[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 83 KB, 500x434, 1600637826523.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16643311 No.16643311 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any philosophers that aren't out-dated by now

>> No.16643314

>>16643311
Define outdated

>> No.16643317

>>16643311
How can a philosopher be "outdated"?

>> No.16643326

>>16643317
>>16643314
A philosopher who's ideas translate poorly to modern life, or are based on out-dated science

>> No.16643333

>>16643326
>A philosopher who's ideas translate poorly to modern life, or are based on out-dated science

Uh, which philosopher would you consider to be outdated?

>> No.16643335

>>16643333
Most of them

>> No.16643343

>>16643326
>epistemology, metaphysics, ontology, and ethics have anything to do with science

>> No.16643363

>>16643335
You really need to do a better job explaining what in the hell do you mean, anon.

>> No.16643364

>>16643314
>>16643317
>>16643333
>>16643343
Sunk cost fallacy

>> No.16643365

>>16643311
Schopenhauer

>> No.16643367

>>16643364
>Sunk cost fallacy
Could you explain what an Economic concept has to do with the questions asked for you?

>> No.16643383

>>16643367
Cope fallacy

>> No.16643400

>>16643311
>out-dated
That's not how philosophy works
It's like a academic hobby debating club, completely detached from the real world. Ideas are appreciated for their ability to pass time, not any sort of external relevance

>> No.16643404

>>16643311
ANGL*IDS BTFO