[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 87 KB, 640x960, 447BFACD-94B4-428A-A5A1-3C9049984C15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16724175 No.16724175 [Reply] [Original]

Did Nietzsche fear Stirner? Why did he never comment on him?

>> No.16724194

he couldnt find anything to disagree with

>> No.16724199

>>16724175
Those he plagiarized the most he commented on least.

>> No.16724210

>>16724175
Nietzsche probably never read any of the young hegelians(including marx) and vice versa.

>> No.16724216

>>16724175
how else would he get away with ripping him off

>> No.16724222

>>16724210
There is an anecdote of someone hanging out with him and seeing the book in his room and him saying it was great.

>>16724199
>>16724216
"plagiarism" and "ripping off" aka having the same point of view and saying it completely differently.

>> No.16724225

Probably not the same but a lot of my writing is growing more towards the direction of Deleuze but I've never read him. Point being that I'm not inclined to read him just yet. I want to keep developing my thoughts and then see how we compare.
Do other anons like to read contemporary philosophers?

>> No.16724233

>>16724210
I think there are some documents proving that he reccomended it to someone

>> No.16724252

>>16724175
Nietzsche's egoism is completely ununifiable with Stirner's science driven psychological egoism, and poor tottering extrapolation.

>> No.16724259

>>16724222
Cope

>> No.16724264
File: 45 KB, 413x174, 36398348885356586.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16724264

NOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST HAVE VIEWS THAT OTHER PEOPLE IN HISTORY HAVE ALSO HELD THATS A HECKIN PLAGIARISMO

>> No.16724278

>>16724175
Nietzsche didn't live a tough life

>> No.16724317
File: 25 KB, 578x76, bib.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16724317

>> No.16724402

I don’t know anon. Unlike Stirner, Nietzsche seems to be plagued with spooks.

>> No.16724413

>>16724264
Just wait till you hear the "Christianity copied X" guys

>> No.16724423

>>16724210
He most certainly read Bruno Bauer and David Strauss

>> No.16724431
File: 104 KB, 837x960, 1538532599849.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16724431

>> No.16724461

>>16724402
The ego isn't real

>> No.16724502
File: 519 KB, 1920x2743, dandelion_witcher-3_cd-projekt-red.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16724502

>>16724461
ninety five percent of retards agree; it takes one to know one, and they all know thee

>> No.16724565
File: 287 KB, 1809x2000, 3a0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16724565

>>16724502
95% of people believe their selves are real -- Egoism is a common ideology. Whatever Stirner was selling isn't original, just a guidebook for idiots on how to think for themselves I guess

>> No.16724604
File: 235 KB, 852x450, smugsnug.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16724604

>>16724175
>Nietzsche fear Stirner
more like ignore.
Anyways, fuck these two petulant childs.

>> No.16724719

>>16724604
>>16724565
>>16724461
marxists out

>> No.16724760 [DELETED] 

>>16724719
>marxists
take a chill pill bill
Im "bundle of stick ist"

>> No.16724766

>>16724760
Fagotist?

>> No.16724775

>>16724719
>marxists
take a chill pill bill
Im a "bundle of stick ist"*
>>16724766
yea

>> No.16725254

>>16724175
>fearing the one you feel you can easily rip off and get away with it
I don't think that's how it works.

>> No.16725276

>>16724175
He did, he told a student who asked him what to pick from a university library to borrow Stirner, describing it as "the best we've got".
No I don't remember the source but I'm certain of having read that in a French book, you can look it up if it really matters to you.

>> No.16725289

>>16725254
>rip off
Brainlet.

>> No.16725324

>>16725289
Would you prefer plagiarized? I don't see why it matters either way. Stirner's philosophy warrants the treatment.

>> No.16725359

Nietzsche is more interesting than Stirner.

>> No.16725361

>>16724252
>Stirner's science driven

>> No.16725519

>>16725324
>Would you prefer plagiarized?
No, without examples that's even dumber.

>> No.16725545

>>16724175
>tfw I know that feeling (the original comic, presumably)
Feels bad

>> No.16725688

>>16724413
judaism copied Zoroastrianism

>> No.16725736

>>16724175
there's a long Wikipedia article on the topic

>> No.16725854

>>16725736
where

>> No.16725856

>>16725854
on wikipedia

>> No.16727116

>>16724719
stirner is a marxist retard

>> No.16727127

>>16727116
Lol

>> No.16727179
File: 16 KB, 487x324, images (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16727179

>>16724199
That's the German way. Same shit happened with Hegel. He skipped all the Scholastic Tradition and oculted his Francisco Suarez influence. Ever wondered why when Philosophy is taught (even in Universities) the skipp over (or quickly overview) a full lenght period, that's it the Middle Age Philosophy and the Scholastiv Tradition, without batting an eye, transitioning from Antiquitiy to Modernity? Well, Hegel made the basic model for every Philosophy curriculum, his is the cronological list used up to this day.
>inb4 muh worthless Middle Age Philosophy bullshit Teological driven waste of time
No. The best ontological discussions were made in that period, they are still relevant in the field. What you got after the amputation of the Scholastic Tradition is philosophical obscurantism, crypto-poetry and delusion.
Don't ever think for a moment that what Descartes pulled off was done ex-nihilo.

>> No.16727237

>>16724402
>Nietzsche seems to be plagued with spooks
Nope. He's the least spooked philosopher of all time. He even beat Stirner on that front.