/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16751694]

Why do branilets and midwits still say that slippery slope is a fallacy when it had been proven right countless times throughout history? Do these dipshits not understand the idea of incrementalism and boiling the frog?

[Anonymous No.16751705]

it's a form of pathos

[Anonymous No.16751708]

>>16751694
I see the slippery slope applied mostly to major historical transition and it's very hard to establish causality with regards to historical events. What you're effectively doing when you say e.g. that the Reformation resulted in women suffrage which will eventually result in the legalization of pedophilia is telling a story that seems plausible but not necessarily true.

[Anonymous No.16751723]

>>16751708
women suffrage actually led to the DElegalization of "pedophilia"

[Anonymous No.16751725]

>>16751708
Women's suffrage always ends in expanded government and welfare state

[Anonymous No.16751733]

>>16751694
>slippery slope
what's that?
t. retard

[Anonymous No.16751744]

>>16751694
They are coping.
Perhaps the frog getting a nice sudden burn will wake the masses up. Or not.