[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 99 KB, 622x434, 1602910564151.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16736679 No.16736679 [Reply] [Original]

Is the Republic really Plato's most important dialogue? I recently read them all and while the Republic sure was the one that finally caught my attention and made me read the others, the later ones aswell as some of the earlier ones like Meno, Gorgias and Phaedo seemed a lot more important in hindsight. Maybe it's recency bias.

>> No.16736683

>>16736679
the most important is the symposium

>> No.16736687

>>16736683
certainly the most poetic

>> No.16736696

>>16736679
Probably, tied with the one where Socrates is about to die and talks about the soul.

>> No.16736714

>>16736679
Republic is the most important historically but it doesn't contain his most profound idea, it's not his best literary work, and it's not the best dialogue overall

>> No.16736752

>>16736714
The first book is kino tho.

>> No.16736861

the laws is the most important, but nobody reads it

>> No.16736882
File: 72 KB, 499x784, symposium.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16736882

>>16736683
This

>> No.16736914

>>16736679
I’d say: Republic, Sophist and Parmenides being followed by Timaeus, Phaedrus and Phaedo.

>>16736714
It does contain his most profound ideas and evinces many details of his metaphysics. In the Republic Plato presents the Good, its place as supra-being, beyond Forms, the relation between the instances and their forms, the idea that recalls the late buddhist doctrine of Two Truths doctrine as a much more sophisticated demonstration.

>> No.16736923

they're all dogshit

>> No.16736938
File: 80 KB, 398x700, nietzsche-uniform-1864.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16736938

>>16736687
>plato
>poetic

>> No.16737040

>>16736938
A few years ago, the first time I read Plato, all I could get from his dialogues right off was the dramatic and poetic aspects that operated the pieces. If you can't see the anagogic poetry in Symposium you are a senseless brute.
But your posting Nietzsche already explains a lot.

>> No.16737049

>>16737040
What is it about Nietzsche that makes brainlets seethe so hard?

>> No.16737067

>>16736679
Republic is not as foundationally important as say those three you mentioned but in exposition, breadth and consequence Republic is important.

>> No.16737077

>>16736679
It's Parmenides, most basic ontology, fully considers all possibilities with regards to its question, actually valid arguments, it will still be relevants when we'll be walking on Mars in robot bodies or whatever.

>> No.16737196

>>16737049
>why do (people I don't like) seethe when I don't argue anything and shit the thread with someone who was wrong about the very topic of the thread.

>> No.16737342

>>16736938
I hope you don't read Nietzsche and Plato in translation. Nietzsche is a good poet and polemicist, Plato is a good poet and a good philosopher.

>> No.16737356

i dont read homosexual authors talk about twink camps, only the kabbalists 4 me

>> No.16737368

What order to read Aristotle in? Is Categories -> Physics -> Metaphysics -> rest of organon -> de anima -> nicomachian ethics -> Politics a reasonable way?

>> No.16737392

>>16737368
Categories and the Organon -> Nicomachean Ethics -> Poetics (optional) -> Physics -> De Anima - > Metaphysics

>> No.16738124

>>16736679
Yes it is because he exposes himself as a GIGAPSEUD in the very first book.

>> No.16738440

thaetatus
statesman
sophist

are the GOAT plato works
clitophon is a close second

>> No.16738524
File: 252 KB, 640x480, The Republic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16738524

>>16736679
Red piled by a dead dude

>> No.16738717

So far I dont think Republic is very good, I will make a thread about it in a few days.

>> No.16738912

>>16738717
It's when he got into his own ideas and was confident so disregard him dropping the socratic method a bit as that's not meant to be as highlighted as his early dialogues. Just look for his metaphysics

>> No.16738929

>>16738912
I still have hope that the book will be good. The political stuff is not that interesting to me and as you said his method is different, the arguments are less rigorous, but I am looking forward to the metaphysical parts.

>> No.16738940

>>16736882
Wordsworth is really another level

>> No.16739050

>>16737342
No i don't, did your mother do it or something?

>> No.16739106

>>16736679
Hippias Minor is my favorite.

>> No.16739109

desd

>> No.16739118

Its good but its SHOULD NOT be the first dialogue that you read. I hate that its memed so hard, it should definitely be read AFTER you've read at least like six others.
In my opinion the best/most important of his dialogues are The Apology, the one where he's imprisoned and the one after his death.

>> No.16739123

>>16739118
You mean Crito? There is no dialogue set after his deatrh unless you mean the Laws.

>> No.16739128
File: 260 KB, 746x1033, plato.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16739128

>>16739118
you should read all of it in order actually

>> No.16739205

>>16739106
Based Hippiasbro. The humour in those is off the charts.

>> No.16739232

>>16738929
Yeah if you disagree w him dw just go to Aristotle

>> No.16739233

Philebus, Phaedrus, Parmenides.

>> No.16739245

>>16737196
Nietzsche wasn't wrong unless you naively took something of his at surface level, but the zoomer you replied to did shit the thread.

>> No.16739253

>>16739233
Can you elaborate on Philebus? I'm all for "no point in pleasure if you can't realize you're having it" thing, but I disagree with most of what he says afterwards.

>> No.16739682

the sign of ignorant man is to point the republic
the wise person chooses the laws

>> No.16740586

>>16736679
Can a absolute brainlet like me understand and enjoy it?

>> No.16742072

up

>> No.16742635

>>16736679
I liked the cave idea.

>> No.16742642

>>16739106
I awkwardly skipped the Hippias, Euthydemus and Menexagoras because I couldn't wait to read the Parmenides and after that it seemed a weird timing.
>>16739682
please tell me what's so good about the laws. It's always mentioned as either boring or underrated and in both cases noone ever explains the contents. Is it just a moral-political treatise?

>> No.16742661

>>16736861

Correct. In over 2000 years the Laws has still not gotten the attention it merits.

>> No.16742722

My favourite work of Plato is Plato Abridged. He must've been really inspired went he wrote it.

>> No.16742751

>>16736679
No. I think his earlier dialogues stay grounded with Socrates and are far better than the republic.

>> No.16742770

>>16742722
My Plato going through a bridge rn

>> No.16742779

>>16740586
Read the five dialogues first: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno and Phaedo

>> No.16742781

Why is Laws never mentioned? I've read a few works of Plato but not Laws yet, is it any good?

>> No.16742782

>>16736683
Symposium is one of the few I haven't read (along with Philebus,Phaedrus and Laws) because I'm a 27yr-old virgin and talk about love and intimacy trigger me into depressive moods that won't go away for weeks.

>> No.16742783

>>16742661
Based, can you write a paragraph for my friend who thinks otherwise? I want to send him the opinion of a sage anon.

>> No.16742842

>>16739245
>IT WAS ACKCHULLY SOOOO DEEP

>> No.16742858
File: 152 KB, 750x768, Plato.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16742858

Explain this

>> No.16742861

>>16742858
plato was his nickname. It meant big chest

>> No.16742869

>>16739682
>please tell me what's so good about the laws. It's always mentioned as either boring or underrated and in both cases noone ever explains the contents. Is it just a moral-political treatise?
Nobody has actually read it and we are just guessing what the correct opinion is. Some one of us should really read the whole damn thing and tell us what its about:
1. It's longer, and possibly a sequel to, the Republic.
2. No Socrates, so its perhaps the final one you should read
3. It's more grounded in reality than in platonic idealism than Republic
4. It's called "Laws", maybe we could adapt it as the hwyte man's law in opposition to the Torah?

>> No.16742961

>>16736679
The most important dialogues are Timaeus, Sophist, Parmenides, Laws, in this order.

>> No.16743028

>>16736923
What makes you make an astounding claim