/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.16586883]

Where do I get started with Gramsci?

[Anonymous No.16586938]

>>16586883
>literal manlet

[Anonymous No.16586952]

>>16586883
Start with reading his Three Volume Notebooks

[Anonymous No.16586971]

>>16586883
Be related to him like me

[Anonymous No.16586980]

>>16586883
A lobotomy.

[Anonymous No.16586989]

>>16586971
Any more convincing proof? Are you a Marxist yourself?

[Anonymous No.16586999]

>>16586952
ISBN or where I can find copies?
>>16586971
Are you actually?
>>16586980
Nah fren, he was a very passionate soul from what I read and as a fascist myself I think his imprisonment was very cruel and unjust.

[Anonymous No.16587003]

>>16586971
How about you take care of your parkinsons so you can take a clear image, you faggot

[Anonymous No.16587033]

>>16586989
No, I've been a full blown /pol/ack since 2014. My family used to be marxist from both sides decades ago, but the older guys and gals became right wing populist, while I have no definite ideology I'd love to live in a world free of jews

[Anonymous No.16587041]

>>16587033
How is Gramsci related to you?
What are you posting?

[Anonymous No.16587044]

>>16587003
Every non smoker in my family has parkinson, and I'm not going to start now to please you

[Anonymous No.16587064]

>>16587041
Not gonna disclose that. I'm also related to Emilio Lussu
Excerpts from handwritten Prison Notebooks

[Anonymous No.16587077]

>>16587064
Bretty cool. Imagine being a 20th century Marxist and having kids that shitpost about joos on /pol/

[Anonymous No.16587083]

learn italian

[Anonymous No.16587094]

>>16587033
>No, I've been a full blown /pol/ack since 2014
Absolutely based, your ancestor must be seething hard in hell where he's burning

[Anonymous No.16587097]

>>16587077
In my opinion every well intentioned, intelligent, brave marxist of the 20th century who also possessed what our arab friend calls "skin in the game" would be a /pol/ack in 2020

[Anonymous No.16587127]

>>16587094
Why wouls Gramsci be burning in hell? He was a good man.

[Anonymous No.16587170]

>>16586971
>admitting to be a kike
you have 0 chance of dodging the ovens the second time around.

[Anonymous No.16587183]

"I hate the indifferent. I believe that living means taking sides. Those who really live cannot help being a citizen and a partisan. Indifference and apathy are parasitism, perversion, not life. That is why I hate the indifferent.

The indifference is the deadweight of history. The indifference operates with great power on history. The indifference operates passively, but it operates. It is fate, that which cannot be counted on. It twists programs and ruins the best-conceived plans. It is the raw material that ruins intelligence. That what happens, the evil that weighs upon all, happens because the human mass abdicates to their will; allows laws to be promulgated that only the revolt could nullify, and leaves men that only a mutiny will be able to overthrow to achieve the power. The mass ignores because it is careless and then it seems like it is the product of fate that runs over everything and everyone: the one who consents as well as the one who dissents; the one who knew as well as the one who didn’t know; the active as well as the indifferent. Some whimper piously, others curse obscenely, but nobody, or very few ask themselves: If I had tried to impose my will, would this have happened?

I also hate the indifferent because of that: because their whimpering of eternally innocent ones annoys me. I make each one liable: how they have tackled with the task that life has given and gives them every day, what have they done, and especially, what they have not done. And I feel I have the right to be inexorable and not squander my compassion, of not sharing my tears with them.

I am a partisan, I am alive, I feel the pulse of the activity of the future city that those on my side are building is alive in their conscience. And in it, the social chain does not rest on a few; nothing of what happens in it is a matter of luck, nor the product of fate, but the intelligent work of the citizens. Nobody in it is looking from the window of the sacrifice and the drain of a few. Alive, I am a partisan. That is why I hate the ones that don’t take sides, I hate the indifferent."

[Anonymous No.16587188]

>>16587170
Gramsci wasn't jewish fucktard

[Anonymous No.16587199]

>>16587183
Sounds very bigoted and oppressive to me

[Anonymous No.16587214]

>>16587188
well, no need to color me surprised.
>he really has a jew vibe though, admit it.

[Anonymous No.16587220]

>>16587214
It's a sardinian, but his ancestors are, my Allah forgive me for uttering this word, albanians

[Anonymous No.16587311]

>>16586883
>he[Gramsci] learned the lesson of the fascists, the lesson of ‘corporatism’, which is the true original of his theory of ‘hegemony’. Society, he realized, is composed of a thousand small institutions, a thousand associations, a thousand patterns of communication and response. To reach into every one of these and to impose upon them – while safeguarding the hegemonic power that they contain – the iron discipline of party leadership: this is the secret of politics. is is what had led the fascists to power and what had formed, for the first time since the birth of the modern Italian state, the unity about a common purpose that gave form and coherence to the mass of followers, and also power and principle to the vanguard party that governed them
>In short, the theory of the Prison Notebooks is the true theory of fascism: of the power that had pre-empted Gramsci’s ambition, by realizing it in other hands. When, in an early article, Gramsci described the proletariat as making up an ideal unity, a fascio, he anticipated in his hopes precisely the form of social order that was later to be achieved by his rival. The philosophy of praxis – so like the ‘philosophical dynamism’ of Mussolini and, like that philosophy, influenced through and through by Georges Sorel’s apologies for violence – retains its charm for the intellectual precisely because it promises both power over the masses and a mystic identity with them. But that is the promise of fascism, and if the left needs constantly to identify the fascist as the single enemy we need look no further for an explanation. For what better way to conceal one’s intentions than to describe them as the intentions of the enemy?
>Gramsci’s importance for us today lies in his resolute attempt to lift the work of revolution out of the streets and factories into the realm of high culture. He redesigned the left-wing programme as a cultural revolution, one that could be conducted without violence and whose site would be the universities, theatres, lecture halls and schools where the intellectuals and their primary audience. The work of revolution was henceforth to involve an attack on the old curriculum and the works of art, literature and criticism that belonged to it. It was to be a work of intellectual subversion, exposing the power networks, the structures of domination, that lie concealed within the high culture of our civilization, in order to liberate the voices that have been oppressed by it. And such has been the new curriculum in the humanities ever since.

[Anonymous No.16587315]

>>16586883
Hegemony is how the ruling class stays on top. Subjective will is not haram for Marxist philosophy.
There you go, no need to read him now.

[Anonymous No.16587354]

>>16586883
His prison notebooks and that’s pretty much it

[Anonymous No.16587366]

>>16586883
Is it true he goes on a rant about “bourgeois sodomites” at some point in his notebooks?

[Anonymous No.16587449]

>>16587127
He was a commie materialist hylic

[Anonymous No.16587459]

>>16587311
This guy was retroactively refuted by Schmitt over and over and over dont take this clown seriously

[Anonymous No.16587492]

>>16587220
Wow holy fuck he is Albanian, I wouldn't have guess but now i can see it. Wtf Gramsci is based now

[Anonymous No.16587516]

>>16587449
You shouldn't burn in hell for being wrong.

[Anonymous No.16587617]

>>16587220
> my Allah forgive me for uttering this word, al*******

[Anonymous No.16587625]

>>16587311
i literally fell asleep reading this barely into the second sentence

[Anonymous No.16587678]

Daily reminder Karl Marx had racial theories, hated blacks and Jews and referred to his octaroon son-in-law as a "gorilla."
https://youtu.be/ywWw2IAyEfs?t=1124

[Anonymous No.16587904]

>>16587449
All Italians go to heaven

[Anonymous No.16587952]

>>16587094
>/pol/
>based
GTFO reddit

[Anonymous No.16587964]

>>16587678
He wanted emancipation of jews and blacks while occasionally using slurs in private letters. You're a retard, read Marx.

[Anonymous No.16587983]

>>16587033
>muh joooz
Kinda cringe bro

[Anonymous No.16588262]

>>16587952
>>16587983
rent free

[Anonymous No.16588448]

>>16587964
Cope. Marx was a problematic chud and so was Gramsci.

[Anonymous No.16588461]

>>16586938
That's why he's based

[Anonymous No.16588608]

>>16587678
How about if you actually read Marx? Lol

[Anonymous No.16589629]

>>16587033
>>16587064
This is your homework faggot

[Anonymous No.16589829]

>>16587033
based if true.
post it with a timestamp anon

[Anonymous No.16589945]

>>16587678
So Marx was actually based unlike modern nigger-asslicking leftists? Who would have known lmao

[Anonymous No.16590073]

>>16587183
Kreia be like

[Anonymous No.16590080]

>>16587678
Based.

[Anonymous No.16590115]

>>16586883
he looks like chudjak

[Anonymous No.16590123]

>>16587033
just imagine,

>picrel is what Gramsci sees when he looks down from the heaven

[Anonymous No.16590227]

>>16587033
> while I have no definite ideology I'd love to live in a world free of jews
Based. We should come up with a name for this.

[Anonymous No.16590655]

>>16587033
Gramsci wrote some anti-semitic letters to his sister. Do you know about them?

[Anonymous No.16590846]

>>16586883
With circumcision

[Anonymous No.16590862]

>>16588608
The real question is whether “read marx” posters have actually read him because they’re never capable of giving you a straight answer to questions about him.

[Anonymous No.16591401]

>>16588448
Who cares? They were right.

[Anonymous No.16592750]

>>16591401
>materialism
>correct

[Anonymous No.16592866]

>>16586883
http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=858333B43E9CAA4A1F8B2243D1839EEA
aka "Antonio Gramsci, Marxismus in Italien"

>>16592750
Gramsci was an idealist.

[Anonymous No.16592918]

>>16592866
Wtf how can you be a Marxist idealist?

[Anonymous No.16593385]

thoughts on Diego Fusaro?

[Anonymous No.16593388]

>>16592918
>>16592750
Bro Dialectical Materialism is only there to ground the ideology in empirical reality. You can't deny the success of science while being grounded in 'materialism'.
Political science should look at the material conditions of people, not be some rhetorician who circle jerks about muh ideals when people starve on the street.

[Anonymous No.16593405]

>>16590655
He was married to a Jew

[Anonymous No.16593424]

>>16593405
So was Lovecraft and he was an antisemite

[Anonymous No.16593432]

>>16593424
>Lovecraft
Good point. And so was Wilhelm Marr (several times) and he invented the term

[Anonymous No.16593439]

>>16587449
Aren't psychics the ones who go to hell? Gnosticism is cope

[Anonymous No.16593442]

>>16593388
wow, mixing up the different meanings of materialism really shows you spend a lot of time on wikipedia instead of plato.stanford.edu

[Anonymous No.16593717]

>>16593405
so was Virginia Woolf

[Anonymous No.16593726]

>>16586883
if you have a good knowledge of marxism you can just do the full prison notebooks. only downside is a lot of it is very specific commentary on things that only apply to Italy at that time and those parts are mostly useless now