/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16768532]

Anyone read this? Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.16768752]

Pedophile

[Anonymous No.16768768]

>>16768752
>tits
>pedophile
>>16768532
What is it about OP?

[Anonymous No.16768775]

>>16768752
>BASED AND REDPILLED OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG

yea desu the cover gives me a reason to call the crusaders to raid the house.

[Anonymous No.16768785]

>>16768775
I can't wait until liberalism does a 360 on it's head and lolis become legal again

[Anonymous No.16768795]

>>16768752
>>16768768
not gonna lie, thought it'd be about pederasty from the thumbnail. not interested now kek

[Anonymous No.16768806]

>>16768795
The pederastry is what got me interested

[Anonymous No.16768861]

>>16768532
>>16768752
>>16768768
>>16768775
>>16768785
>>16768795
>>16768806
The people who do the covers usually haven't even read the book. The cover usually has nothing to do with the actual contents. Hence why you should not judge a book by its cover.

[Anonymous No.16769047]

>>16768785
Unironically I think this is going to happen in the next ~20 years. Every other wall has been broken down.

[Anonymous No.16769077]

>>16768532
I did, actually. Some anon finally shared an ebook version years ago. I liked it enough, though it was more lascivious than Lolita I didn't find it erotic for some reason. My favorite thing about it, actually, was the descriptions of the small town the main character stays.

[Anonymous No.16769125]

>>16769077
can I get a brief summary (no spoilers)? Is it worth reading if I liked Lolita?

[Anonymous No.16769278]

>>16769125
>some dude is staying in a ratty-ass cabana in the outskirts of this poor European village for some reason
>he is called "the outsider"
>this little girl plays near his cabana
>he gets her to come inside and hang out
>she takes off her pants and he fingerbangs her
>tells her not to tell anyone
>she brings a friend later
>eventually the man becomes a staple in the town and people warm up to him
>he visits one of the family's houses and get involved in their affairs
>comes to and from the town but always looks forward to coming back now
>his fiance or somebody from his hometown comes to visit him at the cabana
>she gets in on the fun, too with the girl and her friend that come over and they have a foursome
>eventually the man leaves town for whatever reason

That's about all I remember. It's a much different book from Lolita and I think Lolita is better even though I'd figured I'd like this more.

[Anonymous No.16769333]

>>16769278
Good lord

[Anonymous No.16769351]

>>16769278
I can't find any info on the author. How underground is this shit? Is it even legal?

[Anonymous No.16769373]

>>16769351
>Is it even legal?
It's just words, anon.

[Anonymous No.16769384]

>>16769373

[Anonymous No.16769398]

>>16769384
Australia is pretty strict with its censorship laws. They're the exception.

[Anonymous No.16769419]

>>16769384
Having something being banned for offensiveness is not as normal as being arrested for reading that something.

[Anonymous No.16769421]

>>16769047
It's taking such a long time because little girls are threats to older women. That's why there's so much resistance from them.
Even fucking little boys has been more normalized than age gap relationships between girls and adults man.
Proof of this is that penalty for homosexual age gap relationships with minors has been reduced in US, the most sexually prudish country.
Anyway I take the ancient greek view for all this, which is that fucking a free boy yet to reach manhood is degrading, while girls should be marrying young so they can form strong bonds

[Achilles No.16769537]

>>16768785
i'm too jaded now. my ass was clinched for the entire 12 seconds of that video waiting for some horrific shit to happen.

[Anonymous No.16769572]

>>16769398
>>16769419
I hear they ban vidya all the time. Why are they like this?

[Anonymous No.16769593]

>>16769278
>>16769333
KEK that's going in the folder

[Anonymous No.16769659]

>>16769572
Australians are generally very conservative, even though they like to pretend otherwise. Most books that were previously banned had the bans removed in the 70s though. We still do have weird shit like when bookstores sell American Psycho it has to be wrapped in plastic on the shelves (so kids can't read it I guess) and you need to be 18+ to buy it.

[Anonymous No.16769799]

>>16769593
you better not fucking post this on reddit

[Anonymous No.16769826]

>>16769659
>has to be wrapped in plastic on the shelves (so kids can't read it I guess) and you need to be 18+ to buy it.
same in russia but only for bookstores, which are for faggots anyways. sane people use bookinist booths and online marketplaces where people sell their stuff.

[Anonymous No.16769861]

>>16769826
Yeah, prior to the internet Australia could get away with having strict censorship control on books by controlling what gets through customs, but the last remaining restrictions are basically meaningless now. Even with the American Psycho example, bookstores only actually follow the rules about half the time.

[Anonymous No.16770109]

>>16769659
>>16769826
>>16769861
>Nooooo not the American Psycho!
This is so fucking stupid lmao. Come on, Bogans.

[Anonymous No.16770126]

>>16770109
It's a harmless book, which is what makes it retarded

[Anonymous No.16770148]

>>16770109
>>16770126
Are you retarded? It was almost not available in general.
>His third novel, American Psycho (1991), was his most successful;[5] upon its release, the literary establishment widely condemned it as overly violent and misogynistic.[6] Though many petitions to ban the book saw Ellis dropped by Simon & Schuster, the resounding controversy convinced Alfred A. Knopf to release it as a paperback later that year.