[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 96 KB, 1200x1200, ted_kaczynski_harvard_g-594372140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16785367 No.16785367 [Reply] [Original]

>Btfos leftists
>Btfos fascists
>Btfos conservatards
Bros how did he do it?

>> No.16785393

Unleashed the untapped will-to-destroy at the core of every tranner.

>> No.16785401

>>16785393
He inverted the intense self hatred all trannies feel and harnessed its raw destructive power

>> No.16785403

>>16785393
>reeeeeeeeeeee everything I dont liek is tranny! reeeeeeeee
>ted was a tranny reeeeeeee
>land is a tranny reeeeeeeee

>inb4 "you will never be a woman"

>> No.16785406

>>16785367
Mk ultra drugs

>> No.16785444

>>16785403
Ted actually was a tranny because of MK-Ultra

>> No.16785833

>>16785393
>>16785401
>>16785403
>>16785444
your devotion to post-irony is the reason why your life is worse than it could be

>> No.16785860

I think Ted was wrong in his perspective. I don't really think being a completely un-socialized monkey is all that fantastic.

>> No.16785871

>>16785860
That's not at all what he argued.

>> No.16785937

>>16785367
Letter bombs.

>> No.16785955
File: 187 KB, 291x293, 1489166770055.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16785955

>>16785833

>> No.16785960

>>16785833
Guess I’ll devote it to insincerity.

>> No.16785964

>>16785367
DUDE HE BTFO SO MANY PEOPLE LOL OMG MY THINKER IS BETTER THAN UR THINKER HAHA!!!!

Please go back to whatever stupid, gay site you came from, fat manchild fuck.

>> No.16786211

>>16785860
Famously what he wrote.

>> No.16786414

It's easy to critique, but hard to build. His alternative was ultimately just escapism.

>> No.16786456

>>16785403
Calm down. I actually had a gender confusion period like Ted did. It was a self-deprecating joke.

>> No.16786706

>>16785367
What did he say about fascists? You think he'd get behind Blood and Soil and the rejection of modernity aspects/veneration of the peasant.

>> No.16786719

>>16786706
hated them (but not the most convincing argumentation behind it)

>> No.16786743

>>16786719
What was the argument?

>> No.16786753

>>16786743
He was pro globohomo universal monkey

>> No.16787318

>>16786753
I highly doubt it.

>> No.16787324
File: 838 KB, 2550x3300, 1603159553920.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16787324

>>16787318
someone posted this on here before

>> No.16787325

>>16787318
Ted said, iirc, that for a true anti-tech revolution to occur, it would require worldwide commitment, i.e. every country and culture would be in cohesion to destroy technology -- because, so long as even one group has technology, the system can arise again.

It's not really possible, of course, unless some external event forced humanity to revert, like a giant EMP explosion.

>> No.16787328
File: 930 KB, 2550x3300, 1603159655452.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16787328

>>16787318
>>16787324
cont

>> No.16787331

>>16787324
>>16787325
>>16787328
How does this make him a globohomo? If anything he perfectly acknowledges that if just one country has a monopoly on technological progress then the rest will inevitably follow suit afterwards.

>> No.16787337

>>16787331
Kalargi and the Jew's are monkey pilled, the end goal of race mixing is turn everyone into black people who will revolt against techno fascism

>> No.16787341

>>16787331
I only assume he meant globohomo with regards to it being global, not what the term originally references.

>> No.16787342

>>16787337
Why are you /pol/fags so insipid and autistic?

>> No.16787345

>>16787328
Fairly prescient as usual, but really he's just arguing against himself. Anything that needs to be embraced worldwide to be viable is actually just nonviable. By contrast the ecofascists seem way more pragmatic

>> No.16787349
File: 42 KB, 113x182, typical urban bugman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16787349

>>16787337
>techno fascism

>> No.16787358

>>16787345
>By contrast the ecofascists seem way more pragmatic
Sure it's pragmatic, but to what end exactly? Ted argues that the chains of ecofascism WILL be broken and thus render the whole affair useless LARP.

>> No.16787361

>>16787337
I think it's more likely the end goal is to have one homogenous race that's easier to predict so the powers that be have less variables to worry about

>> No.16787381

People are this board are not as intelligent as they think they are.

>> No.16787388

>>16787328
>>16787324
>fascism is socialism
>racism is not morally but strategically bad
Just when you think he can't get any more based

>> No.16787391

>>16787358
The chains of any ideology will be broken eventually, but pro-active ones move the starting point for the next round closer to their ideal. Like the Hellenics and the Roman empire are dead and gone yet so much of modern society is still based on their systems

>> No.16787403
File: 44 KB, 638x479, 1603880424913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16787403

>>16787391
Rome wasn't a racialist white ppl state though

>> No.16787413

>>16785367
Teds critique of the left was pretty based, his critique of the right was cringe though

>> No.16787416

>>16787413
cringe

>> No.16787422

>>16787403
Irrelevant, dude. His argument is directed generally at "planned societies"

>> No.16787423

>>16787416
>DUDE I FUCKING LOVE MARX!!@!@!@!@!!11!@2222!!!

>> No.16787426

>>16787324
>non cursive
into the trash it goes

>> No.16787427

>>16787423
>dude I fucking love balding old white men and their cocks

>> No.16787449

>>16787391
And what will ecofascism leave for future generations, anon? Traditional values will slowly corrode away as technological progress becomes the primary mover of societal development, leaving nothing but a husk reminiscent of modernity. You say history shapes our development, and you are right, but not in the way you think you are right.

>> No.16787453

idk but he was literally a repressed tranny

>> No.16787456

btfo's my kindle by blowing it up

>> No.16787466

>>16787449
we need all the strong bvll genes we can get

>> No.16787472

>>16787449
Ecofascism is a futuristic and technological ideology, clearly you misunderstand it. Yeah it means limiting personal automobiles and other things that pollute, but it also means pumping hyperbux into shit like fusion so that we can actually stop being reliant on fossil fuels

>> No.16787483

>>16787472
Wow I was previously under the assumption ecofascism was about controlling the flow of technology to ensure a traditional society can persist, rather than a technocracy under the pretense of environmental care. If I knew it was that retarded I would have just told you to fuck off instead.

>> No.16787507

>>16787483
Says the guy who's ideology is literally just the "return to monke" meme

>> No.16787512

>>16787507
That's what Redditors turned it into. Ted is more of a Medievalist than anything.

>> No.16787515

>>16787324
>>16787328
Interesting person.

>> No.16787516

>>16785367
His basic philosophy doesn't really seem anti fascist, he seems against it in a purely practical sense

>> No.16787519

>>16787516
Ted's ideology comes off as a materialist rendition of traditionalism imo.

>> No.16787543

btfo's my computer by uploading a bomb in the pdf file

>> No.16787559

>>16787516
It definitely is. He's very concerned with freedom and is obviously very anti-technology, fascism fits neither.

>> No.16787575

btfo's my fingers while opening the new anti tech revolution book package.

>> No.16787577

>>16787507
>>16787512
I wouldn't call Ted a "Medievalist". He admits that it doesn't matter what kind of society we'll want after techno-industrial society is overthrown. He's very pragmatic and endorses Anarcho-primitivism despite being critical of it. Really, we'd only know after a revolution and he agrees with this. Some places will be hunter-gatherer due to insufficient farming ability, some places will be able to farm.

>> No.16787605

>>16787559
He deifies nature and tradition

>> No.16787614

>>16787605
>Fascism
>Nature
Yeah the ideology that specifically spawned out of industrialism is really "deifying nature".

>> No.16787615

>>16787577
in the meantime billions will starve, kill and eat each other, etc.

>> No.16787633

>>16787615
And?

>> No.16787639

>>16787614
>spawned out of industrialism
Dats marx sweaty
t.Hitler was vegan

>> No.16787652

>>16787633
seems a relevant thing to mention lol

>> No.16787684

>>16787577
>Some places will be hunter-gatherer due to insufficient farming ability, some places will be able to farm.
If the land isn't fit for farming you can just have herds of sheep or whatever instead. Hunter-gatherer living is for cavemen, not humans

>> No.16787699

penti linkola the finn or ted kaczynski the pole?

>> No.16787705

>>16787427
stop projecting dude, that's weird as fuck

>> No.16787707

>>16787684
People have hunted and gathered forever. It won't be the only food source but after industrial breakdown it will be a food source used, undeniably.

>> No.16787720

>>16787684
>Hunter-gatherer living is for cavemen, not humans
hunter gathering is still done today, many people hunt animals and eat them today. go to a wild place near you and you would find people setting traps to hunt squirrels and coons to eat them.

>> No.16787729

>>16787427
are you referring to US presidents?

>> No.16787737

>>16787707
>>16787720
Was talking about hunter-gathering as a lifestyle, not hunting and gathering in general you donkeys. Hurr I shot a deer once I'm a hunter gatherer now

>> No.16787770

>>16787737
people do it as a lifestyle, not full time but they do it on a daily paces and they load their fridges full of meat and they eat from their hunting and gathering. I know a guy like that, I also know a guy who fishes a lot and eats from it.

>> No.16787800

>>16787737
also you don't need to be in the wilderness larping as a caveman to be a hunter gatherer, you can go there and set your traps and put your lure and come the next day to found out you catched some animals, do that a couple of times and that's enough for a month.

>> No.16787825

>>16787770
>>16787800
I'm talking about on a societal level.
Hunter-gatherering society < herding society <= farming society
Herding is like the same shit but better in every way, although obviously yeah they still hunt aswell. No herds or farms is cavemen shit

>> No.16787836
File: 275 KB, 1920x953, 1920px-World_in_2000_BC.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16787836

>>16787825
maybe this will help illustrate what I mean

>> No.16787845

>>16787825
depends on the numbers of that society, a tribe of 200 people can have both Hunter Gathering and Herding without the farm, a village of 1000+ probably needs a farm to live.

>> No.16787863

Why do people like hunting so much? I genuinely don't get it, how is it rewarding to kill an animal in order to eat?

>> No.16787871

>>16787863
Have you tried it? I also had my reservations before I actually tried it once. You'll feel alive.

>> No.16787872

>>16787863
We're animals dude, the reason sugar tastes so good is the same reason hunting feels exciting and rewarding

>> No.16787880

>>16787871
>>16787872
I think killing must give you a bloodlust, I think evolving towards vegan agrarianism would be better

>> No.16787887
File: 106 KB, 1200x675, consoomer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16787887

>Why do people like hunting so much? I genuinely don't get it, how is it rewarding to kill an animal in order to eat?

>> No.16787893

>>16787887
projection

>> No.16787896

I like feet