Whatever happened to The Last Psychiatrist /Alone?

[Anonymous No.16778894]

I would have loved his take on current event

[Anonymous No.16778916]

Why can't society just lay on the thing that the landlord(s) is standing on? Seems firm enough

[Anonymous No.16778926]

>>16778916
Can't wait til Biden rounds up the "progressives" now that they've served their purpose.

[Anonymous No.16778930]

>>16778894
Gotta assume this comic is ironic

[Anonymous No.16778936]

>>16778916
die commie fuck

[Anonymous No.16778937]

>>16778894
The Last Psychiatrist writes like a tranny. His (her?) mysterious schtick is narcissistic in the extreme. Self-important. Die!!!

[Anonymous No.16778949]

>>16778930
how do you propose minimum wage white leftists live in cities without someone renting them property? Really exactly how would that go? Not in some fantasy world but in this reality.

[Anonymous No.16778962]

>>16778937
oof

TLP was extremely based and you should kys

[Anonymous No.16778974]

>>16778894
Not literature you schizo faggot

[Anonymous No.16778982]

>>16778974
TLP is definitely lit you fucking retard newfaggot. Hes been discussed on here long before you ever posted here.

[Anonymous No.16779049]

>>16778949
Idk maybe they could actually buy property instead of having to throw their cash away just so some boomer can buy another Ural or Harley. Just a thought.

[Anonymous No.16779085]

>>16779049
They can't buy property dumbass that's why they rent. Is lit really the high iq board lmao

[Anonymous No.16779110]

>>16779085
They could mortgage property if there were access to it you moron. If you can rent, you can mortgage. Your rent is already more than likely paying your landlord's mortgage on that property if it's in an urban sector.

[Anonymous No.16779118]

>>16779110
Oh so you don't understand the basics of real estate now it makes sense why you'd be some retard commie. Got it.

Thanks for validating my worldview

[Anonymous No.16779129]

>>16779118
Not a commie you faggot but it's really telling that you'd assume so.

[Anonymous No.16779265]

>>16779129
You made a mistake here. Your post was so puerile and braindead that the conversation was over. Sorry you typed more words thinking I had any respect left for you

[Anonymous No.16779277]

>>16779265
>I have nothing to add but I want to have the last word so let me pop in 20 minutes later hoping you're gone
Not gonna happen faggot. I'm here till the thread dies. I always win.

[Anonymous No.16779305]

>>16779277
I don't care how many people see your intellectual "offerings" about real estate. You're just a stupid communist and you will get your just desserts.

[Anonymous No.16779312]

>>16779305
deserts*

[Anonymous No.16779319]

>>16779305
>NOOOOO ANYONE WHO DOESN'T AGREE WITH ME IS A COMMUNIST

[Anonymous No.16779345]

>>16778894
At least post the real version

[Anonymous No.16779374]

>>16779345

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16779387]

>>16779374
>Not writing “capt. Picard” on his chest

[Anonymous No.16779389]

>>16779374

[Anonymous No.16779394]

>>16779319
People who don't know anything about economics and demand free shit based on reality magically changing might as well be communists as far as I'm concerned. Not interested in your snowflake definitions

[Anonymous No.16779402]

>>16779394
>demand free shit
Rent sure sounds like free money to me big guy.

[Anonymous No.16779410]

>>16779394
Anybody who thinks economics is a real issue and that we can’t just plan our economy is braindead.

[Anonymous No.16779424]

>>16779394
>either you support landlords or you support the state being your eternal landlord there's no alternative

[Anonymous No.16779435]

>>16778894

[Anonymous No.16779439]

>>16779265
You sound like a sniveling little wormy faggot in this post. It's so obvious how much of a whiny bitch you are.
Before you call me a commie, I actually think I agree with you, you're just a little mewling pussy.

[Anonymous No.16779461]

>>16778894
Landlords are parasites. They're like morally inferior NEETs.

[Anonymous No.16779621]

>>16778894
He left us with a book list and got out while the getting was good.
Dude's a legit practicing psychiatrist at an academic medical center in a big city. Once the doxings started he bailed, you can find his name out there but in my opinion he made the correct decision as it's rare and only comes up in fringe circles whereas slate star codex (not that I would say he and TLP are even close to equals, but they are similar figures) had a NYT article dox him or something along those lines.

Unironically I know where TLP practices and I'm trying to get my psych residency there. Everything is cancelled as fuck right now but once they allow away rotations I'm gonna position myself to get that seat boy.

[Anonymous No.16779629]

>>16778894
Funniest part of this is a bunch of disability activists calling themselves "marxists" are defending the landlords as it's a feasible income-earning position for someone who is too disabled to work.

[Anonymous No.16779771]

>>16779621
Can you please link to that book list for me?

[Anonymous No.16779773]

>>16779410
Then why has that never been done, ever? I don't even care about arguing because you're essentially not a part of reality. No one will ever do any of the shit you argue for. Ever.

[Anonymous No.16779781]

>>16779439
Holy hell you sure are mad about words on the internet. I kinda... enjoy this feeling. I must acquire more of it.

[Anonymous No.16779822]

>>16779621
Why would it matter if he or Slate Star were doxed? Its not like they were posting horrible controversial things?

Obviously they took it this way but I don't understand their mindset

[Anonymous No.16779864]

>>16779771
https://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2009/06/where_did_the_title_come_from.html
and someone several years ago on the rebbit compiled a list of works he referenced in passing, copypasted here:
Understanding Media - Marshall McLuhan (he quotes this all the time)
Trading Up - Michael Silverstein (as an example of the new "Aspirational 14%")
Notes from the Underground - Fyodor Dostoyevsky (as an example of the narcissist)
Story - Robert McKee (as an example of psychoanalysis)
Paideia - Werner Jaeger (as an example of a text parents ought to be familiar with, but aren't)

Obviously Kohut and Freud and the rest of the OG psychoanalysts too
Copyright (c) UWorld, Please do not save, print, cut, copy or paste anything while a test is active.

[Anonymous No.16779866]

>>16779394
>propose people buy property instead of renting
>HURR COMMIES DEMAND FREE SHIT

[Anonymous No.16779874]

>>16779822
They've got jobs in institutions which exist within a very restrictive inner circle of political correctness, the culture is very buttoned-up and authoritarian as it always has been but with some transplanted 2010s morality instead of whatever they had before.

[Anonymous No.16779923]

>>16778916
He isn't standing, he's flying. Like Superman.

>>16779864
I like TLP, but he's definitely a "diagnosing, not providing solutions" type. To be fair, he never makes himself seem otherwise. I'd definitely encourage you to try to do your residency with him though.

[Anonymous No.16779940]

>>16778936
Silence, property usurer.

[Anonymous No.16779970]

>>16779923
would be fucking awesome.

[Anonymous No.16779988]

>>16778949
Mind you middle class conservatives cant afford property in the city either.

[Anonymous No.16779995]

>>16779110
>If you can rent, you can mortgage
Unlikely. Step outside your mothers basement in whatever bumfuck town you live in.

[Anonymous No.16780008]

>>16779995
Your rent literally pays for the mortgage and utilities plus profit, retard.

[Anonymous No.16780031]

>>16780008
With median house price of 2m majority of people and families cannot afford that.
You are clueless bro.

[Anonymous No.16780037]

>>16780031
If you can afford 3-4k a month rent you can sure as hell afford 1.5-3k a month towards your mortgage. You're a moron.

[Anonymous No.16780052]

>>16780037
>hi bank please give me two million dollars I'll pay it back over the next 70 years
Thats not how it works either. Really should get out of your mothers basement.

[Anonymous No.16780059]

>>16780037
btw a mortgage of 2 million paid back at 1.5k a month is over a century of payments not taking into consideration any interest at all

[Anonymous No.16780091]

>>16780052
>>16780059
I'm not talking about 2m dollar houses you pulled out your ass faggot. Median house price isn't 2 million dollars retard. It isn't even 300k. Most houses I see on the market go for 500k and the bank doesn't give a fuck about you so long as you put 10% down. But sure, go around telling people they should throw their money away towards nothing so some greasy old faggot can buy more property to rent out.

[Anonymous No.16780145]

>>16780091
It is in the city, retard. A city with one of the highest indexes of living on the world not some american poverty shithole. No one gives a fuck if you can buy a dilapidated weatherboard house in bumfuck michigan for $50k.

[Anonymous No.16780162]

>>16779435
So Adam Smith was wrong about something. He wasn't right about everything.

[Anonymous No.16780163]

Is SSC ever coming back, guys?

[Anonymous No.16780165]

>>16779970
I'm about to start my clinicals to be a psychiatric nurse practitioner. Maybe I can get him to precept me too.

[Anonymous No.16780166]

>>16780145
>the city
What city fagass? The city you made up in your head? Sorry you can't bear to live in a neighborhood that isn't comprised of nothing but multi million dollar mansions.

[Anonymous No.16780169]

>>16779394
t. Internet libertarian who knows nothing about economics except “it’s common sense you should budget the govt like A household”

[Anonymous No.16780173]

>>16780166
Sydney.

[Anonymous No.16780185]

>>16780037
This, if you are paying more than $1k a month in rent and feel trapped, it’s not something that’s happening to you, it’s something you are doing.
Either move to a cheaper apartment or move out of the city you can’t afford to live in.

[« Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ » !!oI3er5KKetj No.16780193]

>>16780162
Srsly?
You come to /lit/ and go out of your way to inform everyone that you like to kiss ass of wealthy robber barons? Theft is alright if you come from a rich background only? You’re really a bootlicking twit?

[Anonymous No.16780194]

>>16780173
Newsflash, faggot. You live in fagopolis. Go somewhere else if you don't want to suck so much cock.

[Anonymous No.16780206]

>>16780145
But it’s not his fault you’re too poor to live in the city. Low crime cities are for rich people and literally always have been

[Anonymous No.16780221]

>>16780185
>you WILL move where capital demands
>you WILL NOT preserve inefficient social bonds for “sentimental” reasons like family, community, church or loved ones

[Anonymous No.16780224]

>>16780206
>Low crime cities are for rich people
Take a look at Appalachia. Wealth and property value aren't what matter when it comes to crime rates.

[Anonymous No.16780248]

>>16780221
You don't form meaningful social bonds in soulless metropoles shit-for-brains. Nobody's family lives in the city, and the people you associate with in those cities are not your friends, they're mutual acquaintances, to be used for climbing the corporate and social ladders.

[Anonymous No.16780249]

>>16780224
I can only speak to NY, but when I was a kid you used to be able to sacrifice a little security and live in a shittier neighborhood and save on rent if you were willing to risk your car stereo getting ripped-off and didn’t mind not going around alone at night with expensive shit.
You literally can’t do that in NY anymore because there is no crime (or at least there wasn’t before COVID)

[Anonymous No.16780254]

>>16780248
>Nobody's family lives in the city,
That’s not true, you watch too much television

[Anonymous No.16780260]

>>16780249
>NY
>no crime

[Anonymous No.16780262]

>>16780248
>You don't form meaningful social bonds in soulless metropoles
Yes you do

>Nobody's family lives in the city
Yes they do

>and the people you associate with in those cities are not your friends
You are autistic

[Anonymous No.16780267]

>>16780260
Yeah, NYC has had ridiculously low crime rates the last 20 years

[Anonymous No.16780277]

>>16780221
For me it was the opposite, I lived with family in the city but I was only in an apartment for a year before I just decided that it wasn’t worth even trying to afford

[Anonymous No.16780285]

>>16780254
>>16780262
The types of people who live in downtown environments don't raise families and are rat-like coorporate ladder climbers. They are a different breed of person. No one's mother lives downtown. The old shriveled up cunts you see downtown aren't grandmothers, they're barren and childless.

[Anonymous No.16780302]

>>16780267
Surprising as it's the only place where I've seen guys get knocked out at random walking down the sidewalk so consistently you could call it a pattern.

[Anonymous No.16780304]

>>16780193
lolnigger

[Anonymous No.16780312]

>>16780285
Shut up. You're a literal delusional poltard. Go outside.

[Anonymous No.16780313]

>>16780285
What you call downtown sort of expanded out to where my family is but I get your point

[Anonymous No.16780334]

>>16780312
>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T TELL PEOPLE DOWNTOWN ENVIRONMENTS FOSTER MANIPULATORS AND REINFORCE THEIR BEHAVIOR

[Anonymous No.16780357]

>>16780313
>expanded out to where my family
Yeah key word being expanded. My old man's is about to be on the outskirts of what would be considered downtown and when I was a kid the place was farmlands. Distance yourself as far as you can.

[Anonymous No.16780410]

>>16778949
common ownership. Many ways this could be organized. One way is for the city to own the land and lease the land to tenant co-operatives who run the buildings and pay for maintenance.

[Anonymous No.16780422]

>>16780410

>>16779424

[Anonymous No.16780449]

>>16780410
It would be just like every other housing program and have an eight year waiting list and have priority skewed towards a need-based approach.

[Anonymous No.16780458]

>>16780422
>>16780422
https://paulcockshott.wordpress.com/2019/08/27/land-nationalisation-and-rent/

[Anonymous No.16780471]

>>16780458
>paul cocks hott
Yeah no thanks buddy. Not interested in your gay cocks.

[Anonymous No.16780485]

>>16780285
Sorry but are you unfamiliar with the definition of a city? Do you not realize there are suburbs filled with 4 bedroom 2 car garage half acre blocks as little as 20 minutes from the cbd corporate hellscape? Its still in the fucking city.

[Anonymous No.16780493]

>>16780334
Western civilization was created from cities kys country bumpkin

[Anonymous No.16780498]

>>16780485
Yeah, no, sorry to burst your bubble, the suburbs are located in this area called "the suburbs". Not sure if you noticed but they both have the same name. Suburbs are normally on the outskirts of cities, hence why they are in such proximity.

[Anonymous No.16780512]

>>16780493
>nooooooooo western civilization was created by silicon valley funko pop collecting adderall addicts

[Anonymous No.16780613]

>>16780498
>he’s never heard of urban sprawl
>he’s a suburban kid larping as a bumpkin when he’s just as metropolitan as the people he hates

[Anonymous No.16780623]

>>16780613
I know it's hard to understand, but when urban sprawl occurs, suburbia grows further out as the inner edge then becomes "urban". It's in the name if you haven't noticed, it's called "suburban" for a reason.

[Anonymous No.16780667]

>>16780623
It’s honestly hilarious to see you describe the terrible shallowness of city living and unironically describe suburbs less than a mile away as a wholesome slice of traditionalist Americana.
Literally, the reason people live in suburbs is because they can visit downtown on a whim and have a short commute.
It sounds like you love the /pol/ rhetoric about cities (which you’re not even really wrong about) but can’t reconcile it with the fact that you live with your family and they chose to live in Long Island or Conshohocken or wherever

[Anonymous No.16780673]

>>16780667
>unironically describe suburbs less than a mile away as a wholesome slice of traditionalist Americana
Haven't done this. Sounds like you're projecting buddy. Looks like you have some bone to pick with /pol/, maybe you should post about it there.

[Anonymous No.16780752]

>>16778894
>>16779049
Posting this everyday until its realised by /lit/

[Anonymous No.16780766]

>>16780752
He was talking about property owners with tenant farmers that actually produced things

[Anonymous No.16780773]

>>16780498
>the suburbs
Actually its called the "Inner West". Its still in the city.
Besides it doesnt change the fact that a house in these "suburbs totally not a city" still have a median value of 2 million.

[Anonymous No.16780780]

>>16780773
>median value of 2 million\
No, it doesn't.

[Anonymous No.16780788]

>>16780766
tell me which part of what he said does not apply EXACTLY the same to the modern day residential/commercial landlord

[Anonymous No.16780822]

>>16780773
>Actually its called the "Inner West"
>every city on the face of the earth is designed using Sydney, Australia as a blueprint

[Anonymous No.16780828]

The inner west is an irredeemable shithole that needs a nuclear cleansing

[Anonymous No.16780840]

>>16779402
Really? You can't think of any reason why people should pay rent? Theres no good or service being provided that you're paying for?

[Anonymous No.16780852]

>>16780840
>service
In the same sense usury is a service.

[Anonymous No.16780958]

>>16780822
Australia is always the proving ground for any shit they want to try in the West, municipal initiatives included

[Anonymous No.16781015]

>>16780410
How will you compensate those you take the ownership away from?

[Anonymous No.16781030]

>>16778926
>>16778936
>>16778949
>>16779049
>>16779085
>>16779118
>>16779305
>>16779394
Please, I beg you, can one of you corporate bootlickers explain the actual service that landlords provide? Like what do they actually do? Other than have their name on a piece of paper. I could really use a good laugh

[Anonymous No.16781044]

>>16781030
I won't even talk about shit like maintenance, it's a lot simpler than that. If being a landlord is so easy why don't you do it, serious question? They take risk with their investment like any business, go ahead and take out loans buy property and rent it out. Why don't you? Because you don't want to take the risk it doesn't pay off, faggot.

[Anonymous No.16781070]

>>16781030
I don't know why you went and stuck my post in here cause it's against landlords. Maybe pay a little more attention next time if you're going to mass reply? Just a friendly suggestion. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.16781075]

>>16781070
Damn my bad bitch

[Anonymous No.16781079]

>>16781044
>Why don't you?
Because I'm not gay for money.

[Anonymous No.16781093]

>>16781044
>If being a grifter is so easy why don't you do it

[Anonymous No.16781099]

>>16781044
I didn’t ask if they took on risk or not, I asked what they did. An electrician installs wiring, a plumber fixes pipes, what does a landlord DO? Like seriously, what service do they provide? Quit dodging the question.

[Anonymous No.16781103]

>>16781044
>>16781044
And as for maintenance, those costs are covered by money paid by tenants. If I take $1000 from you but use $500 of it to buy you an X-box, I still did it with your money.

[Anonymous No.16781104]

>>16781044
Maintenance, lol. What is there other than plumbing problems after 50 years?
Anything that needs maintaining is ignored by the landlord and taken out of the tenants bond.

[Anonymous No.16781110]

>>16781075
It's OK, I forgive you.

[Anonymous No.16781112]

>>16781075
Don't listen to this faggot >>16781110 he isn't me, and I don't forgive you, and I never will.

[Anonymous No.16781118]

>>16781099
>Like seriously, what service do they provide?
The service of inflating the property market by using properties they dont own as leverage to buy more properties they dont own.

[Anonymous No.16781134]

>>16781044
That’s really all it is. It’s not even a question of raising capital since it’s so easy to get a mortgage in America. Nobody wants to take the risk though.
And yeah, the people that do it are money-grubbing fags but if they didn’t buy the 400k house, someone else would just buy it for 380k a month later.
It’s not like there’s a scenario where the most attractive real estate in the world is feasible for the median household income of people under 40.
If you nationalize huge tracts of land it will just go to welfare queens and single Moms. The government isn’t going to deduct people’s student loan payments from their income before assessing if they qualify lol

[Anonymous No.16781142]

>>16781099
They literally buy houses, that’s what they do. Why can’t you understand that they are landlords because they can buy a house and you can’t? Do you really not understand the utility of a half a million dollar check?

[Anonymous No.16781147]

>>16781079
>>16781093
>>16781099
>>16781103
>>16781104
I accept your evasion and surrender.

[Anonymous No.16781151]

>>16781079
>Because I'm not gay for money.
lmao commie cope at its fucking finest

"of course I could be rich, I just don't want to, the qualification is evil, it's not that I'm inept"

god just imagining the type of person who actually deludes themself this way and lives their life as a beggar and political prostitute is hilarious

[Anonymous No.16781153]

>>16781151
>if you're not a fag for mammon's gold you're a communist

[Anonymous No.16781154]

>>16781134
>nationalization
Please don't be retarded. Real estate costs so much in America because it is prohibitively difficult to build housing in populated areas, the laws and regulations and corporation collusion make it all but impossible for the supply to be able to effectively regulate the price.
>inb4 you quote how many millions of US homes are empty
Almost none of those are in dense population centers.

[Anonymous No.16781161]

>>16781153
If the shared public shoes and dildo fit...

[Anonymous No.16781168]

>>16781153
The idea of someone voluntarily choosing not to be wealthy via a process that allegedly requires nothing from you is so stupid only a communist could suggest it. Everyone acts in their own interest, your actions are just limited based on your limitations, which evidently have to do with intelligence.

[Anonymous No.16781170]

>>16781161
cringe post newfag sentence formatting

[Anonymous No.16781176]

>>16781170
>>16781161
Samefag? Schizos out in force itt.

[Anonymous No.16781180]

>>16781170
>I have no actual points, arguments, or refutations
>I know I'll demonstrate how retarded I am by appealing to group identity to which I clearly don't belong
>good thing I'm so smart and they won't find out
you're trying too hard

[Anonymous No.16781185]

>>16781168
I don't care about money. Money is gay, and if you spend your life working for money thinking it's going to bring you any sort of fulfilment you're a fag.

[Anonymous No.16781189]

>>16781185
Being a landlord requires no work. That's the theme of this thread. Fulfillment is easy to find when you're financially secure from doing nothing, you fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.16781191]

>>16781176

[Anonymous No.16781196]

>>16781180
>you're trying too hard
>shared public shoes and dildo

[Anonymous No.16781201]

>>16781154
>prohibitively difficult to build housing in populated areas
It is not, they do it all the time but it’s more profitable to build luxury apartments then milking you for $400 a month
Again, the more attractive a living space is the more it will cost. The reduction of violent crime and technological progress have made cities more attractive then ever, and that’s why the cost has gone up.
If the homicide rate and drug convictions returned to 1991 levels you would see housing getting a lot cheaper really quick (and landlords would get hosed).

[Anonymous No.16781204]

>>16781196
cringe quiplet

[Anonymous No.16781206]

>>16781189
Financial security doesn't exist.

[Anonymous No.16781210]

>>16781204
>cringe
>posts "shared public shoes and dildo"

[Anonymous No.16781211]

>>16781201
>It is not, they do it all the time but it’s more profitable to build luxury apartments then milking you for $400 a month
shut the fuck up
You will say anything to try and validate your default position which requires neither evidence nor discretion

https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/californias-regulatory-hostility-prevents-more-new-homes/
fuck yourself and don't reply to me again

[Anonymous No.16781214]

>>16781044
Landlords take absolutely no risk you fucking retard. The tenant pays 2 to 3 times the cost of their mortgage each month, they use a fraction of the remaining profit to pay for insurance that makes them impervious to pretty much anything even the worst tenant could do to the property. What risk are they taking?

[Anonymous No.16781217]

>>16781211
https://www.mercatus.org/publications/urban-economics/do-minimum-lot-size-regulations-limit-housing-supply-texas

etc

there's a million examples

[Anonymous No.16781224]

>>16781214
If it's so risk free why don't the tenants do the same? Anyone can get loans to do this, what's stopping these tenants? Are they fucking stupid? Are you? Why don't you become a landlord if it's so easy and risk free?

[Anonymous No.16781230]

>29 posters
>133 posts
>about 5 actually mention the topic of the thread
What a board!

[Anonymous No.16781233]

>>16781211
Kek, i knew you were a spoiled zoomer mad because the government won’t make up the difference between his student loans and his living expenses, but California? Lol

[Anonymous No.16781240]

To get a mortgage you need to be able to pay a deposit, something that the average working class person cannot do because they are busy paying 2 to 3 times the cost of somebody else's mortgage every single month.

[Anonymous No.16781247]

>>16781154
Nobody gives a shit about another $700,000 McMansion in West Chester. People who actually care about landlords inflating prices are referring to affordable urban living that no longer exists not disenfranchised yuppies.

[Anonymous No.16781248]

>>16781240
meant for
>>16781224

[Anonymous No.16781250]

>>16781240
So it’s not that easy then?

[Anonymous No.16781251]

>>16781250
Its easy when mummy and daddy help with your deposit

[Anonymous No.16781254]

>>16781250
>if it's so easy for rich people to buy things why don't poor people buy things?

[Anonymous No.16781261]

>>16781251
>>16781254
>muh generational wealth
Yeah it always comes back to some meme. Just remember when leftist politicians get traction to make some strides for “equality” in the housing sector, your name won’t be on the list.

[Anonymous No.16781267]

>>16781261
I'm not a leftist you politics obsessed queer.

[Anonymous No.16781271]

>>16781261
>If I call it a meme it stops existing

[Anonymous No.16781282]

>>16781271
Again if you grew up in a house or have a college degree you are most certainly on the “generational wealth” beneficiary list, that’s the whole point, it’s not about how much cash you have in the bank right now.

[Anonymous No.16781287]

>>16780163
He has been doing a little bit on Tumblr
https://slatestarscratchpad.tumblr.com/post/633822178059730944/here-are-the-nine-ways-the-election-could-end

[Anonymous No.16781291]

[Anonymous No.16781296]

Give me a genuine argument relative to the times.
Now that so much infrastructure is built, why not make it so people can only own 1 home, but can rent freely

[Anonymous No.16781302]

>>16781282
Listen faggot. You're arguing with somebody you made up in your head. Nobody gives a fuck about who's "going after" who. This has nothing to do with the subject at hand and you're so fucking obsessed with this strawman of who you perceive is your political opponent that you think you're headed into some argument about muh gommunism. Wake the fuck up faggot. Not everyone is as obsessed with politics as you are.

[Anonymous No.16781369]

>>16781302
Nah, seethe harder
Nobody mentioned politics until >>16781211
which is some faggot who doesn’t understand that urban real estate has and always will be more expensive.
But yes, if your solution is regulating like mentioned here >>16781154 and doubling down on urban living then you are retarded if you think it will change your situation unless you are a literal poorfag

[Anonymous No.16781370]

>>16781254
>>16781251
generational wealth is almost totally irrelevant you realize?
https://money.cnn.com/2016/01/07/news/economy/top-1/index.html

[Anonymous No.16781379]

>>16778894
>I would have loved his take on current event
Most modern people are narcissists deeply deluded and manipulated both by others and themselves. That was easy, wasn't it?

[Anonymous No.16781581]

>>16781030
They fix your broken toilet at a 200% markup when you do the rent vs amortization calculation.
You stupid goy.

[Anonymous No.16781620]

>>16780285
downtown in my city is full of 6-figure yuppies with 2.5 children and a large expensive dog

[Anonymous No.16781621]

>>16781153
This. The level of kikery on this board is quite alarming.

[Anonymous No.16782530]

>>16780493
All the more reason to bomb all cities to the ground

[Anonymous No.16782763]

>>16781153
>>16781621
There's a second wave of normiecons who got on board with Buckley conservatism because anarchists and feral negroes were burning cities to the ground.


When you point out it was being encouraged by global capital it breaks their brains they're just NPCs don't tell them.

[Anonymous No.16783095]

>>16778962
>oof

[Anonymous No.16783110]

I hate the communal solution of Marxism, I hate the neoliberals and landlords.
Where do I turn?

[Anonymous No.16783730]

>>16781030
Essentially they broker between the developers of housing and the consumers of housing.

Builders usually want large payments upfront (selling the building) rather than steady trickles (renting the building) because they want to get started with their next project. But many consumers of housing aren't looking to commit to a large permanent purchase because they either don't have that much saved up or they would prefer to spend those savings elsewhere. Some people are wiling to make those large purchases, which allows the builders to move on, in exchange for the future steady trickle, which a subset of housing consumers would prefer to pay over the full purchase.

Maintaining the building is itself a pretty big responsability. The building itself is a depreciating asset that can become a liability. It's the ground under the building that appreciates and is the value of that land, the location, that speculators are casting their bets on, which drives housing costs up. Some types of taxes would prevent this speculation, like land value taxation, harberger taxation or even government land leases.

[Anonymous No.16783738]

>>16783110
Anarcho-Neo Nomadism

[Anonymous No.16783812]

>>16782763
No everyone knows that even and especially contemporary Republicans. You're just a retard who forces everything into dichotomies because it let's you pretend your side isn't the only one that's idiotic

[Anonymous No.16783856]

[Anonymous No.16783887]

>>16781015
With a bullet to the brain.

[Anonymous No.16783982]

>>16778894

[Anonymous No.16784271]

>>16781369
I don't give a shit about your solutions faggot. Again, this has nothing to do with anything that was being discussed.

[Anonymous No.16784329]

>>16783110
Just drop all the isms and tell people to fuck off.

[Anonymous No.16784409]

>>16783730
>Maintaining the building is itself a pretty big responsability
I have never had a landlord who actually kept up the house I was renting. Most of them are parasites who do the minimum amount of work possible.

[Anonymous No.16784426]

>>16784409
This. Friend of mine got a place where the last tenant used to punch holes in the drywall. Owner never bothered to fix it.

[Anonymous No.16785150]

>>16780493
>self-sustaining Renaissance cities and their surrounds are totally comparable to the constant-foreign-imports-reliant mulatto egopolises of (((international capital)))