How is this possible?

[Anonymous No.16779627]

This book has never been refuted, but it's still banned. Why?

[Anonymous No.16779630]

It's so gay it got banned, just like OP

[Anonymous No.16779960]

Bump

[Anonymous No.16780020]

>>16779627
This shit is like a 12 gauge redpill that blows your brains out

[Anonymous No.16780075]

lol where is this pile of shit banned

[Anonymous No.16780082]

>>16780075
Amazon.
Why is it a pile of shit? Have you even read it?

[Anonymous No.16781381]

>>16779627
What's this all about?

[Anonymous No.16781415]

>>16779630
>>16780075

Oy vey.

[Anonymous No.16781423]

>>16779627
I like it when they ban books because it just let's me know what I should read

[Anonymous No.16781429]

>>16780082
Didn't they also ban "the history of central banking and the enslavement of mankind"?
Pretty sure the guy who wrote that was like second in command for South Africa's central bank

[Anonymous No.16781564]

>>16779627
in case you didn't notice the jewish gameplan is to lever everything and bluff and double down infinitely

they think they have enough material control to ride out their plan against any backlash or setbacks,
until they have the technology to exterminate all nonjews and replace them with machines

they have succeeded in replacing the voluntary agency of humans with the compelled agency of sub/post-human cattle;
the real humans have been bluffed out of playing the game while the retard cattle stampede insanely everywhere

the jews aren't even close to being able to exterminate their human enemies or even their subhuman cattle, their power is fragile and entirely a bluff,
an epidemic of civil violence would bring their tower crashing down and if a human who is aware of them were to take power they would be annihilated

[Anonymous No.16781571]

>>16781423
it also puts a heavy burden of duty on you to act on your knowledge since almost all others will be ignorant and idle

[Anonymous No.16781605]

>>16781564
Everything you've said is right except for the last paragraph.
At this point I think every prediction of their immanent failure is a cope.

[Anonymous No.16782553]

>>16781429
I can't seem to find it so yes, probably. Good book.

[Anonymous No.16782559]

>>16779627
Not even 24 hours have past and we're having the same thread again

[Anonymous No.16782565]

>>16782559
Do you have a problem with it, rabbi?

[Anonymous No.16782605]

>>16779627
It doesn't need to be refuted, it just needs to be realized that literally nothing would change even if the capitalist class didn't have any Jews besides maybe a less strong push against antisemitism

[Anonymous No.16782704]

not gonna read this (im a jew, dont want some goy telling me objective truths i already know) but my sides bursted at this sequence of reviews
of course it's the rainbow flag avatar with passive-agressive list titles

[Anonymous No.16782716]

>>16779627
It isn't banned?

Also the issue is with capitalism, not Jews themselves, they just happen to be the race who for historic reasons have come out on top of the capitalist system.

[Anonymous No.16782723]

>>16782605
How so? Capitalism as we know it is a jewish invention. It would definitely change something. But it sounds like you haven't read the book.

[Anonymous No.16782728]

>>16782716
It's as good as banned. And no, the issue is with jews, as they are not only capitalists but also communists. They play both sides. They've come out on top of both because they invented both. Have you read the book?

[Anonymous No.16782734]

>>16782704
based jew (but you should read it anyway)

[Anonymous No.16782764]

>>16782728


>>16778449

[Anonymous No.16782773]

>>16782764
1. False since jews are now overrepresented in universities (and in positions of influence). False since the president does not hold a lot of power by any means. Plus MacDonald also speaks about Europe, not just America.
2. Have you heard of the Balfour declaration? You are being very disingenuous now. Jews have been by far the most influential group in shaping history, just look at the overrepresentation of jews in many fields of expertise and power.
>Now name me a single case where libel against Jews was proven to be true. You can't, because there isn't any.
MacDonald made no arguments on this issue, you brought it up. More derailing.
>What you want is that Jews are the only people in the world to have people in charge commit bad things.
Nice strawman, I don't, and neither does MacDonald. We're just wondering why we can't point it out when they do bad things collectively.
>antisemitism
What is antisemitic about any of the statements MacDonald has made? Is it anti-semitic to notice things? That would be odd.
>Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation
The double standard is that we can accuse white people or chinese people of these practices, but now jews. Why not? Are there double standards in discussing certain behaviours?

[Anonymous No.16782776]

>>16782773
i was trying to link the whole thread not that reply

my bad

let me try again

>>16776236

[Anonymous No.16782781]

>>16782716
>oy vey it's some abstract thing not the people doing it to you
This too, is a jewish trick.

[Anonymous No.16782791]

>>16782776
It's funny how it was a 400+ post thread with not a single refutation of any claim by MacDonald, just constant whataboutism and guilt by association.

[Anonymous No.16782900]

>>16782734
sorry i exclusively read fine literature and entertaining niche non-fiction. i am literally unconcerned with earthly ordeals

[Anonymous No.16782916]

>>16782900
> i am literally unconcerned with earthly ordeals
That's very un-jewish of you.

[Anonymous No.16782929]

>>16782916
i'm a faulty jew, dont care about money nor having gentile bow before me. i took the contempative dreamer pill

[Anonymous No.16782936]

>>16782723
Change what exactly? Major companies are controlled by shareholders who care about nothing but profitability, a CEO can be the nicest guy in the world but only if he wants to be replaced by the shareholders.
>well maybe if there were less (((shareholders)))...
Yeah I'm sure white people would definitely coordinate to make a loss on the stock market to make the world a better place; your ideology is literally no different from those liberals that want #moreblackfemaleCEOs

[Anonymous No.16783231]

>>16782728
"freely available everywhere except one online retailer" is not "as good as banned"
many other online retailers still sell it, example pic related, a well respected uk bookseller
a better question is why nobody ever mentions the other books in the series. it just leads me to believe that people just want to post shit threads about it because of muh joos but nobody has actually ever read it.

[Anonymous No.16783244]

>>16782728
>they play both sides
Okay now name a race where this isn't true

[Anonymous No.16783258]

>>16782929
>contempative dreamer pill
Sounds cozy

[Anonymous No.16783316]

>>16782936
>your ideology is literally no different from those liberals that want #moreblackfemaleCEOs
Yeah, identity politics is mind rot

[Anonymous No.16783328]

>>16782929
I don't car what ethnic tribe you're from, nobody has an essence in them that gives them evil cultural traits

[Anonymous No.16783344]

>>16782936
No rabbi, I just don't want jews dictating what happens in my country. I don't care about your false equivalencies, I just want my own people to take care of their own without jewish interference.
>>16782929
I respect that.

[Anonymous No.16783380]

>>16783231
>"freely available everywhere except one online retailer" is not "as good as banned"
Being banned from the largest bookstore world wide is pretty much "as good as banned" and you know it.
>a better question is why nobody ever mentions the other books in the series. it just leads me to believe that people just want to post shit threads about it because of muh joos but nobody has actually ever read it.
That's assumptions, I'm OP and I've read all of MacDonald's books. I agree, Culture of Critique is somewhat of a meme and it gets the conversation going. But it's because they're less relevant to current issues, although they're just as good. I recommend everyone to read the entire trilogy.
>>16783244
It's about playing both sides both internationally and in countries that aren't their own. All races have this tendency, jews just act it out way more often.

[Anonymous No.16783382]

>>16783344
>I want the ruling class to be replaced by people who look like me but will in the end have near identical policies to the former one
What idpol really does to motherfucker

[Anonymous No.16783393]

>>16783380
>It's about playing both sides both internationally and in countries that aren't their own. All races have this tendency, jews just act it out way more often.
Can you prove that

[Anonymous No.16783413]

>>16783380
Huh?

[Anonymous No.16783423]

>>16783393
That’s what the book is about. Also look at the major power positions in media/finance/academia/politics and follow the trail to Israel.
Pretty easy but you won’t.

[Anonymous No.16783428]

>>16783382
I never said that, disingenuous retard. Our current system is a jewish materialistic invention, I want none of it, nor jews in it. What they do on their own is their own business.
>>16783413
What?

[Anonymous No.16783436]

>>16783393
Yes, read the book. Well documented with primary sources.

[Anonymous No.16783449]

>>16782728
>They play both sides. They've come out on top of both because they invented both. Have you read the book?
This is idpol mental gymnastics. Yes Jews all share one mind, if a Jew is a capitalist and another is a communist, that means it's just one Jew playing both sides. This is totally not schizo thinking

[Anonymous No.16783450]

I've seen people write paragraphs and paragraphs on here trying to dissuade people from reading it only to admit they haven't read the book themselves. I think you would only see this sort of behavior with Jews because if the book was about any other group it would be completely uncontroversial.

[Anonymous No.16783453]

>>16783428
So it's a systemic problem and not a racial one
Good to know, I agree with you
>>16783423
You could pretty easily follow the trail to basically any major country in the Western world if you wanted to due to neoliberalism

[Anonymous No.16783460]

It's funny how all the criticism of the book in these threads is not about the actual contents, but what people who haven't read it think is in it.

[Anonymous No.16783466]

>>16783453
>So it's a systemic problem and not a racial one
No, it's both. They're not mutually exclusive. Have you read the book?

[Anonymous No.16783468]

>>16783423
>follow the trail to Israel.
lol israel is a second world country with a gdp per capita about the same as cyprus
they can't organise decent public sanitation never mind a global conspiracy

[Anonymous No.16783476]

>>16783466
Sounds mutually exclusive to me if the ebil joos can't have any power without a corrupt system

[Anonymous No.16783477]

>>16783460
the question in the op asked why the book is banned. we have already seen that the book is not actually banned. basically op is a faggot but is going to bitch about his meme book anyway

[Anonymous No.16783479]

>>16783468
It's not just israel, it's international jews, which also includes israel. They're so overrepresented in media, academia, justice, banking, infrastructure all over the western world that there's really no one in a better position to enact a "global conspiracy" than them. You're not even trying.

[Anonymous No.16783480]

>>16783476
He believes that all Jews share a mystical essence that makes them evil

[Anonymous No.16783486]

>>16783477
It's as good as banned. And it still hasn't been refuted. What in the book is untruthful according to you?

[Anonymous No.16783491]

>>16783479
>You're not even trying.
you specifically said "follow the trail to israel". stop changing the fucking goalposts

[Anonymous No.16783495]

>>16783476
>>16783480
Why don't you read the book and criticize the arguments in it instead of putting words in my mouth?
>Sounds mutually exclusive to me if the ebil joos can't have any power without a corrupt system
If they're the one who invented and implemented the system it sure can be buddy, you're not the brightest are you?

[Anonymous No.16783500]

>>16783486
>It's as good as banned
jesus christ anon change the fucking record
it isn't banned. you can buy it at a hundred online retailers. amazon are not the government yet

[Anonymous No.16783502]

>>16783491
That was someone else, I think "israel" is too narrow as well, that's why I explained what he should have said. Now disprove what I said.

[Anonymous No.16783507]

>>16783500
Amazon is the largest bookstore in the world. Anything that happens there has a ripple effect, it's been banned from various places. Can you refute anything that's in the book though?

[Anonymous No.16783524]

>>16783479
Witness this person ignore how much of the globe's most valuable resource, oil, is controlled by the eternal Arab. Notice how all his malice is toward the sworn enemy of the Saudis, the Jews, and not the true masters of the world. He will never ask himself "Wait, why hasn't any president ever criticized the Saudis? Why do all presidents have pictures of them bowing to Saudi royalty?"
>>16783495
That would be true but the Jews didn't create the stock market sorry to say

[Anonymous No.16783531]

>>16783507
>it's been banned from various places.
name some

[Anonymous No.16783545]

>>16783531
First answer my question you keep dodging. What is in the book that would merit it being banned anywhere?
>Saudi
I dislike Saudis nearly just as much as jews. But Arabs don't dictate culture, they just have oil. What's your point now?

[Anonymous No.16783558]

>>16783545
>>16783524

[Anonymous No.16783569]

>>16783524
>That would be true but the Jews didn't create the stock market sorry to say
You might want to read up on you Amsterdam and London history and look up the ethnicity of the people involved, anon.

[Anonymous No.16783584]

>>16783545
i'm not dodging any questions. op stated that this book is banned. it obviously isn't. >>16783507 stated it is banned from various places. i am asking you or anyone to name some. for each place that it is banned, i could easily show a place where it is freely available. the op question is "why is this book banned", the answer is "it isn't banned". nothing to do with the actual contents of the book, which i don't give a flying fuck about.

[Anonymous No.16783596]

>>16783584
Pilpul. It's banned from Amazon, why is that? What is in the book that merits it being banned? If you answer that question, which was the original question, I'll give you more examples
>nothing to do with the actual contents of the book, which i don't give a flying fuck about.
You should, because then you would understand it shouldn't have been banned anywhere

[Anonymous No.16783609]

>>16783545
>But Arabs don't dictate culture
they most certainly do, in a number of ways

[Anonymous No.16783625]

>>16783569
Yeah they were Dutch and English, probably a couple Scottish people too unless you can name a couple Jews heading megacorporations such as the VOC in the 1600's

[Anonymous No.16783634]

>>16783596
>It's banned from Amazon, why is that?
ask jeff fucking bezos. amazon is a private company, they can choose to sell whatever they want. which incidentally includes macdonald's other books.
>Pilpul.
you utter moron

[Anonymous No.16783640]

>>16783625
You need to read more, anon.
>a couple Jews heading megacorporations such as the VOC in the 1600's
You don't know much about the jewish situation in Amsterdam before and during that do you?

[Anonymous No.16783646]

>>16783545
>But Arabs don't dictate culture
Uh..

[Anonymous No.16783651]

>>16783609
Wouldn't have been possible without jewish cultural degredation.

[Anonymous No.16783654]

>>16783609
>>16783646
>It's fine to talk about how arabs dictate culture (when they obviously don't) but if you claim that jews do that's anti-semitic /pol/ drivel
classic

[Anonymous No.16783663]

>>16783634
So what's in this book specifically that would merit it being banned anywhere? Or are you agreeing that it shouldn't have been banned?

[Anonymous No.16783671]

>>16783640
So I take it you can't
I mean neither can I which is why I asked
I do know that there were Jewish investors in the Netherlands at the time, at some point they even almost managed to make up almost 4% of shares held in the Dutch West India Company lmao
They were basically running the place god damn

[Anonymous No.16783675]

>>16783634
incidentally, here's the book freely available on the website of one of the uk's biggest high street chains, proving yet again that it isn't fucking banned.

[Anonymous No.16783676]

>>16783654
>arabs don't dictate culture in their countries
wat

[Anonymous No.16783678]

>>16783646
see
>>16783651
>>16783654

[Anonymous No.16783685]

>>16783654
epic strawman, anon.

[Anonymous No.16783688]

>>16783671
>They were basically running the place god damn
Unironically this. I've given you multiple resources to look it up, now it's up to you to do the legwork.

[Anonymous No.16783698]

>>16783675
It's still banned from Amazon, what's in the book that merits it being banned anywhere? Or are you agreeing that it shouldn't have been banned from Amazon?

[Anonymous No.16783709]

>>16783698
sweet baby christmas crackers
you anon are a special kind of stupid

[Anonymous No.16783711]

>>16783676
>>16783685
Funny how we went from talking about jewish influence to arab influence, in a thread about a book about jewish influence. It's almost like it's out of a playbook.

[Anonymous No.16783722]

>>16783711
maybe you shouldn't have started talking about arabs then

[Anonymous No.16783724]

>>16783709
Answer the question, retard. What's in the book that merits its being banned from anywhere? What's in it that's so offensive?

[Anonymous No.16783726]

>>16783634
ISP's are private companies, should they be able to ban people they have political disagreements with?

[Anonymous No.16783732]

>>16783722
But I didn't, rabbi. >>16783524 This anon did.

[Anonymous No.16783749]

>>16783726
unfortunately the answer is yes. a private company should not be forced to provide goods or services that are fundamentally against their policies or standards. if you disagreed with the idea of that baker being forced to make a cake for a gay couple, you should also hold the same standards for any private company.

[Anonymous No.16783756]

>>16783711
holy fuck I hate you people

[Anonymous No.16783764]

>>16783756
watchu mean u people?

[Anonymous No.16783771]

Reminder that nothing in the book has been refuted by any of the kvetching anons here, who are just arguing the semantics of banning, instead of addressing what was in the book that was so offensive in the first place.

[Anonymous No.16783777]

>>16783688
Giving me resources without giving me a concrete example of what I asked for is either evidence that
a) you didn't do the reading yourself
b) the resource doesn't actually answer my question

[Anonymous No.16783782]

>>16783749
If I ever took over the country I would just shoot people like you in the head. You're stupidity is poisonous to other people who can't think about the implications of their philosophy so it needs to be rooted out by the stem.

[Anonymous No.16783791]

>>16783777
Alright buddy, whatever you like. Now let's address the contents of the book.

[Anonymous No.16783792]

>>16783764
schizo posters

[Anonymous No.16783795]

>why does the general public only seem to talk about this author's most important book
>why are you talking about this book in a thread about this book
>muh antisemites

Spin that dreidel, Chuck.

[Anonymous No.16783798]

>>16783782
>If I ever took over the country I would just shoot people like you in the head.
good thing you're just a powerless piece of trash then eh
>You're stupidity
did you do that deliberately?

[Anonymous No.16783800]

>>16783756
why? for pointing out the obvious? for noticing patterns?

[Anonymous No.16783811]

>>16783800
You're not as smart and clever as you think you are, you're actually insane

[Anonymous No.16783813]

>>16783792
Are you aware of the hasbara playbook, anon? It fits very well with what happened in this thread. You should read it.

[Anonymous No.16783814]

>>16783480

[Anonymous No.16783830]

>>16783811
Great arguments, Freud.

[Anonymous No.16783838]

>hey guys let's talk about my arch nemesis ethnic group, da jooz
>arrg I really hate these gypsies, it's totally not just a cultural prejudice I inherited from my home country Khazakstan
>anyways read this unrefuted book on why the jew is the soul of Satan, thank you very much

[Anonymous No.16783844]

>>16783813
>google hasbara playbook
>it's real

[Anonymous No.16783852]

>>16783791
I would read the book but nobody who has read it apparently likes talking about what it really says according to this thread so I assume it's not about anything interesting

[Anonymous No.16783861]

>>16783838
You'd assume a book that get so many people so riled up would be refuted by now huh? I wonder why that is.

[Anonymous No.16783881]

>>16783852
Don't assume, find out for yourself. I like talking about it but nobody addresses the contents, like you're doing.

[Anonymous No.16783885]

>>16783861
Why would it be refuted? it's a literally who book, one of many which say the same things

[Anonymous No.16783899]

>>16783861
There are academic refutations. They refute things Macdonald never said and are generally ignored.

[Anonymous No.16783910]

>>16783885
If it's banned, and the author lost his position for alleged anti-semitism, shouldn't there be arguments in the book that are untruthful? Or can we ban books when they have conclusions we don't like now?
>it's a literally who book
Gee I wonder why when it's so suppressed everywhere
>one of many which say the same things
Any other good ones you recommend?

[Anonymous No.16783914]

>>16779627
Banned by who exactly?
You can get it anywhere, is anyone coming to knock on your door for talking about it?
>>16780082
https://www.amazon.com/Culture-Critique-Introduction-Critical-Discourses/dp/081332047X

[Anonymous No.16783917]

>>16783838
Like most Americans I had romantic notions about Gypsies until I met some.
Like most Americans I had romantic notions about jews until I gave their claims some scrutiny.

[Anonymous No.16783919]

>>16783844
You might want to read Culture of Critique, anon.

[Anonymous No.16783929]

>>16783910
>Any other good ones you recommend?
Eustace Mullins and E Micheal Jones was my introduction to antisemitic thought

[Anonymous No.16783932]

>>16783914
Fuck off rabbi, that's not the book. What's in the book that would merit it being banned from amazon?

[Anonymous No.16783933]

>>16783899
Why haven't any of the academic refutations been refuted

[Anonymous No.16783939]

>>16783933
They have been, by MacDonald.

[Anonymous No.16783948]

>>16783932
Besos doesn't like it?
Amazon is not a public service poltard

[Anonymous No.16783952]

>>16783939
Which in turn, have been refuted by academia

[Anonymous No.16783953]

>>16783917
You do know how relative those experiences are going to be right? Imagine judging an entire ethnicity because of a bad experience, never mind the fact that someone else would be greeted by hospitality and warmth from other members of the same ethnic group. You're an actual brainlet if you get sucked into hysterical claims about random ethnic groups

[Anonymous No.16783956]

>>16783929
I didn't like what I've seen from EMJ so far but I'll check out Mullins, thanks.

[Anonymous No.16783960]

>>16783939
this is exactly the kind of circular reasoning that people accuse macdonald of

[Anonymous No.16783965]

>>16783948
>double standards
What's in the book that merits it being banned anywhere? Why did the author lose his job at the university he worked for publishing this? What's so offensive about his arguments?

[Anonymous No.16783981]

>>16783956
Lots of people hate E Michael Jones because he isn't racist enough, and he's coming from a Christian perspective. Dude is still a repressed homosexual though, the psyche of all these people is always deranged

[Anonymous No.16783983]

>>16783952
>>16783960
No one else is willing to defend him because if they would, they would lose their jobs. You can't be this disingenuous. You should know how academia works. Dissent is not allowed.

[Anonymous No.16784002]

>>16783919
I've listened to about six hours of interviews with Macdonald talking about it. I get the jist.
I prefer to read histories.

>>16783933
They were refuted almost immediately, which is why people ignore them.
>>16783939
Not just by him.

>>16783948
>I'll try tactical libertarianism! That's a good trick!

[Anonymous No.16784009]

>>16783965
Well if there's nothing offensive about his arguments it sound like he was just retarded

[Anonymous No.16784013]

>>16783965
There are no double standards
Amazon is a business, what they sell or do not sell is up to them. Just as they can refuse to sell to you if they so chose.

[Anonymous No.16784017]

>>16783981
>I can't refute a thing he says so I'll try fruedian ad homs!
The tactics of (((these people))) are always obvious.

[Anonymous No.16784021]

>>16784002
Cry harder butthurt poltards

[Anonymous No.16784034]

>>16784013
Yes there are double standards, you're just being disingenuous. Why did the author lose his job over this book?
>>16784009
That's not an argument. Or do you agree there was nothing offensive about it and he shouldn't have been banned?

[Anonymous No.16784035]

>>16784017
>The tactics of (((these people))) are always obvious.
Quit projecting

[Anonymous No.16784048]

>>16784034
Being kicked out of academia for being retarded is the expected result

[Anonymous No.16784049]

>>16784035
Have you read the hasbara playbook anon? It's not projection if it's a documented practice.

[Anonymous No.16784051]

>>16784034
>Why did the author lose his job over this book?
Why would I give a shit?
This is /lit/, not some self-help group for butthurt conspiracy theorists. Talk about literature or fuck off back to /pol/

[Anonymous No.16784055]

>>16784017
anyone who wears a bowtie is at least a little gay, there's nothing wrong with that but it's still true

[Anonymous No.16784058]

>>16784048
The reason he was kicked out was anti-semitism, not retardation. What's anti-semitic about the book? Stop being disingenuous.

[Anonymous No.16784059]

>>16784058
antisemitism and retardation go hand in hand

[Anonymous No.16784067]

>>16781564
Except Hitler knew about them and failed, they only use what happened as fuel for their fire. The holocaust is probably the best thing that ever happened for these guys. Now they can bring it up and cry antisemitism to get whatever they want

[Anonymous No.16784068]

>>16784058
Why don't you tell me?
If there's nothing antisemitic about it, then it was just retarded

[Anonymous No.16784070]

>>16784051
>Why would I give a shit?
Because you value freedom of speech?
>Talk about literature or fuck off back to /pol/
Nobody is willing to engage the content of the book, including you. Why don't you try discussing the book?

[Anonymous No.16784072]

>>16784021
>I'll call him a crying poltard that's a good trick!

>>16784035
>if i project my projection the goyim will never see through it!

>>16784055
>i'll just keep calling him gay!

>>16784059
>i'll call him retarted!

I thought jews were supposed to have high IQs.

[Anonymous No.16784077]

>>16784059
What's anti-semitic about the book? Stop being disingenuous.

[Anonymous No.16784083]

>>16784067
>The holocaust is probably the best thing that never happened for these guys.
ftfy

[Anonymous No.16784084]

>>16784072
I'm not Jewish, retard

[Anonymous No.16784091]

>>16784068
>Why don't you tell me?
I honestly don't know, I found nothing anti-semitic in the book. That's why threads like this exist.
>If there's nothing antisemitic about it, then it was just retarded
What was retarded about it?

[Anonymous No.16784098]

>>16784072
>EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH ME ONLINE IS A JEW
How pathetic are you?

[Anonymous No.16784101]

>>16784083
Correct.
https://archive.org/details/ThomasDaltonDebatingTheHolocaust

[Anonymous No.16784119]

>>16784091
>Through the series, MacDonald asserts that Jews as a group have biologically evolved to be highly ethnocentric and hostile to the interests of white people.
Idk but if this wikipedia summary is true, that really is a retarded concept seeing as I really can't visualize how that would help Jews reproduce more

[Anonymous No.16784122]

>>16784084
>>16784098
>I'll just lie that always works

[Anonymous No.16784128]

>>16784070
Not you, *I*. Why would *I* give a shit? I don't. Your thread has nothing to do with literature.
I already told you I don't a shit about your book, or it's contents, I don't give a shit about Jews, or identity politics, or what gets sold on Amazon
I made a single post making fun of the claim it was BANNED, and everything since that has been bait responses and M-muh jews
Just kys already you fucking retards

[Anonymous No.16784138]

>>16784122
>wowow weewow everyone who doesn't agree with me is a secret Jew, conniving and gaslighting me on an oriental knitting board

[Anonymous No.16784140]

>>16784122
>Just kys already you fucking retards
That goes for you too frogger

[Anonymous No.16784154]

>>16784128
Then why are you replying, butthurt retard? Fuck off of you don't give a shit, this proves you actually do.

[Anonymous No.16784167]

>>16784119
>Wikipedia
He actually lays out very good arguments based on primary sources in his books. It's not about reproducing more, but not mixing with other groups. Keeping a distinct ethnic identity while being an international people.

[Anonymous No.16784206]

>>16784101
One I don't know about. Neat.

You might be interested in this. Most are free as ebooks.

https://shop.codoh.com/category/holocaust-handbooks

>>16784138
Yes.

[Anonymous No.16784207]

>>16784167
I mean that makes some sense if you ignore all the cases where Jews do mix with other populations, which would be rather easy to do since those children might not even be aware of being half Jewish. It's rather doubtful that they "keep it in the family" more than other diaspora groups

[Anonymous No.16784221]

>>16779627
Who cares. Even if Jews do run the world they only do it through the techno-industrial system. They're slaves to it, and not the other way around.

[Anonymous No.16784224]

>>16784207
>Chabad doesn't exist goy and if it does its mission is just some religious esoterica nothing to see here

[Anonymous No.16784244]

>>16784221
>being rich and powerful sucks!
Talk about copes.

[Anonymous No.16784245]

>>16784206
Yes I'm familiar with the series, the one I posted I found randomly and is what got me into this rabbit hole.

[Anonymous No.16784250]

>>16784207
You should read up on the history of jews more, you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Incidentally MacDonald has written three excellent books on the topic.

[Anonymous No.16784251]

>>16784244
Nice misreading of my post. You rabid anti-Semites are actually retarded.

[Anonymous No.16784252]

>>16783813
>>16783844
>>16784049
whats the hasbara playbook

[Anonymous No.16784257]

>>16784154
I don't give a shit about your book, or about you, or what you think
What I give a shit about is jannies not purging you pol scum that have turned the board into a morass of shit

[Anonymous No.16784268]

>>16784252
Google it. You'll never see the internet the same way again.
>>16784257
seethe

[Anonymous No.16784291]

>>16784221
>who cares
So you're not disagreeing with the book?
>>16784251
Do you think MacDonald is anti-semitic?

[Anonymous No.16784304]

>>16784251
>you disagreed with me you're an antisemite!

Please post about how you're not a jew again. I liked that one.

[Anonymous No.16784305]

>>16784268
>Google it. You'll never see the internet the same way again.
can't find a link to the book

only a couple random websites?

[Anonymous No.16784323]

>>16784305
It's actually Hasbara handbook. It's not supposed to be public, it was leaked. There are PDFs floating around. Basically it's
>Wikipedia defines Hasbara as “Public diplomacy in Israel” and refers to it as “public relations efforts to disseminate abroad positive information about Israel.” That’s true enough but in reality Hasbara is a manipulative propaganda machine. Students are paid to spread pro-Israel messages online and have been slaving away in the Hasbara War Room to sell the Gaza war in social media. According to the Hasbara Handbook – their main target audience is USA.

[Anonymous No.16784361]

>>16784305
That's weird. There are links to PDF copies in the first five results of every other search engine. I wonder why that is.

[Anonymous No.16784367]

>>16784361
post the link to the pdf thanks

[Anonymous No.16784371]

>>16784367
Why?

[Anonymous No.16784372]

>>16784323
http://www.middle-east-info.org/take/wujshasbara.pdf
is it this?

[Anonymous No.16784381]

>>16784372
Yep.

[Anonymous No.16784395]

>>16784257
Janny must be orthodox.

[Anonymous No.16784396]

>>16784371
nvm >>16784372

[Anonymous No.16784437]

>>16779627
>Why?
because it talks bad about Jews

[Anonymous No.16784444]

Reminder that nothing in the book has been refuted by any of the kvetching anons here. They refuse to engage the contents.

[Anonymous No.16784454]

>>16784437
So anti-semitism is not people who don't like jews, but people who jews don't like?

[Anonymous No.16784471]

>>16784444
Quads don't lie.

[Anonymous No.16784475]

>>16781429
That book is the real redpill, all other redpills are fake and gay in comparison

[Anonymous No.16784509]

>>16784323
I mean no shit, every state has propaganda campaigns on the internet for similar purposes, it's not just Israel.

[Anonymous No.16784536]

>>16784509
Those other nations don't control my country through bribery and blackmail though so I care a lot less about them.

[Anonymous No.16784550]

>>16784509
But the difference with israel is the free pass of (perceived) anti-semitism. Plus that they have the most disproportionate power in the world. These issues combined with propaganda make a very stifling cocktail.

[Anonymous No.16784591]

>>16784536
>>16784550
Israel do not actually outright control the US, there would have been a war in Iran if that were true. There are obviously links between higher-ups in Israel and those elsewhere in the world, but that group of people is not simply 'Israel'.

Many western countries had been subverted before Israel even existed, it makes more sense to see Israel as another project by this one group, rather than the country itself being the nexus of power.

[Anonymous No.16784617]

>>16784591
>Israel do not actually outright control the US, there would have been a war in Iran if that were true.
No, that's a retarded statement to make, Israel isn't that stupid. It's easy to see Israel has more control over the US than the other way round though.
> There are obviously links between higher-ups in Israel and those elsewhere in the world, but that group of people is not simply 'Israel'.
Sure, just like when we talk about the US or China. We all know this.
>Many western countries had been subverted before Israel even existed, it makes more sense to see Israel as another project by this one group, rather than the country itself being the nexus of power.
Actually correct. That doesn't change the fact that Israel is the home hub though.

[Anonymous No.16784625]

>>16784591
>there would have been a war in Iran if that were true
>thinking you go to war without planning years/decades in advance
>trump didn't start any wars
>biden who voted for the iraq war just got elected :^)

heh

[Anonymous No.16784667]

>>16784591
>Israel do not actually outright control the US
Anyone who watches this and still believes that is lying: either to themselves or others.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KMVhb57RqI

>there would have been a war in Iran if that were true.
This is because jewish factions are having a genuine disagreement over that policy, not because gentile Americans have a say.

Otherwise I agree with you. Israel is just a jewish base of operations. It's very important and contains half their global population, but they're very good at operating without it. See the Solzhenitsyn history posted here >>16784002
It's one of the better descriptions of their subversion playbook.

[Anonymous No.16785067]

>>16784250
>>16784224
>I'm going to ignore what you said and just call you ignorant instead
Holy shit it really was easy to refute that book

[Anonymous No.16785244]

>>16782553
>>16784475
>>16782553
>The principal usurers,many of whom were Jewish,[5] were charging interest rates as high as 48% per annum. As Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4BC-65AD), the philosopher, would later remark in de Superstitione “The customs of that most criminal nation have gained such strength that they have now been received in all lands. The conquered have given laws to the conqueror.”

This book is great. Thanks for recommending it.

>>16785067
>I'll try coming back an hour later and mischaracterizing the replies that's a good trick!
I'm sorry but the goyim know.

[Anonymous No.16785354]

>>16784291
>So you're not disagreeing with the book?
Like I said I don't care who runs the world be it Jews, whites or Chinese people.
Whoever "runs it" is the enemy anyway.

[Anonymous No.16785378]

Where download?

[Anonymous No.16785459]

>>16785378
Nevermind, found it.

[Anonymous No.16785461]

>>16785244
How does referencing Chabad even begin to refute my post? Hasidic Orthodox Jews make up a fraction of a fraction of the total Jewish population, and are definitely not the ones in positions of power lol
Honestly you're just coping at this point

[Anonymous No.16785488]

>>16779627
I found always admired and been inspired by the Jews. It took them 2,000 years, but they won back their homeland and have a massive amount of influence in the West. They have given persecuted minorities the guide on how to win back what belongs to them.

[Anonymous No.16785522]

>>16785488
the other minorities are too dumb to do what Jews do, and Jews will happily exploit them anyway, you're just licking the balls of people in power, which is probably the only thing you're capable of doing

[Anonymous No.16785533]

>>16785488
I don't think they did anything special. Any group of people with a sufficiently strong in-group preference will succeed within and eventually dominate a group that sufficiently open to out-groups while having a weak in-group preference. Jews can easily camouflage their interests and be accepted by whites.

[Anonymous No.16785627]

>>16785461
The purpose of Chabad is, as you say, "to keep it in the family." That is, to reduce the community dissolution caused by secularization & outbreeding, and restore ethnic cohesion. It is not just part of the jewish strategy to preserve distinct ethnic identity, but an actual institution dedicated to it. One of many, but bringing secular jews back into the fold is its special provenance.

The very existence of Chabad House is evidence of Mcdonald's thesis, specifically when it comes to preserving ethnic boundaries. This is most thoroughly outlined in his book A People That Shall Dwell Alone.

Of course you knew this. But you were hoping I was a retard who thought it was some secret Illuminati temple where the puppet masters pull strings or something. That would be an easy target to shoot down.

The goyim do in fact know.

[Anonymous No.16785651]

>>16785533
The "guide" I mentioned boils down to:
1. Strong in-group preference
2. Heavy emphasis on intellectualism
3. Major media presence
Any group can win if it has these things.

[Anonymous No.16785689]

>>16785627
There you go ignoring what I said again, the point of the post was to point out how retarded it was to extrapolate from a tiny minority of Jewish people to the entire Jewish population
The existence of the Chabad House is evidence of nothing unless you can show that that behavior is exclusive to the Jews, which it obviously isn't
Try again

[Anonymous No.16785695]

>>16785651
>Any group can win if it has these things AND OTHERS DO NOT.

Jews use much of their ethnic political advantage to ensure they're the only ones who get to employ these strategies, and literally no blow is too low in achieving this end. Including genocide. This is what makes them so fucking dangerous to everyone else.

[Anonymous No.16785711]

>>16785695
This is projection, Nazi's project their own motives on the Jews. You can't complain that genocide is bad, when you want to do it yourself

[Anonymous No.16785722]

>>16785695
>Any group can win if it has these things AND OTHERS DO NOT.
Clearly not the case. Blacks, Jews, Hispanics, even Indians and Asians are able to capitalize on their media presences to make progress. Only White people don't do this.

[Anonymous No.16785733]

>>16779627
>>16781429
These are for sale on the Barnes and Noble website. Barnes and Noble is a book store. Amazon is not a book store and most people are not using ereaders. The surveys are performed on Amazon MTurk users who mainly get paid in Amazon gift cards.

[Anonymous No.16785740]

>>16785722
whites don't need to make progress, they're already on the top of the totem pole privilege wise

[Anonymous No.16785759]

>>16785740
>they're already on the top of the totem pole privilege wise
in literally no quantifiable way. They are openly discriminated against by universities and outearned by Jews and Asians

[Anonymous No.16785774]

>>16779627
Extremely problematic thread.

[Anonymous No.16785775]

>>16785759
Just because you got bullied by twinks in university, doesn't make them wrong.

[Anonymous No.16785784]

>>16785775
not a reply to either point

[Anonymous No.16785787]

>>16785784
cope

[Anonymous No.16785788]

>>16785689
>Oy vey goy those jews are totally different from the rest of us and nothing they do means anything at all!

>>16785711
>I'll just project my projection again maybe they won't notice this time around!
>Also I'll call him a Nazi that usually works too!

>>16785722
They are allowed these advantages against whites, and each other. The moment they push against jewish power they learn whose system it really is and where the limits are. If the Whites were gone and Asians were the biggest ethnic group they'd get the White treatment.

>>16785740
I don't believe you believe this.
>>16785775
See? I knew you didn't.

[Anonymous No.16785790]

>>16785775
?

[Anonymous No.16785795]

>>16785787
You didn't address either university discrimination(applies to Asians too), or income/wealth. You can't.

[Anonymous No.16785816]

>>16785788
>>I'll just project my projection again maybe they won't notice this time around!
It's not a projection, white supremacists see everyone who's not a genetically pure specimen of their in group an existential threat that must be exterminated. Jew's aren't even this bad in the sense that they consider anyone born with a Jewish mother a fellow Jew, and they've been known to fight for the rights of other minority groups.

[Anonymous No.16785824]

>>16785788
>all Jews exist as a monolith
Okay schizo

[Anonymous No.16785851]

>>16785790
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/appeals-court-rejects-lawsuit-alleging-anti-asian-discrimination-at-harvard/ar-BB1aX5MP

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/07/16/kevin-macdonald-jewish-overrepresentation-at-elite-universities-explained/

This one is my favorite: jews complaining they're not over-represented ENOUGH
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/harvard-s-jewish-problem

[Anonymous No.16785873]

>>16785816
>white supremacists see everyone who's not a genetically pure specimen of their in group an existential threat that must be exterminated.
EXACTLY the projection I'm talking about.

>>16785824
When it comes to dealing with outsiders you absolutely are.

[Anonymous No.16785878]

>>16781429
Look up Sumerian Swindle: How the __ betrayed mankind

[Anonymous No.16785881]

Reminder that nothing in the book has been refuted by any of the kvetching anons here. They refuse to engage the contents.

[Anonymous No.16785898]

>>16785881
>books gets refuted multiple times in thread
>y-you didn't refute it though
The cope never ends

[Anonymous No.16785939]

>>16785878
>by G_d

[Anonymous No.16785951]

>>16785898
Where? None of its arguments have been addressed, only what people who haven't read it think it is about. Stop being so disingenuous.

[Anonymous No.16785966]

>>16785951
Well this guy >>16785788 resorted to claiming the Jews are hivemind in his defense of the book and no one has refuted me yet so the book is refuted

[Anonymous No.16785979]

>>16785966
>I'm a retard
alright then, I don't know what I expected

[Anonymous No.16785989]

>>16785979
Notice how the eternal coper so swiftly resorts to ad hominem attacks

[Anonymous No.16786039]

>>16785989
>this guy made a claim that's not in the book
>I refuted him
>therefore I refuted the book
Yes you're a retard, retard. If you want me to engage, criticize the arguments MacDonald makes that are supposed to be anti-semitic. I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.16786055]

>>16786039
Already did, go back further in the thread of comments

[Anonymous No.16786061]

>>16785966
>Well this guy >>16785788 (You) resorted to claiming the Jews are hivemind
Nope. I didn't say that. Macdonald doesn't say that. I didn't say he does.

I agree with Macdonald: You have internal disagreements and factions, but present a united front against outsiders, and employ a set of common strategies to further you group interest at the expense of others. Which I have said in several posts in this thread.

By attacking straw men and using ideological trigger words to characterize your opponents you are just making the point for >>16785951

[Anonymous No.16786067]

>>16786039
He knows what he's doing.

[Anonymous No.16786072]

>>16786055
Point me to it, I can't find it. Probable because you didn't.

[Anonymous No.16786082]

>>16786067
Of course, it's once again straight out of the handbook. It's like they're not even trying.

[Anonymous No.16786223]

>>16786055
>>16786072
>>16785881
Still waiting for that epic refutation of MacDonald's arguments...

[Anonymous No.16786705]

Reminder that nothing in the book has been refuted by any of the kvetching anons here. They refuse to engage the contents.

[Anonymous No.16786748]

>>16786705
Jews argue ike fat high school girls. It's sophistry, buzzwords and ghetto snaps all the way down.

[Anonymous No.16786766]

>private company choosing not to list a product now means it is "banned"
this just in, the coles down the road doesnt stock frosties (frosted flakes), guess they are now banned

[Anonymous No.16786768]

>>16786705
Are you a bot? You've been posting the same thing ad nauseam since this morning when you made the thread. Repetitively saying something doesn't convince us, it's just annoying and cringe

[Anonymous No.16786778]

>>16786768
Maybe you should refute something in the book then.

[Anonymous No.16786785]

>>16786778
Refute what exactly? Antisemitism is retarded, and most antisemites are mental ill weirdo old men

[Anonymous No.16786796]

>>16783981
>lol anyone who opposes thing X is secretly thing X
You are insufferable, and your destination is, rightly, a dark grave.

[Anonymous No.16786801]

>>16786785
Had you actually read the book, you would know what you were supposed to try and refute.

[Anonymous No.16786808]

>>16786766
>we're not stocking this cereal even though it's profitable and I'm the only guy anywhere near you that sells cereal
>i'm not doing it because the manufacturer said maybe I should stop banning things I don't like
>this isn't a ban though lol

>>16786785
So he's right. You can't do it.

[Anonymous No.16786827]

>>16786796
>You are insufferable, and your destination is, rightly, a dark grave.

[Anonymous No.16786842]

>>16786827

[Anonymous No.16786846]

>>16784444
This.

[Anonymous No.16786855]

>>16786808
>we're not stocking this cereal even though it's profitable and I'm the only guy anywhere near you that sells cereal
you can order from 100s of book stores. they all have international shipping.
stop playing a victim you fucking GIRL

[Anonymous No.16786856]

>>16786842
el diablo mucho satanas

[Anonymous No.16786901]

>>16786768
Why don't you try to dismantle any of the supposedly anti-semitic arguments then?

[Anonymous No.16786917]

>>16786855
Doesn't matter, it's banned from the largest international bookstore. What in the book merits it being banned from there?

[Anonymous No.16786919]

>>16786855
Just sell the book, bigot.

[Anonymous No.16786930]

>>16786901
What arguments? I doubt the people shilling this book even read it

[Anonymous No.16786936]

>>16779627
good thing I got the book before it was banned

[Anonymous No.16786941]

>>16786917
Coles stopped selling frosties because of how much sugar was in them. Idgaf I walk down to IGA and buy a box.

>but they are the largest retailer!
Then you should intentionally NOT buy from them! Why do you want to support these monopolies instead of independent businesses? Are you an NPC?

[Anonymous No.16786965]

>>16786941
Answer the question. What in the book merits it being banned from anywhere?

[Anonymous No.16786980]

>>16786965
It isnt banned it just isnt stocked. Go into a physical bookstore and tell me how many books are banned just because they arent stocked.
idiot.

[Anonymous No.16786984]

>>16786941
You are being disingenuous and avoiding discussing the subject.
The one you're replying to is the not interested in the morality of supporting large companies.

[Anonymous No.16786991]

>>16786980
You can't buy it from amazon. The author has lost his job over the book. What is in the book that merits it being banned anywhere, or the author losing his job?
It's funny how you keep kvetching about the semantics of banning instead of addressing the issue.

[Anonymous No.16786994]

>>16786980
Now you're outright lying in addition to discussing the subject.
The book is banned on amazon.

[Anonymous No.16787045]

>>16786965
Buy it from Amazon and find out :^)

[Anonymous No.16787055]

>>16786984
>You are being disingenuous
No, that would be you claiming outright that "the book is banned" because a single retailer doesnt stock it.
typically when someone says something is banned it is banned by law. BY LAW. Not because a sole retailer does not stock it.

You are trying to play the victim card and its fucking pathetic. Grow up you altright incel child.

>>16786991
>The author has lost his job over the book
Eh?

>>16786994
>outright lying
Im not the one who said "the book is banned". That is you and the other victim incels.
The book is not for sale on amazon, that is what you are meant to say. Not "DA BOOK IS BANNED"

[Anonymous No.16787070]

>da book is banned guys you cant buy it anywhere!
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=culture+of+critique+macdonald&_sop=12

Who the fuck buys books of amazon anyway? Monopoly supporting bootlicking NPC cucks thats who

[Anonymous No.16787072]

>>16787045
I own it but I think it shouldn't be banned, why do you think it should be?
>>16787055
Stop the pilpul and semantics game and answer the question already. What is in the book that merits its removal from amazon?

[Anonymous No.16787079]

>>16787070
Stop the pilpul and semantics game and answer the question already. What is in the book that merits its removal from amazon?

[Anonymous No.16787088]

>>16787072
>What is in the book that merits its removal from amazon?
Whatever the retailers reason is their reason. Its called a free market. Why do you want to force private companies to do what you want? Are you some kind of communist?
learn the definition of ban and remove then remove yourself from this site

[Anonymous No.16787095]

>>16787088
Stop the pilpul and semantics game and answer the question already. What is in the book that merits its removal from amazon?

[Anonymous No.16787103]

>>16782605
literally this
correct or not, da joos is just more idpol bullshit

[Anonymous No.16787108]

>>16787095
learn the definition of ban and remove then remove yourself from this site

[Anonymous No.16787112]

>>16787108
Stop the pilpul and semantics game and answer the question already. What is in the book that merits its removal from amazon?

[Anonymous No.16787114]

>>16779627
Refute this:
https://postsyntheticsocietalproject.wordpress.com/2018/08/12/yoko-taro-is-a-dragon-from-the-future/
https://postsyntheticsocietalproject.wordpress.com/2019/07/26/i-am-the-second-coming-of-jesus-the-antichrist-the-dragon-of-revelations-and-whatever-else-a-meditation/

[Anonymous No.16787122]

>>16787103
There is nothing bullshit about idpol if they're the one dictating the rules of the game, anon.

[Anonymous No.16787123]

>>16787088
Yes you're a proud and sincere libertarian we all believe you.


>>16787103
Why is it bullshit? Perhaps you could refute one of the theses in MacDonald's books to illustrate your point.

[Anonymous No.16787164]

>The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multiculturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald’s most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty — that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of Gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

[Anonymous No.16787215]

https://www.unz.com/bookstore/
these are all the books banned by amazon

[Anonymous No.16787278]

>>16787215
Huh. These books have one thing in common. That's quite a coincidence.

[Anonymous No.16787290]

>>16787278
Merely a Cohencidence.

[Anonymous No.16787308]

>>16787278
yep

[Anonymous No.16787544]

Just coming back to see if anyone's made a refutation of the book on its theses and their merits. Guess I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.16788024]

Huh. Still waiting.

[Anonymous No.16788069]

>>16788024
many such cases

[Anonymous No.16788369]

>>16780075
I can vouch that I ordered it from amazon before it was banned among a bunch of other books, and culture of critique was the only one thats order got cancelled and refunded. Had to buy it from a different website in the states but I did secure a copy. Well worth the money lol very cool book

[Anonymous No.16788384]

>>16782605
Capitalism is the decision that the price of a good is decided by the buyer and seller instead of a third party (the state). Stop using the word capitalism as some vague ideology. its not an ideology lol its a law of nature. Capitalism is the way things have been since the beginning of time.

[Anonymous No.16788416]

>>16788384
>capitalism is just exchange of things
Shut the fuck up retard