[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 83 KB, 1064x465, my-image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16690564 No.16690564 [Reply] [Original]

heres my rankings of the literature of the biggest european languages. i tried to be objective as possible. im not including greek and latin because many works from classical times havent survived.

english i feel has had the biggest literary impact. the sheer volume alone of works published in english is immense, and the language has produced countless masterpieces. the greatest plays (besides the classical ones) are written by shakespeare, "leaves of grass" is widely considered the best work of poetry, moby dick is likewise considered the best novel, hume, locke, hobbes, bentham, mill are essential to the philosophical cannon, and pretty much any relevant contemporary writer writes in english

french is like english but on a slightly lesser scale. great philosophy, tons of great literature. A tier language

german and russian are b tier because they both are really only good in one field of literature. russia has good 19th century realists and romantic poets but not much outside that. germany's only literary achievements besides goethe is all philosophy.

italian has good poetry and dante and some lesser known philosophers, not as good as the others but still solid. spainish has cervantes and borges and some obscure stuff nobody except spics have read. they go last on the rankings

>> No.16690571

>>16690564
Where would Irish go on the list?

>> No.16690572

Which is your native language anon?

>> No.16690573

>>16690571
Z

>> No.16690578

>>16690573
That's the one at the very top, right?

>> No.16690580

>>16690564
S. Ancient Greek, Sanskrit
A. Latin, French
B. English, German, Italian
C. Spanish, Portuguese Russian
D. Romanian

>> No.16690581

>>16690572
bulgarian. im only ranking the major languages, because obviously smol countries like mine dont have much

>> No.16690593

>>16690564
So are you ranking based on the quantity / quality of production or the aesthetic value of the language itself? Do you really think English rivals German, French, and Italian in terms of literary-aesthetic value? Very interested in this from non-native English speakers.

>> No.16690614

>>16690593
i mean if they were able to make so many masterpieces it has to be a pretty fucking sweet language. i feel like when people consider romance languages they picture the warm weather, the picturesque scenery, especially the beaches, and fabio, and conclude that the language is be innately beautiful, even if they dont know it. and dont get me wrong italy has stuff like dante but not quite near the amount of masterpieces as uk and france have

>> No.16690655

>>16690614
Interesting. I’m native English but French literature and find the latter to be much more apt for poetry and more intrinsically beautiful overall. I think English is great for prose and other things such as clear descriptions and direct communication, but Romance languages seem more innately poetic. I’m always surprised that anyone but native English speakers see English literature as genuinely valuable, it’s reassuring because being more as a native English speaker always feels like some sort of curse.

>> No.16690658

>>16690655
*French literate

>> No.16690711

S. Ancient Greek
A. Latin, French, English
B+. German, Italian, Arabic, Sanskrit(/pol/fags get out)
B. Spanish, Russian, Chinese
C. Portuguese, Japanese
D. Dutch
btw I view making the list an accomplishment itself

Also OP is a retard for not including classical languages and his reasoning is a meme. I view Arabic and Sanskrit highly because they are important classical languages in large parts of the world which have produced some of the best /lit/erary work of all time.

>> No.16690713

>>16690711
also persian should probably be between C and B

>> No.16690821

>>16690581
ee zdr bace

>> No.16690856

>>16690564
british isn't a language div, should have used the english flag

>> No.16690934

>>16690711
What’s your native language?

>> No.16690940

>>16690564
Spanish
English
powergap
italian
power gap
power gap
power gap
power gap
russian
power gap
power gap
german
power gap
power gap
power gap
power gap

french

>> No.16690953

>>16690564
Imagine being so stupid that you unironically rate languages and, moreover, put yours, presumably the only one you understand, at the top

>> No.16690963

>>16690934
French

>> No.16690998

>>16690655
English has evolved some excellent styles over the years. The drawback to becoming the lingua franca is loss of the natural culture built around a language as it "internationalizes" to some degree. It's hard to imagine a specific character for the English language nowadays but by the industrial era it had become something quite great, and these authors are always a joy to read since no other nation's style really fills this role. Native anglos seem to have a characteristic apathy toward this literature though, to Dickens and Thackeray & others who they probably have not read but mentally view as bland, unable to relate to their pre-war mentalities. Of course this era of literature really is great, our ancestors weren't lying to us, but it takes a proper mindset to see this.

>> No.16691029

>>16690564
I can tell why you are brainlet. You only listed modern languages.

>> No.16691039

>>16690998
I see. I guess I get insecure with how dry english seems compared with honestly most world languages. It’s surprising that so much great literature was produced by something so ostensibly flat. I’ve come to love it at times of course, in Chaucer, Yeats, Melville, and many others. But I always assumed there just happened to be many prolific writers but the rest of the world didn’t think much of it. The rampant (and obviously understandable) Anglo-slander of the day doesn’t help. Not that I care, I’m no Anglo myself but even as a lover of language I’ve always been insecure about English.

>> No.16691051

>>16690564
What's the point of this thread if everyone's just going to put their language at the top?

>> No.16691070

>>16691051
They don’t.

>> No.16691087

>>16690564
>"leaves of grass" is widely considered the best work of poetry, moby dick is likewise considered the best novel
No they aren't
>hume, locke, hobbes, bentham, mill are essential to the philosophical cannon
Hume and Hobbes sure. The rest of those chucklefucks not so much.

>> No.16691089

>>16691070
Okay, not the top, but second tier, like that guy >>16690711 did.
How do you even measure the /lit/ness of a language if you don't know all of them?

>> No.16691119

>>16691089
Presumably off reputation but even that’s dependent on region so I agree it’s faulty but interesting what people think.
>>16691087
True MD and LoG aren’t considered THE greatest, but are often held in conversations with other top tiers like Proust and Tolstoy. Well, MD is at least, to stay in the realm of novels.

>> No.16691173

>>16690564
Greek --> Homer
Spanish --> Cervantes
Italian --> Dante
English --> The Canterbury Tales
French --> Gargantua and Pantagruel
Latin --> Ockham & Spinoza
Russian --> Dostoyevsky
German --> Rainer Maria Rilke

>> No.16691175

>>16691089
>How do you even measure the /lit/ness of a language if you don't know all of them?
Based on how retarded the people speaking them are

>> No.16691203

>>16691173
Spanish --> Cervantes, the Celestina* & the Lazarillo*
Greek --> Homer & Oedipus Rex*
Italian --> Divine Comedy* & Decameron*

>> No.16691220

German
powergap
Ancient Languages
Russian
powergap
French
Anything else
powergap
powergap
powergap
powergap
powergap
english

>> No.16691239

>>16691203
Greek --> Homer, Oedipus Rex*, Plato* & Aristotle*

fixed.

>> No.16691255

>>16690564
German i feel has had the biggest literary impact. the sheer volume alone of works published in German is immense, and the language has produced countless masterpieces. the greatest plays (besides the classical ones) are written by Goethe, "Die Nibelungen" is widely considered the best work of poetry, Der Zauberberg is likewise considered the best novel, Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Wittgenstein are essential to the philosophical cannon, and pretty much any relevant contemporary writer writes in German

>> No.16691268

>>16690614
>i mean if they were able to make so many masterpieces it has to be a pretty fucking sweet language.
Do people actually think that the language itself matters? A languages literary history is all about historical circumstances there's nothing inherent about languages in this matter.

>> No.16691271

>>16691255
>"Die Nibelungen" is widely considered the best work of poetry, Der Zauberberg is likewise considered the best novel
you're an absolut brainlet if you think these are the crowning achievements of the german language (let alone the bests in the word)

>> No.16691280

>>16691255
This is laughable. You overestimate the impact of German lit wayyyy too much. It is not as widely read outside of German speaking countries as you think.
The only thing true is the philosophers, and even then only Hegel and Kant are truly worthwhile of those you listed.

>> No.16691286

>>16691271
Still better than OP's Leaves of Grass and Moby Dick, so go fuck yourself.

>> No.16691290

>>16690564
This is laughable. You overestimate the impact of English lit wayyyy too much. It is not as widely read outside of English speaking countries as you think.
The only thing true is the philosophers, and even then only Locke is truly worthwhile of those you listed.

>> No.16691293

>>16691280
Not him but you reek of anglo. Anglos have always dismissed anything continental (especially German) as bad. The impact of German literature goes way beyond Germany.

>> No.16691298

>>16690564
>>16690564
>>16690564

Ahh yes the power of being a dirty monoglot and only being aware of the basic of bitches Anglo version of the canon.

>> No.16691299

>>16690564
In all honesty ranking languages like this is silly. Even ranking individual categories like poetry or novels is silly. Even if you knew all these languages fluently and had read a huge amount of each country's literature, you would still have only very ambiguous ways of comparing them with each other.

>> No.16691361

>>16691299
>>16691299
>>16691299
>you would still have only very ambiguous ways of comparing them with each other.

Lmao don't be a naive stupid faggot. The hierarchy of literatures is unspoken of in polite company, but its very tangible and real. Maybe 4chan is a crank pseud shithole that can't do it, but languages and their affects can very much be ranked and most definitely are.

>> No.16691371

>>16691361
Well I can't rank any of the languages I know as definitively superior to each other, and I don't even know how you would do that. The entire idea seems dumb to me. Maybe you can tell me how you do it personally with some examples

>> No.16691386

>>16691293
Cope lmao, I'm not even an anglo.
I say this because I have lived in 3 European countries and know for a fact German lit is not prominent at all outside of Germany, excluding the philosphy.
I can admit that Kant was probably the greatest philosopher since Aristotle, and he has been the best since, but thinking the Magic Mountain is the greatest novel is just pathetic nationalism...

>> No.16691389

>>16690564
Switch German and Spain's positions. German has the best philosophers, but mediocre literature and is no way better than Spain in that regard.

>> No.16691417

>>16691386
>I say this because I have lived in 3 European countries and know for a fact German lit is not prominent at all outside of Germany, excluding the philosphy.
This is anecdotal and postwar bias. German lit is and will always be very influential and palpable as long as the idea of Europe persists.

>> No.16691434

Scottish Gaelic has to be high just because of this masterpiece.

Night came to U-thorno.
They chiefs stood about their grief.
The blast went in turns through each warriors hair,
Fingal slowly dragged his feet,
Past the mighty congregation of kings,
Fingal's thoughts lay deep within his chest.
He called forth melodious Ullin of Harps,
And called for the songs of the chiefs to rise.
"He was no falling fire without flame

>> No.16691443

>>16691417
Well this is my experience talking to people from different European countries and guess what? everyone overestimates their countries literature.
If you were to ask some dude from Burma the greatest writers he would put some Burmese author in the top 10.
If you honestly think that the Nibelungenlied is the greatest poetry ever written you are severly underread and reek of chauvinism and cheap patriotism.
Modern German philosophy is the most relevant in the world, but the literature is not even in the top 5 of Europe.
And fyi, the greatest strength of Portuguese and Spanish lit is the poetry, which is severly underwhelming when read in translation, that's why they are underrepresented in these bullshit western canon while Russian lit (that has arguably some of the greatest novels and short stories) is overrepresented.

>> No.16691448

>>16691434
STFU autist. Ossian does reach homeric heights, but millennia too late to have any impact, stop being a tryhard ossianfag.

>> No.16691453

>>16691448
The thread is about beauty not impact.
If you want to talk about impact then English has no place.

>> No.16691459

>>16691443
>If you honestly think that the Nibelungenlied is the greatest poetry ever written you are severly underread and reek of chauvinism and cheap patriotism.
You're a retard in contact with other retards. Find new better friends and be like them. If Goethe thought Nibel was shit, no modern reader worth talking with would bother to overrate it.

Spanish and Portuguese poetry is indeed underrated, but ironically they lack craft and substance. Italian poetry, even had Dante not existed, truly is the peak of med craft.

>> No.16691460

i am absolutely positive that nobody in this thread can read in more than 2 languages without pulling up a dictionary for every other sentence.

>> No.16691462

Scottish poetry peaks in the Germanic languages.

>> No.16691474

>>16691460
t jealous monoglot

>> No.16691483

>>16691459
>but ironically they lack craft and substance
There, you outed yourself as a retard.
I was trying to say that you will always have a skewed judgement in favour of your own country/language and will downplay foreing traditions heavily based on poetry. It is exactly the same with Chinese lit. If you were from Sichuan you would be saying that Li Bai was the gratest poet to ever live.
Mate, I'm sorry to break this news to you but no one outside of Germany/Austria give a fuck about Nibelungenlied.

>> No.16691500

A. Ancient Greek, Classical Chinese
B. Latin, Sanskrit,
C. Spanish, Italian, Mandarin
D. Russian (barely extant prior to 19th century, otherwise close to C)
E. English
F. Portuguese, French, German

>> No.16691517

>>16691483
You obviously can't read. Nibel is shit, and so are you.

Compared to Italian poetry, Iberian poetry just doesn't compare, lmao.

Name five Iberian poets you think outweigh the best Italics. Don't be afraid. Whatever either of us might say, it remains for the audience here to decide who's more right. And if you can't muster them, you're a coward who admits defeat.

>> No.16691534

>>16690581
Slavic literature is quite underrated, older literature and folk poetry in particular.

>> No.16691540

>>16690564
Here is the objective list:

Philosophy:
S+: Ancient Greek, German
F: Everything else

Poetry:
S: French
A: Italian, Latin
B: Spanish, Portuguese
C: German, Chinese
D: Everything else
F: English

Epics:
S: Latin
A: Ancient Greek
B: Italian
C: French
F: Everything else

Novel:
S: French
A: German, Spanish
B: Russian
C: Everything else

>> No.16691543

>>16691540
shit list kys

>> No.16691557

>>16691543
>t. *nglo

>> No.16691562

>>16691543
Cope

>> No.16691563

>>16691517
My favorites:
Góngora
San Juan de la Cruz
Camões
Pessoa
Federico García Lorca

Other strong ones (you can switch any if you wish):
Quevedo
Garcilaso de la Vega
Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz
Machado
Bécquer
Sa Carneiro
Florbela Espanca
Cesário Verde

I could list dozens more but there is no point, just pick the five you wish and compare all you want.

>> No.16691573

>>16691563
I was honestly hoping for better picks, not just territory I'm already familiar with.

unamusedface.jpg

>> No.16691615 [DELETED] 
File: 16 KB, 210x240, 340af4d564aa41a1e9c62548a759c63.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16691615

>>16691573
>I was honestly hoping for better picks, not just territory I'm already familiar with

>> No.16691636

>>16691563
mediocre bruh

>> No.16691641

>>16691483
>no one outside of Germany/Austria give a fuck about Nibelungenlied.
It was a huge inspiration for both Wagner and Tolkien.

>> No.16691643

>>16691641
>Outside of Germany
>Wagner

>> No.16691657

Ge'ez is the most /lit/ language

>> No.16691742

>>16691643
Wagner's influence itself can be felt all over the arts in every western country.

>> No.16691761

>>16690593
>o you really think English rivals German, French, and Italian in terms of literary-aesthetic value?
Yes. There is a reason those other languages are going extinct

>> No.16691775

/lit/ isn't an identity

>> No.16691784

>>16691534
yes but it's not like you can read every language if you know one

>> No.16691912

>>16691293
I like German literature but come on.

>> No.16691971

>>16690564
you forgot milton. paradise lost is one of the greatest literary achievements of all time, one of the 5 epics actually worth reading, alongside homer's illiad and oddyssey, dante's inferno, and virgil's aeneid

>> No.16691986

>>16691912
It's ok. Anglos dropped off in quality in the mid 20th century when they became monolingual.

>> No.16692009
File: 230 KB, 1064x558, download.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16692009

>>16690564
fixed it for you

>> No.16692065

>>16690564
>Russian and German above Italian
Peak pleb.

>> No.16692190

>>16691280
>only hegel and kant are truly worthwile
aka I'm only interested in those two

>> No.16692301

>>16691239
Don't mix Literature with Philosophy, t least make a consequent tier list.

>> No.16692402

>>16690564
S: German
A: French, Ancient Greek
B: Russian, Latin, English
C: Japanese, Italian
D: Everything else

>> No.16692415

>>16690564
>"leaves of grass" is widely considered the best work of poetry
Holy cow. I pray to God this was a trolling attempt.

There can't be seriously people like that, can there now?

>> No.16693616

>>16690564
Funny, OP, I made a similar ranking as yours a long time ago but since I am American everyone talked loads of shit. However personally I would rate Russian literature lowest on the list because although Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, and Pushkin are great authors, they haven't been nearly as influential as Dante or Cervantes.

>> No.16693625

>inb4 ESLs start seething at English being in S

>> No.16693647

A. Spanish
B. Spanish
C. Spanish
D. Spanish

>> No.16693656
File: 33 KB, 600x514, gustavobueno2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16693656

How iliterate do you have to be to put spanish so low? It has one of the richests literatures, if not the richest, and its philosophy is not far behind.

>> No.16693716

>god tier
Canadian
>perfect
American, Italian, Irish
>some good works
French, Russian, African-American
>one good author
German, English, African, Latin
>good intentions
Japanese, Brazilian, Korean
>overrated
Spanish, Ancient Greek, Hindu/Buddhist, Persian
>delete
Chinese, Mexican, Argentinian, Hellenic, Arab, Polish, Finnish, Lithuanian
>the very worst
Internet

>> No.16694104

>>16691173
Russian here. The language of Dostoevsky isn't very sophisticated or special, the ideas of his prose are more important than his writing style. If you are looking for stylistics, you'd better read Tolstoy, Nabokov or Bely in Russian.

>> No.16694112
File: 35 KB, 600x600, 1300044776986.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16694112

>ctrl f "anglo"
>8 results

>> No.16694121
File: 79 KB, 850x400, frase-la-impresion-que-tuve-la-primera-vez-que-fui-a-inglaterra-es-que-quitando-las-elites-de-las-gustavo-bueno-105132.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16694121

>>16694112
9
Fuck anglos

>> No.16694166

>>16694121
Fuck anglos indeed

>> No.16694232

>>16690564
Good list, anon. Honestly can't fault it.

>> No.16694234

>>16694112
Seething spics, as per usual.

>> No.16694820

>>16694121
Ah yes, the famous refined table manners and speech of middle and lower class Spaniards
lmao

>> No.16694957

this thread is retarded

>> No.16694983

>>16694234
Found the Nazi fascist incel chud bootlicker

>> No.16694991

>>16690711
Good ranking but should have made Dutch a F or G category instead of just D. What an ugly language.

>>16691255
German literature is quite completely irrelevant before the very end of the 18th century, and has been very disappointing in the second half of the 20th century up to contemporary publishing.The language also never had a global impact which limited the spread and implies almost everyone read translations from the start.

>> No.16695589

>>16694991
I'm Dutch, I like my language, I think it can be beautiful, but admittedly Dutch literature is pretty shit.

Knowing Dutch is a good stepping stone for getting into English/German or even French literature though.

>> No.16695619

>>16690571
I get the impression that OP is doing it on language, not nationality. So most of the great Irish writers are under English along with American works. Irish language literature (like essentially all Celtic languages) is a joke compared to the major languages

>> No.16695621

>>16695619
>is a joke compared to the major languages
Do you mean the size of it?

>> No.16695628

>>16694991
>Good ranking but should have made Dutch a F or G category instead of just D. What an ugly language.
D is clearly the correct position for Dutch, a country that produced Vondel, Hooft, Bilderdijk and Gorter, should not be placed lower and when you add to that a decent amount of philosophy, scientific literature, a few novel and a lot of good history works, it should probaly be placed higher alongside Portuguese.

>> No.16695633

>>16695589
Learn Scots.
Has lots of similarities to Dutch phonetically.

>> No.16695639

Myfuckingod. The amount of people placing French in the top tiers and disrespecting Spanish shows how absolutely full of uneducated faggots this board is nowadays.

>> No.16695662

>>16695633
So I can be that hipster who can say they've learned Scots? No thanks. It's even more useless than learning Dutch.

>> No.16695671

>>16695662
>It's even more useless than learning Dutch.
Only if you don't like reading.

>> No.16695672

>>16695662
>It's even more useless than learning Dutch.
How else are you going to learn about the Golden Age, Dutch painters, Modern Democracy and large chapters of scientific history, if you dont learn Dutch Anon?

>> No.16695674

>>16695639
Hate to break it to you, but French lit > Spanish lit.

>> No.16695703

>>16695672
Yeah Dutch has had a significant impact on scientific development during the Dutch golden age, but do you really need to speak Dutch to learn about science? No. Unless you want to read these ancient documents in the old Nederlandsche taal, it really won't help you that much.
As for painters, what does that have to do with language?

>> No.16695724

>>16695703
>Yeah Dutch has had a significant impact on scientific development during the Dutch golden age
You arent very well educated, the Dutch gave a scientific contribution to the world for its total existence as a nation from Boerhaave to Lorentz.

Also kinda difficult understanding the meaning and context of a painting if you do not know the shape a society takes, also.

Cant properly understand early mysticism without learning Dutch or the history of protestantism.

Also missing out on a lot of good late 19th and 20th century novels and poetry.

>> No.16695727

>>16691534
It’s the youngest European language, they were the last to develop literature in EU or another way of putting it the last to exit pre history

>> No.16695732

>>16695727
no, thats the finns.

>> No.16695734

>>16695662
FACT: DUTCH PEOPLE ARE THE MOST POWERFUL RACE IN THE WORLD

>> No.16695763

>>16695734
The Dutch have been producing occasional great pieces of literature since the Middle Ages, while the German squirted all their talent out in one big century, no doubt Dutch will win out in the end.

>> No.16695784

>>16695621
Extent depth and quality, relative quality is good but affirmative action
>>16695639
It’s been over 4 centuries since Cervantes died, get over it Maestro.

>> No.16696039

>>16690593
>Do you really think English rivals German, French, and Italian in terms of literary-aesthetic value
yes, easily

>> No.16696067

>>16695763
>tiny pebble rabbit poops vs one big softserver chocolate mombo jombo.

Yah, I thenk the germans win out.

>> No.16696329

>>16696067
>>tiny pebble rabbit poops vs one big softserver chocolate mombo jombo.
I take it you are Jewish?

>> No.16696723

>>16694991
>German literature is quite completely irrelevant before the very end of the 18th century
The same can be said for English and Russian. Also to my knowledge French and Spanish were also pretty irrelevant up until a couple centuries prior (with the exception of the troubadours).
>very disappointing in the second half of the 20th century
What country hasn't been disappointing in terms of literary output since the end of WW2?

>> No.16696734

>>16695763
>The Dutch have been producing occasional great pieces of literature since the Middle Ages
I literally can't think of a single Dutch writer worth mentioning besides Erasmus while there are close to a dozen German writers regularly discussed on this board.

>> No.16696741

>>16695732
I thought it was Russian written language and didn’t say it to belittle, it’s in fact the only language (besides native English) that I’ve studied, I’m not fluent but can read enough of it to get by

>> No.16696759

>>16690564
This is kind of tangential but what do you guys think is the most "efficient" language for literature? I asked my high school English teacher this question a few years ago but he was a retard and couldn't answer. By "efficient", I mean able to convey the most meaning with the least amount of writing. I was tempted to say Chinese but if you take a sentence and translate it into a bunch of different languages Chinese doesn't look to be THAT efficient + hanzi are much more complex than the Latin alphabet. Any ideas?
>English: It is very important to read many books. Your mind should be challenged and engaged as often as possible.
>Chinese: 阅读很多书非常重要。 您的思维应尽可能多地挑战和参与。
>Latin: Magna est nimis multa librorum legere. Et quotiens vocarentur in controversiam potest animo versantur.
>Welsh: Mae'n bwysig iawn darllen llawer o lyfrau. Dylai eich meddwl gael ei herio a'i ymgysylltu mor aml â phosib.
>Arabic: من المهم جدًا قراءة العديد من الكتب. يجب تحدي عقلك وإشراكه قدر الإمكان.

>> No.16696764
File: 130 KB, 742x716, 1602789504426.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16696764

>>16690564

>> No.16696778

>>16696759
I seen something about information per syllable and English is up there with the Asian languages but it wasn’t first place, Spanish too

>> No.16696835

>>16691563
Add Ruben Dario, Antero de Quental, Bocangel or even just Boscan to the mix and you'd BTFO of the italians even more. Hell, even Borges was an fine poet.

>> No.16696838

>>16696778
I wanted to say that English could be up there but figured that might be a bit presumptuous.

>> No.16696839

>portuguese is a good /lit/ language
t. spics

>> No.16697190

>>16696734
>I literally can't think of a single Dutch writer worth mentioning besides Erasmus while there are close to a dozen German writers regularly discussed on this board.
lol, learn Dutch and study the literature then.

>> No.16697313

>>16697190
If your literary tradition doesn't have writers that are well regarded enough to be translated into English, it's not worth looking into.

>> No.16697334

>>16696723
Wrong. The height of Spanish literature was in the XVII century. Even Schopenhauer learnt Spanish to read the Spanish Golden Age classics.

>> No.16697353

>>16696723
>>16697334
Okay, I didn't read the couple centuries earlier. My bad.

>> No.16698104

>>16690564
>italian>spanish
do you not realize?

>> No.16698134
File: 80 KB, 745x758, 4A7C640C-EE56-4BCE-8488-B669F5E3513A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16698134

Literally refuted your thread.

>> No.16698386

>>16690564
did Mexicans unironically killed the Spanish Language? at least the perception of it? i´m south american but i think the anglo ressentment towards the spanish language comes because of the mexicans who speak spanish in a retarded way to begin with, such a shame

>> No.16698395
File: 155 KB, 500x420, ebony nibba.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16698395

>>16694121

https://youtu.be/QT13kk8HDDo

>> No.16698406

>>16690953
Based

>> No.16698421

汉字是太好了desu

>> No.16698507

The only reason you consider one leanguage beautiful is because of the works written in it. So the best are based on their countrys power. English is the best because England ruled the world, but before England came France, Spain or Rome. To try and order the language of the works of literature is dumb stuff, no language is intrinsecally beatiful, all of them are imperfect in transmitting ideas or feelings. That said the best language is spanish.

>> No.16698538

the most literary languages are those which only exist in books or a particular literary performance: biblical hebrew, sanskrit; homeric greek was a creole poetic dialect, and, accordingly, tragedy, comedy, then the continued epic tradition had grammatical and vocabulary traits unique to the tradition of their genres.

>> No.16698547

>>16698507
>intrinsecally beatiful
What did he mean by this?

>> No.16698567

>>16698507
in some ways it´s a measure of national pride, i think one of the reasons bardolatry took off was because of nationalism too

>> No.16698600

>>16698547
I meant its good

>> No.16699680

>>16691761
>>16696039
How about I beat the fucking SHIT out of you instead?

>> No.16700149

>>16690940
>Spanish first
>French that low
>power gap
I can't believe how much I hate this post being spanish myself. You bring us ignominy.

>> No.16700394

>>16691742
That doesn’t have anything to do with it being broadcasted on airwaves all throughout ww2 in axis controlled territories?

>> No.16700528

>>16691563
>Florbela Espanca
Far underrated girl. I should pay more attention to her.

>> No.16700548
File: 41 KB, 727x727, 1553642620971.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16700548

>>16696764
*Escohotado runs for his life*

>> No.16700549

>>16698386
Mexicans doesn't help to spanish consideration indeed. And the most funny is that is probably the spanish more mixed with english you can find, a bastardized dialect that no one likes.

>> No.16700551

>>16695732
the Finnish empire ruled large parts of Asia and Europe when it reigned .

>> No.16700577

>>16690564
for philosophy german is as if not more important than english

>> No.16700604

>>16698386
>anglo ressentment towards the spanish language
I've never seen this. The inverse on the other hand I've seen in spades.

>> No.16701501

>>16690580
>we're in the same ranking as actually relevant languages
LET'S GO
LET'S FUCKING GOOOOOO

>> No.16701513
File: 94 KB, 641x360, 160097368592.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16701513

>>16700548
>TU TIENES UNA CITA CON ESPAÑA

>> No.16701589

>>16691280
nigger what? nietzsche might be the most relevant philosopher rn

>> No.16701594

>>16701501
Stop shitting on your own culture

>> No.16701656

>>16691986
we're not talking about anglos

>> No.16701801
File: 28 KB, 763x639, 1521753750558.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16701801

>>16701513
Kek, saved

>> No.16701834

>>16691220
This

>> No.16701978

>>16701594
insha'allah, i'm cheering
it's that weird monky feel when you randomly see your irrelevant shithole mentioned

>> No.16702015

>>16700604
The resentment towards Spanish stems from a sense of class superiority. Anglophones see themselves as the most important and powerful nation on the world, while Spanish speakers are usually associated with crime ridden hellholes full of poverty and corruption, whose inhabitants try to escape in order to live in the "land of opportunity". Basically, the tongue of a lower caste. Thus, in most English speaking circles, at least among the average Joes, Spanish is the tongue of housekeepers, gardeners, drug traffickers, illegal immigrants or, if you're a leftist, the tongue of a poor oppressed minority whose only characteristic is being mistreated by whites.
Not to say that there is no animosity the other way around; there's plenty of it too.

>> No.16702357

Only slightly related but have any of you guys noticed that some languages just don't work when sung in Operas? Like italian and german can sound great, but english sounds awful, same for portuguese and french.

>> No.16702605

Chaucer was an incel.
He wrote poems moaning about how he wants to break women's necks.

>> No.16702630

>>16697313
>If your literary tradition doesn't have writers that are well regarded enough to be translated into English, it's not worth looking into.
English is just an ugly language for trade and movies for the plebs, no wonder a more articulate language like Dutch doesnt win your favour.

>> No.16703185

>>16702630
Cope

>> No.16703405
File: 747 KB, 1500x1198, A1D39265-0D27-4832-A4F4-A6CA7D4CBBD9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16703405

I'm worried people here don't realise that the divine comedy is the pinnacle of literature

>> No.16703437
File: 14 KB, 200x209, 200px-Dalriada.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16703437

>>16703405
Weird way to put Ossian's Fingal

>> No.16703587

>>16703437
>Ossian's Fingal

literally who

>> No.16703777

>>16700394
No it really doesn't. Wagner was a big influence on a number if modernist writers and the earliest film score composers followed his music.

>> No.16703965

>>16702630
More articulate language than Dutch? You could probably translate this sentence into Dutch just by doubling all the vowels.