Academia only reinforces power structures - NO exceptions

[Anonymous No.16794977]

How do you all pretend otherwise. I'm a new psychiatric nurse practitioner and seeing the academia to pharma pipeline, and the absolute control the industry has over academic peer reviewed research/conclusions is astounding. There is literally no such thing as academic freedom or independent research. Academia is fully at the service of the corporate world and uses the concept of intellectual freedom as a marketing tool for these corporations. They willingly, gladly lie and manipulate results about drugs and every single researcher is in on it.

Why would this not be true in any other field? Even in a field without money backing it, why would any ideas be allowed that hurt the university's bottom line? The Ivies and major privates are functionally hedge funds when you get down to it. Everything related to education is secondary.

So please tell me how edgy communists believe they can get a humanities education at a college and subvert the system when the system is supplying them with every single idea in their heads?

[Anonymous No.16794997]

>>16794977
>Writes two paragraphs about how capitalists run, exploit, and ruin all aspects of academia
>shits on communists
Jesus christ capitalism has you guys by the balls

[Anonymous No.16795004]

>>16794997
Reading comprehension sure sucks on the lit board huh? Maybe if you weren't such a triggered faggot retard you could actually see my point

[Anonymous No.16795019]

>>16794977
also another point: can you name any time in history that academia hasn't fully been at the service of financially dominant power structures?

pro tip you can't. So why would it be different now?

[Anonymous No.16795041]

>>16794997
Not sure if this answers your question but I believe a just government should execute communists.

[Anonymous No.16795052]

>>16794997
Silence commie fuck, real human beings are talking.

[Anonymous No.16795062]

>>16795041

[Anonymous No.16795073]

>>16794997
>some criticizes communism
>anon automatically assumes they are some far-right libertarian

Bruh, you realize that the world is not black and white? Not everyone can be neatly categorized as either "nazi" or "communist". I fucking hate normies, but surprisingly even normies are less cringe and less pozzed than random extremist weirdos on the internet. Outside of places like pol and twitter, it's pretty uncommon to run into actual antifa trannies or QTard schizos. Normies are pretty annoying, but faggots like you actually have them beat. For once maybe the normies deserve a pat on the back.
Also game theory and social choice theory absolutely BTFO communists and libertarians.

[Anonymous No.16795103]

>>16795073
The true redpill is that we live in an anarcho capitalist society right here and now. It just doesn't take the form Hoppe thought.

Every society at all time is anarcho capitalist because that's all there is. Just raw financial power.

[Anonymous No.16795120]

>>16794977
>How do you all pretend otherwise.
They lie to themselves and cope. They bribe themselves with false promises of security.

The worst are retards who exist outside that system but suck down its effluvia, cargo-culting from the outside. They con themselves, thinking they're the true radicals, while holding the same opinions as the people inside the walls. This board is full of such people. One of them is a tripfag you love to hate.

The most powerful con this system has is convincing participants they're revolutionaries taking it down from the inside. This is the perfect cover for neoliberalism as it loots the infrastructure of civilization.

[Anonymous No.16795150]

>>16794977
>>16795103
>>16795073
>>16795120
How can we realistically change the sway of power so cheap labor is not being abused by Über-capitalists to get rich?

A maximum income level, and housing+Food being provided to every person (NOT in the form of finances however) would be a good start but the power industrialists hold over every aspect of society, especially the media, doesn’t exactly make the implementation of this very easy.

[Anonymous No.16795153]

>>16795120
This. There's a reason the top 1 percent, 10 percent , 20 percent even, plus every major corporation, are democrats. What defies reason is why drug addicted communist freaks in Portland are as well

[Anonymous No.16795157]

>>16795150
you only talk about dumb shit like ubi because the corporations want you to. This type of post is exactly what op is talking about. How do you not see this

[Anonymous No.16795183]

>>16795150
>How can we realistically change the sway of power so cheap labor is not being abused by Über-capitalists to get rich?
What you are asking is a nonsense question based on semantic unrealities. Its like the thing about God making a rock so big he can't lift it. You don't get to escape.

[Anonymous No.16795188]

>>16794997
>he can't criticize both
My car gets me to where I want to go, but that doesn't mean that I don't think it's a hunk of shit or that I should trade it in for another hunk of shit.

[Anonymous No.16795189]

>>16794977
What research is forbidden?

[Anonymous No.16795193]

>>16795103
You just think that because you've never seen another system. The ruins of something else are all around you. You're just a feral child crawling through it, unaware of what you're looking at.

>>16795150
Racial-ethnic-national solidarity and organization.
There's a reason the system put every resource at it's disposal to make this idea repellent to you. It's the only thing that can threaten it.

[Anonymous No.16795206]

>>16795193
Its repellent because its an outdated money maker. Globalism is just nationalism 2.0

[Anonymous No.16795212]

I'm an engineering PhD student and academia is just used as low cost contract work. Students are cheap labour.

Everything we do is either for a company or for a commercial application that can be used for a company.

There's no point in what I do which I why I'm going to go into industry when I graduate.

[Anonymous No.16795224]

>>16795189
There is no forbidden research but you'll only get funding if it's for something that a company wants. There is no research because something seems interesting.

[Anonymous No.16795231]

>>16795150
Why should everyone have a right to food and housing? What capitalism does is filter out the worthless among us, go outside more and you will soon realize why not everyone deserves a free education or even access to basic human needs.

[Anonymous No.16795233]

>>16795206
>nationalism was just capitalism, kids!
>t. tenure-track prof applying for corporate grants

Like I said, the brainwashing worked. They put literally everything into it, and gave you ten thousand copes to chose from.

[Anonymous No.16795257]

>>16795233
Even if you're right, it doesn't matter. Besides, look my Asian wife in the eyes and tell her whites only. How dare you.

[Anonymous No.16795264]

>>16795183
>t. Satan

[Anonymous No.16795298]

>>16795257
Did you notice that WM/AF is the paring in every commercial and TV show that depicts a white man as respectable, healthy, and with a family?

Everyone's been poisoned by the brainwashing in some way. That's your cross to bear, sadly. No one gets an easy answer.

But white solidarity is still the only thing that actually scares the system. Facts is facts.

Asians are actually a lot more compatible with whites than any other race, so there's small grace.

[Anonymous No.16795312]

>>16795183
What is the rock resting on?

[Anonymous No.16795405]

>>16794977
> So please tell me how edgy communists believe they can get a humanities education at a college and subvert the system when the system is supplying them with every single idea in their heads?

I know this post isn't about Harvard, but you put a picture of it so I'll tell you about it because I went there. There are very few communists at Harvard. Probably more than when I went there, but few. There are a lot of "theory" kids who do a bit of "reading Marx" as a lark, but they are a species of liberal in the end. The political spectrum is thin on the right (which everyone knows) but also thin on the far left. It's basically Pete Buttigiegs as far as the eye can see. Even the pro-Palestine activists I knew went on to work for big foundations. At Harvard, the communist left is a mirage.

The answer to your question is no one actually thinks that. Most people in academia are run off the mill liberals, and of the few who engage in radicalism, it's almost never orthodox Marxism, and even when it is, it's usually a drag thing. Everyone wants to be employable after graduation. You can do that after doing BLM; it's a lot harder if you were selling Trot newspapers.

The are real problems on college campuses (mostly idpol) but out and out communism is not one of them.

[Anonymous No.16795412]

>>16794977
>midlevel
Your points are good but your career is retarded.

[Anonymous No.16795429]

>>16794997

[Anonymous No.16795440]

>>16795429

[Anonymous No.16795453]

>>16795429
I've never seen the super rich promote socialism. They even thought Bernie was too radical and he's a mere social democrat.

[Anonymous No.16795461]

>>16795412
My career was based on necessity since I fucked around in my 20s and then suddenly was getting married and having kids. Being a nurse and then NP allowed me to make a full time salary of ~70 to 80K while going to school, and then making six figures. Of course I'd be a doctor if I could do it over and didn't have a family. But with the health care changes these days, being an MD is a sadder and sadder prospect whereas my current career trajectory is increasingly lucrative.

[Anonymous No.16795467]

>>16795405
But I'm not talking about the people at Harvard, as should be obvious based on my OP. I'm talking about the people on the outside or the posters here who are deluded into thinking Harvard isn't something entirely corporate and institutional

[Anonymous No.16795481]

>>16795453
Doesn't Bernie literally own multiple mansions though?

[Anonymous No.16795496]

>>16795453
Bankers pay for this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gnpCqsXE8g

It was sucessful in France with "egalite fraternite liberte" (((commies))) in Russia took power with similar bullshit.

[Anonymous No.16795506]

>>16795481
I wouldn't call them mansions but he's a senator who wrote a popular book so he's doing pretty well financially. He's far from super rich, though. Nowhere near as rich as the more corrupt senators like Mitch McConnell.

[Anonymous No.16795512]

>>16795496
Here couple examples. Goofy cartoons but anyway.

[Anonymous No.16795517]

>>16795512

[Anonymous No.16795526]

Here who promote this egalitarism to useful idiots now.

[Anonymous No.16795534]

[Anonymous No.16795540]

[Anonymous No.16795546]

>>16795467
In other words, you're strawmanning and doing it hard.

[Anonymous No.16795547]

[Anonymous No.16795557]

>>16795546
Wow look at the intellectual comments a Harvard education buys you. Fuck off troll.

[Anonymous No.16795579]

>>16795546
What is your gay point? There are obviously people in the world who think that revolutionary or subversive ideas are accessible through academic areas like the social sciences. Why are you so acting like a dense retard on purpose?

[Anonymous No.16795584]

>>16795557
Go ahead and name specific people who say the things you're disagreeing with. Then it isn't a straw man.

[Anonymous No.16795594]

>>16795579
My point is it's fewer than you'd think.

[Anonymous No.16795596]

@16795584
Sorry, fresh out of Yous. Please move onto the next thread; we're all very impressed with your point. Adults are talking here so piss off.

[Anonymous No.16795855]

Bump after Harvard fag derailed the thread with his narcissism

[Anonymous No.16795950]

>>16795584
>>16795594
I'll never forgive you for totally killing my thread you fucking piece of shit. All for a non point.

[Anonymous No.16796574]

>>16795453
There's tons of documentation of bankers shoveling cash at communists revolutionaries. They don't have to go on /tv/ to support it. Read Ralph Epperson's book

[Anonymous No.16796589]

>>16795453
The corporation and the welfare state gradually merge into one thing that gives the appearance of socialism. The bureaucracy of the corporate boardroom and the politics of the party blur to become one massive hegemonic power. Its almost inevitable.

[Anonymous No.16796828]

This isn't quite true about academic leftism in the humanities. Leftists captured the universities through will-to-power and office politics, promoting activist colleagues and grad students, et cetera. Its also simply the case that many educated people go in for certain modish forms of stupidity, its been like that since at least the 19th century. A lot of professors in the West were communist Soviet-sympathizers in the 1930's at the height of Stalinist terror - it wasn't big corporations making them feel or think that way. They were just naive idiots.

[Anonymous No.16796837]

>reads moldbug once
Lmao universities are the intellectual vanguards unless you unironically believe that caveman-tier rural trump voters are somehow going to come up with some revolutionary theory for organizing society

[Anonymous No.16796857]

>>16794997
Some of the replies to your post are pure cringe but still, there's really not a clear dichotomy like communism vs capitalism

[Anonymous No.16796949]

>>16794977
>Why would this not be true in any other field? Even in a field without money backing it, why would any ideas be allowed that hurt the university's bottom line? The Ivies and major privates are functionally hedge funds when you get down to it. Everything related to education is secondary.
this is why (((academics))) went to the gulag

[Anonymous No.16796966]

>>16794997
You're not the solution, you never were and I don't think you'll ever see why.

[Anonymous No.16796969]

>>16796837
This has nothing to do with whatever strawman allows you to preserve your cognitive dissonance. My post is derived from professional observations about academia. Unless you are arguing that corporate money doesn't influence peer reviewed research I really don't think you're making any point at all

[Anonymous No.16796992]

>>16795206
I like that even poltards are realizing this about nationalism now. Ethnic borders are only feasible on a small scale. Talebs multipolar localism is essentially what /pol/ really wants

[Anonymous No.16796995]

>>16796828
Every revolutionary idea and social issue in the past century has been championed by academia but motivated totally by economics and business demand.

Feminism was in vogue in universities but it did not push women into the workforce. Inflation did. The universities simply generated the rationale for the change and willingly played the part of radical progressive bad guy.

[Anonymous No.16797005]

>>16796969
News flash- corporations recruit from academia, not the other way around.

[Anonymous No.16797015]

>>16796837
>Lmao universities are the intellectual vanguards
t. Starbucks barista with student loan debt who gets his kicks feeling superior to rich milfs

[Anonymous No.16797024]

>>16797005
holy shit you are a fucking child. I am actually speechless at how naive you are. I guess this is the mindset that boomer college propaganda pays for with those government subsidies

Guess how I know you don't have a job?

[Anonymous No.16797029]

>>16797015
How goes the clean coal and crippling opioid addiction Trumpie? Don’t worry, Biden will send his antifa death squads to put you out of your misery shortly.

[Anonymous No.16797042]

>>16797024
Facts don’t care about your feelings. The CIA recruits from Yale. Google recruits from MIT. McDonald’s doesn’t even recruit inbred rural retards like you, you have to go hat in hand and fill out an application like every unwashed swine that hopped the border fence.

[Anonymous No.16797045]

>>16797029
I'm a Democrat, because I have two private school children in a dual income professional household in the top 8 percent. Looks like I struck a nerve with my post huh? Thats ok. I already felt superior to you before you exposed your hurt to the anonynous internet.

Also your post was off topic :)

[Anonymous No.16797051]

>>16797042
I'm waiting to see where your point is. Unfortunately you don't have an Ivy education or you'd be able to articulate it better.

[Anonymous No.16797061]

>>16797042
this post is embarrassing and doesn't address the point that corporate influence over academia is obvious and pervasive

[Anonymous No.16797062]

>>16797045
You’re the retard that claimed money influences academic studies, which is untrue. Corporations recruit those academics to pay for counter studies (see tobacco, oil industry, etc) while in an academic setting this simply doesn’t happen. Guess you went to a third rate school and that’s why you are so bummed out.

[Anonymous No.16797069]

>>16797061
>corporate influence over academia is obvious and pervasive
Link me any study that proves this, I’ll wait. Studies paid for by corporations are not conducted in an academic context and are arranged for privately. Seethe harder my uneducated prole, surely the revolution is close at hand.

[Anonymous No.16797080]

>>16797062
Yes money doesn't influence academic studies at all. Universities are pure centers of ethical perfection that ignore things like grants and research funding.

I'm not sure if you never went to college or were just a nobody at whatever school you attended. Your ignorance on this point proves without question you didn't go to a research I school, but you could have just been a faggy humanities major without prospects so who knows. Either way I'm not interested in your hot takes any further.

[Anonymous No.16797088]

>>16797080
>muh-uh
Yawn. Didn’t read the rest of your diatribe. You seem to be experiencing massive cognitive dissonance. Seek help for your psychosis.

[Anonymous No.16797093]

>>16797062
>You’re the retard that claimed money influences academic studies, which is untrue.
bruh did you write this sentence with a straight face

maybe you should cool off for a few minutes and reread the stuff you've been posting

[Anonymous No.16797096]

>>16797069
Look at the raging cognitive dissonance here. Imagine what this person is like. Someone whose identity is desperately attached to something as nonsensical as the idea that colleges are "pure and untarnished" by the real world.

This is someone who doesn't have an identity outside of a college degree. Moreover, someone who is thrashing about in a sunken cost trap about it.

Hipster on food stamp anyone? No person with a modicum of identity or self worth would react so aggressively about this topic.

[Anonymous No.16797104]

>>16797088
guess what psychiatric defense mechanism this post exhibits

[Anonymous No.16797114]

>>16797093
No response, though I didn’t expect one. Still waiting on that study though :)
>>16797096
>ad-hom
Yawn. Typical reactionary plebe raging against the vanguard.

[Anonymous No.16797124]

>>16797114
Is this what lit has sunk to? Not too late to claim you were trolling all along, buddy.

[Anonymous No.16797128]

>>16797114
New poster here. Just wanted to pop in to comment that you're a mentally ill fucking retard and you're making an ass if yourself
>t. Phd candidate at Penn

[Anonymous No.16797132]

>>16795231
This isn't capitalism. There is no free market. Corporations deemed "too essential" are not allowed to fail. mfw Corporate Socialism. Bootlicker.

[Anonymous No.16797133]

>>16797124
You’re shilling for anti-intellectualism. Morons like you decried Socrates for corrupting the youth with his school. Of course, you wouldn’t know anything about history or philosophy since the intellectual vanguard that advances these ideas somehow uphold the status quo (lol). Get back to your oxy’s and go bitch on Twitter about how the elites stole the election from your glorious spokesman of the working class.

[Anonymous No.16797137]

>>16797069
>Studies paid for by corporations are not conducted in an academic context
is this poster admitting he hasn't gone to college with this post... ?

[Anonymous No.16797141]

>>16797137
I didn’t go to college, I went to university.

[Anonymous No.16797149]

>>16797133
Also new poster. Is your argument literally that corporations do not influence research conducted in universities? Is that your claim? That things like research grants don't exist? Are you calling anyone who acknowledges the existence of a grant a Trump supporter? What made you like this? Were you raped or something? Why are you so broken?

[Anonymous No.16797155]

>>16797137
leftism is taking a major L with the guy in this thread lmao

>>16797141
OK dude where do you think all the money for study grants comes from? The federal government? The money tree? The Albert Einstein impartial and ethical science foundation? My hemorrhoidal ass? Where in your little pea brain do you think the money comes from?

[Anonymous No.16797164]

>>16797069
>Link me any study that proves this, I’ll wait
Other than the comical tautology inherent in this statement, here is evidence that might reach your idiot brain

https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/04/public-universities-get-an-education-in-private-industry/521379/

Is the Atlantic lying about corporate grants in universities here? Is this a Trumpist plot? Bear in mind I typed this thread topic into Google and pulled the first search result also kys

[Anonymous No.16797168]

>>16797133
holy shit PLEASE kys you autist. seriously stop posting.

[Anonymous No.16797177]

>>16797149
Gonna need a citation on that please. I asked 5 posts ago for a study that proves this.
>>16797155
90%+ of university funding comes from tuition and federal subsidies. Are you going to link any source that backs up your insipid claims or just cry all day that you will always be looked down on as filth because you didn’t have the stomach for academia and instead chose to wage slave? You larpers are universally mocked.

[Anonymous No.16797181]

>>16797164
> That’s what happened last December when a paper commissioned by the International Life Sciences Institute—composed of companies like Red Bull and Hershey among others—downplayed the importance of limiting one’s sugar intake.
It’s exactly as I said- this paper was specifically commissioned and paid for. Academic research is not. It’s in your own article, numbskull.

[Anonymous No.16797182]

Why is this faggot repeating phrases like muh intellectual vanguard with the utmost seriousness? Was it autism, or just debt-addled denialism? Someone else hit the nail on the head saying its like he's defending a car that turned out to be a lemon. But it seems his politics are intertwined with idolizing universities as if they aren't corporations themselves.

Go ahead fag and tell me they're non profit.

[Anonymous No.16797188]

>>16797168
Who would have guessed that drawing historical parallels would anger phillistines ignorant of history

[Anonymous No.16797191]

who fucking cares

[Anonymous No.16797192]

>>16797182
Yawn. More impotent rage. Go peddle your reactionary tripe to your Neo-Nazi Facebook group. We oppress you because you are stupid and refuse to change. Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.16797193]

>>16797177
>Gonna need a citation
>Link me any study
>Still waiting on that study though :)

[Anonymous No.16797207]

>>16797181
Actually you didn't read the article. Here's another

https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/sciences-worst-enemy-corporate-funding

Research universities, too, are rapidly privatizing. Both public and private institutions now receive a shrinking portion of their overall funding from government sources. They are looking instead to private industry and other commercial activities to enhance their funding. Last summer, an investigation by the San Jose Mercury News found that one-third of Stanford University’s medical school administrators and department heads now have reported financial conflicts of interest related to their own research. These included stock options, consulting fees, and patents.

[Anonymous No.16797217]

>>16797207
Do you plan on linking an actual study or just sensational anecdotes? For every anecdote I can link you 10000 legitimate papers. Quite ironic seeing as how big business and media outlets are joined at the hip.

[Anonymous No.16797221]

>>16797193
this is such a bizarre demand, like aggressively demanding evidence of what should be common knowledge

>>16797177
>cry all day that you will always be looked down on as filth because you didn’t have the stomach for academia and instead chose to wage slave?
yet another completely deranged statement. What is your age and employment status? You could clear up a lot of hassle if you admit that you're 19 and the adults are wasting their time ITT talking to you

[Anonymous No.16797222]

>>16797193
I accept your concession

[Anonymous No.16797228]

>>16794997
>eat shit or drink piss, no other options are available to you
Silence wretch

[Anonymous No.16797231]

>>16797221
28, social scientist. Still waiting on the peer reviewed studies to support your nonsense claims lol.

[Anonymous No.16797235]

>>16797217
Are you asserting that article is lying?

[Anonymous No.16797240]

>>16797235
Get reading comprehension.

[Anonymous No.16797243]

>>16797217
>"provide proof that universities get a large amount of corporate funding from universities"
>anon provides proof
>"thats ad homenim you neo nazi"
>anon provides more proof
>"no provide REAL proof"

The ABSOLUT state of leftist intellectuals

[Anonymous No.16797245]

>>16797231
>28, social scientist.
jeeezus christ

god help us if this is true, no wonder so much "social science" is fake. You're 28 years old and you think that people who work outside of academia are "filth"??? What the fuck is wrong with you?

[Anonymous No.16797255]

>>16797243
Still waiting on that study :)
>>16797245
I do consulting work- I am not even in academia. It’s very amusing to see your tiny reactionary brain twist itself into a pretzel when asked for a study to back up your claims.

[Anonymous No.16797259]

>>16797132
>Spouting buzz words
How about you give some examples retard.

[Anonymous No.16797271]

>>16797245
>you think that people who work outside of academia are "filth"
The uneducated are extremely unpleasant company. Crude and unwordly with nothing to say.

[Anonymous No.16797279]

>>16797231
>28, social scientist.
Oh sweetie... that's not a real occupation...

[Anonymous No.16797280]

>>16797255
He provided proof twice anon, maybe consider that your cognitive dissonance is warping your perception? I know the purity of universities is VERY important to your self worth...

[Anonymous No.16797289]

>>16797231
>28, social scientist
Lmao fuck me guys I'm out. Someone else play tard wrangler for a bit lol

[Anonymous No.16797303]

>>16797231
hol up dis nigga is a tranny

[Anonymous No.16797312]

>>16797271
What kind of consulting do you do?

[Anonymous No.16797317]

>>16797279
>>16797289
Uh-oh, it appears I have enraged the Trumpies.
>>16797280
Anecdotes are not evidence. A peer reviewed study would be acceptable. Naturally you are a mouth breathing reactionary that no doubt believes that Biden committed mass voter fraud because some lib poll worker tore up a dozen ballots.

[Anonymous No.16797320]

>>16797255
>ah yes I'm in the "work industry" you see us anthro majors are in high demand filing consultation, making business reports that sort of thing
You will never be a real woman

[Anonymous No.16797328]

>>16797312
Probably the kind that happens in a bathroom stall with a hole in the wall.

[Anonymous No.16797329]

>>16797320
Looks like I was on the mark about the anti intellectuals replying to me being hick rube poltards. You’re a waste of oxygen.

[Anonymous No.16797340]

>>16797312
Business development. Now how does that have anything to do with you unable to provide any credible study to back up your claims? Note that I don’t care what dirty construction site you lug wood around all day for the aristocracy.

[Anonymous No.16797342]

>>16797329
Tell us what your gender is. Admit you are a tranny. How's that field research going at the gay bar drag show?

I guess there aren't many corporations paying for ethnographic research huh maybe that's where the confusion lies

[Anonymous No.16797354]

>>16797340
Ah yes the business development field. Very lucrative. Businesses are always in need of development, as they say.

[Anonymous No.16797356]

>>16797317
https://theconversation.com/amp/when-big-companies-fund-academic-research-the-truth-often-comes-last-119164

Multiple studies are cited between the three articles that you have been provided with as evidence. Naturally, you will continue to dismiss all the evidence that doesn't line up with your belief, you are a social scientist after all.

[Anonymous No.16797360]

>>16797340
>Business development.

What does that mean? Who are your clients?

[Anonymous No.16797370]

>>16797340
even if you're just trolling for the lulz, your posts reek of mania. think about upping your depakote. grandiose, expansive, narcissistic. and that's me assuming you're just joshin'

[Anonymous No.16797378]

>>16797360
>Who are your clients?
he's going to say something like "business developers" because he clearly has zero real world experience at all.

[Anonymous No.16797381]

>>16797356
>Naturally, you will continue to dismiss all the evidence that doesn't line up with your belief, you are a social scientist after all.
heh

[Anonymous No.16797416]

>>16794997
Academic communists and capitalist organizations have a mutualities relationship, but within it, both parties are striving to control the other.

[Anonymous No.16797431]

>>16794997
Youre right, but these faggots Are just mad.

[Anonymous No.16797445]

>>16797431
What are some communist countries with absolute academic freedom where party interests are not an influence?

[Anonymous No.16797450]

>>16797431
>you capitalist cocksuckers better not insult my universities with billion dollar endowments or else

[Anonymous No.16797454]

>>16797360
What does that matter? It’s plainly obvious you don’t have any argument.
>>16797370
Yawn.
>>16797378
I have already accepted your concession.

[Anonymous No.16797470]

>>16794997
>be communist
>defend the richest organizations in the world
>Harvard literally wealthier than most countries
What kind of disease brain is this exactly?

[Anonymous No.16797473]

>>16797454
>What does that matter?
Who you are and where your perspective comes from is all that interests me about this conversation. I want to know something about the person who espouses the views you do - that is aside from the question of whether you are even being honest, but even lies can be characteristic. If you don't want to reveal anything more about yourself, fine, there is nothing else for us to talk about.

[Anonymous No.16797498]

>>16797473
Ok Trumpnigger. Go back to your trailer you racist hick

[Anonymous No.16797515]

>>16797498
ah the enlightened social scientist finally starts slinging the n-word while calling others racists. the thread is now complete.

[Anonymous No.16797559]

>>16797515
>starts slinging the n-word while calling others racists.

That's probably because he isn't white. Racists can only be white according to their theory, so there's no contradiction.

[Anonymous No.16797566]

>>16794977
>NO exceptions
What is it with idiots thinking that they can make spurious statements and command people into believing some nonsense. You want it to only reinforce power structures, that's the only way a pissant like yourself can have any power.

[Anonymous No.16797569]

Why is this thread allowed? It has nothing to do with literature. Anyway, I don't give a fuck since I'm a liberal

[Anonymous No.16797580]

>>16797566
what is with idiots who can't read the thread

[Anonymous No.16797585]

>>16797559
They're the real racists am I right kek. I am being discriminated against when people tell me that I cannot say nigger as a non-nigger. I am a victim of racism. We need to push for more equality in the world so that I can say nigger.

[Anonymous No.16797592]

>>16797585
just curious what's your ip address

[Anonymous No.16797602]

>>16797592
nice try glowie. Everything I say on this website is satire.

[Anonymous No.16797619]

>>16797585
True facts!

[Anonymous No.16797624]

>>16797255
Based

[Anonymous No.16797637]

>>16797585
>>16797602
what's hilarious is that regardless of the spirit in which it was intended, this post could ruin your life -completely- if it were every linked to your identity. did you think about that before you posted it?

[Anonymous No.16797648]

>>16797619
are you endorsing the use of the n word with this post and your ip address?

[Anonymous No.16797655]

>>16797637
no i did not. the shitposting succubus got ahold of me

[Anonymous No.16798254]

>>16795206
>nationalism is just super-capitalism, kids!
>t. tenure-track prof applying for Ford Foundation grants

[Anonymous No.16798268]

>>16795193
This is correct.

[Anonymous No.16798334]

>>16794997
Based post.
Everybody replying to you is a seething retard.

[Anonymous No.16798931]

>>16795062
Haha murder is chad hahah funny killings im an edge lord on anon site haha i'm smart