[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 3.44 MB, 3472x3262, whodis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16549363 No.16549363 [Reply] [Original]

Why do we never have those on /lit/?
Post all your simple question in here instead of artificially increasing the pace of the board while decreasing its quality.
I'll start with a simple one: Is there a chart for starting with the Russians?

>> No.16549408

No flowchart for the Russians but you should start with Pushkin if you want to start at the "beginning".

>> No.16549439

>>16549408
Pushkin is good but there are better Russians.i know you’re not implying this but lit often confuses “the first..” with “the best”.just because a similar work came earlier, that doesn’t make it better

>> No.16549447

>>16549439
>better Russians
like?

>> No.16549768

In western canon reading lists there's usually a ~1000 year sparsely populated gap between virgil and dante. I was just wondering if there's anything between that progressively builds from virgil to dante. (please don't give me a bunch of non-sequitur theological texts, explain how they're related)

>> No.16549781

>>16549447
gogol

>> No.16549812

>>16549363
why are newfriends incapable of reading the sticky on the very top of the board? Why are they incapable of going to the wiki?

>> No.16550190

>>16549363
What’s the best English bible translation? I was thinking I might as well read KJV if it’s enjoyably worded.

>> No.16550193

>>16549447
Master and Margarita is peak Russian /lit/

>> No.16550261

I'm from a country that's rangebanned from posting images? Any way I can bypass this? Message the mods? Download Tor?

>> No.16550287

Does anyone here have any books for learning Ge'ez? My mother has lots of old liturgical books from the Tewahedo church written in Ge'ez that I would like to translate for the younger kids in my church.

>> No.16550302

>>16550190
but i heard it misses stuff and i dont want to miss stuff at the price of prettiness

>> No.16550339

>>16549768
Just make sure you're familiar with everything in here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cultural_references_in_the_Divine_Comedy

>> No.16550351

>>16549439
>>16549439
The first is the best to start with

>> No.16550365

>>16550351
I was just digressing.i don’t necessarily disagree

>> No.16550399

>>16550365
To add, I don’t think you need to read something like last of the Mohicans before Huckfinn or Moby Dick.fiction isn’t exactly like philosophy where it builds off its predecessors in a way that you need to read ina certain order.like I said, I don’t disagree but it’s not essential to read, for example, Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy or Turgenev in a particular order

>> No.16550499
File: 215 KB, 961x964, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16550499

I've looked at the charts but normally there's criticism on the starter charts here, am I good to start with poetry as outlined

>> No.16550522

>>16550499
you don't need a chart for poetry.
it's much more important to know about the time period of the poet, rather than the poets before him.

>> No.16550541

>>16550522
thanks, that helps a decent bit, I have leaves of grass and an edgar allan poe compilation at home but with all the books on the internet these days there always feels like a better place you can start. I was really enjoying some banjo paterson earlier, I might read him first and go from there

>> No.16550555
File: 6 KB, 225x225, arab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16550555

>>16549363
Where to start with Islamic philosophy?

>> No.16550570

>>16550499
dont listen to >>16550522

this is a decent chart for starting, add the Ode Less Traveled to the starting books, and read that one first. then Mary Oliver's handbook. you can skip the greek poets entirely but you should have a reasonably thorough knowledge of greek mythology, Edith Hamilton's mythologies is great. as for anthologies, the first two on that chart are great, I would ignore Harold Bloom's rambling notes on each poet though and just skip to the poetry, at least for a beginner.

>> No.16550572

>>16550399
I read all the major influences of an author before reading the author, and I think any other way is pseud-tier

>> No.16550589

>>16550499
Don't listen to >>16550570

You can't skip the Greek poets, they're huge influences on Ovid and Virgil who are huge influences on every subsequent poetry.

>> No.16550603

>>16550572
Not sure if bait, but if you want to read 1 book, you’ll read 10 other ones first?maybe that’s fine if your an academic but don’t give beginners the impression they have to spend a year reading other books in order to read The Brothers Karamazov.Thats just disingenuous

>> No.16550637

>>16550555
Marshall Hodgson, Venture of Islam
Annemarie Schimmel, Mystical Dimensions of Islam
Coplestone's brief chapter(s) on Islam in his history of medieval philosophy (depends which book you get), since he has a good bibliography and will introduce you to the main names

Try to keep your wits about you, modern Islam is a fucking mess and half the people into it, whether Islamonationalists or religious fundamentalists, or gentle-seeming mystics on the internet, are only looking to recruit you as a footsoldier. The mystics might only recruit you to win autistic brownie points but with some of the other ones it's more literal. Being a sincere Muslim is hard in this day and age. But it is a beautiful tradition. Sedgwick's Western Sufism is a good book.

>>16550522
It depends on the perspective you take. You can read poetry orthogonally, developmentally, internalistically. That would make you a critic. Critics are just a rare breed, one that only emerged with modernity (for a reason), and is now completely suppressed and deformed into the politicized midwit horseshit that "literary criticism" passes for these days. The last real critics died mid-century, which is a shame, because they were the necessary link between empirical and philosophical studies of man. Only critics give you deep structural histories of mankind's psychic development. Philosophers are too high and people who study social structures are too low. Kaplan's Criticism: Major Statements is good.

But otherwise agreed, you need to learn about a period. Read Kenner's The Pound Era. Don't tolerate shitty poetry either. Too many people read poetry like women and fops, as if it's an occasional little decadent gay fruit snack with chocolate coating. Poetry used to start wars. Everything sucks now.

>>16550287
That's beautiful, please do that. Ge'ez is so rare, have you thought of getting in touch with some professionals directly? I read about about the history of Ge'ez philology (while trying to figure out Zera Yacob) and it seems like one of those fields tiny enough to have wonderful people in it who all know each other and want to help anybody who loves what they love.

>>16549408
Don't just start with Russian lit. Read Solovieff and the sophiologists. Sergei Bulgakov NOT Mikhail Bulgakov ok (actually both are good)

Read Mirsky's history of Russian literature, read Riasanovsky's history of Russia, every book in Russian you read will come alive like one great overarching drama if you do this.

>> No.16550642

>>16550541
Poetry is a language, learning a language is a combination of hard study and long time spent soaking it in from a thousand different sources. Let yourself wander but also force yourself to dig, try to find a balance between the two.

>> No.16550647

>>16550637
>>16550589
>>16550570
Thanks anons, I'll take this a little more seriously and start, like in all things, with the Greeks. I'll start with Kenner as you said last anon

>> No.16550649

>>16550603
It's not disingenous, it's the proper way. Whenever you want to actually engage with literature as an art form, start with the Greeks.

>> No.16550870

>>16550193
Based

>> No.16550914

Can somone tell me if "The Kingdom Of God Is Within You" by Tolstoy is worth a read? How hard yo understand is it for someone who is not used to readimg philosophical works?

>> No.16550957

>>16549363
Start with Crime and Punishment

>> No.16550967

>>16550399
This is true, but it's also good to be familiar with the predecessors. You will enjoy english language literature far more if you are familiar with Shakespeare and the Bible, so too you will further enjoy Russian literature after familiarizing yourself with Pushkin.

>> No.16550976

>>16550967
Did you read the whole bible? How long did it take?

>> No.16550995

>>16550649
The best way to get into reading is to read what you like and branch out from there.i agree there certain backbones of literature that everyone should read such as Homer,Aeneid, the major plays of Shakespeare,Don Quixote,etc but after that, the hierarchy becomes muddled and, depending on what you want to read, arbitrary.A new reader doesn’t have to read a slew of Ancient Greek texts to read The Great Gatsby.

>> No.16551024

>>16550995
Depends what you want to get out of reading.

>> No.16551037

>>16550967
I agree.My point is that “start with the Greeks” is generally a pseud meme because there is too many great works of literature in the last 200 years that you will never get around to if you methodically work your way up.in another post I mentioned that I do believe there are certain pillars of literature that a serious reader should read at some point

>> No.16551047

>>16551024
That is true.Academics should read differently than hobbyists.IMO one should read for fun while still challenging themselves and gain insight at the same time; so a balance of sorts

>> No.16551080

>>16551037
If you can't take 5 years or so to read the most important works up until 20th century, then you're a casual and r/books my be more up your alley.

>> No.16551093

>>16551037
Start with the Greeks just means Homer, Herodotus, Plato, Aristotle and the playwrights. Those shouldn't take you forever.

>> No.16551100

>>16551037
Most of Plato's dialogues are like 12 pages. You could read one a day and be done in a few weeks.

>> No.16551161

>>16551080
>>16551093
>>16551100
My point is that generally turns off a new reader.A new reader should start with something quick, easy and “exciting” to get in the habit of reading and build themselves up.A bridge so to speak before getting into serious literary works

>> No.16551180

>>16551161
If they're for something quick, easy, and exciting, then they should try reddit and stop watering down /lit/ with american mediocrity

>> No.16551222
File: 43 KB, 333x500, The Muhammad Code.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16551222

>>16550555

>> No.16551227

>>16551180
IDk what your point is?I consider myself well read.I am specifically talking about brand new readers.They need to develop the habit and cultivate their taste and tolerance to actually reading.New readers generally consider older works to be dry and are put off if that’s their baptism into the hobby

>> No.16551233

>>16551161
Then you do that. I will read what I want and recommend what I enjoy or appreciate.

>> No.16551245

>>16551227
Why are you talking about some hypothetical person that thinks Homer and Plato are too hard?

>> No.16551249

>>16549363
What’s going on with Bolaño in the OP?

>> No.16551253

Where to start with philosophy?

>> No.16551256

>>16551233
A lot of anons are misinterpreting what I’m posting.Ive read the so called “pillars”.All I’m trying to say is they are not a good way to break in someone brand new.

>> No.16551265

>>16551227
I don't know why you find it so hard to understand a simple point. As far as I'm concerned, brand new readers should start with the Iliad and if they find it hard thent they should keep trying. The solution is not "start with YA" but rather "try harder or go back"

>> No.16551273

I don’t enjoy fiction anymore. Anyone else experienced this?

>> No.16551275

>>16551245
When did I say too hard?Generally a beginner wants something with simpler prose.You would do better to give a 14 year old Vonnegut than Aristotle

>> No.16551283

>>16551275
You have to be over 18 to post on this board, why is your hypothetical /lit/ browser now 14?

>> No.16551293

>>16551256
Then don't read what's recommended if you don't like it. I'm not sure really what else to say to that.

>> No.16551303

Lots of pseud dick-sizing going on in here.lol

>> No.16551972

>>16549363
is warosu down for anyone else?

>> No.16552605

How do you guys handle unfamiliar vocabulary you come across in a book? Do you defend it immediately or do you write down the word and address it later?

>> No.16552615

>>16552605
*define

>> No.16552638
File: 5 KB, 225x225, chad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16552638

>>16552605
That has never happened to me

>> No.16552640

>>16549363
>Why do we never have those on /lit/?
You dumb newfag. This has been attempted many times for years now. It would really help the board if it was more successful—in that posters actually used it instead of making their worthless threads—but each attempt had little long term success. Good on you for making the thread, I pray it becomes a bigger part of board culture.

>> No.16552647

>>16550261
>I'm from a country that's rangebanned from posting images?
What country lol

>> No.16553598

There was a 3d animated picture of Kant circulating on /lit/ but I can't find it. Does anyone have it?

>> No.16554383

>>16550914
EVERYTHING by tolstoy is worth a read, retard

>> No.16554481

>>16552605
immediatly, otherwise you would be reading without completely understanding the meaning

>> No.16554537

Do anyone of you summary part of a book after you read it ? Should I do it with bullet point or full summary ?

>> No.16554708

Thales, Heraclitus, Democritus, Pythagoras?, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Diogenes, Hesus, Aurelius, Aquinas, Dante, Machiavelli, Luther, Shakespeare?, Descartes, Leviathan?, Spinoza and Leibniz, Newton, Reid, French fag, Kant, Hegel, Goethe?, Schopenhauer, some guy, Kyrkogård, Marx....some phenomenalist here, skipping to Russell, and analytical philosophers.
Recognize later names but forgot the names of these you only read summaries of desu.

>> No.16554720

Mods should pin this thread and delete every one line question threads.

>> No.16554722

>>16550555
Plotinus. Unironically. Islamic philosophy is neoplatonic.

>> No.16554728

>>16552647
Armenia

>> No.16555162

What are some good books on the history of England or Britain? Ones that begin before the conquest of William I would be especially good.

>> No.16555333

I'm starting with the Greeks and so far I've read Homer and Hesiod. I'm thinking about reading Herodotus but I've seen an anon saying he references some plays (I think it was Oresteia and the Theban plays). Is that true? Is anything else I should read before starting the Histories?

>> No.16555446
File: 187 KB, 220x221, 1601778026595.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16555446

Can anyone recommend me some good hungarian literature?

Also, what's the best translation of "journey to the west" to read?

>> No.16555899

good time tested resource on raising cats?

>> No.16555937

>>16555333
I'm reading Histories right now and I haven't read the plays and I find it fine. You should read them if you think you will enjoy them though. I've heard they are great.

>> No.16556920

Why the fuck hasn't there been a flowchart for Kierkegaard yet?

>> No.16556956

>>16555333
You should read Herdotous before the plays because everything about Athenians in the Classical Age revolves around the Greco-Persic wars covered by Herodotus. Hell, the first play we have from Greeks is Aeschylus' "The Persians" so reading Herodotus before any plays is normal.

Herodotus will talk about a lot of shit though, so make sure you Google stuff and have many maps ready. Stuff like this can help http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/historians/ and http://moellerhaus.com/Persian/Historie_1.html

That said, the more knowledge you have about Greek myths and culture, the better. But IMO you shouldn't get the knowledge from the plays, you should already have the knowledge before the plays. I personally read Apollodorus' book, but I know it's not for everyone.

>> No.16556967

>>16554728
RIP

>> No.16556977
File: 26 KB, 713x611, 1602365744659.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16556977

>>16554720
>still has hopes for /lit/

>> No.16557095

>>16555446
A gyertyák csonkig égnek - Márai Sándor

>> No.16557197

>>16555446
kertesz

>> No.16557490
File: 68 KB, 1022x731, external-content.duckduckgo.com.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16557490

>hegel thread
>mishima thread
>land thread
>peterson thread
>/pol/ thread
>feels thread
>hegel thread
>thread about women
>/leftypol/ thread
>catholic thread
>/b/-tier philosophy thread
I'm tired bros

>> No.16557804

>>16555162
Churchill's is okay although he was history's greatest monster

Hume if you really want to have a good time

>> No.16557858

>>16557804
How is Hume's history? I took a look once and it was a gigantic book

>> No.16557869

>>16557804
Thanks, I'll look into the Hume one at some point in the future as I've already got his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding so I'll need to read that one first. And why is Churchill such a heathen when it comes to history?

>> No.16558244

>>16556967
Is there really no way I can ever post?

>> No.16558442

are there any books about some kind of deity coming to the modern world and turning it into a fucking horrible hellscape, like satan appearing one day and all of the world is now the pits and fires of hell or something

anything like that, I just want more books about being faced with infinite hopelessness and helplessness against infinitely powerful and wise creatures that just fucking hate us