

"Still, the girl is thin," Lord Uls pointed out. "For adequacy and advantage, a female needs proper amplitude." Duke Cypris gave qualified agreement.

"A learned Moor has worked out the exact formula, though I forget the numbers; so many square inches of skin to so many hands in height. The effect must be sumptuous but neither expansive nor rotund."

"Quite so. That would be carrying the doctrine too far."
Jack Vance, 'Lyonesse:Madouc'

[Anonymous No.16820700]

>>16801591
de sade was a pedophilic monster who jerked off using shit as lube fuck that freak

[Anonymous No.16821506]

bump

[Anonymous No.16821529]

how the fuck is the shit in this thread worksafe
fucking jannies

[Anonymous No.16821546]

>>16821529
No nipples, genitals or penetration.

[Anonymous No.16821640]

>>16821546
Show it to your whore mother then and see what she thinks

[Anonymous No.16821768]

>>16821640
If his mother was a whore she would literally consider this thread worksafe, you braindead mongoloid.

[Anonymous No.16821849]

>>16821640
Regardless, it’s on topic. I’ve actually read Sade’s 120 Days of Sodom. He was obsessed with asses and anal. We’re having a debate on wether big or small asses are the most aesthetically pleasing. You can leave and enter the 50 other threads active on this board if you don’t like this one.

[Anonymous No.16822934]

>>16821849
>We’re having a debate on wether big or small asses are the most aesthetically pleasing.
Massive, muscular man ass is the best.

[Anonymous No.16822946]

>>16821529
This is how ladies dress today, bigot

[Anonymous No.16823787]

Bump for more buttposts

[Anonymous No.16823814]

>>16821849
>Regardless, it’s on topic.
porn is always on topic amirite?
god damn it the world needs gulags for your kind

[Anonymous No.16823863]

>>16823814
We are talking about Sade, a guy obsessed with butts, so yeah.

[Anonymous No.16823889]

>>16823814
Where is the porn ITT?
If you think a woman's half exposed buttocks is pornographic then you're not gonna like what the world outside your basement looks like.

[noisy No.16824244]

>>16815134
absolutely baste

[Anonymous No.16824951]

>>16819247
Is there any coomer/lit/ about facesitting?

[Anonymous No.16825011]

What's the /lit/ equivalent of facialabuse.com?

[Anonymous No.16825031]

>>16807325
>35
>tolerable

anon, you're a chubby chaser. 15 - 30 is prime.
>>16804871
25 and 30 should be reversed. Lighting is deceiving in the 25 image. Go to /fit/ and ask how beneficial and flattering lighting can be

[Anonymous No.16825060]

>>16814901
>but when I see the butts I'm still thinking about butts when I alt-tab away.
I feel sorry, bro.

[Anonymous No.16825090]

>>16815134
Paglia-pilled.

[Anonymous No.16825182]

>>16825011
>What's the /lit/ equivalent of facialabuse.com?
I know I'm fucked up, but the hottest thing about facialabuse is that they ACTUALLY break the girls down with their mind games. It is not the physical agression per se but the way they push them (emotionally) to a way and then to the other that actually do the deed.

[Anonymous No.16825300]

>>16825182
I know, it's both arousing and hilarious.

[Anonymous No.16825605]

>>16825300
>I know, it's both arousing and hilarious.
It's so ridiculous that sometimes I end up almost losing my boner.

[Anonymous No.16826165]

>>16825011

Sartre was facially abused in the womb

[Anonymous No.16826209]

>>16801662
fugg, imagine being that freak's son

[Anonymous No.16827810]

How do I get into de Sade?

[Anonymous No.16828938]

Was Sade a Jacobine I have to know what his politics were

[Anonymous No.16828979]

>>16828938
He wasn't a Jacobin, Jacobins were hardcore Rousseau fanboys while de Sade was the complete opposite. In some ways he was kind of like a proto-communist but really he was just an epic gamer that was being oppressed by society.

[Anonymous No.16829044]

>>16827810
Philosophy in the bedroom and/or Justine

[Anonymous No.16829106]

>>16828979
What source are you using

[Anonymous No.16829113]

>>16829106
I don't have a source that he was an epic gamer, but it seems very likely.

[Anonymous No.16829121]

>>16828979
De Sade was also a Rousseau fanboy, and the only one who understood him btw

[Anonymous No.16829138]

>>16829113
I am talking about the proto-communist stuff

[Anonymous No.16829161]

>>16829138
>As a revolutionary thinker de Sade was in complete opposition to all his contemporaries firstly in his complete and continual denial of a right to property, and secondly in his view of the struggle as being—not between the Crown, the bourgeoisie, the aristocracy or the clergy, or sectional interests of any of these against one another (the view of all his contemporaries)—but of all these more or less united against the proletariat. By holding these views he cuts himself off entirely from the revolutionary thinkers of his time to join those of the mid-nineteenth century. For this reason he can with some justice be called the first reasoned socialist.
https://ia801600.us.archive.org/11/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.211905/2015.211905.The-Revolutionary_text.pdf
p197

[Anonymous No.16829203]

>>16829161
This seems very biased. I remember from the Philosophy in the Bedroom that he was against private property, but he was also against all property rights. He didn't think that there should be laws against theft. But since he didn't advocate for any institution to distribute wealth, his position here seems closer to Anarchocapitalism, since there are vast differences in power between individuals and no central institution that enforces laws against theft or murder.
On the other hand he wanted the government to organize orgies where it would be illegal to refuse sexual advances to enable equal opportunity for sexual pleasure. He wanted a limited goverment but he thought this is one of the few areas where government intervention is needed.

[Anonymous No.16829272]

>>16829203
>On the other hand he wanted the government to organize orgies where it would be illegal to refuse sexual advances to enable equal opportunity for sexual pleasure.
so what you're saying de sade is the solution to the incel problem

[Anonymous No.16829707]

>>16801591
Wait I don't get? Was this the future he wanted or the future he didn't want? Or was this what he expected the future to be?